The Six Dimensions of Strong Theory

References

• Agger B (2007) Public Sociology: From Social Facts to Literary Acts (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Cronin MA (2022) It’s the theory, stupid. Organ. Psych. Rev., ePub ahead of print February 21, https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221080629.Google Scholar
• Aksom H, Firsova S (2021) Structural correspondence between organizational theories. Philos. Management 20(3):307–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albert S, Whetten DA (1985) Organizational identity. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:263–295.Google Scholar
• Allport GW, Odbert HS (1936) Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psych. Monographs 47(1):i–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Sandberg J (2011) Generating research questions through problematization. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):247–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Gabriel Y, Paulsen R (2017) Return to Meaning: A Social Science with Something to Say (Oxford University, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P (1999) Perspective: Complexity theory and organization science. Organ. Sci. 10(3):216–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Antonakis J (2017) On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications. Leadership Quart. 28(1):5–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnett RD (2023) Uniting through difference: Rich cultural-identity expression as a conduit to inclusion. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1887–1913.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ (2013) Having scholarly impact: The art of hitting academic home runs. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 12(4):623–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE (2021) Why the heck did that happen. Chen XP, Steensma HK, eds. A Journey Toward Influential Scholarship: Insights from Leading Management Scholars (Oxford University Press, New York), 1–25.Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Kreiner GE (1999) “How can you do it?”: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):413–434.Google Scholar
• Astley WG, Zammuto RF (1992) Organization science, managers, and language games. Organ. Sci. 3(4):443–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Augier M, March JG, Sullivan BN (2005) Notes on the evolution of a research community: Organizational studies in Anglophone North America, 1945–2000. Organ. Sci. 16(1):85–95.Link, Google Scholar
• Bacharach SB (1989) Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):496–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (2006) When I write my masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting. Acad. Management J. 49(1):16–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartunek JM, Rynes SL, Ireland RD (2006) What makes management research interesting and why does it matter? Acad. Management J. 49(1):9–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Haveman HA (2020) Editors’ comments: The future of organizational theory. Acad. Management Rev. 45(2):268–272.Google Scholar
• Bechky BA, Okhuysen GA (2011) Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises. Acad. Management J. 54(2):239–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman C (2022) From the editor. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(1):v–vi.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Hays NA (2012) Status conflict in groups. Organ. Sci. 23(2):323–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Berg JM (2014) The primal mark: How the beginning shapes the end in the development of creative ideas. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 125(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg JM (2016) Balancing on the creative highwire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):433–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):181–216.Google Scholar
• Besharov M, Mitzinneck B (2023) The multiple facets of corporate purpose: An analytical typology. Strategic Sci. 8(2):233–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M (2011) Paying more to get less: The effects of external hiring versus internal mobility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(3):369–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Foster PC (2003) The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management 29(6):991–1013.Google Scholar
• Bosco FA (2022) Accumulating knowledge in the organizational sciences. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 9:441–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau JW (2004) 50th Anniversary article: Organizational behavior, strategy, performance, and design in management science. Management Sci. 50(11):1463–1476.Link, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2015) Accounting for the gap: A firm study manipulating organizational accountability and transparency in pay decisions. Organ. Sci. 26(2):311–333.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Flynn FJ (2005) Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organ. Sci. 16(4):434–447.Link, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, George G (2011) Publishing in AMJ—Part 1: Topic choice. Acad. Management J. 54(3):432–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Zapata-Phelan CP (2007) Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1281–1303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corley KG, Gioia DA (2011) Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):12–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JP (2025) The problem with propositions: Theoretical triangulation to better explain phenomena in management research. Acad. Management Rev. 50(2):342–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowgill B, Davis JM, Montagnes BP, Perkowski P (2025) Stable matching on the job? Theory and evidence on internal talent markets. Management Sci. 71(3):2508–2526.Link, Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ, Gleser GC (1957) Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions (University of Illinois Press, Urbana-Champaign, IL).Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE (1955) Construct validity in psychological tests. Psych. Bull. 52(4):281–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Stouten J, Van Knippenberg D (2021) The theory crisis in management research: Solving the right problem. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):667–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Stouten J, van Knippenberg D (2022) Why theory on “how theory fits together” benefits management scholarship. Acad. Management Rev. 47(2):333–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. 50(3):352–364.Link, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lewin AY (1990) Can organizational studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket? An editorial essay. Organ. Sci. 1(1):1–9.Link, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lewin AY (2008) Perspective—Rigor and relevance in organizational studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution. Organ. Sci. 19(1):177–183.Link, Google Scholar
• Dane E, Pratt MG (2007) Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):33–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das H, Long BS (2010) What makes management research interesting? An exploratory study. J. Management Issues 22(1):127–144.Google Scholar
• David A, Hatchuel A (2007) From actionable knowledge to universal theory in management research. Shani A, Mohrman SA, Pasmore WA, Stymne B, Adler N, eds. Handbook of Collaborative Management Research (Sage, London), 33–47.Google Scholar
• Davis MS (1971) That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philos. Soc. Sci. 1(2):309–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Marquis C (2005) Prospects for organizational theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organ. Sci. 16(4):332–343.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):480–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeCelles KA, Leslie LM, Shaw JD (2019) From the editors—Disciplinary code switching at AMJ: The tale of Goldilocks and the three journals. Acad. Management J. 62(3):635–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeChurch LA, Marks MA (2006) Leadership in multiteam systems. J. Appl. Psych. 91(2):311–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Lin W, Song Y, Wang M, Cai D, Liu J (2025) Socialization as a political arena: A multi-agent interactionist perspective to understand political skill and newcomer socialization rates. Acad. Management J. 68(1):108–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Vries TA, Hollenbeck JR, Davison RB, Walter F, Van Der Vegt GS (2016) Managing coordination in multiteam systems: Integrating micro and macro perspectives. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1823–1844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donaldson D (2022) Blending theory and data: A space odyssey. J. Econom. Perspect. 36(3):185–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubois A, Gadde LE (2014) “Systematic combining”—A decade later. J. Bus. Res. 67(6):1277–1284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duran P, Kammerlander N, Van Essen M, Zellweger T (2016) Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1224–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eden D (2017) Field experiments in organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 4(1):91–122.Google Scholar
• Eden C, Huxham C (1996) Action research for the study of organizations. Clegg SR, Hardy C, Nord WR, eds. Handbook of Organization Studies (Sage, London), 526–542.Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Lei Z (2014) Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1(1):23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertug G, Brennecke J, Tasselli S (2023) Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology. Acad. Management Ann. 17(2):626–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M, Ansell C, Boin A (2015) Perspective—Pragmatism in organizational studies: Meeting the challenges of a dynamic and complex world. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1787–1804.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman ER, Hernandez E (2022) Synergy in mergers and acquisitions: Typology, life cycles, and value. Acad. Management Rev. 47(4):549–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2009) Entrepreneurs as theorists: On the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies. Strategic Entrepreneurship 3(2):127–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris DL, Yan M, Lim VK, Chen Y, Fatimah S (2016) An approach–avoidance framework of workplace aggression. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1777–1800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organizational research. Acad. Management J. 54(2):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (1996) The economic sociology of the transitions from socialism. Amer. J. Soc. 101(4):1074–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Lide CR (2023) Communication miscalibration: The price leaders pay for not sharing enough. Acad. Management J. 66(4):1102–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Sitkin SB (2015) Bridging the divide between behavioral science policy. Behav. Sci. Policy 1(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French JRP, Raven B (1959) The bases of social power. Cartwright D, Zander A, eds. Group Dynamics (Harper and Row, New York), 259–269.Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Shepherd GB (1994) How are the mighty fallen: Rejected classic articles by leading economists. J. Econom. Perspect. 8(1):165–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Zenger T (2023) The firm as a subsociety: Purpose justice and the theory of the firm. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1965–1980.