With a Little Help from My (Girl) Friends: Field Evidence on Gender Homophily and Women’s Training Outcomes in Remote Environments

References

• Alan Ş, Çörekçioğlu G, Kaba M, Sutter M (2025) Female leadership and workplace climate. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print September 12, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05507.Link, Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Belliveau MA (2005) Blind ambition? The effects of social networks and institutional sex composition on the job search outcomes of elite coeducational and women’s college graduates. Organ. Sci. 16(2):134–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Binning KR, Doucette D, Conrique BG, Singh C (2024) Unlocking the benefits of gender diversity: How an ecological-belonging intervention enhances performance in science classrooms. Psych. Sci. 35(3):226–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands R, Ertug G, Fonti F, Tasselli S (2022) Theorizing gender in social network research: What we do and what we can do differently. Acad. Management Ann. 16(2):588–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ (1985) Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Acad. Management J. 28(2):327–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB (1999) The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? J. Soc. Issues 55(3):429–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1998) The gender of social capital. Rationality Soc. 10(1):5–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Nehmeh R (2025) In Praise of the Office: The Limits to Hybrid and Remote Work (Wharton School Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Lobo MS (2008) When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):655–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Flynn FJ (2001) The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Acad. Management J. 44(5):956–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheryan S, Ziegler SA, Montoya AK, Jiang L (2017) Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psych. Bull. 143(1):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole C, Jablokow K, Mohammed S, Miller S (2023) The impact of gender on individual perceptions and team psychological safety in engineering design teams in education. J. Mech. Design 145(3):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins NL, Miller LC (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 116(3):457–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dailey-Hebert A (2018) Maximizing interactivity in online learning: Moving beyond discussion boards. J. Educators Online 15(3):26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta N (2011) Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psych. Inquiry 22(4):231–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta N, Scircle MM, Hunsinger M (2015) Female peers in small work groups enhance women’s motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(16):4988–4993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Schrage D, Kalev A (2015) Rage against the iron cage: The varied effects of bureaucratic personnel reforms on diversity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(5):1014–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doering L, Tilcsik A (2025) Location matters: Everyday gender discrimination in remote and on-site work. Organ. Sci. 36(2):547–571.Link, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ (1994) The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):203–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emanuel N, Harrington E, Pallais A (2023) The power of proximity to coworkers: Training for tomorrow or productivity today? NBER Working Paper No. 31880, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Estrada S (2020) Demand for online learning increased “exponentially” as COVID-19 drove telework. HR Dive. Retrieved April 24, https://www.hrdive.com/news/demand-for-online-learning-increased-exponentially-as-covid-19-drove-tele/576445/.Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Ames DR (2006) What’s good for the goose may not be as good for the gander: The benefits of self-monitoring for men and women in task groups and dyadic conflicts. J. Appl. Psych. 91(2):272–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson LL, Maynard MT, Jones Young NC, Vartiainen M, Hakonen M (2015) Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. J. Management 41(5):1313–1337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goulas S, Megalokonomou R, Sotirakopoulos P (2025) Top-performing girls are more impactful peer role models than boys, teachers say. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122(6):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Wall TD (2009) The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation: Why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers. Organ. Res. Methods 12(4):653–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Mollick E (2017) Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female founders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(2):341–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE (2011) Applied Thematic Analysis (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Hall RM, Sandler BR (1982) The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women? (Association of American Colleges, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Hampole M, Truffa F, Wong A (2024) Peer effects and the gender gap in corporate leadership: Evidence from MBA students. Preprint, submitted October 23, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4991793.Google Scholar
• Hart CG (2021) Trajectory guarding: Managing unwanted, ambiguously sexual interactions at work. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 86(2):256–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3):290–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoxby CM (2000) Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. NBER Working Paper No. 7867, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1992) Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):422–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inzlicht M, Ben-Zeev T (2000) A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psych. Sci. 11(5):365–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keck S, Tang W (2018) Gender composition and group confidence judgment: The perils of all-male groups. Management Sci. 64(12):5877–5898.Link, Google Scholar
