Getting to the Heart of Conflict: Emotional Acknowledgment Reduces Negative Emotional Expression Intensity and Improves Intrateam Conflict Resolution

References

• Adam H, Brett JM (2018) Everything in moderation: The social effects of anger depend on its perceived intensity. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 76:12–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allred KG, Mallozzi JS, Matsui F, Raia CP (1997) The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 70(3):175–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, John OP, Keltner D (2012) The personal sense of power. J. Personality 80(2):313–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, McGrath JE (1993) Group processes in organizations: Continuity and change. Cooper CL, Robertson IT, eds. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 8 (Wiley, Chichester, UK), 333–389.Google Scholar
• Ayoko OB, Callan VJ (2010) Teams’ reactions to conflict and teams’ task and social outcomes: The moderating role of transformational and emotional leadership. Eur. Management J. 28(3):220–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayoko OB, Konrad AM (2012) Leaders’ transformational, conflict, and emotion management behaviors in culturally diverse workgroups. Equality Diversity Inclusion Internat. J. 31(8):694–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayoko OB, Callan VJ, Härtel CEJ (2008) The influence of team emotional intelligence climate on conflict and team members’ reactions to conflict. Small Group Res. 39(2):121–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barry B (1999) The tactical use of emotion in negotiation. Bies RJ, Lewicki RJ, Sheppard BH, eds. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, vol. 7 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 93–121.Google Scholar
• Barsade SG (2002) The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):644–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel CA, Saavedra R (2000) The collective construction of work group moods. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(2):197–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Statist. Software 67(1):1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beersma B, De Dreu CK (1999) Negotiation processes and outcomes in prosocially and egoistically motivated groups. Internat. J. Conflict Management 10(4):385–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behfar KJ, Mannix EA, Peterson RS, Trochim WM (2011) Conflict in small groups: The meaning and consequences of process conflict. Small Group Res. 42(2):127–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behfar KJ, Peterson RS, Mannix EA, Trochim WMK (2008) The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):170–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliese PD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 349–381.Google Scholar
• Boroș S (2020) Controversy without conflict: How group emotional awareness and regulation can prevent conflict escalation. Group Decision Negotiation 29(2):251–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boulding KE (1963) Conflict and Defense: A General Theory (Harper Torchbooks, New York).Google Scholar
• Bowlby J (1969) Attachment and Loss: Sadness and Depression (Institute of Psycho-Analysis, London).Google Scholar
• Bradley CM, Greer LL (2026) Hey boss! Are you doing okay? Overcoming rank-based norms for emotional acknowledgment improves team performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 195:104493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradley CM, Greer LL, Trinh E, Sanchez-Burks J (2024) Responding to the emotions of others at work: A review and integrative theoretical framework for the effects of emotion-response strategies on work-related outcomes. Acad. Management Ann. 18(1):3–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks AW (2015) Emotion and the art of negotiation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 93(12):56–64.Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Schweitzer ME (2011) Can Nervous Nelly negotiate? How anxiety causes negotiators to make low first offers, exit early, and earn less profit. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(1):43–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brykman KM, O’Neill TA (2023) How conflict expressions affect recipients’ conflict management behaviors. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 174:104208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS, Van Der Vegt GS, Cantimur Y, Rink F (2016) Different views of hierarchy and why they matter: Hierarchy as inequality or as cascading influence. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1265–1289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnevale PJ, Probst TM (1998) Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(5):1300–1309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheshin A (2020) The impact of non-normative displays of emotion in the workplace: How inappropriateness shapes the interpersonal outcomes of emotional displays. Frontiers Psych. 11(6):fpsyg.2020.00006.Google Scholar
• Clark MS, Mills J (1993) The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 19(6):684–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn MA, Mehl MR, Pennebaker JW (2004) Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psych. Sci. 15(10):687–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Bezrukova K (2019) Conflict management through the lens of system dynamics. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):770–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Weingart LR (2019) Conflict across representational gaps: Threats to and opportunities for improved communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(16):7642–7649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curhan JR, Elfenbein HA, Xu H (2006) What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(3):493–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curşeu PL, Boroş S, Oerlemans LA (2012) Task and relationship conflict in short‐term and long‐term groups: The critical role of emotion regulation. Internat. J. Conflict Management 23(1):97–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, Van Vianen AEM (2001) Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. J. Organ. Behav. 