Digital Innovation and the Division of Innovative Labor: Digital Controls in the Automotive Industry

References

• Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM. (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. 80(7):40–47.Google Scholar
• Acs ZJ, Anselin L, Varga A. (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Res. Policy 31(7):1069–1085.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Kogut B. (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML. (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archibugi D, Pianta M. (1996) Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation 16(9):451–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS. (1999) The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” bomber. Organ. Sci. 10(2):162–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Bigelow L. (2010) Innovation, modularity, and vertical deintegration: Evidence from the early U.S. auto industry. Organ. Sci. 21(4):842–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A. (1994) The changing technology of technological change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Res. Policy 23(5):523–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashby WR. (1958) Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1(2):83–99.Google Scholar
• Baldwin CK. (2008) Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms. Indust. Corporate Change 17(1):155–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Clark K. (2000) Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basberg BL. (1987) Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature. Res. Policy 16(2–4):131–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Korn HJ, Kotha S. (1995) Dominant designs and population dynamics in telecommunications services: Founding and failure of facsimile transmission service organizations, 1965–1992. Soc. Sci. Res. 24 97–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Lyytinen K. (2009) Iteration in systems analysis and design: Cognitive processes and representational artifacts. , Chiang RHL, Siau K, Hardgrave BC, eds. Systems Analysis and Design: Techniques, Methodologies, Approaches, and Architectures. (M. E. Sharpe, New York), 37–57.Google Scholar
• Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y. (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Booch G, Maksimchuk B, Engle M, Young B, Conallen J, Houston K. (2007) Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications. (Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bowen H, Wiersema M. (2004) Modeling limited dependent variables: Methods and guidelines for researchers in strategic management. , Ketchen D, Bergh D, eds. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management. (Elsevier, New York), 87–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S. (2005) The limits to specialization: Problem solving and coordination in “modular networks. ” Organ. Stud. 26(12):1885–1907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S, Prencipe A. (2006) Making design rules: A multidomain perspective. Organ. Sci. 17(2):179–189.Link, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S, Prencipe A, Pavitt K. (2001) Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):597–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• California Air Resource Board. (1996) Low-Emission Vehicle and Zero-Emission Vehicle Program Review. . Report, Mobile Division, CARB, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
• Campbell RS, Levine LO. (1984) Technology Indicators Based on Patent Data: Three Case Studies. . Report, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA.Google Scholar
• Christensen JF. (2006) Wither core competency for the large corporation in an open innovation world? , Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J, eds. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 35–61.Google Scholar
• Clark KB. (1989) Project scope and project performance: The effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development. Management Sci. 35(10):1247–1263.Link, Google Scholar
• Clark KB, Fujimoto T. (1991) Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cohen WM. (1995) Empirical studies of innovative activity. , Stoneman P, ed. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change. (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 182–264.Google Scholar
• Cohen WN, Nelson RR, Walsh JP. (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). . NBER Working Paper 7522, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Curtis B, Krasner H, Iscoe N. (1988) A field study of the software design process for large systems. Comm. ACM 31(11):1268–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davies A. (2003) Integrated solutions: The changing business of systems integration. , Prencipe A, Davies A, Hobday M, eds. The Business of Systems Integration. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 333–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorf RC, Bishop RH. (2008) Modern Control Systems, 9th ed. (Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dosi G, Hobday M, Marengo L, Prencipe A. (2003) The economics of system integration: Toward an evolutonary interpretation. , Prencipe A, Davies A, Hobday M, eds. The Business of Systems Integration. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 95–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drouin M, Abou-Kandil H, Mariton M. (1991) Control of Complex Systems: Methods and Technology. (Planum Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ernst D. (2005) Limits to modularity: Reflections on recent developments in chip design. Indust. Innovation 12(3):303–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Findeisen W, Bailey FN, Bryds M, Malinowski K, Tatjewski P, Wozniak A. (1980) Control and Coordination in Hierarchical Systems. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Fine C, Whitney D. (1999) Is the make-buy decision process a core competence? , Muffato M, Pawar K, eds. Logistics in the Information Age—Proc. 4th Internat. Sympos. Logistics, (Servizi Grafici Editoriali, Padova, Italy), 31–63.Google Scholar
