Repatterning Interactions in Remote Work Environments: Bolstering Psychological Safety Through Mutually Humanizing Self-Disclosure

References

• Ancona D, Bresman H, Mortensen M (2021) Shifting team research after COVID‐19: Evolutionary and revolutionary change. J. Management Stud. 58(1):289–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnett RD (2023) Uniting through difference: Rich cultural-identity expression as a conduit to inclusion. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1887–1913.Link, Google Scholar
• Baer M, Frese M (2003) Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J. Organ. Behav. 24(1):45–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Faraj S, Hinds PJ, Leonardi PM, von Krogh G (2022) We are all theorists of technology now: A relational perspective on emerging technology and organizing. Organ. Sci. 33(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Bailyn L (2006) Breaking the Mold: Redesigning Work for Productive and Satisfying Lives (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Barley SR (2015) Why the internet makes buying a car less loathsome: How technologies change role relations. Acad. Management Discoveries 1(1):5–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel CA, Wrzesniewski A, Wiesenfeld BM (2012) Knowing where you stand: Physical isolation, perceived respect, and organizational identification among virtual employees. Organ. Sci. 23(3):743–757.Link, Google Scholar
• Beane M, Orlikowski WJ (2015) What difference does a robot make? The material enactment of distributed coordination. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1553–1573.Link, Google Scholar
• Bradley BH, Postlethwaite BE, Klotz AC, Hamdani MR, Brown KG (2012) Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. J. Appl. Psych. 97(1):151–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresman H, Zellmer-Bruhn M (2013) The structural context of team learning: Effects of organizational and team structure on internal and external learning. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1120–1139.Link, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F (2007) From iron cage to iron shield? How bureaucracy enables temporal flexibility for professional service workers. Organ. Sci. 18(2):297–314.Link, Google Scholar
• Brueller D, Carmeli A (2011) Linking capacities of high-quality relationships to team learning and performance in service organizations. Human Resource Management 50(4):455–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron LD, Conzon VM, Lam L (2025) Selling the self: Neo-normative control and the platform paradox. Res. Organ. Behav. 45:100230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron LD, Thomason B, Conzon VM (2021) Risky business: Gig workers and the navigation of ideal worker expectations during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Appl. Psych. 106(12):1821–1833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmeli A (2007) Social capital, psychological safety and learning behaviours from failure in organisations. Long Range Planning 40(1):30–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Gittell JH (2009) High‐quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. J. Organ. Behav. 30(6):709–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Brueller D, Dutton JE (2009) Learning behaviours in the workplace: The role of high‐quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Res. Behavioral Sci. 26(1):81–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Reiter-Palmon R, Ziv E (2010) Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Res. J. 22(3):250–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castrillon C (2025) Remote work loneliness: 5 ways to stay connected. Forbes (June 4), https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolinecastrillon/2025/06/04/5-strategies-to-prevent-social-isolation-when-working-remotely/.Google Scholar
• Collins NL, Miller LC (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 116(3):457–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conzon VM (2023) The equality policy paradox: Gender differences in how managers implement gender equality–related policies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(3):648–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conzon VM, Huising R (2024) Devoted but disconnected: Managing role conflict through interactional control. Organ. Sci. 35(6):2117–2140.Link, Google Scholar
• Conzon VM, Mellody JC (2025) Concerted quantification: How knowledge workers limit overwork while maintaining client satisfaction. Organ. Sci. 36(5):1834–1860.Link, Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A (2014) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (SAGE, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Coutifaris C, Grant A (2022) Taking your team behind the curtain: The effects of leader feedback-sharing and feedback-seeking on team psychological safety. Organ. Sci. 33(4):1574–1598.Link, Google Scholar
• Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3):346–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Cristea IC, Leonardi PM (2019) Get noticed and die trying: Signals, sacrifice, and the production of face time in distributed work. Organ. Sci. 30(3):552–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Burris ER (2007) Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Acad. Management J. 50(4):869–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2003) Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J. Management Stud. 40(6):1419–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2004a) Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. J. Appl. Behavioral Sci. 40(1):66–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2004b) Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. Kramer RM, Cook KS, eds. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 239–272.Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bransby DP (2023) Psychological safety comes of age: Observed themes in an established literature. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 10(1):55–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Daley G (2020) How to foster psychological safety in virtual meetings. Harvard Bus. Rev. (August 25), https://hbr.org/2020/08/how-to-foster-psychological-safety-in-virtual-meetings.Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Detert JR (2005) The role of speaking up in work-life balancing. Kossek EE, Lambert SJ, eds. Work and Life Integration (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 401–427.Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Lei Z (2014) Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1:23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Mortensen M (2021) What psychological safety looks like in a hybrid workplace. Harvard Bus. Rev. (April 19), https://hbr.org/2021/04/what-psychological-safety-looks-like-in-a-hybrid-workplace.Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fayard AL, Weeks J (2007) Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organ. Stud. 28(5):605–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fletcher L, Marvell R (2023) Furthering transgender inclusion in the workplace: Advancing a new model of allyship intentions and perceptions. Internat. J. Human Resource Management 34(9):1726–1756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frazier ML, Tupper C (2018) Supervisor prosocial motivation, employee thriving, and helping behavior: A trickle-down model of psychological safety. Group Organ. Management 43(4):561–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frazier ML, Fainshmidt S, Klinger KL, Pezeshkan A, Vracheva V (2017) Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psych. 70(1):113–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Gonsalves L (2023) Work (un)interrupted: How non-territorial space shapes worker control over social interaction. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1651–1671.Link, Google Scholar
• Greenbaum RL, Bonner JM, Mawritz MB, Butts MM, Smith MB (2020) It is all about the bottom line: Group bottom-line mentality, psychological safety, and group creativity. J. Organ. Behav. 41(6):503–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith TL, Neale MA (2001) Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory. Res. Organ. Behav. 23:379–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu Q, Wang GG, Wang L (2013) Social capital and innovation in R&D teams: The mediating roles of psychological safety and learning from mistakes. R&D Management 43(2):89–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardin AE (2024) The more you know: The impact of personal knowledge on interpersonal treatment at work. Organ. Sci. 35(5):1909–1929.Link, Google Scholar
• Hardin AE, Schinoff BS, Byron K, Balven RM (2025) A window into coworkers’ worlds: The relational outcomes of learning vivid, unintentional, and nonwork-related information about coworkers. Acad. Management J. 68(2):267–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey JF, Johnson KJ, Roloff KS, Edmondson AC (2019) From orientation to behavior: The interplay between learning orientation, open-mindedness, and psychological safety in team learning. Human Relations 72(11):1726–1751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heaphy ED, Trefalt Š (2024) Hiding in plain sight: Co-enacting the sustainable worker schema in a consulting firm. Organ. Sci. 35(4):1271–1298.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Bailey DE (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. 14(6):615–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Cramton CD (2014) Situated coworker familiarity: How site visits transform relationships among distributed workers. Organ. Sci. 25(3):794–814.Link, Google Scholar
• Hirak R, Peng AC, Carmeli A, Schaubroeck JM (2012) Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. Leadership Quart. 23(1):107–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn WA, Heaphy ED (2013) Relational contexts of personal engagement at work. Truss C, Alfes K, Delbridge R, Shantz A, Soane E, eds. Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice (Routledge, New York), 82–96.Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Work and Family in the United States: A Critical Review and Agenda for Research and Policy (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Kark R, Carmeli A (2009) Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. J. Organ. Behav. 30(6):785–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly EL, Kalev A (2006) Managing flexible work arrangements in US organizations: Formalized discretion or ‘a right to ask.’ Socio-Economic Rev. 4(3):379–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly EL, Moen P (2020) Overload: How Good Jobs Went Bad and What We Can Do About It (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kelly EL, Ammons SK, Chermack K, Moen P (2010) Gendered challenge, gendered response: Confronting the ideal worker norm in a white-collar organization. Gender Soc. 24(3):281–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kossek EE, Perrigino MB, Rock AG (2021a) From ideal workers to ideal work for all: A 50-year review integrating careers and work-family research with a future research agenda. J. Vocational Behav. 126:103504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kossek EE, Dumas TL, Piszczek MM, Allen TD (2021b) Pushing the boundaries: A qualitative study of how STEM women adapted to disrupted work–nonwork boundaries during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Appl. Psych. 106(11):1615–1629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (2021) What is “this” a case of? Generative theorizing for disruptive times. J. Management Inquiry 30(3):251–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Kramer A (2022) Understanding the (lack of) utilization of work-family practices: A multilevel perspective. Cross Cultural Strategic Management 29(4):899–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee MY, Mazmanian M, Perlow LA (2020) Fostering positive relational dynamics: The power of spaces and interaction scripts. Acad. Management J. 63(1):96–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leigh A, Melwani S (2022) “Am I next?” The spillover effects of mega-threats on avoidant behaviors at work. Acad. Management J. 65(3):720–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Parker SH, Shen R (2024) How remote work changes the world of work. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 11(1):193–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie LM, Manchester CF, Park TY, Mehng SA (2012) Flexible work practices: A source of career premiums or penalties? Acad. Management J. 55(6):1407–1428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang J, Farh CI, Farh JL (2012) Psychological antecedents of promotive voice: A two-wave examination. Acad. Management J. 55(1):71–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathison S (1988) Why triangulate? Ed. Res. 17(2):13–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mauss M (1954) The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies (Cohen & West, London).Google Scholar
• Mazmanian M, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2013) The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1337–1357.Link, Google Scholar
• McCluney CL, Bryant CM, King DD, Ali AA (2017) Calling in Black: A dynamic model of racially traumatic events, resourcing, and safety. Equality Diversity Inclusion 36(8):767–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minnotte KL, Pedersen DE (2019) Department environment and work-to-life conflict among faculty in the STEM fields. J. Family Issues 40(10):1299–1320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen M (2023) Why hybrid work can become toxic. Harvard Bus. Rev. (July 28), https://hbr.org/2023/07/why-hybrid-work-can-become-toxic.Google Scholar
• Mortensen M, Hinds PJ (2001) Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. Internat. J. Conflict Management 12(3):212–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukerjee J, Metiu A (2022) Play and psychological safety: An ethnography of innovative work. J. Product Innovation Management 39(3):394–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemanich LA, Vera D (2009) Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. Leadership Quart. 20(1):19–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC (2006) Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J. Organ. Behav. 27(7):941–966.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman A, Donohue R, Eva N (2017) Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Rev. 27(3):521–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nippert-Eng CE (1996) Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries Through Everyday Life (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Leary MB, Wilson JM, Metiu A (2014) Beyond being there: The symbolic role of communication and identification in perceptions of proximity to geographically dispersed colleagues. MIS Quart. 38(4):1219–1243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ollier-Malaterre A, Jacobs JA, Rothbard NP (2019) Technology, work, and family: Digital cultural capital and boundary management. Annual Rev. Sociol. 45(1):425–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ollier-Malaterre A, Rothbard NP, Berg JM (2013) When worlds collide in cyberspace: How boundary work in online social networks impacts professional relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 38(4):645–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padavic I, Ely RJ, Reid EM (2020) Explaining the persistence of gender inequality: The work–family narrative as a social defense against the 24/7 work culture. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):61–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng J, Wang Z, Chen X (2019) Does self-serving leadership hinder team creativity? A moderated dual path model. J. Bus. Ethics 159(2):419–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perlow LA (2012) Sleeping with Your Smartphone: How to Break the 24/7 Habit and Change the Way You Work (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Perrigino MB, Raveendhran R, Ryu JW (2024) Technology use for nonwork purposes at work: A behavior-focused integrative review. Acad. Management Ann. 18(2):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillemer J, Rothbard NP (2018) Friends without benefits: Understanding the dark sides of workplace friendship. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):635–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramarajan L, Reid EM (2013) Shattering the myth of separate worlds: Negotiating nonwork identities at work. Acad. Management Rev. 38(4):621–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reid EM (2015) Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organ. Sci. 26(4):997–1017.Link, Google Scholar
• Rhymer J (2023) Location-independent organizations: Designing collaboration across space and time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(1):1–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP, Phillips KW, Dumas TL (2005) Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organ. Sci. 16(3):243–258.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP, Ramarajan L, Ollier-Malaterre A, Lee SS (2022) OMG! My boss just friended me: How evaluations of colleagues’ disclosure, gender, and rank shape personal/professional boundary blurring online. Acad. Management J. 65(1):35–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck JM, Lam SS, Peng AC (2011) Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. J. Appl. Psych. 96(4):863–871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schinoff BS, Ashforth BE, Corley KG (2020) Virtually (in)separable: The centrality of relational cadence in the formation of virtual multiplex relationships. Acad. Management J. 63(5):1395–1424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schinoff BS, Pillemer J, Rogers KM, Petriglieri JL (2025) Blurring boundaries in coworker relationships: How a nonwork setting becomes a relational holding environment. Organ. Sci. 36(6):2061–2086.Link, Google Scholar
• Schulte M, Cohen NA, Klein KJ (2012) The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organ. Sci. 23(2):564–581.Link, Google Scholar
• Solomon BC, Scott AK, Hall MEK (2025) Employee “free” speech vs. organizational censorship on social media: Balancing the tension between free expression and safeguards to foster psychological safety. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print May 14, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2024.19506.Link, Google Scholar
• Stanko TL, Beckman CM (2015) Watching you watching me: Boundary control and capturing attention in the context of ubiquitous technology use. Acad. Management J. 58(3):712–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatcher SMB, Zhu X (2006) Changing identities in a changing workplace: Identification, identity enactment, self-verification, and telecommuting. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):1076–1088.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson PS, Klotz AC (2022) Led by curiosity and responding with voice: The influence of leader displays of curiosity and leader gender on follower reactions of psychological safety and voice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 172:104170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trefalt Š (2013) Between you and me: Setting work-nonwork boundaries in the context of workplace relationships. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1802–1829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ubaka A, Cardador MT, Wayne SJ (2026) Relaxing into differences and energizing into differences: How group‐based play enables demographically diverse adults to co‐create a climate of psychological safety. J. Organ. Behav. 47(4):550–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veltrop DB, Bezemer PJ, Nicholson G, Pugliese A (2021) Too unsafe to monitor? How board-CEO cognitive conflict and chair leadership shape outside director monitoring. Acad. Management J. 64(1):207–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilhelm H, Richter A, Semrau T (2019) Employee learning from failure: A team-as-resource perspective. Organ. Sci. 30(4):694–714.Link, Google Scholar
• Williams JC (2001) Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Zeng H, Zhao L, Zhao Y (2020) Inclusive leadership and taking-charge behavior: Roles of psychological safety and thriving at work. Frontiers Psych. 11:62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Fang Y, Wei K, Chen H (2010) Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities. Internat. J. Inform. Management 30(5):425–436.Crossref, Google Scholar