Psyched Up or Psyched Out? The Influence of Coactor Status on Individual Performance

References

• Aiken L. S., West S. G. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
• Báles R. F., Strodtbeck F. L., Mills T. M., Roseborough M. E. (1951) Channels of communication in small groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 16(4) 461–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkow J. H. (1975) Prestige and culture: A biosocial interpretation. Current Anthropology 16(4) 553–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J., Zelditch M. (1985) Status, Rewards, and Influence. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) .Google Scholar
• Berger J., Cohen B. P., Zelditch M. (1972) Status characteristics and social interaction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 37(3) 241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J., Wagner D., Zelditch M. (1985) Expectation states theory: Review and assessment. , Berger J., Zelditch M. J., eds. Status, Rewards, and Influence. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) , 1–72.Google Scholar
• Berger J., Fisek M. H., Norman R. Z., Zelditch M. (1977) Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach. (Elsevier Scientific, New York) .Google Scholar
• Blau P. M. (1963) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) .Google Scholar
• Chatman J. A., Flynn F. J. (2005) Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organ. Sci. 16(4) 434–447.Link, Google Scholar
• Cottrell N. B., Wack D. L., Sekerak G. J., Rittle R. H. (1968) Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 9(3) 245–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earley P. C., Connolly T., Ekegren G. (1989) Goals, strategy development, and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting. J. Appl. Psych. 74(1) 24–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eibl-Eibesfeldt I. (1989) Human Ethology. (Aldine De Gruyter, New York) .Google Scholar
• Feldman N. S., Ruble D. N. (1981) Social comparison strategies: Dimensions offered and options taken. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 7(1) 11–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L. (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2) 117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske S. T. (1993) Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. Amer. Psychologist 48(6) 621–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn F. J. (2003) How much should I help and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad. Management J. 46(5) 539–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn F. J., Reagans R. E., Amanatullah E. T., Ames D. R. (2006) Helping one's way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(6) 1123–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foddy M., Smithson M. (1996) Relative ability, paths of relevance and influence in task-oriented groups. Soc. Psych. Quart. 59(2) 140–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foschi M. (1996) Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Soc. Psych. Quart. 59(3) 237–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geen R. G., Gange J. J. (1983) Social facilitation: Drive theory and beyond. , Blumberg H. H., Hare A. P., Kent M. V., Davies M. F., eds. Small Groups and Social Interaction, Vol. 1. (John Wiley & Sons, London) , 141–153.Google Scholar
• Gilbert S., Thompson J. K. (1999) Winning or losing against an opposite-sex peer on a gender-based competitive task. Sex Roles 41(11–12) 875–899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein N. J., Cialdini R. B. (2007) The spyglass self: A model of vicarious self-perception. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(3) 402–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W. (1997) Econometric Analysis, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) .Google Scholar
• Guryan J., Kroft K., Notowidigdo M. J. (2009) Peer effects in the workplace: Evidence from random groupings in professional golf tournaments. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 1(4) 34–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harkins S. G., White P. H., Utman C. H. (2000) The role of internal and external sources of evaluation in monitoring task performance. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 26(1) 100–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertel G., Kerr N. L., Messé L. A. (2000) Motivation gains in performance groups: Paradigmatic and theoretical developments on the Köhler effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(4) 580–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hull C. L. (1934) The concept of the habit-family hierarchy and maze learning: Part I. Psych. Rev. 41 33–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Köhler O. (1926) Kraftleistungen bei Einzel- und Gruppenarbeit. [Physical performance in individual and group situations.] Industrielle Psychotechnik 3 274–282.Google Scholar
• Köhler O. (1927) Über den Gruppenwirkungsgrad der menschlichen Körperarbeit und die Bedingung optimaler Kollektivkraftreaktion. [On group efficiency of physical labor and the conditions of optimal collective performance.] Industrielle Psychotechnik 4 209–226.Google Scholar
• Kurland N. B., Egan T. D. (1999) Telecommuting: Justice and control in the virtual organization. Organ. Sci. 10(4) 500–513.Link, Google Scholar
• Latham G. P., Yukl G. A. (1975) A review of research on the application of goal-setting in organizations. Acad. Management J. 18(4) 824–845.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke E. A. (1968) Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 3(2) 157–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke E. A., Latham G. P. (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) .Google Scholar
• Lount R. B. , Phillips K. W. (2007) Working harder with the out-group: The impact of social category diversity on motivation gains. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(2) 214–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meindl J. R., Ehrlich S. B., Dukerich J. M. (1985) The romance of leadership. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(1) 78–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Messé L. A., Hertel G., Kerr N. L., Lount R. B., Park E. S. (2001) Knowledge of partner's ability as a moderator of group motivation gains: An exploration of the Köhler discrepancy effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(6) 935–946.Google Scholar
• Michaels J. W., Blommel J. M., Brocato R. M., Linkous R. A., Rowe J. S. (1982) Social facilitation and inhibition in a natural setting. Replications Soc. Psych. 2 21–24.Google Scholar
• Mohrman S. A., Cohen S. G., Mohrman A. M. (1995) Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) .Google Scholar
• Moore D. A., Kim T. G. (2003) Myopic social prediction and the solo comparison effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(6) 1121–1135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L. (1997) Where do status value beliefs come from? New developments. , Szmatka J., Skvoretz J., Berger J., eds. Status, Network, and Structure: Theory Development in Group Processes. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) , 137–159.Google Scholar
• Sanders G. S., Baron R. S., Moore D. L. (1978) Distraction and social-comparison as mediators of social facilitation effects. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 14(3) 291–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schachter S. (1959) The Psychology of Affiliation. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) .Google Scholar
• Seta J. J. (1982) The impact of comparison processes on coactors' task-performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 42(2) 281–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snodgrass S. E. (1985) Women's intuition: The effect of subordinate role on interpersonal sensitivity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 49(1) 146–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stapel D. A., Blanton H. (2004) From seeing to being: Subliminal social comparisons affect implicit and explicit self-evaluations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(4) 468–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szymanski K., Garczynski J., Harkins S. (2000) The contribution of the potential for evaluation to coaction effects. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 3(3) 269–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tauer J. M., Harackiewicz J. M. (1999) Winning isn't everything: Competition, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 35(3) 209–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triplett N. (1898) The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. Amer. J. Psych. 9(4) 507–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vance R. J., Colella A. (1990) Effects of two types of feedback on goal acceptance and personal goals. J. Appl. Psych. 75(1) 68–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vroom V. H. (1964) Work and Motivation. (John Wiley & Sons, New York) .Google Scholar
• Wheeler L., Shaver K. G., Jones R. A., Goethals G. R., Cooper J., Robinson J. E., Gruder C. L., Butzine K. W. (1969) Factors determining the choice of a comparison other. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 5(2) 219–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajonc R. B. (1965) Social facilitation. Science 149(3681) 269–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zanna M. P., Pack S. J. (1975) On the self-fulfilling nature of apparent sex differences in behavior. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 11(6) 583–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zanna M. P., Goethals G. R., Hill J. F. (1975) Evaluating a sex-related ability: Social comparison with similar others and standard setters. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 11(1) 86–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zillmann D., Paulus P. B. (1993) Spectators: Reactions to sports events and effects on athletic performance. , Singer R. N., Murphey M., Tennant L. K., eds. Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology. (Macmillan, New York) , 600–619.Google Scholar