Accidental Innovation: Supporting Valuable Unpredictability in the Creative Process

References

• Anderson C. (2010) In the next industrial revolution, atoms are the new bits. Wired (January 25). . http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/01/ff_newrevolution/.Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ingram P. (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin R, Devin L. (2003) Artful Making: What Managers Need to Know About How Artists Work. (Financial Times Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Avital M, Te'eni D. (2009) From generative fit to generative capacity: Exploring and emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance. Inform. Systems J. 19(4):345–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beccerra-Fernandez I, Sabherwal R. (2001) Organizational knowledge management: A contingency perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 18(1):23–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck K. (1999) Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. (Addison-Wesley, Boston).Google Scholar
• Beck K, Beedle M, van Bennekum A, Cockburn A, Cunningham W, Fowler M, Grenning J, et al. (2001) Principles behind the agile manifesto. . Retrieved June 21, 2011, http://www.agilemanifesto.org/principles.html.Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S, Krishnan, Mahajan VVJ. (1998) Managing new product definitions in highly dynamic environments. Management Sci. 44(11):S50–S64.Link, Google Scholar
• Boland RJ, Collopy F. (2004) Managing as Designing. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y. (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Boland RJ, Collopy F, Lyytinen KJ, Yoo Y. (2008) Managing as designing: Lessons for organization leaders from the design practice of Frank O. Gehry. Design Issues 24(1):10–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonabeau E, Bodick N, Armstrong RW. (2008) A more rational approach to new-product development. Harvard Business Rev. 86(3):96–102.Google Scholar
• Brown S. (2005) Science, serendipity and the contemporary marketing condition. Eur. J. Marketing 39(11–12):1229–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon WB. (1940) The role of chance in discovery. Sci. Monthly 50(3):204–209.Google Scholar
• Carlile PR. (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ. (1986) An investigation into the new product process: Steps, deficiencies, and impact. J. Product Innovation Management 3 71–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ. (1987) New products: What separates winners from losers? J. Product Innovation Management 4(3):169–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport TH, De Long DW, Beers MC. (1998) Successful knowledge management projects. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 39(2):43–57.Google Scholar
• Dew N. (2009) Serendipity and entrepreneurship. Organ. Stud. 30(7):735–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN. (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):84–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glasser BG. (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA).Google Scholar
• Grant RM. (1996) Prospering in dynamically competitive environments; Organizational capabilities as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. 7(4):375–387.Link, Google Scholar
• Hedberg B, Jönsson S. (1982) Designing semiconfusing information systems for changing organizations. ACM SIGMIS Database 13(2–3):12–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson K. (1991) Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Sci. Tech. Human Values 16(4):448–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson K. (1998) The role of material objects in the design process: A comparison of two design cultures and how they contend with automation. Sci. Tech. Human Values 23(2):139–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Highsmith JH. (1999) Adaptive Software Development: A Collaborative Approach to Managing Complex Systems. (Dorset House, New York).Google Scholar
• Hindo B. (2007) At 3M, A struggle between efficiency and creativity. BusinessWeek , (June 11), . http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_24/b4038406.htm.Google Scholar
• Holland JH. (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
• Holt DB. (2004) How Brands Become Icons: The Principles of Cultural Branding. (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Jonson B. (2005) Design ideation: The conceptual sketch in the digital age. Design Stud. 26(6):613–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S, Levin S. (1987) Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. J. Theoret. Biol. 128(1):11–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP. (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kivijärvi H, Zmud RW. (1993) DSS implementation activities, problem domain characteristics and DSS success. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 2(3):159–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krafcik JF. (1988) Triumph of the lean production system. Sloan Management Rev. 30(1):41–52.Google Scholar
• Licklider JCR, Taylor RW. (1968) The computer as a communication device. Sci. Tech. (April) 21–41.Google Scholar
• Mach E. (1896) On the part played by accident in invention and discovery. Monist 6(January, 2):161–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Cooper LP, Neece OE. (2004) Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Sci. 50(2):174–188.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG. (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Markus ML, Majchrzak A, Gasser L. (2002) A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quart. 26(3):179–212.Google Scholar
• Merton RK, Barber E. (2004) Travels and Adventures of Serendipity. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. (1994) The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H, McHugh A. (1985) Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(2):160–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell WJ. (2004) Beyond the ivory tower: Constructing complexity in the digital age. Science 303(5663):1472–1474.Google Scholar
• Royce WW. (1970) Managing the development of large software systems. Proc. IEEE WESCON, (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–9.Google Scholar
• Rudenstein N. (1995) . Commencement address, June 24. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Savasvathy SD. (2007) Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. (Routledge, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
• Shneiderman B. (1998) Codex, memex, genex: The pursuit of transformational technologies. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Interaction 10(2):87–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shneiderman B. (2007) Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation. Comm. ACM 50(12):20–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schrage M. (2000) Serious Play: How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Schroeder RG, Van de Ven A, Scudder GD, Polley D. (1989) The development of innovation ideas. , , Van de Ven A, Angle HL, Poole MS, eds. Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 107–134.Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Shah R, Ward PT. (2003) Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles, and performance. J. Oper. Management 21(2):129–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S. (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. 11(4):448–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Star SL. (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. , Gasser L, Huhns MN, eds. Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2 (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA), 37–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. (2000) The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):9–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke SH. (2003) Expermentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Van Andel P. (1994) Anatomy of the unsought finding. Serendipity: Origin, history, domains, traditions, appearances, patterns and programmability. British J. Philos. Sci. 45(2):631–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A, Angle HL, Poole MS. , eds. (1989) Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Von Hippel EA. (2005) Democratizing Innovation. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walls JG, Widmeyer GR, ElSawy OA. (1992) Building an information system design theory for Vigilant EIS. Inform. Systems Res. 3(1):36–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Yin RK. (1984) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Vol. 5 (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K. (2006) From organization design to organization designing. Organ. Sci. 17(2):215–229.Link, Google Scholar