Framing Contests: Strategy Making Under Uncertainty

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0340

References

  • Agar M.The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography (1980) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Agar M.Speaking of Ethnography (1986) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison G. T.Essence of Decision; Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (1971) (Little Brown, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Archibald K. A. Three views of the expert's role in policymaking. Policy Sci. (1970) 1:73–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnard C. I.The Functions of the Executive (1938) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Barr P. S. Adapting to unfamiliar environmental events: A look at the evolution of interpretation and its role in strategic change. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(6):644–669LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barr P. S., Stimpert J. L., Huff A. S. Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(Special Issue):15–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. R., Wally S. Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(11):1107–1129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):312–330LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benford R. D. Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Soc. Forces (1993) 71(3):677–701CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benford R. D., Snow D. A. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2000) 26:611–639CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bogner W. C., Barr P. S. Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: A cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(2):212–226LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bolman L. G., Deal T. E.Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership (2003) 3rd ed.(Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Bourdieu P.Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P., Wacquant L. J. D.An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (1992) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Bourgeois L. J., Eisenhardt K. M. Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Sci. (1988) 34(7):816–835LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bower J. L.Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment (1970) 2nd ed.(Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Bower J. L., Doz Y., Schendel D., Hofer C. Strategy formulation: A social and political process. Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and Planning (1979) (Little Brown and Co., Boston) Google Scholar
  • Bucciarelli L. L.Designing Engineers (1994) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Burgelman R. A. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 223–244CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman R. A. Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(1):24–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell J., Davis G. F., McAdam D., Scott W. R., Zald M. N. Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movements research. Social Movements and Organization Theory (2005) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York) 41–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):442–455LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Child J. Organization structure and strategies of control—A replication of the Aston study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 163–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemens E. S., Cook J. M. Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1999) 25:441–466CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., March J. G., Olsen J. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17(1):1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Creed W. E. D., Langstraat J. A., Scully M. A. A picture of the frame: Frame analysis as technique and as politics. Organ. Res. Methods (2002a) 5:34–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Creed W. E. D., Scully M. A., Austin J. R. Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organ. Sci. (2002b) 13(5):475–496LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Weick K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):284–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis G. F., McAdam D., Scott W. R., Zald M. N.Social Movements and Organization Theory (2005) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dearborn D. C., Simon H. A. Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry (1958) 21(2):140–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diesing P.Reason in Society; Five Types of Decisions and Their Social Conditions (1962) (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL) Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J. Culture and cognition. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1997) 23:263–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992a) 3(2):179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation. Strategic Management J. (1992b) 13(Special Issue):77–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D., Baum J. A. C. Grounded theory building: Some principles and practices. Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK) 849–867Google Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Ashford S. J. Selling issues to top management. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18:397–424CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989a) 14:532–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989b) 32(3):543–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Bourgeois L. J. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(4):737–770CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Zbaracki M. J. Strategic decision making. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:17–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D., Sutton R. I. Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(4):699–736CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D., Barr P. S., Hargadon A. B. Identifying situated cognition in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):422–433LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(4):727–752CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fine G. A. The sad demise, mysterious disappearance, and glorious triumph of symbolic interactionism. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1993) 19:61–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol C. M., Huff A. S. Maps for managers: Where are we? Where do we go from here? J. Management Stud. (1992) 29(3):267–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiss P. C., Hirsch P. M. The discourse of globalization: Framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2005) 70(1):29–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fligstein N. Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61:656–673CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fligstein N. Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociol. Theory (2001) 19(2):105–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foster R. N., Kaplan S.Creative Destruction: Why Companies that Are Built to Last Underperform the Market—And How to Successfully Transform Them (2001) (Currency (Doubleday), New York) Google Scholar
  • French J. R., Raven B., Cartwright D., Zander U. The bases of social power. Studies in Social Power (1968) (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI) 259–269Google Scholar
  • Gamson W. A. Goffman legacy to political-sociology. Theory Soc. (1985) 14(5):605–622CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gamson W. A., Meyer D. S., McAdam D., McCarthy J. D., Zald M. N. Framing political opportunity. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (1996) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 275–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R., Rappa M. A. A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(3):344–362LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Levinthal D. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):113–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Gilbert C., Bower J. L. Disruptive change: When trying harder is part of the problem. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(5):94–101Google Scholar
  • Gioia D., Sims H. P. J., Gioia D. A. Symbols, scripts and sensemaking: Creating meaning in the organizational experience. The Thinking Organization (1986) (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco) 49–74Google Scholar
  • Gioia D. A., Chittipeddi K. Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(6):433–448CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glynn M. A. When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(3):285–298LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glynn M. A., Barr P. S., Dacin M. T. Pluralism and the problem of variety. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(4):726–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman E.Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (1974/1986) 2nd ed.(Northeastern University Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Goffman E. The interaction order. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(1):1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Hinings C. R. Organizational design types, tracks and the dynamics of strategic change. Organ. Stud. (1988) 9(3):293–316CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):193–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman H. A. Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(1):48–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hine C.Virtual Ethnography (2000) (Sage Publications, London/Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirsch P. M., Lounsbury M. Ending the family quarrel: Toward a reconciliation of “old” and “new” institutionalisms. Amer. Behavioral Scientist (1997) 40(4):406–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huff A. S.Mapping Strategic Thought (1990) (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK/New York) Google Scholar
