Revolutionary Sparks: Exploring the Resource Spillover Effect of Street Protests on Entrepreneurship

References

• Adler PS, Adly A, Armanios DE, Battilana J, Bodrožić Z, Clegg S, Davis GF, Gartenberg C, Glynn MA, Aslan Gümüsay A (2023) Authoritarianism, populism, and the global retreat of democracy: A curated discussion. J. Management Inquiry 32(1):3–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alder S, Shao L, Zilibotti F (2016) Economic reforms and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities. J. Econom. Growth 21:305–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, Ruef M, Lippmann S (2020) Organizations Evolving (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA).Google Scholar
• Alexander P (2010) Rebellion of the poor: South Africa’s service delivery protests—A preliminary analysis. Rev. African Political Econom. 37(123):25–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amenta E, Carruthers BG, Zylan Y (1992) A hero for the aged? The Townsend movement, the political mediation model, and US old-age policy, 1934–1950. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(2):308–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amenta E, Caren N, Chiarello E, Su Y (2010) The political consequences of social movements. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36:287–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews M (2013) The Limits of Institutional Reform in Development: Changing Rules for Realistic Solutions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang YY (2016) How China Escaped the Poverty Trap (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arkes HR, Blumer C (1985) The psychology of sunk cost. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 35(1):124–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armanios DE, Eesley CE (2021) How do institutional carriers alleviate normative and cognitive barriers to regulatory change? Organ. Sci. 32(6):1415–1438.Link, Google Scholar
• Assunção J, Gandour C, Rocha R (2020) The effect of rural credit on deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Res. Econom. 76(1):61–85.Google Scholar
• Auyero J (2006) The political makings of the 2001 lootings in Argentina. J. Latin Amer. Stud. 38(2):241–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey ER, Wang D, Soule SA, Rao H (2023) How Tilly’s WUNC works: Bystander evaluations of social movement signals lead to mobilization. Amer. J. Sociol. 128(4):1206–1262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Duflo E (2014) Do firms want to borrow more? Testing credit constraints using a directed lending program. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(2):572–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartik TJ (1991) Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies? (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumol W (1994) Entrepreneurship, Management, and the Structure of Payoffs (MIT Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Gupta A (2016) Social activism in and around organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):671–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Safford S (2008) The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):460–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Gupta A, Anner MS (2015) Social activism and practice diffusion: How activist tactics affect non-targeted organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):300–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brollo F, Nannicini T, Perotti R, Tabellini G (2013) The political resource curse. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(5):1759–1796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Organ. Sci. 64(2):5497–5520.Google Scholar
• Cai Y (2020) Collective Resistance in China (Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Candeias JC, Sarkar S (2023) Entrepreneurial ecosystems policy formulation: A conceptual framework. Acad. Management Perspect. 38(1):77–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Withers MC, Semadeni M (2017) A tale of two effects: Using longitudinal data to compare within- and between-firm effects. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1536–1556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole M, Elliott R, Zhang J (2011) Growth, foreign direct investment, and the environment: Evidence from Chinese cities. J. Regional Sci. 51(1):121–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Comaroff J, Comaroff J (2001) Millennial capitalism: First thoughts on a second coming. Comaroff JL, Comaroff J, Weller RP, eds. Millennial Capitalism and the Culture of Neoliberalism (Duke University Press, New York), 1–56.Google Scholar
• Conti A, Roche M (2021) Lowering the bar? External conditions, opportunity costs, and high-tech start-up outcomes. Organ. Sci. 32(4):909–1148.Link, Google Scholar
• Correia S, Guimarães P, Zylkin T (2020) PPMLHDFE: Fast Poisson estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects. Stata J. 20(1):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croke K, Grossman G, Larreguy HA, Marshall J (2016) Deliberate disengagement: How education can decrease political participation in electoral authoritarian regimes. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 110(3):579–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dean T, Brown R, Stango V (2000) Environmental regulation as a barrier to the formation of small manufacturing establishments: A longitudinal examination. J. Environ. Econom. Management 40(1):56–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Distelhorst G (2017) The power of empty promises: Quasi-democratic institutions and activism in China. Comparative Political Stud. 50(4):464–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Georgallis P (2018) Differential firm commitment to industries supported by social movement organizations. Organ. Sci. 29(1):154–171.Link, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Haans RFJ (2022) Optimally distinct? Understanding the motivation and ability of organizations to pursue optimal distinctiveness (or not). Organ. Theory 3(1):1–6.Google Scholar
• Duvanova D (2014) Economic regulations, red tape, and bureaucratic corruption in post-communist economies. World Development 59:298–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferguson JP, Dudley T, Soule SA (2018) Osmotic mobilization and union support during the long protest wave, 1960-1995. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(2):441–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Figueiredo O, Guimarães P, Woodward D (2015) Industry localization, distance decay, and knowledge spillovers: Following the patent paper trail. J. Urban Econom. 89:21–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fremeth AR, Holburn GLF, Piazza A (2022) Activist protest spillovers into the regulatory domain: Theory and evidence from the US nuclear power generation industry. Organ. Sci. 33(3):1163–1187.Link, Google Scholar
• Fritzen SA (2006) Probing system limits: Decentralisation and local political accountability in Vietnam. Asia Pacific J. Public Admin. 28(1):1–23.Google Scholar