22(3):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR (2003) Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):741–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, Weingart LR, Kwon S (2000) Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78(5):889–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Wit FRC, Greer LL, Jehn KA (2012) The paradox of intragroup conflict: A metaanalysis. J. Appl. Psych. 97(2):360–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeChurch LA, Mesmer-Magnus JR, Doty D (2013) Moving beyond relationship and task conflict: Toward a process-state perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 98(4):559–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M (1949) A theory of co-operation and competition. Human Relations 2(2):129–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M (1973) The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorison CA, Minson JA (2022) You can’t handle the truth! Conflict counterparts over-estimate each other’s feelings of self-threat. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 170:104147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doyle SP, Chung S, Lount RB Jr, Swaab RI, Rathjens J (2023) Hierarchical team structures limit joint gain in interteam negotiations: The role of information elaboration and value-claiming behavior. Acad. Management J. 66(5):1586–1616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ekman P, Friesen WV (1975) Unmasking the Face: A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Clues (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Etkin A, Egner T, Peraza DM, Kandel ER, Hirsch J (2006) Resolving emotional conflict: A role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron 51(6):871–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forgas JP (1998) On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(3):565–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frijda NH, Ortony A, Sonnemans J, Clore GL (1992) The complexity of intensity: Issues concerning the structure of emotion intensity. Clark MS, ed. Emotion (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 60–89.Google Scholar
• Fritz MS, MacKinnon DP (2007) Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psych. Sci. 18(3):233–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gable SL, Gonzaga GC, Strachman A (2006) Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(5):904–917.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gable SL, Reis HT, Impett E, Asher ER (2004) What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(2):228–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Maddux WW, Gilin D, White JB (2008) Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations. Psych. Sci. 19(4):378–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George JM (2000) Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Relations 53(8):1027–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson DE, Schweitzer ME, Callister RR, Gray B (2009) The influence of anger expressions on outcomes in organizations. Negotiation Conflict Management Res. 2(3):236–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick WH (1985) Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Acad. Management Rev. 10(3):601–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glikson E, Rees L, Wirtz J, Kopelman S, Rafaeli A (2019) When and why a squeakier wheel gets more grease: The influence of cultural values and anger intensity on customer compensation. J. Service Res. 22(3):223–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gottman JM, Levenson RW (2000) The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. J. Marriage Family 62(3):737–745.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greer LL, Jehn KA (2007) The pivotal role of negative affect in understanding the effects of process conflict on group performance. Mannix EA, Neale MA, Anderson CP, eds. Research on Managing Groups and Teams: Affect and Groups, vol. 10 (Elsevier, Oxford, UK), 21–43.Google Scholar
• Greer LL, Van Kleef GA (2010) Equality versus differentiation: The effects of power dispersion on group interaction. J. Appl. Psych. 95(6):1032–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greer LL, Jehn KA, Mannix EA (2008) Conflict transformation: A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between different types of intragroup conflict and the moderating role of conflict resolution. Small Group Res. 39(3):278–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greer LL, De Jong BA, Schouten ME, Dannals JE (2018) Why and when hierarchy impacts team effectiveness: A meta-analytic integration. J. Appl. Psych. 103(6):591–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Morris CG (1975) Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 8 (Academic Press, New York), 45–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy N (2008) Team negotiation: Social, epistemic, economic, and psychological consequences of subgroup conflict. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(12):1687–1702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harinck F, De Dreu CK (2004) Negotiating interests or values and reaching integrative agreements: The importance of time pressure and temporary impasses. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 34(5):595–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harinck F, De Dreu CK (2008) Take a break! Or not? The impact of mindsets during breaks on negotiation processes and outcomes. J. Experiment Soc. Psych. 44(2):397–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harinck F, De Dreu CK (2011) When does taking a break help in negotiations? The influence of breaks and social motivation on negotiation processes and outcomes. Negotiation Conflict Management Res. 4(1):33–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartung J, Knapp G (2001) On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta‐analysis with normally distributed responses. Statist. Medicine 20(12):1771–1782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2018) Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Comm. Monographs 85(1):4–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hays NA, Li H, Yang X, Oh JK, Yu A, Chen Y-R, Hollenbeck JR, Jamieson BB (2022) A tale of two hierarchies: Interactive effects of power differentiation and status differentiation on team performance. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2085–2105.Link, Google Scholar