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA (2004) 50th Anniversary article: The strategy field from the perspective of Management Science: Divergent strands and possible integration. Management Sci. 50(10):1309–1318.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D, Ocasio W (2007) Perspective—Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie school’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Gehrlein WV (1983) Condorcet’s paradox. Theory Decision 15(2):161–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelfand MJ, Nishii LH, Raver JL (2006) On the nature and importance of cultural tightness–looseness. J. Appl. Psych. 91(6):1225–1244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G (2016) Management research in AMJ: Celebrating impact while striving for more. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1869–1877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Howard-Grenville J, Joshi A, Tihanyi L (2016) Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1880–1895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gergen KJ (1973) Social psychology as history. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 26(2):309–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R (2005) Four formal(izable) theories of the firm? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 58(2):200–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert D (2006) Stumbling on Happiness (Alfred A. Knopf, New York).Google Scholar
• Gioia D (2022) On the road to hell: Why academia is viewed as irrelevant to practicing managers. Acad. Management Discoveries 8(2):174–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gladstein DL (1984) Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4):499–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg MA (1996) The case against “practicality” and “relevance” as gauges of business schools: Responding to challenges posed by criticisms of business school research. J. Management Inquiry 5(4):336–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gooday G (2012) “Vague and artificial”: The historically elusive distinction between pure and applied science. Isis 103(3):546–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon RA, Howell JE (1959) Higher Education for Business (Columbia University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorwa R, Guilbeault D (2020) Unpacking the social media bot: A typology to guide research and policy. Policy Internet 12(2):225–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graebner ME, Knott AM, Lieberman MB, Mitchell W (2023) Empirical inquiry without hypotheses: A question-driven, phenomenon-based approach to strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 44(1):3–10.Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Pollock TG (2011) Publishing in AMJ—Part 3: Setting the hook. Acad. Management J. 54(5):873–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillen MF (2000) Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Acad. Management J. 43(3):362–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (2007) Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research. Acad. Management J. 50(4):775–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guler I, Guillén MF, Macpherson JM (2002) Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):207–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haas MR (2010) The double-edged swords of autonomy and external knowledge: Analyzing team effectiveness in a multinational organization. Acad. Management J. 53(5):989–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (1987) The design of work teams. Hackman JR, Lorsch JW, eds. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 315–342.Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 16(2):250–279.Google Scholar
• Haidt J, Graham J, Joseph C (2009) Above and below left–right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psych. Inquiry 20(2–3):110–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (1994) What if the academy actually mattered? Acad. Management Rev. 19(1):11–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (2007) The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Acad. Management J. 50(6):1346–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardin AE, Schinoff BS, Byron K, Balven RM (2024) A window into coworkers’ worlds: The relational outcomes of learning vivid, unintentional, and nonwork-related information about coworkers. Acad. Management J. 68(2):267–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.Google Scholar
• Heath C, Heath D (2007) Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Heath C, Sitkin SB (2001) Big‐B versus big‐O: What is organizational about organizational behavior? J. Organ. Behav. 22(1):43–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ, Delios A (2001) Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hidi S (1990) Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Rev. Ed. Res. 60(4):549–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsch PM, Levin DZ (1999) Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organ. Sci. 10(2):199–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Hofman JM, Watts DJ, Athey S, Garip F, Griffiths TL, Kleinberg J, Margetts H, et al. (2021) Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science. Nature 595(7866):181–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck JR (2008) The role of editing in knowledge development: Consensus shifting and consensus creation. Baruch Y, Konrad AM, Aguinis H, Starbuck WH, eds. Opening the Back Box of Editorship (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 16–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck JR, Beersma B, Schouten ME (2012) Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Acad. Management Rev. 37(1):82–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH (2006) Venture capitalists and cooperative start-up commercialization strategy. Management Sci. 52(2):204–219.Link, Google Scholar
• Hussain I, Pitesa M, Thau S, Schaerer M (2024) Pay suppression in social impact contexts: How framing work around the greater good inhibits job candidate compensation demands. Organ. Sci. 35(2):525–549.Link, Google Scholar