• Giugni MG (1998) Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24(1):371–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grandy JB, Hiatt SR (2020) State agency discretion and entrepreneurship in regulated markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(4):1092–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grandy JB, Hiatt SR (2024) The radical flank revisited: How regulatory discretion shapes the effectiveness of social activism on business outcomes. Organ. Sci. 35(3):835–852.Link, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2012) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Guo G (2007) Retrospective economic accountability under authoritarianism: Evidence from China. Political Res. Quart. 60(3):378–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo S (2012) Chinese Politics and Government: Power, Ideology and Organization (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haines H (1984) Black radicalization and the funding of civil rights: 1957–1970. Soc. Problems 32(1):31–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman H, Rao H, Paruchuri S (2007) The winds of change: The progressive movement and the bureaucratization of thrift. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(1):117–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman H, Jia N, Shi J, Wang Y (2017) The dynamics of political embeddedness in China. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(1):67–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes A (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Hepp A, Hjarvard S, Lundby K (2015) Mediatization: Theorizing the interplay between media, culture and society. Media Culture Soc. 37(2):314–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Carlos WC (2019) From farms to fuel tanks: Stakeholder framing contests and entrepreneurship in the emergent US biodiesel market. Strategic Management J. 40(6):865–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Park S (2022) Shared fate and entrepreneurial collective action in the US wood pellet market. Organ. Sci. 33(5):2065–2083.Link, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Polhill P (2025) Social movements, entrepreneurship, and innovation. Thornton P, Sorenson O, eds. Handbook of Sociology of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (De Gruyter, Berlin), 581–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Grandy JB, Lee BH (2015) Organizational responses to public and private politics: An analysis of climate change activists and US oil and gas firms. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1769–1786.Link, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2009) From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):635–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Zhang H, Yang P (2020) Resilience under Weiji: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Management Organ. Rev. 16(4):761–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang Y (2008) Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics: Entrepreneurship and the State (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Yue LQ, Rao H (2010) Trouble in store: Probes, protests, and store openings by Wal-Mart, 1998–2007. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(1):53–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jha S, Mohapatra AK, Lodha SS (2019) Political economy of farm loan waivers in India. FIIB Bus. Rev. 8(2):88–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG (2008) A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):395–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Cornwall M, Dahlin EC (2005) Winning woman suffrage one step at a time: Social movements and the logic of the legislative process. Soc. Forces 83(3):1211–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohler E, Matsusaka JG, Wu Y (2023) Street-level responsiveness of city governments in China, Germany, and the United States. J. Comparative Econom. 51(2):640–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landy PE (2008) Decentralized Authoritarianism in China: The Communist Party’s Control of Local Elites in the Post-Mao Era (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larmer M (2010) Social movement struggles in Africa. Rev. African Political Econom. 37(125):251–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee CK, Zhang Y (2013) The power of instability: Unraveling the microfoundations of bargained authoritarianism in China. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(6):1475–1508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levie J, Autio E (2011) Regulatory burden, rule of law, and entry of strategic entrepreneurs: An international panel study. J. Management Stud. 48(6):1392–1419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Li M, Wang X, Thatcher JB (2021) Strategic directions for AI: The role of CIOs and boards of directors. MIS Quart. 45(3):1603–1644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linz JJ (2000) Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes (Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, CO).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipset SM (2012) Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 53(1):69–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lorentzen PL (2013) Regularizing riots: Permitting public protest in an authoritarian regime. Quart. J. Political Sci. 20(1):162–175.Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Bird Y (2018) The paradox of responsive authoritarianism: How civic activism spurs environmental penalties in China. Organ. Sci. 29(5):948–968.Link, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Qian C (2013) Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organ. Sci. 25(1):127–148.Link, Google Scholar
• McAdam D, McCarthy JD, Zald MN (1996) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCammon HJ, Campbell KE, Granberg EM, Mowery C (2001) How movements win: Gendered opportunity structures and US women’s suffrage movements, 1866 to 1919. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(1):49–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH, King BG (2013) Keeping up appearances: Reputational threat and impression management after social movement boycotts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):387–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell MH, King BG, Soule SA (2015) A dynamic process model of private politics: Activist targeting and corporate receptivity to social challenges. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(3):654–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mkandawire T (2001) Thinking about developmental states in Africa. Cambridge J. Econom. 25(3):289–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nee V, Opper S (2012) Capitalism from Below: Markets and Institutional Change in China (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odziemkowska K (2022) Frenemies: Overcoming audiences’ ideological opposition to firm–activist collaborations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(2):469–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odziemkowska K, McDonnell M (2023) Ripple effects: How collaboration reduces social movement contention. Strategic Management J. 45(4):775–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Persson T, Tabellini G (2002a) Political economics and public finance. Auerbach AJ, Auerbach M, eds. Handbook of Public Economics, vol. 3, 1549–1659.Google Scholar