• Kelly EL, Moen P, Oakes JM, Fan W, Okechukwu C, Davis KD, Hammer LB, et al. (2014) Changing work and work-family conflict: Evidence from the work, family, and health network. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(3):485–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knoke D, Kalleberg AL (1994) Job training in U.S. organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 59(4):537–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane JN, Lakhani KR, Fernandez RM (2024) Setting gendered expectations? Recruiter outreach bias in online tech training programs. Organ. Sci. 35(3):911–927.Link, Google Scholar
• Laurenceau JP, Barrett LF, Pietromonaco PR (1998) Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(5):1238–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavy V, Schlosser A (2011) Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 3(2):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler EJ (2001) An affect theory of social exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):321–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu F, Anderson ML (2015) Peer effects in microenvironments: The benefits of homogeneous classroom groups. J. Labor Econom. 33(1):91–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lutter M (2015) Do women suffer from network closure? The moderating effect of social capital on gender inequality in a project-based labor market, 1929 to 2010. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(2):329–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAllister DJ (1995) Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. 38(1):24–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melin JL (2024) The help-seeking paradox: Gender and the consequences of using career reentry assistance. Soc. Psych. Quart. 87(2):152–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melin JL, Correll SJ (2022) Preventing soft skill decay among early-career women in STEM during COVID-19: Evidence from a longitudinal intervention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(32):1–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obukhova E, Kleinbaum AM (2022) Scouting and schmoozing: A gender difference in networking during job search. Acad. Management Discoveries 8(2):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ody-Brasier A, Fernandez-Mateo I (2017) When being in the minority pays off: Relationships among sellers and price setting in the champagne industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(1):147–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park M, Yu C, Macy M (2023) Fighting bias with bias: How same-race endorsements reduce racial discrimination on Airbnb. Sci. Adv. 9(6):1–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranganathan A (2018) Train them to retain them: Work readiness and the retention of first-time women workers in India. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):879–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivas MJ, Baker RB, Evans BJ (2020) Do MOOCs make you more marketable? An experimental analysis of the value of MOOCs relative to traditional credentials and experience. AERA Open 6(4):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saks AM, Gruman JA (2012) Getting newcomers on board: A review of socialization practices and introduction to socialization resources theory. Wanberg CR, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Socialization (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 27–55.Google Scholar
• Schultz TW (1961) Investment in human capital. Amer. Econom. Rev. 51(1):1–17.Google Scholar
• Seron C, Silbey SS, Cech E, Rubineau B (2016) Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation. Work Occupations 43(2):178–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaikh UU, Asif Z (2022) Persistence and dropout in higher online education: Review and categorization of factors. Frontiers Psych. 13:1–14.Google Scholar
• Stein M (2023) E-learning and remote work offer women educational and career opportunities they might not otherwise have had. World Economic Forum. Retrieved March 14, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/06/online-learning-remote-work-gender-gap/.Google Scholar
• Sterling A, Merluzzi J (2019) A longer way in: Tryouts as alternative hiring arrangements in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 39:1–17.Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner J (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA).Google Scholar
• Tsai HT, Bagozzi RP (2014) Contribution behavior in virtual communities. MIS Quart. 38(1):143–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2023) Income in the United States: 2022. Retrieved March 14, https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2023/demo/p60-279.html.Google Scholar
• Villamor I, Hill NS, Kossek EE, Foley KO (2023) Virtuality at work: A doubled-edged sword for women’s career equality? Acad. Management Ann. 17(1):113–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood S (2024) 20 lower-cost online private colleges. U.S. News & World Report (March 21), Retrieved February 13, https://www.usnews.com/higher-education/online-education/the-short-list-online-programs/articles/lower-cost-online-private-colleges.Google Scholar
• Wu DJ, Thiem KC, Dasgupta N (2022) Female peer mentors early in college have lasting positive impacts on female engineering students that persist beyond graduation. Nature Comm. 13(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang T, Lee HY (2025) “Why I searched alone”: Understanding mothers’ hesitation to seek network assistance during workforce reentry. Organ. Sci. 36(6):2150–2184.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Chawla NV, Uzzi B (2019) A network’s gender composition and communication pattern predict women’s leadership success. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(6):2033–2038.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yarmar Y, Yang T, King MD (2026) When women stick together: Network dynamics and shared resources following disruptive events. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print January 30, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2024.0199.Crossref, Google Scholar