Helping Hand or Competition? The Moderating Influence of Perceived Upward Mobility on the Relationship Between Blended Workgroups and Employee Attitudes and Behaviors

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0606

References

  • Ashford S. J., George E., Blatt R. (2007) Old assumptions, new work: The opportunities and challenges of research on nonstandard employment. Acad. Management Ann. 1 65–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth B. E., Mael F. (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1) 20–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Kunda G. (2004) Gurus, Hired Guns, and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) .Google Scholar
  • Barnett W. P., Miner A. S. (1992) Standing on the shoulders of others: Career interdependence in job mobility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(2) 262–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron J. N., Bielby W. T. (1980) Bringing the firms back in: Stratification, segmentation and the organization of work. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 45(5) 737–765.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bauer D. J., Preacher K. J., Gil K. M. (2006) Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 11(2) 142–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Ridgeway C. L., Fisek M. H., Norman R. Z. (1998) The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(3) 379–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bettencourt B. A., Dorr N., Charlton K., Hume D. L. (2001) Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy and group permeability. Psych. Bull. 127(4) 520–542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P. M. (1956) Social mobility and interpersonal relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 21(3) 290–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branscombe N. R., Ellemers N. (1998) Coping with group-based discrimination: Individualistic versus group-level strategies. , Swim J. K., Stangor C., eds. Prejudice: The Target's Perspective. (Academic Press, New York) , 243–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broschak J. P., Davis-Blake A. (2006) Mixing standard work and nonstandard deals: The consequences of heterogeneity in employment arrangements. Acad. Management J. 49(2) 371–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chattopadhyay P., George E. (2001) Examining the effects of work externalization through the lens of social identity theory. J. Appl. Psych. 86(4) 781–788.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chattopadhyay P., George E., Lawrence S. (2004a) Why does dissimilarity matter? Exploring self-categorization, self-enhancement and uncertainty reduction. J. Appl. Psych. 89(5) 892–900.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chattopadhyay P., Tluchowska M., George E. (2004b) Identifying the ingroup: A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Acad. Management Rev. 29(2) 180–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohany S. R. (1998) Workers in alternative employment arrangements: A second look. Monthly Labor Rev. 121(November) 3–21.Google Scholar
  • Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S. (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Applied Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) .Google Scholar
  • Davis-Blake A., Broschak J. P. (2009) Outsourcing and the changing nature of work. Annual Rev. Sociol. 35 321–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis-Blake A., Uzzi B. (1993) Determinants of employment externalization: A study of temporary workers and independent contractors. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(2) 195–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis-Blake A., Broschak J. P., George E. (2003) Happy together? How using nonstandard workers affects exit, voice, and loyalty among standard employees. Acad. Management J. 46(4) 475–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu C. K., Weingart L. R. (2003) Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4) 741–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeVellis R. F. (1991) Scale Development: Theory and Applications. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) .Google Scholar
  • Eagly A. H., Karau S. J. (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3) 573–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards J. R., Lambert L. S. (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psych. Methods 12(1) 1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellemers N., Spears R., Doosje B. (1997) Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(3) 617–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellemers N., van Knippenberg A., Wilke H. (1990) The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British J. Soc. Psych. 29(Part 3) 233–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellemers N., Doosje B., van Knippenberg A., Wilke H. (1992) Status protection in high status minority groups. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 22(2) 123–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellingson J. E., Gruys M. L., Sackett P. R. (1998) Factors related to the satisfaction and performance of temporary employees. J. Appl. Psych. 83(6) 913–921.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federico C. M. (1999) The interactive effects of social domination orientation, group status and perceived stability on favoritism for high status groups. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 2(2) 119–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske S. T., Cuddy A. J., Glick P., Xu J. (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(6) 878–902.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gardner M., Palmer G. (1997) Employment Relations: Industrial Relations and Human Resource Management in Australia. (Macmillan Education Australia, South Melbourne) .Google Scholar
  • Geary J. F. (1992) Employment flexibility and human resource management: The case of three American electronics plants. Work, Employment Soc. 6(2) 251–270.Google Scholar
  • George E. (2003) External solutions and internal problems: The effects of employment externalization on internal workers' attitudes. Organ. Sci. 14(4) 386–402.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Handy C. (1989) The Age of Unreason. (Business Books, London) .Google Scholar
  • Harrison B., Kelley M. R. (1993) Outsourcing and the search for “flexibility”. Work, Employment Soc. 7(2) 213–235.Google Scholar
  • Haslam S. A. (2001) Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach. (Sage, London) .Google Scholar
  • Haslam S. A., Ellemers N. (2005) Social identity in industrial and organizational psychology: Concepts, controversies, and contributions. , Hodgkinson G. P., Ford J. K., eds. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 20. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) , 39–118.Google Scholar
  • Hogg M. A. (1993) Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 4 85–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg M. A., Abrams D. (1988) Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Process. (Routledge), London.Google Scholar
  • Hogg M. A., Hains S. C. (1996) Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(2) 295–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg M. A., Hains S. C. (1998) Friendship and group identification: A new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 28(3) 323–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg M. A., Hardie E. A. (1991) Social attraction, personal attraction and self categorization: A field study. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(2) 175–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg M. A., Cooper-Shaw L., Holzworth D. W. (1993) Group prototypicality and depersonalized attraction in small interactive groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 19(4) 452–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Houseman S. N., Kalleberg A. L., Erickcek G. A. (2003) The role of temporary agency employment in tight labor markets. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 57(1) 105–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hox J. J. (2002) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson C., Dowd T. J., Ridgeway C. L. (2006) Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Rev. Sociol. 32(1) 53–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joshi A., Liao H., Jackson S. E. (2006) Cross-level effects of workplace diversity on sales performance and pay. Acad. Management J. 49(3) 459–481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanter R. M. (1993) Men and Women of the Corporation. (Basic Books, New York) .Google Scholar
  • Kirkpatrick I., Hoque K. (2006) A retreat from permanent employment? Accounting for the rise of professional agency work in UK public services. Work, Employment Soc. 20(4) 649–666.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda G., Barley S. R., Evans J. (2002) Why do contractors contract? The experience of highly skilled technical professionals in a contingent labor market. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 55(2) 234–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Magee J., Galinsky A. (2008) Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2 351–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mangum G., Mayall D., Nelson K. (1985) The temporary help industry: A response to the dual internal labor market. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 38(4) 599–611.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer K. J., Nickerson J. A. (2005) Antecedents and performance implications of contracting for knowledge workers: Evidence from information technology services. Organ. Sci. 16(3) 225–242.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Messick D., Brewer M. (1983) Solving social dilemmas: A review. , Wheeler L., Shaver D., eds. Review of Personality and Social Psychology. (Sage, Beverley Hills, CA) , 11–44.Google Scholar
  • Miner A. S. (1987) Idiosyncratic jobs in formalized organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 32(3) 327–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neihoff B. P., Moorman R. H. (1993) Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Acad. Management J. 36(3) 527–557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oakes P. J., Turner J. C. (1980) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive? Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 10(3) 295–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oakes P., Haslam S. A., Turner J. C. (1997) A consideration of prototypicality from the perspective of self-categorization theory. , Deschamps J. C., Morales J. F., Paicheler H., eds. Current Perspectives on Social Identity and Social Categorization. (Anthropos, Barcelona, Spain) , 75–92.Google Scholar
  • O'Mahony S., Bechky B. A. (2006) Stretchwork: Managing the career progression paradox in external labor markets. Acad. Management J. 49(5) 918–941.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Organ D. W. (1988) Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) .Google Scholar
  • Osterman P. (1987) Choice of employment systems in internal labor markets. Indust. Relations 26(1) 46–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearce J. L. (1993) Toward an organizational behavior of contract laborers: Their psychological involvement and effects on employee co-workers. Acad. Management J. 36(5) 1082–1096.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearce J. L., Gregersen H. B. (1991) Task interdependence and extra-role behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. J. Appl. Psych. 76(6) 838–844.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce J. L., Gardner D. G., Cummings L. L., Dunham R. B. (1989) Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 32(3) 622–648.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Price J. L., Mueller C. W. (1981) A causal model of turnover for nurses. Acad. Management J. 24(3) 543–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravlin E. C., Thomas D. C. (2005) Status and stratification processes in organizational life. J. Management 31(6) 966–987.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raynor M. E., Bower J. L. (2001) Lead from the center: How to manage divisions dynamically. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79(5) 92–100.Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L. (1991) The social construction of status values: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2) 367–386.Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L. (2000) The formation of status beliefs: Improving status construction theory. , Thye S. R., Lawler E. J., Macy M. W., Walker H. A., eds. Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 17. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 77–102.Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Boyle E. H., Kuipers K. J., Robinson D. T. (1998) How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interactional experience. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(3) 331–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singer J. D. (1998) Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J. Ed. Behav. Statist. 24(4) 323–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singer J. D., Willett J. B. (2003) Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith V. (1998) The fractured world of the temporary worker: Power, participation, and fragmentation in the contemporary workplace. Soc. Problems 45(4) 411–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H., Turner J. C. (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , Austin W., Worchel S., eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA) , 33–47.Google Scholar
  • Tajfel H., Turner J. C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. , Worchel S., Austin W., eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. (Nelson-Hall, Chicago) , 7–24.Google Scholar
  • Terry D. J., Callan V. J. (1998) In-group bias in response to organizational merger. Group Dynam. 2(2) 67–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terry D. J., Pelly R. N., Lalonde R. N., Smith J. R. (2006) Predictors of cultural adjustment: Intergroup status relations and boundary permeability. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 9(2) 249–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turner J. C. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) .Google Scholar
  • Van Dyne L., Ang S. (1998) Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in Singapore. Acad. Management J. 41(6) 692–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verkuyten M., Reijerse A. (2008) Intergroup structure and identity management among ethnic minority and majority groups: The interactive effects of perceived stability, legitimacy, and permeability. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 38(1) 106–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wenzel M. (2000) Justice and identity: The significance of inclusion for perceptions of entitlement and the justice motive. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 26(2) 157–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.