• Persson T, Tabellini G (2002b) Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42(1):185–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Przeworski A, Alvarez ME, Cheibub JA, Limongi F (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990 (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pye O (2019) Commodifying sustainability: Development, nature and politics in the palm oil industry. World Development 121:218–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qin B, Strömberg D, Wu Y (2017) Why does China allow freer social media? Protests versus surveillance and propaganda. J. Econom. Perspect. 31(1):117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qin B, Strömberg D, Wu Y (2021) Social media and collective action in China. Econometrica 92(6):1993–2026..Google Scholar
• Raines GW, Polhill PS, Hiatt SR, Coles RS (2024) Cultural norms and the gendered impact of entrepreneurship policy in Mexico. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(4):1006–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rakodi C (1999) A capital assets framework for analysing household livelihood strategies: Implications for policy. Development Policy Rev. 17(3):315–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Yue LQ, Ingram P (2010) Activists, categories, and markets: Racial diversity and protests against Walmart store openings in America. Negro G, Dobbin FW, Koçak TD eds. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 229–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Remington T (2011) Politics in Russia (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schifeling T, Soderstrom S (2022) Advancing reform: Embedded activism to develop climate solutions. Acad. Management J. 65(6):1775–1803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumaker P (1975) Policy responsiveness to protest group demands. J. Politics 37(2):488–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2005) Testing for mediating variables in management research: Concerns, implications, and alternative strategies. J. Management 31(3):330–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siermann CLJ (1998) Politics, Institutions and the Economic Performance of Nations (Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., Northampton, MA).Google Scholar
• Silva GE (2015) Social movements, protest, and policy. Euro. Rev. Latin Amer. Caribbean Stud. 100:27–39. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Lee BH (2009) Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the US wind energy sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):123–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Somaini P, Wolak FA (2015) An algorithm to estimate the two-way fixed effects model. J. Econometric Methods 5(1):143–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1546–1588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soule SA (2009) Contention and Corporate Social Responsibility (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soule SA, King BG (2006) The stages of the policy process and the equal rights amendment, 1972–1982. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(6):1871–1909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soule SA, Olzak S (2004) When do movements matter? The politics of contingency and the equal rights amendment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(4):473–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stares PB, Ighani H (2017) How stable is Saudi Arabia. Council on Foreign Relations. Accessed April 22, 2022, http://www.cfr.org/expertbrief/how-stable-saudi-arabia.Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Andrews DWK, Stock JH, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 80–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Storper M (2012) Keys to the City: How Economics, Institutions, Social Interaction, and Politics Shape Development (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Tilly C (1998) Durable Inequality (University of California Press, Los Angeles).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treisman D (2011) Presidential popularity in a hybrid regime: Russia under Yeltsin and Putin. Amer. J. Political Sci. 111(6):1871–1909.Google Scholar
• Wang D, Luo XR (2019) Retire in peace: Officials’ political incentives and corporate diversification in China. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(4):773–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang D, Piazza A (2016) The use of disruptive tactics in protest as a trade-off: The role of social movement claims. Soc. Forces 94(4):1675–1710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang MS, Steele CWJ (2024) From foe to friend: Exploring state-led destigmatization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(4):839–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang D, Du F, Marquis C (2019) Defending Mao’s dream: How politicians’ ideological imprinting affects firms’ political appointment in China. Acad. Management J. 62(4):1111–1136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang XL, Hu L, Fan G (2021) Marketization Index of China Provinces: NERO Report 2021 (Social Sciences Literature Press, Beijing).Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wouters R, Walgrave S (2017) Demonstrating power: How protest persuades political representatives. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(2):361–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, York J (2017) An identity-based approach to social enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 42(3):437–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xia T, Liu X (2017) Foreign competition, domestic competition and innovation in Chinese private high-tech new ventures. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 48(6):716–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu C (2010) The institutional foundations of China’s reforms and development. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP7654. Preprint, submitted February 8, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1547574.Google Scholar
• Xu D, Lu JW, Gu Q (2014) Organizational forms and multi-population dynamics: Economic transition in China. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):517–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu L, Yang S, Liu Y, Newbert SL, Boal K (2023) See the forest and the trees: Exploring the impact of inter- and intra-entrepreneurial ecosystem embeddedness on new venture creation. Acad. Management J. 66(6):1954–1982.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeung B (2021) Hong Kong’s 2019–2020 Social Unrest: The Trigger, History and Lessons (World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore).Google Scholar
• Yue L, Rao H, Ingram P (2013) Information spillovers from protests against corporations: A tale of Walmart and Target. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(4):669–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeng J, Wen Y (2021) Effect of government entrepreneurship policy on urban entrepreneurship: A quasi-natural experiment based on national entrepreneurial cities. Econom. Res. J. 4:55–70.Google Scholar
• Zhang X (2019) China Innovation and Entrepreneurship Index. Peking University Open Research Data Platform, V4. https://doi.org/10.18170/DVN/PEFDAS.Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Briscoe F, DesJardine MR (2023) Corporate boards with street smarts? How diffuse street protests indirectly shape corporate governance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(4):1056–1093.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng Y (2007) Technological Empowerment: The Internet, State, and Society in China (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar