A Dynamic Model of Individual and Collective Learning Amid Disruption

References

• Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1):43–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Amburgey TL, Kelly D, Barnett WP (1993) Resetting the clock—The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(1):51–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson EG Jr, Parker GG (2002) The effect of learning on the make/buy decision. Production Oper. Management 11(3):313–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1993) Group and organizational learning curves: Individual, system, and environmental components. British J. Soc. Psych. 32(1):31–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer, Norwell, MA).Google Scholar
• Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin JR (2003) Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):866–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey CD (1989) Forgetting and the learning-curve—A laboratory study. Management Sci. 35(3):340–352.Link, Google Scholar
• Benkard CL (2000) Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):1034–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black LJ, Carlile PR, Repenning NP (2004) A dynamic theory of expertise and occupational boundaries in new technology implementation: Building on Barley’s study of CT scanning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(4):572–607.Google Scholar
• Boh WF, Slaughter SA, Espinosa JA (2007) Learning from experience in software development: A multilevel analysis. Management Sci. 53(8):1315–1331.Link, Google Scholar
• Boone T, Ganeshan R (2001) The effect of information technology on learning in professional service organizations. J. Oper. Management 19(4):485–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boone T, Ganeshan R, Hicks RL (2008) Learning and knowledge depreciation in professional services. Management Sci. 54(7):1231–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandon DP, Hollingshead AB (2004) Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. 15(6):633–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Obel B (2011) Computational modeling for what-is, what-might-be, and what-should-be studies—and triangulation. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1195–1202.Link, Google Scholar
• Carley K (1992) Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organ. Sci. 3(1):20–46.Link, Google Scholar
• Carrillo JE, Gaimon C (2000) Improving manufacturing performance through process change and knowledge creation. Management Sci. 46(2):265–288.Link, Google Scholar
• Chase WG, Simon HA (1973) Perception in chess. Cognitive Psych. 4(1):55–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark HH (1985) Language use and language users. Lindzey G, Aronson E, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology (Random House, New York), 179–231.Google Scholar
• Clark HH (1998) Communal lexicons. Malmkjaer K, Williams J, eds. Context in Language and Language Understanding (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 64–87.Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory—Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4):554–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):480–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Holan PM, Phillips N (2004) Remembrance of things past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting. Management Sci. 50(11):1603–1613.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton JM, Thomas A (1984) Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):235–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epple D, Argote L, Devadas R (1991) Organizational learning curves: A method for investigating intra-plant transfer of knowledge acquired through learning by doing. Organ. Sci. 2(1):58–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Ellis HC (1965) The Transfer of Learning (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):1554–1568.Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher SR, White MA (2000) Downsizing in a learning organization: Are there hidden costs? Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):244–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forrester JW (1958) Industrial dynamics: A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Bus. Rev. 36(4):37–66.Google Scholar
• Fraidin SN (2004) When is one head better than two? Interdependent information in group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 93(2):102–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Rappa MA (1994) A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organ. Sci. 5(3):344–362.Link, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJG, Hackman JR (1990) Havitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(1):65–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman PS, Leyden DP (1991) Familiarity and group productivity. J. Appl. Psych. 76(4):578–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. 7(4):375–387.Link, Google Scholar
• Harrison JR, Lin Z, Carroll GR, Carley KM (2007) Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1229–1245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hatch NW, Dyer JH (2004) Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 25(12):1155–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CWL, Rothaermel FT (2003) The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad. Management Rev. 28(2):257–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinsz VB (1990) Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(4):705–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB (1998a) Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 34(5):423–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB (2001) Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(6):1080–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB, Fraidin SN (2003) Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 39(4):355–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huckman RS, Staats BR, Upton DM (2009) Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Sci. 55(1):85–100.Link, Google Scholar
• Krauss RM, Fussell SR (1996) Social psychological approaches to the study of communication. Higgins ET, Kruglanski A, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (Guilford Press, New York), 655–701.Google Scholar
• Lant TK, Mezias SJ (1992) An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organ. Sci. 3(1):47–71.Link, Google Scholar
