Supervisory Support Shift: The Impact of Disability Inclusion on Coworker Productivity

References

• Alemany L, Vermeulen F (2023) Disability as a source of competitive advantage. Harvard Bus. Rev. 101(7–8):106–115.Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Northcraft GB (2003) Robbing Peter to pay Paul: Feedback environments and enacted priorities in response to competing task demands. Human Resource Management Rev. 13(4):537–559.Google Scholar
• Baldridge DC, Swift ML (2016) Age and assessments of disability accommodation request normative appropriateness. Human Resource Management 55(3):385–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldridge DC, Veiga JF (2001) Toward a greater understanding of the willingness to request an accommodation: Can requesters’ beliefs disable the Americans with Disabilities Act? Acad. Management Rev. 26(1):85–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belliveau MA (2012) Engendering inequity? How social accounts create vs. merely explain unfavorable pay outcomes for women. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1154–1174.Link, Google Scholar
• Bobocel DR, Son Hing LS, Davey LM, Stanley DJ, Zanna MP (1998) Justice-based opposition to social policies: Is it genuine? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(3):653–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borusyak K, Jaravel X, Spiess J (2024) Revisiting event-study designs: Robust and efficient estimation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 91(6):3253–3285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothello J, Ioannou I, Porumb VA, Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu Y (2023) CSR decoupling within business groups and the risk of perceived greenwashing. Strategic Management J. 44(13):3217–3251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradburn NM, Sudman S, Wansink B (2004) Asking Questions: The Definitive Guide to Questionnaire Design–For Market Research, Political Polls, and Social and Health Questionnaires (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Ma S, Tian X (2018) How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation? J. Financial Econom. 130(2):237–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Joshi A (2017) Bringing the boss’s politics in: Supervisor political ideology and employee outcomes. Acad. Management J. 60(4):1413–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Kellogg KC (2011) The initial assignment effect: Local employer practices and positive career outcomes for work-family program users. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(2):291–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromley P, Powell WW (2012) From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):483–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2016) Social responsibility messages and worker wage requirements: Field experimental evidence from online labor marketplaces. Organ. Sci. 27(4):1010–1028.Link, Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (2015) Measuring question sensitivity. Report, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (2025) Persons with a disability: Labor force characteristics—2024. Accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/disabl.pdf.Google Scholar
• Campbell FK (2009) Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2011) Bringing managers back in: Managerial influences on workplace inequality. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76(5):667–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2015) Accounting for the gap: A firm study manipulating organizational accountability and transparency in pay decisions. Organ. Sci. 26(2):311–333.Link, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ, Benard S (2010) The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(4):543–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CDC (2025) Disability and health overview. Accessed December 4, 2023, https://www.cdc.gov/disability-and-health/about/index.html.Google Scholar
• Chauvin J, Choudhury P, Fang TP (2024) Working around the clock: Temporal distance, intrafirm communication, and time shifting of the employee workday. Organ. Sci. 35(5):1571–1955.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Roth J (2024) Logs with zeros? Some problems and solutions. Quart. J. Econom. 139(2):891–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole D, Narayanan S, Vickery S (2024) Does leader disability status influence the operational performance of teams with individuals with disabilities? An empirical study in the apparel industry. J. Oper. Management 70(3):459–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colella A (2001) Coworker distributive fairness judgments of the workplace accommodation of employees with disabilities. Acad. Management Rev. 26(1):100–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colella A, Varma A (2001) The impact of subordinate disability on leader-member exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. 44(2):304–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colella A, Paetzold R, Belliveau MA (2004) Factors affecting coworkers’ procedural justice inferences of the workplace accommodations of employees with disabilities. Personnel Psych. 57(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Goldman B, Folger R (2003) Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. J. Organ. Behav. 24(8):1019–1024.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Byrne ZS, Bobocel DR, Rupp DE (2001) Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. J. Vocational Behav. 58(2):164–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuddy AJC, Fiske ST, Glick P (2008) Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40:61–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dardenne B, Dumont M, Bollier J-P (2007) Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(5):764–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dover TL, Kaiser CR, Major B (2020) Mixed signals: The unintended effects of diversity initiatives. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 14(1):152–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dwertmann DJG (2016) Management research on disabilities: Examining methodological challenges and possible solutions. Internat. J. Human Resource Management 27(14):1477–1509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dwertmann DJG, Boehm SA (2016) Status matters: The asymmetric effects of supervisor–subordinate disability incongruence and climate for inclusion. Acad. Management J. 59(1):44–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dwertmann DJG, Boehm SA, McAlpine KL, Kulkarni M (2025) Organizational burden or catalyst for ideas? Disability as a driver of cognitive flexibility and creativity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 70(3):655–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dwertmann DJG, Goštautaitė B, Kazlauskaitė R, Bučiūnienė I (2023) Receiving service from a person with a disability: Stereotypes, perceptions of corporate social responsibility, and the opportunity for increased corporate reputation. Acad. Management J. 66(1):133–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman LB, Krieger LH, Eliason SR, Albiston CR, Mellema V (2011) When organizations rule: Judicial deference to institutionalized employment structures. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(3):888–954.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eklund J, Raj M, Eggers JP (2025) Attention focus and new opportunities: The moderating role of managerial attention to alternative issues. Organ. Sci. 36(1):21–39.Link, Google Scholar
• Elvira MM, Graham ME (2002) Not just a formality: Pay system formalization and sex-related earnings effects. Organ. Sci. 13(6):601–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher RJ (1993) Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J. Consumer Res. 20(2):303–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Florey AT, Harrison DA (2000) Responses to informal accommodation requests from employees with disabilities: Multistudy evidence on willingness to comply. Acad. Management J. 43(2):224–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman Z (2024) Neurodiversity in leadership: Rethinking the rules. Harvard Bus. Rev. 102(2):70–77.Google Scholar
• Gasper J, Palan M, Muz B (2020) Survey of employer policies on the employment of people with disabilities. Report, Office of Disability Employment Policy, Department of Labor, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Glick P, Fiske ST (1996) The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(3):491–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick P, Fiske ST (2001) An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. Amer. Psych. 56(2):109–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econometrics 225(2):254–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18(1):59–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn H (1988) The politics of physical differences: Disability and discrimination. J. Soc. Issues 44(1):39–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Kravitz DA, Mayer DM, Leslie LM, Lev-Arey D (2006) Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: Summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research. J. Appl. Psych. 91(5):1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hebl MR, King EB, Glick P, Singletary SL, Kazama S (2007) Hostile and benevolent reactions toward pregnant women: Complementary interpersonal punishments and rewards that maintain traditional roles. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1499–1511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heider F (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (Wiley, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Blader SL (2001) Assuming preferential selection when the admissions policy is unknown: The effects of gender rarity. J. Appl. Psych. 86(2):188–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Lucas JA, Kaplow SR (1990) Self-derogating consequences of sex-based preferential selection: The moderating role of initial self-confidence. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 46(2):202–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hein P, Ansari S (2022) From sheltered to included: The emancipation of disabled workers from benevolent marginalization. Acad. Management J. 65(3):749–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hideg I, Ferris DL (2016) The compassionate sexist? How benevolent sexism promotes and undermines gender equality in the workplace. J Personality Soc. Psych. 111(5):706–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill NS, Seo MG, Kang JH, Taylor MS (2012) Building employee commitment to change across organizational levels: The influence of hierarchical distance and direct managers’ transformational leadership. Organ. Sci. 23(3):758–777.Link, Google Scholar
• Huy QN (2011) How middle managers’ group-focus emotions and social identities influence strategy implementation. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1387–1410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D (2010) A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psych. Methods 15(4):309–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jen Su A (2016) Assessment: Can you handle the increased workload of being a modern leader? Harvard Bus. Rev. (December 27), https://hbr.org/2016/12/assessment-can-you-handle-the-increased-workload-of-being-a-modern-leader.Google Scholar
• Jones DA, Willness CR, Madey S (2014) Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Acad. Management J. 57(2):383–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Piccolo RF (2004) Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J. Appl. Psych. 89(5):755–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaiser CR, Major B, Jurcevic I, Dover TL, Brady LM, Shapiro JR (2013) Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 104(3):504–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaye HS, Jans LH, Jones EC (2011) Why don’t employers hire and retain workers with disabilities? J. Occupational Rehabilitation 21(4):526–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kendall KM, Karns GL (2018) The business case for hiring people with disabilities. Soc. Bus. 8(3):277–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King EB, Botsford W, Hebl MR, Kazama S, Dawson JF, Perkins A (2012) Benevolent sexism at work: Gender differences in the distribution of challenging developmental experiences. J. Management 38(6):1835–1866.Google Scholar
• Köbsell S (2006) Towards self-determination and equalization: A short history of the German Disability Rights Movement. Disability Stud. Quart. 26(2):15.Google Scholar
• Lee RM (1993) Doing Research on Sensitive Topics (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Lee MY, Mazmanian M, Perlow L (2020) Fostering positive relational dynamics: The power of spaces and interaction scripts. Acad. Management J. 63(1):96–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lengnick-Hall ML (2007) Hidden Talent: How Leading Companies Hire, Retain, and Benefit from People with Disabilities (Bloomsbury Publishing USA, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie LM (2019) Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences. Acad. Management Rev. 44(3):538–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin SH, Scott BA, Matta FK (2019) The dark side of transformational leader behaviors for leaders themselves: A conservation of resources perspective. Acad. Management J. 62(5):1556–1582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lo D, Brahm F, Dessein W, Minami C (2022) Managing with style? Microevidence on the allocation of managerial attention. Management Sci. 68(11):8261–8285.Link, Google Scholar
• Lowery BS, Unzueta MM, Knowles ED, Goff PA (2006) Concern for the in-group and opposition to affirmative action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(6):961–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo H, Zhang L (2021) Scandal, social movement, and change: Evidence from #MeToo in Hollywood. Management Sci. 67(8):4865–4883.Google Scholar
• Maitlis S, Christianson M (2014) Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):57–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Molinsky A (2008) Navigating the bind of necessary evils: Psychological engagement and the production of interpersonally sensitive behavior. Acad. Management J. 51(5):847–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin KD, Cullen JB (2006) Continuities and extensions of ethical climate theory: A meta-analytic review. J. Bus. Ethics 69(2):175–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer DM (2014) A review of the literature on ethical climate and culture. Schneider B, Barbera KM, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 415–440.Google Scholar
• McConnell B (2023) What’s logs got to do with it? On the perils of log dependent variables and difference-in-differences. Preprint, submitted August 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.00167.Google Scholar
• Mik-Meyer N (2016) Othering, ableism and disability: A discursive analysis of co-workers’ construction of colleagues with visible impairments. Human Relations 69(6):1341–1363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Näher AF, Krumpal I (2012) Asking sensitive questions: The impact of forgiving wording and question context on social desirability bias. Quality Quantity 46(5):1601–1616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Terris E (2020) Inclusive manufacturing: The impact of disability diversity on productivity in a work integration social enterprise. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1112–1130.Link, Google Scholar
• Nario-Redmond MR, Kemerling JL, Silverman AM (2019) Hostile, benevolent, and ambivalent ableism: Contemporary manifestations. J. Soc. Issues 75(3):726–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nishii LH, Lepak DP, Schneider B (2008) Employee attributions of the “why” of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psych. 61(3):503–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Patton MQ (2015) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice, 4th ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods Instruments Comput. 36(4):717–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pruett SR, Chan F (2006) The development and psychometric validation of the Disability Attitude Implicit Association Test. Rehabilitation Psych. 51(3):202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramasubramanian S, Oliver MB (2007) Activating and suppressing hostile and benevolent racism: Evidence for comparative media stereotyping. Media Psych. 9(3):623–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberson QM (2019) Diversity in the workplace: A review, synthesis, and future research agenda. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 6:69–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robert PM, Harlan SL (2006) Mechanisms of disability discrimination in large bureaucratic organizations: Ascriptive inequalities in the workplace. Sociol. Quart. 47(4):599–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romani L, Holck L, Risberg A (2019) Benevolent discrimination: Explaining how human resources professionals can be blind to the harm of diversity initiatives. Organization 26(3):371–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rupp DE (2011) An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility. Organ. Psych. Rev. 1(1):72–94.Google Scholar
• Santuzzi AM, Waltz PR (2016) Disability in the workplace: A unique and variable identity. J. Management 42(5):1111–1135.Google Scholar
• Schloemer-Jarvis A, Bader B, Böhm SA (2022) The role of human resource practices for including persons with disabilities in the workforce: A systematic literature review. Internat. J. Human Resource Management 33(1):45–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schur L, Nishii L, Adya M, Kruse D, Bruyère SM, Blanck P (2014) Accommodating employees with and without disabilities. Human Resource Management 53(4):593–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shea CT, Hawn OV (2019) Microfoundations of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility. Acad. Management J. 62(5):1609–1642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherf EN, Venkataramani V, Gajendran RS (2019) Too busy to be fair? The effect of workload and rewards on managers’ justice rule adherence. Acad. Management J. 62(2):469–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small ML (2011) How to conduct a mixed methods study: Recent trends in a rapidly growing literature. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 37:57–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart R, Volpone SD, Avery DR, McKay P (2011) You support diversity, but are you ethical? Examining the interactive effects of diversity and ethical climate perceptions on turnover intentions. J. Bus. Ethics 100(4):581–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stone DL, Colella A (1996) A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 21(2):352–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sudman S, Bradburn NM (1982) Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE, Vieider FM, Patil SV, Grant AM (2013) Accountability and ideology: When left looks right and right looks left. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 122(1):22–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Timmons JC, McGinnity BL, Carroll SL (2023) The inclusive talent pipeline: Building an equitable future of work for people with disabilities. British J. Soc. Psych. 62(1):178–202.Google Scholar
• To C, Sherf EN, Kouchaki M (2024) When speaking up at work backfires: The role of incivility and power perceptions. Acad. Management J. 67(2):499–528.Google Scholar
• Tost LP (2015) When, why, and how do powerholders “feel the power”? Examining the links between structural and psychological power and reviving the connection between power and responsibility. Res. Organ. Behav. 35:29–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tost LP, Johnson HH (2019) The prosocial side of power: How structural power over subordinates can promote social responsibility. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 152:25–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tourangeau R, Yan T (2007) Sensitive questions in surveys. Psych. Bull. 133(5):859–883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weaver GR, Treviño LK, Cochran PL (1999) Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Acad. Management J. 42(5):539–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Weiner B (1985) An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psych. Rev. 92(4):548–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss RS (1995) Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies, 1st Free Press pbk. ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2021) Two-way fixed effects, the two-way Mundlak regression, and difference-in-differences estimators. Preprint, submitted August 17, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3906345.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2023) Simple approaches to nonlinear difference-in-differences with panel data. Econometrics J. 26(3):C31–C66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (2011) World report on disability. Accessed December 4, 2023, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564182.Google Scholar