• Heaphy ED (2017) “Dancing on hot coals”: How emotion work facilitates collective sensemaking. Acad. Management J. 60(2):642–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homan AC, Van Knippenberg D, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CK (2007) Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. J. Appl. Psych. 92(5):1189–1199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphrey SE, Aime F, Cushenbery L, Hill AD, Fairchild J (2017) Team conflict dynamics: Implications of a dyadic view of conflict for team performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 142:58–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huy QN (2002) Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: The contribution of middle managers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):31–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaakyan S, Sherf EN, Tangirala S, Guenter H (2021) Keeping it between us: Managerial endorsement of public versus private voice. J. Appl. Psych. 106(7):1049–1066.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1993) rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. J. Appl. Psych. 78(2):306–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James EH, Wooten LP, Dushek K (2011) Crisis management: Informing a new leadership research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):455–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA (1997) A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):530–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Bendersky C (2003) Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:187–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Mannix EA (2001) The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Management J. 44(2):238–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Greer L, Levine S, Szulanski G (2008) The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision Negotiation 17(6):465–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):602–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonassen Z, He VF, von Krogh G (2026) Good lessons despite bad feelings: How boundary-spanning teams learn from collaboration failure. Organ. Sci. 37(1):17–47.Link, Google Scholar
• Jordan PJ, Troth AC (2004) Managing emotions during team problem solving: Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. Human Performance 17(2):195–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn WA (2025) Through the narrows: The meaning and enactment of interpersonal holding. Organ. Sci. 36(1):340–360.Link, Google Scholar
• Kammrath LK, Dweck C (2006) Voicing conflict: Preferred conflict strategies among incremental and entity theorists. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(11):1497–1508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kearney E, Gebert D, Voelpel SC (2009) When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Acad. Management J. 52(3):581–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Weingart LR, Bendersky C, Behfar K, Todorova G, Bear J, Jehn K, Miron-Spektor E (2026) Conflict expression tendencies in workgroups: Measure validation and a test of theory. Small Group Res., ePub ahead of print June 11, https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964261448469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimmel MJ, Pruitt DG, Magenau JM, Konar-Goldband E, Carnevale PJ (1980) Effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 38(1):9–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogan N, Lamm H, Trommsdorff G (1972) Negotiation constraints in the risk-taking domain: Effects of being observed by partners of higher or lower status. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 23(2):143–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Ilgen DR (2006) Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 7(3):77–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lauche K, Erez M (2023) The relational dynamics of issue-selling: Enacting different genres for dealing with discontent. Acad. Management J. 66(2):553–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS (1999) Stress and Emotion: A New Synthesis (Springer Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
• LeBreton JM, Senter JL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ. Res. Methods 11(4):815–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee DS, Orvell A, Briskin J, Shrapnell T, Gelman SA, Ayduk O, Ybarra O, Kross E (2020) When chatting about negative experiences helps—And when it hurts: Distinguishing adaptive versus maladaptive social support in computer-mediated communication. Emotion 20(3):368–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt JS, Coutifaris CGV, Green PI Jr, Barsade SG (2025) Timing is everything: An imprinting framework for the implications of leader emotional expressions for team member social worth and performance. Organ. Sci. 36(1):514–546.Link, Google Scholar
• Little RJ, Rubin DB (2019) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS (2007) Mediation analysis. Annual Rev. Psych. 58(1):593–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psych. Methods 7(1):83–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) 8 social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):351–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Hollenbeck JR, van Knippenberg D, Ilgen DR (2017) A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology. J. Appl. Psych. 102(3):452–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McShane BB, Böckenholt U (2017) Single-paper meta-analysis: Benefits for study summary, theory testing, and replicability. J. Consumer Res. 43(6):1048–1063.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McShane BB, Böckenholt U (2025) Single paper meta‐analysis is unavoidable. J. Consumer Psych. 