  • Jackson S. E., Dutton J. E. Discerning threats and opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1988) 33(3):370–387CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarzabkowski P.Strategy as Practice: An Activity-Based Approach (2005) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
  • Johnson G., Langley A., Melin L., Whittington R.Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources (2007) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnston H., Johnston H., Klandermans B. A methodology for frame analysis: From discourse to cognitive schemata. Social Movements and Culture (1995) (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis) 217–246Google Scholar
  • Kaplan S. Cognition, capabilities and incentives: Assessing firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. Acad. Management J. (Forthcoming) Google Scholar
  • Kaplan S., Henderson R. Inertia and incentives: Bridging organizational economics and organizational theory. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(5):509–521LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S., Murray F., Henderson R. M. Discontinuities and senior management: Assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(4):203–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiesler S., Sproull L. Managerial response to changing environments: Perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27(4):548–570CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knight F. H.Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (1921/1965) (Harper & Row, Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kunda G.Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Organization (1992) (Temple University Press, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Baum J. A. C. Organizational cognition and interpretation. Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA) 344–362Google Scholar
  • Latour B., Woolgar S.Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (1979) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lindblom C. E.The Intelligence of Democracy; Decision Making Through Mutual Adjustment (1965) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Louis M. R. Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25(2):226–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M., Glynn M. A. Cultural entreprenuership: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisitions of resources. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(6/7):545–564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M., Rao H. Sources of durability and change in market classifications: A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944–1985. Soc. Forces (2004) 82(3):969–999CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M., Ventresca M. J., Hirsch P. M. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural-political perspective on U.S. recycling. Socio-Econom. Rev. (2003) 1(1):71–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G.A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen (1994) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • March J. G., Olsen J. P.Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (1976) (Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, Norway) Google Scholar
  • McAdam D., McCarthy J. D., Zald M. N. Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes—Toward a synthetic comparative perspective on social movements. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (1996) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York) 1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer A. D., Gaba V., Colwell K. A. Organizing far from equilibrium: Nonlinear change in organizational fields. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(5):456–473LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:187–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Keefe D. J.Persuasion: Theory and Research (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–428LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J., Gash D. C. Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (1994) 2(2):174–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Papadakis V. M., Lioukas S., Chambers D. Strategic decision-making processes: The role of management and context. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(2):115–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew A. M.The Politics of Organizational Decision-Making (1973) (Tavistock, London) Google Scholar
  • Pettigrew A. M. Context and action in the transformation of the firm. J. Management Stud. (1987) 24(6):649–670CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.Power in Organizations (1981) (Pitman, Marshfield, MA) Google Scholar
  • Porac J. F., Thomas H., Pettigrew A. M., Thomas H., Whittington R. Managing cognition and strategy: Issues, trends and future directions. Handbook of Strategy and Management (2002) (Sage Publications, London and Thousand Oaks, CA) 165–181Google Scholar
  • Porac J. F., Thomas H., Baden-Fuller C. Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish Knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. (1989) 26(4):397–416CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Prahalad C. K., Bettis R. A. The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7(6):485–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H. Caveat emptor: The construction of nonprofit consumer watchdog organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1998) 103(4):912–961CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan C.Prime Time Activism: Media Strategies for Grassroots Organizing (1991) 1st ed.(South End Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Schön D. A., Rein M.Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies (1994) (BasicBooks, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sewell W. H. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. (1992) 98(1):1–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A.Administrative Behavior; A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (1947) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Smith K. G., Grimm C. M. Environmental variation, strategic change and firm performance: A study of railroad deregulation. Strategic Management J. (1987) 8(4):363–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snow D. A., Soule S. A., Kriesi H.The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (2004) (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snow D. A., Rochford E. B., Worden S. K., Benford R. D. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1986) 51(August):464–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steinberg M. W. The talk and back talk of collective action: A dialogic analysis of repertoires of discourse among nineteenth-century English cotton spinners. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105(3):736–780CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A. L., Corbin J. M.Grounded Theory in Practice (1997) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Stryker R. Legitimacy processes as institutional politics: Implications for theory and research in the sociology of organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. (2000) 17:179–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suddaby R., Greenwood R. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(1):35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutcliffe K. M., Huber G. P. Firm and industry as determinants of executive perceptions of the environment. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(8):793–807CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swidler A. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1986) 51(2):273–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G., Doz Y., Ovetzky Y. Incumbents' framing: Three established companies respond to the Internet. Adv. Strategic Management: Bus. Strategy Over Indust. Life Cycle (2004) 21:77–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tarrow S. G.Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York) Google Scholar
  • Thornton P. H., Ocasio W. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105(3):801–843CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10/11):1147–1161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Rosenkopf L. Executive succession, strategic reorientation and performance growth: A longitudinal study in the U.S. cement industry. Management Sci. (1996) 42(7):939–953LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Shafir E. Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psych. Sci. (1992) 3(6):358–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vincenti W. G.What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History (1990) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore) Google Scholar
  • Virany B., Tushman M. L., Romanelli E., Cohen W. M., Sproull L. Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments. Organizational Learning (1996) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Walsh J. P. Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(3):280–321LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E.Sensemaking in Organizations (1995) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(4):409–421LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whittington R. Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning (1996) 29(5):731–735CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiersema M. F., Bantel K. A. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(1):91–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Zald M. N. The strange career of an idea and its resurrection: Social movements in organizations. J. Management Inquiry (2005) 14(2):157–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zald M. N., Berger M. A. Social-movements in organizations—Coup D'Etat, insurgency, and mass movements. Amer. J. Sociol. (1978) 83(4):823–861CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zbaracki M. J. The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(3):602–636CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zerubavel E.Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology (1997) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.