CROSSROADS—Organization Research as an Applied Science: Lessons from Fields That Shape Practice and Policy

References

• Aguinis H, Cronin MA (2022) It’s the theory, stupid. Organ. Psych. Rev., ePub ahead of print February 21, https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221080629.Google Scholar
• Berry LL (2025) CROSSROADS—Applied science deserves a bigger role in business research. Organ. Sci. 36(5):2052–2054.Google Scholar
• Bettis RA, Helfat CE, Shaver JM (2016) The necessity, logic, and forms of replication. Strategic Management J. 37(11):2193–2203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boussioux L, Lane JN, Zhang M, Jacimovic V, Lakhani KR (2024) The crowdless future? Generative AI and creative problem-solving. Organ. Sci. 35(5):1589–1607.Link, Google Scholar
• Bryk AS, Gomez LM, Grunow A, LeMahieu PG (2015) Learning to Improve: How America’s Schools Can Get Better at Getting Better (Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA). Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Stouten J, Van Knippenberg D (2021) The theory crisis in management research: Solving the right problem. Acad. Management Rev. 46(4):667–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Galvin BM, George E, Gruber M, Lindebaum D, Markman GD, Miller CC, Rose EL, Thatcher SMB, Wood GT (2025) From a portfolio of journals to a system of knowledge production. Acad. Management Ann. 19(1):1–8.Google Scholar
• Croson RTA, Croson DC (2025) CROSSROADS—Increasing the impact of organization science research: Lessons from economics. Organ. Sci. 36(5):2040–2043.Google Scholar
• Deaton A (2010) Instruments, randomization, and learning about development. J. Econom. Literature 48:424–455.Google Scholar
• de Bakker FG, Pek S, Bapuji H (2024) How to achieve impact with innovative publication formats: Taking stock of Business & Society’s commentary section. Bus. Soc. 63(8):1691–1708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Gerber E (2025) CROSSROADS—Designing institutions for applied impact: Lessons from engineering for organizational research. Organ. Sci. 36(5):2044–2051.Google Scholar
• Epstein S (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge (University of California Press, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Fraser K, Deng X, Bruno F, Rashid TA (2020) Should academic research be relevant and useful to practitioners? The contrasting difference between three applied disciplines. Stud. Higher Ed. 45(1):129–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Howard-Grenville J, Joshi A, Tihanyi L (2016) Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1880–1895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, Ertug G, Bapuji H, Doh JP, Mair J, Prasad A (2024) COVID-19 and management scholarship: Lessons for conducting impactful research. Bus. Soc. 63(4):715–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ (2008) GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924–926.Google Scholar
• Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, et al. (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J. Clinical Epidemiology 64(4):383–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (2007) The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Acad. Management J. 50(6):1346–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hideg I, DeCelles KA, Tihanyi L (2020) From the editors: Publishing practical and responsible research in AMJ. Acad. Management J. 63(6):1681–1686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/.Google Scholar
• Kniffin KM, Narayanan J, Anseel F, Antonakis J, Ashford SP, Bakker AB, Bamberger P, et al. (2021) COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. Amer. Psych. 76(1):63–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann. Internal Medicine 151(4):264–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1993) Barriers to the advance of organizational science: The case of diversity research. Acad. Management Rev. 18(2):529–540.Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Fong CT (2002) The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 1(1):78–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillutla M, Thau S (2013) Organizational sciences’ obsession with “that’s interesting!” Consequences and an alternative. Organ. Psych. Rev. 3(2):187–194.Google Scholar
• Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I (2019) Machine learning in medicine. New England J. Medicine 380(14):1347–1358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reichstein M, Camps-Valls G, Stevens B, Jung M, Denzler J, Carvalhais N, Prabhat F (2019) Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566(7743):195–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312(7023):71–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2020) Causal identification through a cumulative body of research in the study of strategy and organizations. J. Management 46(7):1244–1256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA). Google Scholar
• Sismondo S (2009) An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies (Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Spector P (2024) Theory salting in the organizational sciences. Accessed January 19, 2025. https://paulspector.com/theory-salting-in-the-organizational-sciences/.Google Scholar
• Tewksbury JJ, Anderson JG, Bakker JD, Billo TJ, Dunwiddie PW, Groom MJ, Hampton SE, et al. (2014) Natural history’s place in science and society. BioScience 64(4):300–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsui AS (2013) On compassion in scholarship: Why should we care? Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):167–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vincenti WG (1990) What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370(9596):1453–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiklund J, Wright M, Zahra SA (2019) Conquering relevance: Entrepreneurship research’s grand challenge. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 43(3):419–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoeli E, Rand D (2025) CROSSROADS—Promoting cooperation: Insights and challenges. Organ. Sci 36(5):2055–2059.Google Scholar