35(4):663–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mikulincer M, Shaver PR (2005) Attachment theory and emotions in close relationships: Exploring the attachment-related dynamics of emotional reactions to relational events. Personal Relationships 12(2):149–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minson JA, Bendersky C, De Dreu C, Halperin E, Schroeder J (2023) Experimental studies of conflict: Challenges, solutions, and advice to junior scholars. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 177:104257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, DeRue DS, Karam EP (2010) Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. J. Management 36(1):5–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris MW, Keltner D (2000) How emotions work: The social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Res. Organ. Behav. 22:1–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Overall NC, Simpson JA, Struthers H (2013) Buffering attachment-related avoidance: Softening emotional and behavioral defenses during conflict discussions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 104(5):854–871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Panico C (2024) Value creation, value appropriation, and cooperation in team production. Acad. Management Rev. 49(3):562–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S, Luciano MM, Mathieu JE, Fenters VW (2024) Intra-individual conflict and task performance in a multiteam context: Examining the structural elements of conflict experience. Acad. Management J. 67(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parke MR, Seo MG, Hu X, Jin S (2022) The creative and cross-functional benefits of wearing hearts on sleeves: Authentic affect climate, information elaboration, and team creativity. Organ. Sci. 33(2):600–623.Link, Google Scholar
• Pescosolido AT (2002) Emergent leaders as managers of group emotion. Leadership Quart. 13(5):583–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petriglieri G, Ashford SJ, Wrzesniewski A (2019) Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):124–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Rev. Psych. 63(1):539–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pondy LR (1967) Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(2):296–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pradies C (2023) With head and heart: How emotions shape paradox navigation in veterinary work. Acad. Management J. 66(2):521–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods Instruments Comput. 36(4):717–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pruitt DG (1998) Social conflict. Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., vol. 2 (McGraw-Hill, New York), 470–503.Google Scholar
• Pruitt DG, Lewis SA (1975) Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 31(4):621–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pruitt DG, Rubin JZ (1986) Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2024) The R Project for Statistical Computing. Version 4.4.1. https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
• Rees L, Friedman R (2025) Not your garden (hose) variety emotion: An integrative review of the flows of anger and a path forward. Acad. Management Ann. 19(1):132–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J. Statist. Software 48(2):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rucker DD, Preacher KJ, Tormala ZL, Petty RE (2011) Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 5(6):359–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Burks J (2004) Protestant relational ideology: The cognitive underpinnings and organizational implications of an American anomaly. Res. Organ. Behav. 26:265–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schelling TC (1960) The Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schwarz N, Clore GL (1983) Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(3):513–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah PP, Peterson RS, Jones SL, Ferguson AJ (2021) Things are not always what they seem: The origins and evolution of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(2):426–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2005) Testing for mediating variables in management research: Concerns, implications, and alternative strategies. J. Management 31(3):330–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver PR, Mikulincer M (2009) An overview of adult attachment theory. Obegi JH, Berant E, eds. Attachment Theory and Research in Clinical Work with Adults (Guilford Press, New York), 17–45.Google Scholar
• Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2013) Life after p-hacking. Preprint, submitted January 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2205186.Google Scholar
• Sinaceur M, Van Kleef GA, Neale MA, Adam H, Haag C (2011) Hot or cold: Is communicating anger or threats more effective in negotiation? J. Appl. Psych. 96(5):1018–1032.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinha R, Janardhanan NS, Greer LL, Conlon DE, Edwards JR (2016) Skewed task conflicts in teams: What happens when a few members see more conflict than the rest? J. Appl. Psych. 101(7):1045–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith W, Lewis M (2022) Both/and Thinking: Embracing Creative Tensions to Solve Your Toughest Problems (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):381–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Somaraju AV, Griffin DJ, Olenick J, Chang CH, Kozlowski SWJ (2024) A dynamic systems theory of intrateam conflict contagion. J. Appl. Psych. 109(6):871–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer SJ, Zanna MP, Fong GT (2005) Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):845–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw BM, DeCelles KA, de Goey P (2019) Leadership in the locker room: How the intensity of leaders’ unpleasant affective displays shapes team performance. J. Appl. Psych. 104(12):1547–1557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stollberger J, Guillaume Y, Van Knippenberg D (2024) Inspiring, yet tiring: How leader emotional complexity shapes follower creativity. Organ. Sci. 35(3):1015–1041.Link, Google Scholar