• Jain A, Thietart RA (2014) Capabilities as shift parameters for the outsourcing decision. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1881–1890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Goldstein D (2003) Do defaults save lives? Science 302(5649):1338–1339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Roh H (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Acad. Management J. 52(3):599–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jurkovich R (1974) A core typology of organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 19(3):380–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Kang J, Han Kim AY (2017) The relationship between CEO media appearances and compensation. Organ. Sci. 28(3):379–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Agarwal S (2017) Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: Evidence from application software developers in the iOS and Android smartphone ecosystems. Organ. Sci. 28(3):531–551.Google Scholar
• Katz D, Kahn RL (1978) The Social Psychology of Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Keller A, Lumineau F, Mellewigt T, Ariño A (2021) Alliance governance mechanisms in the face of disruption. Organ. Sci. 32(6):1542–1570.Link, Google Scholar
• Khurana R (2010) From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Kelemen M (2001) The consolations of organizational theory. British J. Management 12(S1):S55–S59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King AW, Lepak D (2011) Editors’ comments: Myth busting—What we hear and what we’ve learned about AMR. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):207–214.Google Scholar
• King BG, Felin T, Whetten DA (2010) Perspective—Finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organ. Sci. 21(1):290–305.Link, Google Scholar
• Klüppel LM, Pierce L, Snyder JA (2018) Perspective—The deep historical roots of organization and strategy: Traumatic shocks, culture, and institutions. Organ. Sci. 29(4):702–721.Link, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SW (2017) Reflections on the Journal of Applied Psychology for 2009 to 2014: Infrastructure, operations, innovations, impact, evolution, and desirable directions. J. Appl. Psychol. 102(3):580–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Forgia A (2023) The impact of management on clinical performance: Evidence from physician practice management companies. Management Sci. 69(8):4646–4667.Link, Google Scholar
• Lanaj K, Hollenbeck JR, Ilgen DR, Barnes CM, Harmon SJ (2013) The double-edged sword of decentralized planning in multiteam systems. Acad. Management J. 56(3):735–757.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latham GP (2019) Perspectives of a practitioner-scientist on organizational psychology/organizational behavior. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 6(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau VP, Shaffer MA (2023) A typological theory of domestic employees’ acculturation stress and adaptation in the context of globalization. Acad. Management Rev. 48(1):57–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leahey E (2018) The perks and perils of interdisciplinary research. Eur. Rev. 26(S2):S55–S67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin K (1946) The research center for group dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Sociometry 8(2):126–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld SO (2012) Public skepticism of psychology: Why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific. Amer. Psychologist 67(2):111–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lind EA, Tyler TR, Huo YJ (1997) Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73(4):767–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA (2007) Field experiments: A bridge between lab and naturally occurring data. BE J. Econom. Anal. Policy 6(2):1–47.Google Scholar
• Litchfield EH (1956) Notes on a general theory of administration. Admin. Sci. Quart. 1(1):3–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke K, Golden-Biddle K (1997) Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and “problematizing” in organizational studies. Acad. Management J. 40(5):1023–1062.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT (2004) Economic Foundations of Strategy (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• March JG (2013) In praise of beauty. M@n@gement 16(5):732–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markides C (2011) Crossing the chasm: How to convert relevant research into managerially useful research. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 47(1):121–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. 26(3):356–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin SR (2016) Stories about values and valuable stories: A field experiment of the power of narratives to shape newcomers’ actions. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1707–1724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin AE, Slepian ML (2021) The primacy of gender: Gendered cognition underlies the big two dimensions of social cognition. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 16(6):1143–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE (2016) The problem with [in] management theory. J. Organ. Behav. 37(8):1132–1141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):709–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGahan AM, Porter ME (1997) How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management J. 18(S1):15–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1984) Groups: Interaction and Performance (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• McGregor I, Little BR (1998) Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: On doing well and being yourself. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(2):494–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1936) The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 1(6):894–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych. Rev. 63(2):81–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D (1996) A preliminary typology of organizational learning: Synthesizing the literature. J. Management 22(3):485–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery CA, Wernerfelt B, Balakrishnan S (1989) Strategy content and the research process: A critique and commentary. Strategic Management J. 10(2):189–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowday RT, Sutton RI (1993) Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Rev. Psych. 44(1):195–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murnighan JK, Roth AE (1977) The effects of communication and information availability in an experimental study of a three-person game. Management Sci. 23(12):1336–1348.Google Scholar
