Seeing Both Sides: How Shared Experience Can Improve Entrepreneur Evaluations of Investors Through Perceived Empathy

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.18429

References

  • Abele AE, Hauke N, Peters K, Louvet E, Szymkow A, Duan Y (2016) Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness—Communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers Psych. 7:1810.Google Scholar
  • Aggarwal R, Kryscynski D, Singh H (2015) Evaluating venture technical competence in venture capitalist investment decisions. Management Sci. 61(11):2685–2706.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich HE, Kim PH (2007) Small worlds, infinite possibilities? How social networks affect entrepreneurial team formation and search. Strategic Entrepreneurship. J. 1(1–2):147–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bacq S, Alt E (2018) Feeling capable and valued: A prosocial perspective on the link between empathy and social entrepreneurial intentions. J. Bus. Venturing 33(3):333–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balachandran S (2024) The inside track: Entrepreneurs’ corporate experience and startups’ access to incumbent partners’ resources. Strategic Management J. 45(6):1117–1150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartlett MS (1947) The use of transformations. Biometrics 3(1):39–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batson CD, Klein TR, Highberger L, Shaw LL (1995) Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: When compassion and justice conflict. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 68(6):1042–1054.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman CM (2006) The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad. Management J. 49(4):741–758.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bengtsson O, Hsu DH (2015) Ethnic matching in the US venture capital market. J. Bus. Venturing 30(2):338–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Black EL, Burton FG, Wood DA, Zimbelman AF (2010) Entrepreneurial success: Differing perceptions of entrepreneurs and venture capitalists. Internat. J. Entrepreneurship Innovation 11(3):189–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blair RJR (2001) Neurocognitive models of aggression, the antisocial personality disorders, and psychopathy. J. Neurology Neurosurgery Psychiatry 71(6):727–731.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blank S (2018) Why the lean start-up changes everything.Google Scholar
  • Boyd RL, Ashokkumar A, Seraj S, Pennebaker JW (2022) The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC-22 (University of Texas at Austin, Austin), 1–47.Google Scholar
  • Brettel M, Mauer R, Appelhoff D (2013) The entrepreneur’s perception in the entrepreneur–VCF relationship: The impact of conflict types on investor value. Venture Capital 15(3):173–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brooks AW, Huang L, Kearney SW, Murray FE (2014) Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4427–4431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson JS (2003) Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: Direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Acad. Management J. 46(4):458–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busenitz LW, Moesel DD, Fiet JO, Barney JB (1997) The framing of perceptions of fairness in the relationship between venture capitalists and new venture teams. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 21(3):5–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Byrne D (1971) The Attraction Paradigm (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Cable DM, Shane S (1997) A prisoner’s dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 22(1):142–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler GN, Lyon DW (2001) Entrepreneurial teams in new ventures: Composition, turnover and performance. Acad. Management Proc. 2001(1):A1–A6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chapagain A (2019) Hands-On Web Scraping with Python: Perform Advanced Scraping Operations Using Various Python Libraries and Tools Such as Selenium, Regex, and Others (Packt Publishing Ltd.).Google Scholar
  • Chilazi S (2019) Advancing gender equality in venture capital: What the evidence says about the current state of the industry and how to promote more gender diversity, equality, and inclusion. Report, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Chua RYJ, Ingram P, Morris MW (2008) From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers’ professional networks. Acad. Management J. 51(3):436–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Claes K, Vissa B (2017) Is homophily always beneficial? Task-relevant homophily and VCs’ valuations and returns. Acad. Management Proc. 2017(1):16269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Claes K, Vissa B (2020) Does social similarity pay off? Homophily and venture capitalists’ deal valuation, downside risk protection, and financial returns in India. Organ. Sci. 31(3):576–603.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Colombo O (2021) The use of signals in new-venture financing: A review and research agenda. J. Management 47(1):237–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox Pahnke E, McDonald R, Wang D, Hallen B (2015) Exposed: Venture capital, competitor ties, and entrepreneurial innovation. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1334–1360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cumming D, Johan S (2008) Information asymmetries, agency costs and venture capital exit outcomes. Venture Capital 10(3):197–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahlander L, McFarland DA (2013) Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(1):69–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davidsson P, Honig B (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Venturing 18(3):301–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Waal FB (2008) Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Rev. Psych. 59:279–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • di Giacomo E, Andreini E, Lorusso O, Clerici M (2023) The dark side of empathy in narcissistic personality disorder. Frontiers Psych. 14:1074558.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Discua Cruz A, Howorth C, Hamilton E (2013) Intrafamily entrepreneurship: The formation and membership of family entrepreneurial teams. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 37(1):17–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drover W, Wood MS, Fassin Y (2014) Take the money or run? Investors’ ethical reputation and entrepreneurs’ willingness to partner. J. Bus. Venturing 29(6):723–740.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, Lei Z (2014) Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1(1):23–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberg N, Miller PA (1987) The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psych. Bull. 101(1):91–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ertug G, Brennecke J, Kovacs B, Zou T (2022) What does homophily do? A review of the consequences of homophily. Acad. Management Ann. 16(1):38–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ewens M, Townsend RR (2020) Are early stage investors biased against women? J. Financial Econom. 135(3):653–677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eyal T, Steffel M, Epley N (2018) Perspective mistaking: Accurately understanding the mind of another requires getting perspective, not taking perspective. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 114(4):547–571.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falik Y, Lahti T, Keinonen H (2016) Does startup experience matter? Venture capital selection criteria among Israeli entrepreneurs. Venture Capital 18(2):149–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST (2018) Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Current Directions Psych Sci. 27(2):67–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleitmann M, Patel U (2024) Deep dive: Founders turned VCs. VC Stack. Accessed January 22, 2024, https://www.vcstack.io/blog/deep-dive-founders-turned-vcs.Google Scholar
  • Florin J, Lubatkin M, Schulze W (2003) A social capital model of high-growth ventures. Acad. Management J. 46(3):374–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foner A (1979) Ascribed and achieved bases of stratification. Annual Rev. Soc. 5:219–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forbes DP, Borchert PS, Zellmer–Bruhn ME, Sapienza HJ (2006) Entrepreneurial team formation: An exploration of new member addition. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 30(2):225–248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Francis DH, Sandberg WR (2000) Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 25(2):5–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franke N, Gruber M, Harhoff D, Henkel J (2006) What you are is what you like—Similarity biases in venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams. J. Bus. Venturing 21(6):802–826.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frederiks AJ, Englis BG, Ehrenhard ML, Groen AJ (2019) Entrepreneurial cognition and the quality of new venture ideas: An experimental approach to comparing future-oriented cognitive processes. J. Bus. Venturing 34(2):327–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gage D (2012) The venture capital secret: 3 out of 4 start-ups fail. Wall Street J. 20. Google Scholar
  • Gagliardi L, Novelli E (2025) Female entrepreneurs targeting women: Strategic redirection under scientific decision-making. Organ. Sci. 36(2):718–736.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky AD, Magee JC, Inesi ME, Gruenfeld DH (2006) Power and perspectives not taken. Psych. Sci. 17(12):1068–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen O, Reeb D, Sulaeman J (2022) Choosing startup investors: Does gender matter? Working paper, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
  • Gino F, Pierce L (2010) Robin Hood under the hood: Wealth-based discrimination in illicit customer help. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1176–1194.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Girtu M-I (2022) From founder to funder: Insights from angel investors with an entrepreneurial background. Forbes (October 4), https://www.forbes.com/sites/mirunagirtu/2022/10/04/from-founder-to-funder-insights-from-angel-investors-with-an-entrepreneurial-background/.Google Scholar
  • Gompers PA (2022) Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. Venture Capital (Routledge), 285–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers PA, Mukharlyamov V (2022) Transferable skills? Founders as venture capitalists. NBER Working Paper No. 29907, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
  • Gompers PA, Huang K, Wang SQ (2017) Homophily in entrepreneurial team formation. NBER Working Paper No. 23459, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Gompers PA, Mukharlyamov V, Xuan Y (2016) The cost of friendship. J. Financial Econom. 119(3):626–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers PA, Gornall W, Kaplan SN, Strebulaev IA (2020) How do venture capitalists make decisions? J. Financial Econom. 135(1):169–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers PA, Mukharlyamov V, Weisburst E, Xuan Y (2022) Gender gaps in venture capital performance. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 57(2):485–513.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gorbatâi A, Dioun C, Lashley K (2021) Making space for emotions: Empathy, contagion, and legitimacy’s double-edged sword. Organ. Sci. 32(1):42–63.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM, Berry JW (2011) The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Acad. Management J. 54(1):73–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray SM, Howell T, Sackett E (2024) Talking past each other: Construal level, utilitarian motives, and entrepreneurial team formation. Organ. Sci. 35(5):1745–1769.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberg J, Mollick E (2017) Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female founders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(2):341–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman EB, Yli-Renko H, Janakiraman R (2012) Resource search, interpersonal similarity, and network tie valuation in nascent entrepreneurs’ emerging networks. J. Management 38(6):1760–1787.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallen BL, Pahnke EC (2016) When do entrepreneurs accurately evaluate venture capital firms’ track records? A bounded rationality perspective. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1535–1560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hans LK, Vissa B (2023) Who gives back? Evidence from India on successful entrepreneurial exit and involvement in philanthropy. Organ. Sci. 34(1):329–357.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hasan S, Koning R (2019) Prior ties and the limits of peer effects on startup team performance. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1394–1416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hegde D, Tumlinson J (2014) Does social proximity enhance business partnerships? Theory and evidence from ethnicity’s role in US venture capital. Management Sci. 60(9):2355–2380.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hellerstedt K, Aldrich HE, Wiklund J (2007) The impact of past performance on the exit of team members in young firms: The role of team composition. Front. Entrepreneurship Res.Google Scholar
  • Hockerts K (2017) Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 41(1):105–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, Cohen MJM, Gonnella JS, Erdmann JB, Veloski J, Magee M (2001) The Jefferson scale of physician empathy: Development and preliminary psychometric data. Ed. Psych. Measurement 61(2):349–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Honoré F (2022) Joining forces: How can founding members’ prior experience variety and shared experience increase startup survival? Acad. Management J. 65(1):248–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu DH (2004) What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? J. Finance 59(4):1805–1844.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu DH (2007) Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Res. Policy 36(5):722–741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang L (2018) The role of investor gut feel in managing complexity and extreme risk. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1821–1847.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang L, Knight AP (2017) Resources and relationships in entrepreneurship: An exchange theory of the development and effects of the entrepreneur-investor relationship. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):80–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang L, Pearce JL (2015) Managing the unknowable: The effectiveness of early-stage investor gut feel in entrepreneurial investment decisions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):634–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Humphrey RH (2013) The benefits of emotional intelligence and empathy to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Res. J. 3(3):287–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ickes W (1993) Empathic accuracy. J. Personality 61(4):587–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ickes W (2001) Measuring empathic accuracy. Interpersonal Sensitivity (Psychology Press, New York), 237–260.Google Scholar
  • Jain BA, Kini O (2000) Does the presence of venture capitalists improve the survival profile of IPO firms? J. Bus. Finance Accounting 27(9–10):1139–1183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanze D, Piazza A (2025) When do gender-diverse teams engage more investors? Evidence of threshold alignment benefits at Techstars. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print 21 August, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2025.20141.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kanze D, Huang L, Conley MA, Higgins ET (2018) We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding. Acad. Management J. 61(2):586–614.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanze D, Conley MA, Okimoto TG, Phillips DJ, Merluzzi J (2020) Evidence that investors penalize female founders for lack of industry fit. Sci. Adv. 6(48):eabd7664.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr WR, Lerner J, Schoar A (2014) The consequences of entrepreneurial finance: Evidence from angel financings. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(1):20–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khalid S, Sekiguchi T (2018) The role of empathy in entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: An experimental study in Japan and Pakistan. J. Bus. Venturing Insights 9:1–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korte R, Smith KA, Li CQ (2018) The role of empathy in entrepreneurship: A core competency of the entrepreneurial mindset. Adv. Engrg. Ed. 7(1):1.Google Scholar
  • Kotha R, George G (2012) Friends, family, or fools: Entrepreneur experience and its implications for equity distribution and resource mobilization. J. Bus. Venturing 27(5):525–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ku G, Wang CS, Galinsky AD (2015) The promise and perversity of perspective-taking in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 35:79–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lambrechts W, Caniëls MC, Molderez I, Venn R, Oorbeek R (2020) Unraveling the role of empathy and critical life events as triggers for social entrepreneurship. Frontiers Psych. 11:579500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33(2):363–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence BS, Shah NP (2020) Homophily: Measures and meaning. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):513–597.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazar M, Miron-Spektor E, Agarwal R, Erez M, Goldfarb B, Chen G (2020) Entrepreneurial team formation. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):29–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazar M, Miron-Spektor E, Chen G, Goldfarb B, Erez M, Agarwal R (2022) Forming entrepreneurial teams: Mixing business and friendship to create transactive memory systems for enhanced success. Acad. Management J. 65(4):1110–1138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leaders League (2023) Private equity venture capital ranking 2023 for investment funds in the United States.Google Scholar
  • Lee M, Huang L (2018) Gender bias, social impact framing, and evaluation of entrepreneurial ventures. Organ. Sci. 29(1):1–16.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Legler A (2023) The tactical guide to the venture capital career path. (February 16), https://www.goingvc.com/post/the-tactical-guide-to-the-venture-capital-career-path.Google Scholar
  • Leonhardt JM, Pezzuti T (2022) Vaccination acceptance across cultures: The roles of collectivism, empathy, and homophily. J. Internat. Marketing 30(2):13–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Longmire NH, Harrison DA (2018) Seeing their side versus feeling their pain: Differential consequences of perspective-taking and empathy at work. J. Appl. Psych. 103(8):894–915.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loudin JL, Loukas A, Robinson S (2003) Relational aggression in college students: Examining the roles of social anxiety and empathy. Aggressive Behav. 29(5):430–439.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luedicke J (2023) Causal mediation analysis using Stata. German Stata Conf. (No. 08). Stata Users Group.Google Scholar
  • Lyness KS, Heilman ME (2006) When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):777–785.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manigart S, Sapienza H (2017) Venture capital and growth. The Blackwell Handbook of Entrepreneurship, 240–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manning P, Stokes P, Tarba SY, Rodgers P (2020) Entrepreneurial stories, narratives and reading—Their role in building entrepreneurial being and behaviour. Internat. J. Entrepreneurship Innovation 21(3):178–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matusik SF, Fitza MA (2012) Diversification in the venture capital industry: Leveraging knowledge under uncertainty. Strategic Management J. 33(4):407–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matusik SF, George JM, Heeley MB (2008) Values and judgment under uncertainty: Evidence from venture capitalist assessments of founders. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 2(2):95–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayya R, Huang P (2025) Startup accelerators, information asymmetry, and corporate venture capital investments. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print March 3, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.03494.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McCrea SM, Erion CJ, Thürmer JL (2022) Why punish critical outgroup commenters? Social identity, general norms, and retribution. British J. Soc. Psych. 61(3):711–728.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McMullen JS (2015) Entrepreneurial judgment as empathic accuracy: A sequential decision-making approach to entrepreneurial action. J. Inst. Econom. 11(3):651–681.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Soc. 27(1):415–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meneses RW, Larkin M (2017) The experience of empathy: Intuitive, sympathetic, and intellectual aspects of social understanding. J. Humanistic Psych. 57(1):3–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller TL, Grimes MG, McMullen JS, Vogus TJ (2012) Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Rev. 37(4):616–640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mosey S, Wright M (2007) From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 31(6):909–935.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nakagawa K, Kosaka G (2022) What social issues do people invest in? An examination based on the empathy–altruism hypothesis of prosocial crowdfunding platforms. Technovation 114:102508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neergaard H (2005) Networking activities in technology-based entrepreneurial teams. Internat. Small Bus. J. 23(3):257–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neiman JL, Gonzalez FJ, Wilkinson K, Smith KB, Hibbing JR (2016) Speaking different languages or reading from the same script? Word usage of Democratic and Republican politicians. Political Comm. 33(2):212–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Norton E (2019) Entrepreneurs make the best tech VCs—Or do they? https://www.amadeuscapital.com/entrepreneurs-make-the-best-tech-vcs-or-do-they/.Google Scholar
  • Packard MD, Burnham TA (2021) Do we understand each other? Toward a simulated empathy theory for entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Venturing 36(1):106076.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker SC (2009) Can cognitive biases explain venture team homophily? Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 3(1):67–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips N, Tracey P, Karra N (2013) Building entrepreneurial tie portfolios through strategic homophily: The role of narrative identity work in venture creation and early growth. J. Bus. Venturing 28(1):134–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piazza A (2018) Essays on Angel Investing in the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem (Columbia University, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piazza A, Reese D, Chung SH (2023) Venturing through the doors of perception. Acad. Management Discoveries 9(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce JR, Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Sivanathan N (2013) From glue to gasoline: How competition turns perspective takers unethical. Psych. Sci. 24(10):1986–1994.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pirlott AG, MacKinnon DP (2016) Design approaches to experimental mediation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 66:29–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pitchbook-NVCA (2025) Pitchbook-NVCA venture monitor. https://nvca.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Q4-2024-PitchBook-NVCA-Venture-Monitor.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polzin F, Sanders M, Stavlöt U (2018) Do investors and entrepreneurs match?—Evidence from The Netherlands and Sweden. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 127:112–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prandelli E, Pasquini M, Verona G (2016) In user’s shoes: An experimental design on the role of perspective taking in discovering entrepreneurial opportunities. J. Bus. Venturing 31(3):287–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preston SD, de Waal FB (2002) Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25(1):1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ren S, Shu R, Bao Y, Chen X (2016) Linking network ties to entrepreneurial opportunity discovery and exploitation: The role of affective and cognitive trust. Internat. Entrepreneurship Management J. 12:465–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reniers RL, Abu-Akel A, Seara-Cardoso A (2022) Cognitive empathy and perspective taking: Understanding the mechanisms of normal and abnormal experiences and abilities. Frontiers Psych. 13:945258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson DR, Hammock GS, Smith SM, Gardner W, Signo M (1994) Empathy as a cognitive inhibitor of interpersonal aggression. Aggressive Behav. 20(4):275–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riess H (2017) The science of empathy. J. Patient Experience 4(2):74–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rocha V, Brymer RA (2025) We go way back: Affiliation‐based hiring and young firm performance. Strategic Management J. 46(3):723–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rocha V, Van Praag M (2020) Mind the gap: The role of gender in entrepreneurial career choice and social influence by founders. Strategic Management J. 41(5):841–866.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruef M, Aldrich HE, Carter NM (2003) The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among US entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(2):195–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santamaria S, Breschi S (2025) On resource complementarity among startups, accelerators, and financial investors: A large-scale analysis of sorting and value creation. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print March 19, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16730.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sebo P (2021) Using Genderize.io to infer the gender of first names: How to improve the accuracy of the inference. J. Medical Library Assoc. 109(4):609–612.Google Scholar