• Lapré MA, Mukherjee AS, Van Wassenhove LN (2000) Behind the learning curve: Linking learning activities to waste reduction. Management Sci. 46(5):597–611.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton DA (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K (2003) Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):587–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K (2004) Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Sci. 50(11):1519–1533.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Herndon B (2011) Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1254–1265.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Lange D, Gillis L (2005) Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. 16(6):581–598.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Belliveau M, Herndon B, Keller J (2007) Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and determinants of collective knowledge. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(2):159–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang DW, Moreland RL, Argote L (1995) Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(4):384–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Jarvenpaa SL, Hollingshead AB (2007) Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organ. Sci. 18(1):147–161.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL (1999) Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. Thompson LL, Levine JM, Messick DM, eds. Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Myaskovsky L (2000) Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):117–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Argote L, Krishnan R (1996) Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. Nye JL, Brower AM, eds. What’s So Social About Social Cognition? Social Cognition Research in Small Groups (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 57–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Argote L, Krishnan R (1998) Training people to work in groups. Tindale RS, Heath L, eds. Theory and Research on Small Groups: Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues (Plenum Press, New York), 37–60.Google Scholar
• Nembhard DA, Uzumeri MV (2000) Experiential learning and forgetting for manual and cognitive tasks. Internat. J. Indust. Ergonomics 25(4):315–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliva R, Sterman JD (2001) Cutting corners and working overtime: Quality erosion in the service industry. Management Sci. 47(7):894–914.Link, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP, Bohmer RMJ, Edmondson AC (2001) Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 47(6):752–768.Link, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F (2013) The competitive implications of certifications: The effects of scientific and regulatory certifications on entries into new technical fields. Acad. Management J. 56(2):597–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao RD, Argote L (2006) Organizational learning and forgetting: The effects of turnover and structure. Eur. Management Rev. 3(2):77–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Carley KM, Argote L (2006) The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know? Management Sci. 52(5):671–682.Link, Google Scholar
• Repenning NP (1996) The improvement paradox: Three essays on process improvement. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Repenning NP (2002) A simulation-based approach to understanding the dynamics of innovation implementation. Organ. Sci. 13(2):109–127.Link, Google Scholar
• Rudolph JW, Repenning NP (2002) Disaster dynamics: Understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sastry MA (1997) Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):237–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Vidal P, Ployhart RE, Marangoni A (2003) Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Sci. 49(1):39–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Singley MK, Anderson JR (1989) The Transfer of Cognitive Skill (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sterman JD, Repenning NP, Kofman F (1997) Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: Exploring a paradox of organizational improvement. Management Sci. 43(4):503–521.Link, Google Scholar
• Stratman JK, Roth AV, Gilland WG (2004) The deployment of temporary production workers in assembly operations: A case study of the hidden costs of learning and forgetting. J. Oper. Management 21(6):689–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Summers JK, Humphrey SE, Ferris GR (2012) Team member change, flux in coordination, and performance: Effects of strategic core roles, information transfer, and cognitive ability. Acad. Management J. 55(2):314–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thorndike EL (1898) Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psych. Rev. Ser. Monogr. Suppl. 2:1–109.Google Scholar
• Thurstone LL (1919) The learning curve equation. Psych. Monogr. 26:1–51.Google Scholar
• Ton Z, Huckman RS (2008) Managing the impact of employee turnover on performance: The role of process conformance. Organ. Sci. 19(1):56–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (1997) Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):119–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Romanelli E (1985) Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation, Cummings L, Staw B, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 177–222.Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1986) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior (Springer-Verlag, New York), 185–208.Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1995) A computer network model of human transactive memory. Soc. Cognition 13(3):319–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM, Giuliano T, Hertel PT (1985) Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. Ickes W, ed. Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (Springer-Verlag, New York), 253–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weldon MS, Bellinger KD (1997) Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learning, Memory, Cognition 23(5):1160–1175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright TP (1936) Factors affecting the costs of airplanes. J. Aeronautical Sci. 3:122–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yelle LE (1979) The learning curve: Historical review and comprehensive survey. Decision Sci. 10(2):302–328.Crossref, Google Scholar