• Franklin GF, Powell JD, Workman ML. (1998) Digital Control of Dynamic Systems. (Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Gerard D, Lave LB. (2005) Implementing technology-forcing policies: The 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments and the introduction of advanced automotive emissions controls in the United States. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 72(7):761–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grandstrand O, Patel P, Pavitt K. (1997) Multitechnology corporations: Why they have “distributed” rather than “distinctive core' capabilities. ” Calif. Management Rev. 39(4):8–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. (1990) Patent statistics as economic-indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature 28(4):1661–1707.Google Scholar
• Handfield RB, Ragatz GL, Peterson KJ, Monczka RM. (1999) Involving suppliers in new product development? Calif. Management Rev. 42(1):59–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen S, Berente N, Lyytinen K. (2009) Requirements in the 21st century: Current practice and emerging trends. , Lyytinen K, Loucopoulos P, Mylopoulos J, Robinson B, eds. Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 14 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 44–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helper S, MacDuffie JP, Sabel C. (2000) Pragmatic collaborations: Advancing knowledge while controlling opportunism. Indust. Corporate Change 9(3):443–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB. (1990) Architectural innovation: The recognition of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Mathiassen L, Svahn F. (2009) Reconfiguring modularity: Closing capability gaps in digital innovation, sprouts. Sprouts: Working Papers Inform. Systems 9(22). . http://sprouts.aisnet.org/9-22.Google Scholar
• Hirschheim RA, Klein HK, Lyytinen K. (1995) Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoang H, Rothaermel F. (2010) Leveraging internal and external experience: Exploration, exploitaion, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management J. 31(7):734–758.Google Scholar
• Hobday M. (1998) Product complexity, innovation and industrial organization. Res. Policy 26(6):689–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G. (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inkpen AC, Dinur A. (1998) Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organ. Sci. 9(4):454–468.Link, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Palmer K. (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Rev. Econom. Statist. 79(4):610–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jurgen RK. (1999) Automotive Electronics Handbook. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Katila R, Chen E. (2008) Effects of search timing on innovation: The value of not being in sync with rivals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):593–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P. (1985) A Guide to Econometric Methods, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kettunen P, Laanti M. (2005) How to steer an embedded software project: Tactics for selecting the software process model. Inform. Software Tech. 47(9):587–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King JL, Lyytinen K. (2005) Automotive informatics: Information technology and enterprise transformation in the automobile industry. , Dutton WH, Kahin B, O'Callaghan R, Wychoff AW, eds. Transforming Enterprise: The Economic and Social Implications of Information Technology. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 283–312.Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U. (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Koopman P. (2002) Critical embedded automotive networks. IEEE Micro 22(4):14–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois RN. (1997) Cognition and capabilities: Opportunities seized and missed in the history of the computer industry. , Garud R, Nayyar P, Shapira Z, eds. Technological Entrepreneurship: Oversights and Foresights. (Cambridge University Press, New York), 71–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois RN. (2003) The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Indust. Corporate Change 12(2):351–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanjouw JO, Pakes A, Putnam J. (1998) How to count patents and value intellectual property: The uses of patent renewal and application data. J. Indust. Econom. 46(4):405–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J, Veloso F. (2008) Interfirm innovation under uncertainty: Empirical evidence for strategic knowledge partitioning. J. Product Innovation Management 25(5):418–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leen G, Heffernan D. (2002) Expanding automotive electronic systems. IEEE Computer 35(1):88–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leen G, Heffernan D, Dunne A. (1999) Digital network in the automotive vehicle. Comput. Control Engrg. J. 10(6):257–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler U. (2008) Open innovation in practice: An analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 55(1):148–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Mathiassen L, Ropponen J. (1998) Attention shaping and software risk—A categorical analysis of four classical risk management approaches. Inform. Systems Res. 9(3):233–255.Link, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Rice RE, Malhotra A, King N, Ba S. (2000) Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported interorganizational virtual team. MIS Quart. 24(4):569–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McConnell VD, Walls MA, Harrington W. (1995) Evaluating the costs of compliance with mobile source emission control requirements: Retrospective analysis. . Discussion paper, Resources for the Future, Washington DC.Google Scholar