  • Shen X, Kim H, Li J (2022) Funding ventures similar to one of us: How status dynamics within heterogeneous groups affect venture evaluation. Strategic Management J. 43(10):2135–2155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shepherd DA, Patzelt H (2015) Harsh evaluations of entrepreneurs who fail: The role of sexual orientation, use of environmentally friendly technologies, and observers’ perspective taking. J. Management Stud. 52(2):253–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shepherd DA, Seyb S, Williams TA (2023) Empathy-driven entrepreneurial action: Well-being outcomes for entrepreneurs and target beneficiaries. J. Bus. Venturing 38(2):106290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singer T, Fehr E (2005) The neuroeconomics of mind reading and empathy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(2):340–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith G (2001) How early stage entrepreneurs evaluate venture capitalists. J. Private Equity 4(2):33–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snellman K, Solal I (2023) Does investor gender matter for the success of female entrepreneurs? Gender homophily and the stigma of incompetence in entrepreneurial finance. Organ. Sci. 34(2):680–699.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Souakri A, Coeurderoy R, Zacharakis A (2023) Valuing failure: An experiment of VC reactions to an entrepreneur’s record of business creation. J. Small Bus. Management 61(5):2350–2381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Souitaris V, Peng B, Zerbinati S, Shepherd DA (2023) Specialists, generalists, or both? Founders’ multidimensional breadth of experience and entrepreneurial ventures’ fundraising at IPO. Organ. Sci. 34(2):557–588.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Souitaris V, Zerbinati S, Peng B, Shepherd D (2020) Should I stay or should I go? Founder power and exit via initial public offering. Acad. Management J. 63(1):64–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spinella M (2005) Prefrontal substrates of empathy: Psychometric evidence in a community sample. Biol. Psych. 70(3):175–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steffens P, Terjesen S, Davidsson P (2012) Birds of a feather get lost together: New venture team composition and performance. Small Bus. Econom. 39:727–743.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stemler AR (2013) The JOBS Act and crowdfunding: Harnessing the power—And money—Of the masses. Bus. Horizons 56(3):271–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stocks EL, Lishner DA (2012) Empathy. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 2nd ed.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stolper O, Walter A (2019) Birds of a feather: The impact of homophily on the propensity to follow financial advice. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(2):524–563.Google Scholar
  • Suitor JJ, Keeton S, Pillemer K (1995) When experience counts: The effects of experiential and structural similarity on patterns of support and interpersonal stress. Soc. Forces 73(4):1573–1588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tata A, Niedworok A (2020) Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? An empirical study of how entrepreneurs, managers, and investors evaluate business opportunities at the earliest stages. Venture Capital 22(1):71–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaidyanathan R, Vaidyanathan V, Wadhwa V (2019) Exploring entrepreneurs’ perceptions of venture capitalists’ added value. J. Macromarketing 39(4):447–462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Valliere D, Peterson R (2007) When entrepreneurs choose VCs: Experience, choice criteria and introspection accuracy. Venture Capital 9(4):285–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vissa B (2011) A matching theory of entrepreneurs’ tie formation intentions and initiation of economic exchange. Acad. Management J. 54(1):137–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vissa B, Chacar AS (2009) Leveraging ties: The contingent value of entrepreneurial teams’ external advice networks on Indian software venture performance. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1179–1191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang CS, Ku G, Tai K, Galinsky AD (2014) Stupid doctors and smart construction workers: Perspective-taking reduces stereotyping of both negative and positive targets. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 5(4):430–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wesley CL II, Kong DT, Lubojacky CJ, Saxton MK, Saxton T (2022) Will the startup succeed in your eyes? Venture evaluation of resource providers during entrepreneurs’ informational signaling. J. Bus. Venturing 37(5):106229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Women in VC (2020) The Untapped Potential of Women-led Funds. https://morphic-images.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/267/WVC_Report_The_Untapped_Potential_of_Women_Led_Funds_a1be950fdd.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Wu W, Su Y, Huang X, Liu W, Jiang X (2020) The dark triad, moral disengagement, and social entrepreneurial intention: Moderating roles of empathic concern and perspective taking. Frontiers Psych. 11:1520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Younis A, Xiaobao P, Nadeem MA, Kanwal S, Pitafi AH, Qiong G, Yuzhen D (2021) Impact of positivity and empathy on social entrepreneurial intention: The moderating role of perceived social support. J. Public Affairs 21(1):e2124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao W, Lyu S, Sekiguchi T (2023) The role of entrepreneurs’ empathy in new venture performance: The mediating effects of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Res. J. 13(4):1113–1137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.