Agency in Action: Entrepreneurs' Networking Style and Initiation of Economic Exchange

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0567

References

  • Ahuja G. (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3) 425–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich H. (1999) Organizations Evolving. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Aldrich H., Zimmer C. (1986) Entrepreneurship through social networks. , Sexton D., Smilor R., eds. The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship. (Ballinger, New York) , 3–23.Google Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. P. (1994) Structural equation models in marketing research: Basic principles. , Bagozzi R. P., ed. Principles of Marketing Research. (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) , 317–385.Google Scholar
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6) 1173–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Calabrese T., Silverman B. S. (2000) Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. 21(3) 267–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. J., Shipilov A. V., Chuang Y. T. (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4) 536–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C. M., Haunschild P. R., Phillips D. J. (2004) Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. 15(3) 259–275.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brass D. J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H. R., Wenpin T. (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. 47(6) 795–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1) 1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (1992) Structural Holes. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. (2000) Decay functions. Soc. Networks 22(1) 1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S., Knez M. (1995) Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality Soc. 7(3) 255–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) .Google Scholar
  • DeVellis R. (2003) Scale Development: Theory and Applications. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4) 532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emerson R. M. (1976) Social exchange theory. Annual Rev. Sociol. 2 335–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emirbayer M., Goodwin J. (1994) Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(6) 1411–1454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick C. J. G. (1994) Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Acad. Management J. 37(1) 9–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3) 481–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H. (1993) Econometric Analysis, 2nd ed. (Macmillan, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Gulati R. (1995) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4) 619–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5) 1439–1493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Sytch M. (2007) Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer's performance in procurement relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1) 32–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallen B. L. (2008) The causes and consequences of the initial network positions of new organizations: From whom do entrepreneurs receive investments? Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4) 685–718.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallen B. L., Eisenhardt K. M. (2008) Catalyzing strategies and efficient network tie formation: How entrepreneurs obtain venture capital. . Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
  • Hite J. M., Hesterly W. S. (2001) The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management J. 22(3) 275–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoang H., Antoncic B. (2003) Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. J. Bus. Venturing 18(2) 165–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P., Morris M. W. (2007) Do people mix at mixers? Structure, homophily, and the “life of the party”. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4) 558–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff M., Tsai W. (2005) Social Networks and Organizations. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Klein K. J., Beng-Chong L., Saltz J. L., Mayer D. M. (2004) How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Acad. Management J. 47(6) 952–963.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. (1999) The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. , Andrews S. B., Knoke D., eds. Networks in and Around Organizations. Research in Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 16. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 183–210.Google Scholar
  • Larson A. (1992) Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(1) 76–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler E. J., Yoon J. (1996) Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(1) 89–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden P. V. (1990) Network data and measurement. Annual Rev. Sociol. 16(1) 435–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily B., Zaheer A. (1999) Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management J. 20(12) 1133–1156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehra A., Kilduff M., Brass D. J. (2001) The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1) 121–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moran P., Ghoshal S. (1999) Markets, firms, and the process of economic development. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3) 390–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nohria N. (1992) Information and search in the creation of new business ventures: The case of the 128 Venture Group. , Nohria N., Eccles R. G., eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) , 240–261.Google Scholar
  • Obstfeld D. (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1) 100–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Papke L. E., Wooldridge J. M. (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates.J. Appl. Econometrics 11(6) 619–632.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1) 116–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rangan S. (2000) The problem of search and deliberation in economic action: When social networks really matter. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4) 813–828.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Metiu A., George V. P. (2001) From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4) 748–772.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S., Cable D. (2002) Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Sci. 48(3) 364–381.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S., Stuart T. (2002) Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Sci. 48(1) 154–170.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shipilov A., Li S. X. (2012) The missing link: The effect of customers on the formation of relationships among producers in the multiplex triads. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 472–491.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shipilov A., Labianca G., Kalnysh V., Kalnysh Y. (2007) Career-related network building behaviors, range social capital, and career outcomes. Best Papers Proc., 67th Annual Conf. Acad. Management, Philadelphia, 1–6.Google Scholar
  • Shrout P. E., Bolger N. (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 7(4) 422–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soda G., Usai A., Zaheer A. (2004) Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Acad. Management J. 47(6) 893–906.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O., Stuart T. E. (2008) Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2) 266–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4) 674–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkataraman S., Van de Ven A. H. (1998) Hostile environmental jolts, transaction set, and new business. J. Bus. Venturing 13(3) 231–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vissa B., Chacar A. (2009) Leveraging ties: The contingent value of entrepreneurial teams' external advice networks on Indian software venture performance. Strategic Management J. 30(11) 1179–1191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin R. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Zott C., Huy Q. N. (2007) How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1) 70–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.