• Mesarovic MD, Macko D, Takahara Y. (1970) Theory of Hierarchical, Multilevel Systems. (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Miller R, Hobday M, Leroux-Demers T, Olleros X. (1995) Innovation in complex systems industries: The case of flight simulation. Indust. Corporate Change 4(2):363–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mondt JR. (2000) Cleaner Cars: The History and Technology of Emission Control Since the 1960s. (Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mumford E. (2003) Redesigning Human Systems. (Idea Publishing, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murmann JP, Frenken K. (2006) Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Res. Policy 35(7):925–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papodopoulos Y, Grante C. (2005) Evolving car designs using model-based automated safety analysis and optimization techniques. J. Systems Software 76(1):77–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavitt K. (1985) Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems. Scientometrics 7(1–2):77–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penner-Hahn J, Shaver JM. (2005) Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management J. 26(2):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pop P, Eles P, Peng Z. (2004) Analysis and Synthesis of Distributed Real-Time Embedded Systems. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popp D. (2003) Pollution control innovations and the Clean Air Act of 1990. J. Policy Anal. Management 22(4):641–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popp D. (2005) Lessons from patents: Using patents to measure technological change in environmental models. Ecological Econom. 54(2–3):209–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L. (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powers WF, Nicastri PR. (2000) Automotive vehicle control challenges in the 21st century. Control Engrg. Practice 8(6):605–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prencipe A. (2000) Breadth and depth of technological capabilities in CoPS: The case of the aircraft engine control system. Res. Policy 29(7–8):895–911.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prencipe A. (2002) Strategy, Systems, and Scope: Managing Systems Integration in Complex Products. (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Prencipe A, Davies A, Hobday M. (2003) The Business of Systems Integration. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragatz GL, Handfield RG, Scanneil TV. (1997) Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. J. Product Innovation Management 14(3):190–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A. (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R, Mahoney JT. (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. 17(Special issue):63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer FM. (1983) The propensity to patent. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 1(1):107–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer FM, Harhoff D. (2000) Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes. Res. Policy 29(4–5):559–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA. (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Rowles CM. (2004) The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development. Management Sci. 50(12):1674–1689.Link, Google Scholar
• Steinmueller WE. (2003) The role of technical standards in coordinating the division of labor in complex systems industries. , Prencipe A, Davies A, Hobday M, eds. The Business of Systems Integration. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 133–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takeishi A. (2001) Bridging inter- and intra-firm boundaries: Management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strategic Management J. 22(5):404–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takeishi A. (2002) Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor: The case of automotive product development. Organ. Sci. 13(3):321–338.Link, Google Scholar
• Tucker DJ, Singh JV, Meinhard AG. (1990) Organizational form, population dynamics, and institutional change: The founding patterns of voluntary organizations. Acad. Management J. 33(1):151–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner J. (1987) Understanding the elements of system design. , Boland RJ, Hirschheim R, eds. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 97–111.Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Murmann JP. (1998) Dominant designs, technology cycles and organizational outcomes. Res. Organ. Behav. 20 231–266.Google Scholar
• Ulrich K. (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K, Eppinger S. (1995) Product Design and Development, 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1990) Environmental investments: The cost of a clean environment. . Report EPA-230-1 1-90-083, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH. (2005) Running in packs to develop knowledge-intensive technologies. MIS Quart. 29(2):365–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesan R. (1992) Strategic sourcing: To make or not to make. Harvard Bus. Rev. 70(6):98–107.Google Scholar
• von Bertalanffy L. (1968) General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. (George Braziller, New York).Google Scholar
• Von Hippel E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Warwick K, Rees D. (1988) Industrial Digital Control Systems, revised ed. (Peter Peregrinus, Stevenage, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• White H. (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitney D. (1990) Designing the design process. Res. Engrg. Design 2(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson D. (1969) Forms of hierarchy: A selected bibliography. General Systems 14 3–15.Google Scholar
• Yip PSL, Tsang EWK. (2007) Interpreting dummy variables and their interaction effects in strategy research. Strategic Organ. 5(1):13–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y. (2010) Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quart. 34(2):213–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K. (2006) From organization design to organization designing. Organ. Sci. 17(2):215–229.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K. (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar