Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0307

References

  • Allen T.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:634–664CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bacon G., Beckman S., Mowery D., Wilson E. Managing product definition in high-technology industries: A pilot study. California Management Rev. (1994) 36:34–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barki H., Pinsonneault A. A model of organizational integration, implementation effort, and performance. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(2):165–179LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:404–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau M.-C., Robey D. Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):3–18LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):40–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P.The Social Life of Information (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brown S., Eisenhardt K.Competing on the Edge (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Carlile P. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):555–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll T. N., Gormley T. J., Bilardo V. J., Burton R. M., Woodman K. L. Designing a new organization at NASA: An organization design process using simulation. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(2):202–214LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clark K., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cramton C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):346–371LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dedrick D., Gurbaxani V., Kraemer K. L. Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Surveys (2003) 35(1):1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Devanna M., Tichy N. Creating the competitive organization of the 21st century: The boundaryless corporation. Human Resource Management (1990) 29(4):455–471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Re-imagining the differentiation and integration of work for sustained product innovation. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(5):612–631LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D., Takacs C. H. Team play: Heedful interrelating as the boundary for innovation. Long Range Planning (2004) 37:569–590CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):350–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol C. M., O'Connor E. J. Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):19–32LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L., Waguespack D. M. Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(2):165–180LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fulk J., DeSanctis G. Electronic communication and changing organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):337–349LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Galbraith J. R.Organization Design (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gibson J. J.The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (1979) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Giddens A.Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis (1979) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffith T. L. Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):472–488CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffith T. L., Sawyer J. E., Neale M. A. Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):265–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Handy C.The Age of Unreason (1989) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 82:929–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hedlund G. The hypermodern mnc—A heterarchy? Human Resource Management (1986) 25(1):9–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hemp P. Avatar-based marketing. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(6):48–57Google Scholar
  • Hinds P., Bailey D. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:615–632LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds P. J., Mortensen M. Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(3):290–307LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchby I. Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology (2001) 35(2):441–456CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iansiti M. Real-world R&D: Jumping the product generation gap. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(3):138–147Google Scholar
  • Jelinek M., Schoonhoven C.The Innovation Marathon: Lessons from High Technology Firms (1990) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Kellogg K. C., Orlikowski W. J., Yates J. A. Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):22–44LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard D., Sensiper S. The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):112–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K., Lange D., Gillis L. Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):581–598LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Wang Q. Breaking the functional mind-set in process organizations. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(5):93–99Google Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Cooper L., Neece O. Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):174–188LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Jarvenpaa S. L., Hollingshead A. B. Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(1):147–161LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Malhotra A., John R. Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology-enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(1):9–27LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Rice R. E., Malhotra A., King N., Ba S. Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):569–600CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L., Majchrzak A., Gasser L. A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(3):179–212Google Scholar
  • Maznevski M. L., Chudoba K. M. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):473–492LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 83:340–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H.Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations (1983) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Myaskovsky L. Explaining the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):117–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge Creating Company (1995) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:398–427LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1967) 32:194–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C.Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View (1970) (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
  • Perrow C. The organizational context of human factors engineering. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28(4):521–541CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Polzer J. T., Crisp C. B., Jarvenpaa S. L., Kim J. W. Extending the faultline model to geographical dispersed teams: How co-located subgroups can impair group functioning. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):679–692CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothaermel F. T., Hill C. W. L. Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: A longitudinal study of industry and firm performance. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):52–70LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schon D. Champions for radical new inventions. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1963) 41(2):77–86Google Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (1992) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Sole D., Edmondson A. Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. British J. Management (2002) 13:S17–S34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Thompson J. D., Bates F. L. Technology, organization, and administration. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1957) 2:325–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trist E. L., Van de Ven A. H., Joyce W. F. The sociotechnical perspective: The evolution of sociotechnical systems as a conceptual framework and as an action research program. Perspectives on Organizational Design and Behavior (1981) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tushman M., O'Reilly C.Winning Through Innovation (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E., von Krogh G. Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for Organization Science. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(2):209–223LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner C., Majchrzak A. Enabling customer-centricity using wikis and the wiki way. J. Management Inform. Systems (2007) 23(3):17–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasko M. M., Faraj S. Why should Ishare? MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):35–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Goodman P. S., Sproull L. S. Technology as equivoque: Sensemaking in new technologies. Technology and Organizations (1990) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 1–44Google Scholar
  • Weick K., Roberts K. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(3):357–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woodward J.Management and Technology (1958) (H. M. S. O., London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Woodward J.Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (1965) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zuboff S.In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future and Power of Work (1988) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.