Asymmetric Effects of Fashions on the Formation and Dissolution of Networks: Board Interlocks with Internet Companies, 1996–2006

References

• Abrahamson E. (1991) Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad. Management Rev. 16(3) 586–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E., Fairchild G. (1999) Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4) 708–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E., Rosenkopf L. (1993) Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Acad. Management Rev. 18(3) 487–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allport G. W. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) .Google Scholar
• Almeida P., Kogut B. (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7) 905–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Baltagi B. H., Song S. H. (2006) Unbalanced panel data: A survey. Statistical Papers 47(4) 493–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A. V. (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3) 797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. J., Shipilov A. V., Chuang Y.-T. (2005) Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4) 536–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman C. M., Haunschild P. R. (2002) Network learning: The effects of partners' heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1) 92–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman C. M., Haunschild P. R., Phillips D. J. (2004) Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. 15(3) 259–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100(5) 992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Foster P. C. (2003) The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management 29(6) 991–1013.Google Scholar
• Bradburn N. M., Sudman S., Gockel G. L. (1971) Side by Side: Integrated Neighborhoods in America. (Quadrangle Books, Chicago) .Google Scholar
• Brass D. J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H. R., Tsai W. (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. 47(6) 795–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks D. (1975) Race and Labor in London Transport. (Oxford University Press, London) .Google Scholar
• Broschak J. P. (2004) Managers' mobility and market interface: The effect of managers' career mobility on the dissolution of market ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(4) 608–640.Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. (1983) Corporate Profits and Cooptation: Networks of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy. (Academic Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Byrnes N., Judge P. C. (1999) Internet anxiety; part in envy, part in fear, corporate America is embracing a radically new business model. Business Week 3635 78–88.Google Scholar
• Cialdini R. B. (1993) Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. (William Morrow and Company, New York) .Google Scholar
• Contoyannis P., Jones A. M., Rice N. (2004) The dynamics of health in the British Household Panel Survey. J. Appl. Econometrics 19(4) 473–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui J. (2007) QIC program and model selection in GEE analyses. Stata J. 7(2) 209–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. F. (1991) Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(4) 583–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. F., Greve H. R. (1997) Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(1) 1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Domhoff G. W. (1967) Who Rules America? Power, Politics, and Social Change. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) .Google Scholar
• Feld S. L. (1981) The focused organization of social ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 86(5) 1015–1035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss P. C., Hirsch P. M. (2005) The discourse of globalization: Framing and sense-making of an emerging concept. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(1) 29–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J., Wasserman S. (1989) Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: An empirical test. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(3) 454–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilovich T. (1987) Secondhand information and social judgment. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 23(1) 59–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3) 481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R. (1995) Jumping ship: The diffusion of strategy abandonment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3) 444–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R., Pozner J.-E., Rao H. (2006) Vox populi: Resource partitioning, organizational proliferation, and the cultural impact of the insurgent microradio movement. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(3) 802–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R., Gargiulo M. (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5) 1439–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutierrez R. G. (2002) Parametric frailty and shared frailty survival models. Stata J. 2(1) 22–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P. R. (1993) Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(4) 564–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P. R. (1994) How much is that company worth?: Interorganizational relationships, uncertainty, and acquisition premiums. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3) 391–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P. R., Beckman C. M. (1998) When do interlocks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4) 815–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herek G. M., Capitanio J. P. (1996) “Some of my best friends” intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 22(4) 412–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim D.-G. (2006) Multivariate analysis of accidental related outcomes with respect to contemporaneous correlation and endogeneity: Application of simultaneous estimation approaches. . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tempe.Google Scholar
• Kono C., Palmer D., Friedland R., Zafonte M. (1998) Lost in space: The geography of corporate interlocking directorates. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4) 863–911.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee B. A., Farrell C. R., Link B. G. (2004) Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The case of public exposure to homelessness. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(1) 40–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang K.-Y., Zeger S. L. (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73(1) 13–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lorsch J. W., MacIver E. (1989) Pawns and Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) .Google Scholar
• Marquis C. (2003) The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4) 655–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGinnis S. P. (1990) Descriptive and evaluative components of stereotypes of computer programmers and their determinants. . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University, New York.Google Scholar
• Mintz B., Schwartz M. (1985) The Power Structure of American Business. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) .Google Scholar
• Mitsuhashi H., Greve H. R. (2009) A matching theory of alliance formation and organizational success: Complementarity and compatibility. Acad. Management J. 52(5) 975–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M. S. (1996) What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Rev. Sociol. 22 271–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M. S., Stearns L. B. (1994) A longitudinal study of borrowing by large American corporations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(1) 118–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M. S., Stearns L. B., Marquis C. (2006) The conditional nature of embeddedness: A study of borrowing by large U.S. firms, 1973–1994. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(2) 310–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Office of Management and Budget (2000) North American Industry Classification System—Update for 2002. . Report, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Palmer D. (1983) Broken ties: Interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(1) 40–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer D. A., Barber B. M., Zhou X. (1993) Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(1) 100–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan W. (2001) On the robust variance estimator in generalized estimating equations. Biometrika 88(3) 901–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennings J. M. (1980) Interlocking Directorates. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) .Google Scholar
• Perkins A. B., Perkins M. C. (2001) The Internet Bubble: Inside the Overvalued World of High-Tech Stocks—And What You Need to Know to Avoid the Coming Shakeout. (Harper Business, New York) .Google Scholar
• Pettigrew T. F. (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Rev. Psych. 49 65–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew T. F. (2008) Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research. Internat. J. Intercultural Relations 32(3) 187–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew T. F., Tropp L. R. (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(5) 751–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J. (1972) Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(2) 218–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. (Harper & Row, New York) .Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M., Page K. L. (1998) Network forms of organization. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24 57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock T. G., Rindova V. P. (2003) Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 46(5) 631–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W. W. (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. , Staw B. M., Cummings L. L., eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) , 295–336.Google Scholar
• Rao H., Greve H. R., Davis G. F. (2001) Fool's gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3) 502–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. (Simon & Schuster, New York) .Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Padula G. (2008) Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry. Organ. Sci. 19(5) 669–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Ruef M. (2000) The emergence of organizational forms: A community ecology approach. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3) 658–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz E. I. (1999) Digital Darwinism. (Broadway Books, New York) .Google Scholar
• Scott W. R. (2004) Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. , Smith K. G., Hitt M. A., eds. Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) , 460–484.Google Scholar
• Simons T., Roberts P. W. (2008) Local and non-local pre-founding experience and new organizational form penetration: The case of the Israeli wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2) 235–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine W. D., Haveman H. A., Tolbert P. S. (2005) Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2) 200–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O., Audia P. G. (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2) 424–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O., Stuart T. E. (2008) Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2) 266–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O., Waguespack D. M. (2006) Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(4) 560–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D., Kim Y.-M. (2004) The diffusion and domestication of managerial innovations: The spread of scientific management, quality circles, and TQM between the United States and Japan. , Ackroyd P. T. S., Tolbert P., Batt R., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) , 177–199.Google Scholar
• Strang D., Macy M. W. (2001) In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1) 147–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Sorenson O. (2003) Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2) 175–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan B. N., Haunschild P., Page K. (2007) Organizations non gratae? The impact of unethical corporate acts on interorganizational networks. Organ. Sci. 18(1) 55–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Useem M. (1979) Social organization of the American business elite and participation of corporation directors in the governance of American institutions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 44(4) 553–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Useem M. (1984) The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U.S. and U.K. (Oxford University Press, New York) .Google Scholar
• Verbeek M., Nijman T. (1992) Testing for selectivity bias in panel data models. Internat. Econom. Rev. 33(3) 681–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verbeek M., Nijman T. (1996) Incomplete panels and selection bias. , Mátyás L., Sevestre P., eds. The Econometrics of Panel Data: A Handbook of the Theory with Applications. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) , 449–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vissa B. (2011) A matching theory of entrepreneurs' tie formation intentions and initiation of economic exchange. Acad. Management J. 54(1) 137–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vissa B. (2012) Agency in action: Entrepreneurs' networking style and initiation of economic exchange. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 492–510.Link, Google Scholar
• Winkelmann R. (2003) Econometric Analysis of Count Data. (Springer, New York) .Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao Z., Tsui A. S. (2007) When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1) 1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A., Soda G. (2009) The evolution of network structure: Where do structural holes come from? Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1) 1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zellner A. (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regression equations and tests for aggregation bias. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 57(298) 348–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker L. G. (1988) Where do institutional patterns come from? Organizations as actors in social systems. , Zucker L. G., ed. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) , 23–49.Google Scholar