• Napier NK, Bahnson PR, Glen R, Maille CJ, Smith K, White H (2009) When “aha moments” make all the difference. J. Management Inquiry 18(1):64–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1986) Opportunity costs and the framing of resource allocation decisions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 37(3):348–356.Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(1):129–141.Google Scholar
• Oxley JE, Rivkin JW, Ryall MD (2010) The strategy research initiative: Recognizing and encouraging high-quality research in strategy. Strategic Organ. 8(4):377–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer D (2006) Taking stock of the criteria we use to evaluate one another’s work: ASQ 50 years out. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(4):535–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patient D, Lawrence TB, Maitlis S (2003) Understanding workplace envy through narrative fiction. Organ. Stud. 24(7):1015–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1981) Power in Organizations (Pitman, Marshfield, MA).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1993) Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Acad. Management Rev. 18(4):599–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) External Control of Organizations—A Resource Dependence Perspective (Stanford Business Classics, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (1999) Knowing “what” to do is not enough: Turning knowledge into action. Calif. Management Rev. 42(1):83–108.Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Loyd DL (2006) When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(2):143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piekkari R, Welch C, Westney DE (2022) The challenge of the multinational corporation to organization theory: Contextualizing theory. Organ. Theory 3(2):1–22.Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2015) Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Acad. Management J. 58(3):856–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillutla MM, Thau S (2013) Organizational science’s obsession with “that’s interesting!” Consequences and an alternative. Organ. Psych. Rev. 3(2):187–194.Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Bono JE (2013) Being Scheherazade: The importance of storytelling in academic writing. Acad. Management J. 56(3):629–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pondy LR (1992) Reflections on organizational conflict. J. Organ. Behav. 13(3):257–261.Google Scholar
• Pongeluppe LS (2024) The allegory of the favela: The multifaceted effects of socioeconomic mobility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(3):619–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prengler MK, Klotz AC, Murphy C (2024) Place iteration and integration: How digital nomads navigate the mobile worker paradox. Admin. Sci. Quart. 70(2):328–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preston MC, Boyd TL, Leigh A, Burgess R, Marsh V (2024) An ally by any other name: Examining the effects of racial minority leaders as allies for advancing racial justice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 181:104321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahman HA, Karunakaran A, Cameron LD (2024) Taming platform power: Taking accountability into account in the management of platforms. Acad. Management Ann. 18(1):251–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raveendran M, Srikanth K, Ungureanu T, Zheng GL (2023) How do performance goals influence exploration-exploitation choices? Organ. Sci. 34(6):2464–2486.Google Scholar
• Reinecke J, Little LM, Simons T, Bliese P, Dencker J, Roberson Q, von Krogh G, Gruber M (2024) Advancing management theory through interdisciplinary research: Challenges and opportunities. Acad. Management J. 67(6):1421–1427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhodes RE, Plotnikoff RC, Spence JC (2004) Creating parsimony at the expense of precision? Conceptual and applied issues of aggregating belief-based constructs in physical activity research. Health Ed. Res. 19(4):392–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosch E (1978) Principles of categorization. Rosch E, Lloyd BB, eds. Cognition and Categorization (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 27–48.Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Leonardelli GJ, Phillips KW (2008) The White standard: Racial bias in leader categorization. J. Appl. Psych. 93(4):758–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP (2001) Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):655–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM (2006) Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management?” Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):256–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salancik GR, Pfeffer J (1974) The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Admin. Sci. Quart. 19(4):453–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandberg J, Alvesson M (2021) Meanings of theory: Clarifying theory through typification. J. Management Stud. 58(2):487–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Green E (2011) Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences. Res. Policy 40(10):1321–1331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schouten ME, van Knippenberg D, Greer LL (2024) Hierarchy conflict: Causes, expressions, and consequences. Organ. Sci. 35(4):1535–1551.Link, Google Scholar