• Swaab RI, Lount RB Jr, Chung S, Brett JM (2021) Setting the stage for negotiations: How superordinate goal dialogues promote trust and joint gain in negotiations between teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 167:157–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas KW (1976) Conflict and conflict management. Dunnette MD, ed. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Rand McNally, Chicago), 889–935.Google Scholar
• Thompson L, Peterson E, Brodt SE (1996) Team negotiation: An examination of integrative and distributive bargaining. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(1):66–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiedens LZ (2001) The effect of anger on the hostile inferences of aggressive and nonaggressive people: Specific emotions, cognitive processing, and chronic accessibility. Motivation Emotion 25(3):233–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Todorova G, Bear JB, Weingart LR (2014) Can conflict be energizing? A study of task conflict, positive emotions, and job satisfaction. J. Appl. Psych. 99(3):451–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Todorova G, Goh KT, Weingart LR (2022) The effects of conflict type and conflict expression intensity on conflict management. Internat. J. Conflict Management 33(2):245–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toegel G, Kilduff M, Anand N (2013) Emotion helping by managers: An emergent understanding of discrepant role expectations and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 56(2):334–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tost LP, Gino F, Larrick RP (2013) When power makes others speechless: The negative impact of leader power on team performance. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1465–1486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripp TM, Sondak H (1992) An evaluation of dependent variables in experimental negotiation studies: Impasse rates and Pareto efficiency. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 51(2):273–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uribe J, Sytch M, Kim YH (2020) When friends become foes: Collaboration as a catalyst for conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(3):751–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ury W (1991) Getting Past No: Negotiating with Difficult People (Bantam Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Van Bunderen L, Greer LL, Van Knippenberg D (2018) When interteam conflict spirals into intrateam power struggles: The pivotal role of team power structures. Acad. Management J. 61(3):1100–1130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Berg W, Curșeu PL, Meeus MTH (2014) Emotion regulation and conflict transformation in multi-team systems. Internat. J. Conflict Management 25(2):171–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Kleef GA, Côté S (2018) Emotional dynamics in conflict and negotiation: Individual, dyadic, and group processes. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 5(1):437–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Kleef GA, Côté S (2022) The social effects of emotions. Annual Rev. Psych. 73(1):629–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW, Manstead ASR (2004) The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(1):57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Beersma B, van Knippenberg D (2010) On angry leaders and agreeable followers: How leaders’ emotions and followers’ personalities shape motivation and team performance. Psych. Sci. 21(12):1827–1834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vuori TO, Huy QN (2022) Regulating top managers’ emotions during strategy making: Nokia’s socially distributed approach enabling radical change from mobile phones to networks in 2007–2013. Acad. Management J. 65(1):331–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton RE, McKersie RB (1965) Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Wang GA, Belu CF, Allsop DB, Rosen NO (2025) Interpersonal emotion regulation during relationship conflict: Daily and longitudinal associations with couples’ sexual well-being. Emotion 25(2):397–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weingart LR, Brett JM, Olekalns M, Smith PL (2007) Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(6):994–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weingart LR, Behfar KJ, Bendersky C, Todorova G, Jehn KA (2015) The directness and oppositional intensity of conflict expression. Acad. Management Rev. 40(2):235–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman N, Applegate JM, Harlow J, Johnston EW (2020) Beyond the pyramid: Alternative formal hierarchical structures and team performance. Acad. Management J. 63(4):997–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang J, Mossholder KW (2004) Decoupling task and relationship conflict: The role of intragroup emotional processing. J. Organ. Behav. 25(5):589–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yip JA, Schweinsberg M (2017) Infuriating impasses: Angry expressions increase exiting behavior in negotiations. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 8(6):706–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu S, Greer LL (2023) The role of resources in the success or failure of diverse teams: Resource scarcity activates negative performance-detracting resource dynamics in social category diverse teams. Organ. Sci. 34(1):24–50.Link, Google Scholar
• Yu A, Berg JM, Zlatev JJ (2021) Emotional acknowledgment: How verbalizing others’ emotions fosters interpersonal trust. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 164:116–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuan Z, Yin J, Sun J (2026) The paradox of team conflict revisited: An updated meta-analysis of the team conflict–team performance relationships. J. Appl. Psych. 111(2):195–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yukl G (2012) Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(4):66–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Thatcher SM, Jehn KA (2019) Instigating, engaging in, and managing group conflict: A review of the literature addressing the critical role of the leader in group conflict. Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):112–147.Crossref, Google Scholar