Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in Business Strategy and Economic Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0424

References

  • Adner R., Helfat C. Dynamic mangerial capabilities and corporate effects. Strategic Managerial J. (2003) 24(10):1011–1027CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alchian A. Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. J. Political Econom. (1950) 58:211–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alchian A. Biological analogies in the theory of the firm: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1953) 43(4):600–603Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Greve H. A behavioral theory of the firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:337–349LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Armour H., Teece D. J. Organizational structure and economic performance: A test of the multidivisional hypothesis. Bell J. Econom. (1978) 9(2):106–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Augier M., Prietula M. Historical roots of a behavioral theory of the firm model at GSIA. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):507–522LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Augier M., Saravathy S. Integrating cognition, evolution, and design: Extending Simonian perspectives to strategic organization. Strategic Organ. (2004) 2(2):169–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Augier M., Teece D. Understanding complex organization: The role of know-how, internal structure, and human behavior in the evolution of capabilities. Indust. Corporate Change (2006) 15(2):395–416CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Augier M., Teece D. Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosian insights and omissions. Management Internat. Rev. (2007) 47:1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnard C.The Functions of the Executive (1938) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casson M., Foss N., Mahnke V. An entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneurship (2000) (Oxford University Press)116–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler A.The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (1977) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Chandler A.Scale and Scope (1990) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chesbrough H., Rosenbloom R. S. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(3):529–555CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coase R. H. The nature of the firm: Origin, meaning, influence. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1988) 4(1):3–47Google Scholar
  • Cohendet P., Llerna P., Marengo L., Foss N., Mahnke V. Is there a pilot in the evolutionary firm? Competence, Governance and Entreprenauership (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Collis D. J. Research note: How valuable are organisational capabilities? Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:143–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Dosi G. Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econom. Literature (1988) 26:1120–1170Google Scholar
  • Dosi G. A very reasonable objective still beyond our reach: Economics as an empirically disciplined social science. Models of a Man: Essays in Memory of Herbert A. Simon (2004) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Friedman M. The methodology of positive economics. Essays in Positive Economics (1953) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Hayek F. A., Hayek F. A. The use of knowledge in society. Individualism and Economic Order (1945) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 77–91Google Scholar
  • Helfat C., Finkelstein S., Mitchell W., Peteraf M. A., Singh H., Teece D. J., Winter S.Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (2007) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Langlois R. Transaction-costs economics in real time. Indust. Corporate Change (1992) 1:99–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loasby B.Choice, Complexity and Ignorance (1976) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Loasby B.The Mind and Method of the Economist (1989) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) Google Scholar
  • Machlup F. Marginal analysis and empirical research. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1946) 36(4):519–554Google Scholar
  • March J. G.A Primer on Decision Making (1994) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Marshall A.Principles of Economics (1925) (McMillan, London) Google Scholar
  • Miles R. Innovation and leadership values. California Management Rev. (2007) 50(1):192–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monteverde K., Teece D. J. Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the U.S. automobile industry. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(1):206–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowery D. C., Nelson R. The global computer software industry. The Sources of Industrial Leadership (1999) (Cambridge University Press, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Penrose E. Biological analogies in the theory of the firm. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1952) 42:804–819Google Scholar
  • Penrose E. Biological analogies in the theory of the firm: Rejoinder. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1953) 43(4):603–609Google Scholar
  • Penrose E.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Peteraf M., Reed R. Managerial discretion and internal alignment under regulatory constraints and change. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28:1089–1112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce L., Boerner C., Teece D. J., Augier M., March J. G. Dynamic capabilities, competence, and the behavioral theory of the firm. The Economics of Choice, Change and Organization: Essays in Honor of Richard M. Cyert (2002) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) 81–95Google Scholar
  • Porter M. What is strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) November/DecemberGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson G. B.Information and Investment (1960) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Rumelt R., Lamb R. B. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management (1984) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Sachs J.The End of Poverty (2005) (Penguin Press, London) Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter J.The Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter J. Economic theory and entrepreneurial history. Change and the Entrepreneur (1949) (Harvard University Press, Boston) 63–84Prepared by the Harvard University Research Center in Entrepreneurial HistoryGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. (1955) 69:99–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. Organizations and markets. J. Econom. Perspectives (1991) 5:25–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. Strategy and organizational evolution. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:131–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A.An Empirically Based Microeconomics (1997) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A. We and they: The human urge to identify with groups. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(3):607–610CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1982) 3(1):39–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Economic analysis and strategic management. California Management Rev. (1984) 26(3):87–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation. Res. Policy (1986) 15(6):285–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Frederickson J. Contributions and impediments of economic analysis in the study of strategic management. Perspectives on Strategic Management (1990) (Harper Business, New York) 39–80Google Scholar
  • Teece D. J. The dynamics of industrial capitalism: Perspectives on Alfred Chandler's Scale and Scope. J. Econom. Literature (1993) 31:199–225Google Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1996) 31:193–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Reflections on the Hymer thesis and the multinational enterprise. Internat. Bus. Rev. (2006a) 15(2):124–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Reflections on profiting from innovation. Res. Policy (2006b) 35(8):1131–1146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(13):1319–1350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G. The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3(3):537–556CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Winter S. G. The limits of neoclassical theory in management education. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74(2):116–121Google Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Firm capabilities, resources and the concept of strategy. (1990) . Working Paper 90-9, Consortium on Competitiveness and Cooperation, Center for Research in Management, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):537–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E., Williamson O. E. Chester Barnard and the incipient science of organization. Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond (1990) (Oxford University Press, New York) 172–206Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Transaction cost economics and the Carnegie connection. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1996) 31:149–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:1087–1108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E., Augier M., March J. G. Empirical microeconomics: Another perspective. The Economics of Choice, Change and Organization: Essays In Honor of Richard M. Cyert (2002) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) 419–441Google Scholar
  • Winter S. G. Economic “natural selection” and the theory of the firm. Yale Econom. Essays (1964) 4(1):225–272Google Scholar
  • Winter S. Satisficing, selection and the innovating remnant. Quart. J. Econom. (1971) 85:237–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter S. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:991–995CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter S. G., Day R., Groves T. Optimization and evolution in the theory of the firm. Adaptive Economic Models (1975) (Academic Press, New York) 73–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter S. G. On Coase, competence, and the corporation. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1988) 4(1):163–180Google Scholar
  • Winter S. G. The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:981–996CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.