• Seyed AP (2012) A Method for Evaluating and Standardizing Ontologies (SUNY, Buffalo, NY).Google Scholar
• Shapira Z (2011) “I’ve got a theory paper—Do you?”: Conceptual, empirical, and theoretical contributions to knowledge in the organizational sciences. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1312–1321.Link, Google Scholar
• Shen X, Li H, Tolbert PS (2023) Converging tides lift all boats: Consensus in evaluation criteria boosts investments in firms in nascent technology sectors. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2415–2435.Link, Google Scholar
• Short J (2009) The art of writing a review article. J. Management 35(6):1312–1317.Google Scholar
• Somaraju AV, Griffin DJ, Olenick J, Chang CHD, Kozlowski SW (2024) A dynamic systems theory of intrateam conflict contagion. J. Appl. Psych. 109(6):871–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck WH (2003) Turning lemons into lemonade: Where is the value in peer reviews? J. Management Inquiry 12(4):344–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starmer C (1999) Cycling with rules of thumb: An experimental test for a new form of non-transitive behaviour. Theory Decision 46:139–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw BM (1995) Repairs on the road to relevance and rigor. Cummings L, Frost PJ, eds. Publishing in the Organizational Sciences (SAGE Publications, London), 85–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw BM (2016) Stumbling toward a social psychology of organizations: An autobiographical look at the direction of organizational research. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 3(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stokes P (2011) Critical Concepts in Management and Organization Studies: Key Terms and Concepts (Palgrave MacMillan, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Billsberry J (2024) What is this thing called misfit? A systematic review into how employee misfit has been defined and researched. Management Rev. Quart., ePub ahead of print August 31, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00461-w.Google Scholar
• Sutton RI, Staw BM (1995) What theory is not. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):371–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tewfik BA (2022) The impostor phenomenon revisited: Examining the relationship between workplace impostor thoughts and interpersonal effectiveness at work. Acad. Management J. 65(3):988–1018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatcher SM, Fisher G (2022) From the editors—The nuts and bolts of writing a theory paper: A practical guide to getting started. Acad. Management Rev. 47(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas KW, Tymon WG (1982) Necessary properties of relevant research: Lessons from recent criticisms of the organizational sciences. Acad. Management Rev. 7(3):345–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thorngate W (1976) Possible limits on a science of social behavior. Strickland L, ed. Social Psychology in Transition (Springer US, Boston), 121–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tihanyi L (2020) From “that’s interesting” to “that’s important.” Acad. Management J. 63(2):329–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tost LP (2011) An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Acad. Management Rev. 36(4):686–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117(2):440–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsang EW (2022) That’s interesting! A flawed article has influenced generations of management researchers. J. Management Inquiry 31(2):150–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342(6157):468–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CK, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1008–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Nordenflycht A (2023) Clean up your theory! Invest in theoretical clarity and consistency for higher-impact research. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1981–1996.Link, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) What theory is not, theorizing is. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):385–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whetten DA (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):490–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whetten DA, Felin T, King BG (2009) The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: Current issues and future directions. J. Management 35(3):537–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1989) Transaction cost economics. Schmalensee R, Willig RD, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), 135–182.Google Scholar
• Woolley AW (2009) Means vs. ends: Implications of process and outcome focus for team adaptation and performance. Organ. Sci. 20(3):500–515.Link, Google Scholar
• Wrzesniewski A, McCauley C, Rozin P, Schwartz B (1997) Jobs, careers, and callings: People’s relations to their work. J. Res. Personality 31(1):21–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang E, DiBenigno J (2025) Opportunistic change during a punctuation: How and when the front lines can drive bursts of incremental change. Organ. Sci. 36(1):40–64.Link, Google Scholar
• Zaccaro SJ, Dubrow S, Torres EM, Campbell LN (2020) Multiteam systems: An integrated review and comparison of different forms. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 7(1):479–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger TR, Felin T, Bigelow L (2011) Theories of the firm–market boundary. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):89–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zilber TB (2020) The methodology/theory interface: Ethnography and the microfoundations of institutions. Organ. Theory 1(2):1–27.Google Scholar