The Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Software Services Offshoring

References

• Adler PS (2005) Beyond hacker idiocy: The changing nature of software community and identity. Heckscher C, Adler PS, eds. The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 61–89.Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):61–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alchian A, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 65(5):777–795.Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Song J, Grant RM (2002) Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building. Organ. Sci. 13(2):147–161.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS (1999) The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” Bomber. Organ. Sci. 10(2):162–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Armstrong DJ, Cole P (2002) Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. Hinds PJ, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 167–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard C (1938) The Functions of the Executive (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Bradach JL, Eccles RG (1989) Price, authority, and trust—From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Rev. Sociol. 15:97–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C (2003) Behavioral Game Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cataldo M, Wagstrom P, Herbsleb JD, Carley K (2006) Identification of coordination requirements: Implications for the design of collaboration and awareness tools. Proc. Comput.-Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York), 353–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark H (1996) Using Language (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conner KR, Prahalad CK (1996) A resource based theory of the firm: Knowledge vs. opportunism. Organ. Sci. 7(5):477–501.Link, Google Scholar
• Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3):346–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5):554–571.Link, Google Scholar
• De Meyer A (1991) Tech talk: How managers are stimulating global R&D communication. Sloan Management Rev. 37(January):49–58.Google Scholar
• Demsetz H (1988) The theory of the firm revisited. J. Law Econom. Organ. 4(1):141–161.Google Scholar
• Dibbern J, Winkler J, Heinzl A (2008) Explaining variation in client extra costs between software projects offshored to India. MIS Quart. 32(2):332–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doherty-Sneddon G, Anderson A, O’Malley C, Langton S, Garrod S, Bruce V (1997) Face-to-face and video mediated communication: A comparison of dialog structure and task performance. J. Experiment. Psych. 3(2):105–125.Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–203.Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH (1996) Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management J. 17(4):271–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH (1997) Effective inter-firm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management J. 18(7):535–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH (2000) Collaborative Advantage: Winning Through Extended Enterprise Supplier Networks (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. 21(3):345–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):488–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KE, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal DA (2004) Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. 50(2):159–173.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Xiao Y (2006) Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. 52(8):1155–1169.Link, Google Scholar
• Farrell D (2005) Offshoring: Value creation through economic change. J. Management Stud. 42(3):675–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ (1996a) Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organ. Sci. 7(5):470–476.Link, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ (1996b) More critical comments on knowledge-based theories of the firm. Organ. Sci. 7(5):519–523.Link, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J (1977) Organization Design (Addison-Wesley, Boston).Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Korine H, Szulanski G (1994) Interunit communication in multinational corporations. Management Sci. 40(1):96–110.Link, Google Scholar
• Grandori A (1997) Governance structures, coordination mechanisms and cognitive models. J. Management Governance 1(1):29–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grandori A, Kogut B (2002) Dialog on organization and knowledge. Organ. Sci. 13(3):224–231.Link, Google Scholar
• Grandori A, Soda G (1995) Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organ. Stud. 16(2):183–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(Special issue):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Lawrence P, Puranam P (2005) Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management J. 26(5):415–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutwin C, Penner R, Schneider K (2004) Group awareness in distributed software development. Proc. 2004 ACM Conf. Comput.-Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York), 72–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayek F (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. 35(4):519–530.Google Scholar
• Heath C, Staudenmayer N (2000) Coordination neglect: How lay theories of organizing complicate coordination in organizations. Sutton RI, Staw B, eds. Research in Organization Behavior, Vol. 22 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 153–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helper S, MacDuffie J, Sabel C (2000) Pragmatic collaborations: Advancing knowledge while controlling opportunism. Indust. Corporate Change 9(3):443–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennart J-F (1993) Explaining the swollen middle: Why most transactions are a mix of “market” and “hierarchy”. Organ. Sci. 4(4):529–547.Link, Google Scholar
• Herbsleb JD, Mockus A (2003) Formulation and preliminary test of an empirical theory of coordination in software engineering. Proc. Foundations Software Engrg. (ACM, New York), 112–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Kiesler S (2002) Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Roberts J (1998) Boundaries of the firm revisited. J. Econom. Perspect. 12(4):73–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Information Week (2004) SmartAdvice: Getting the right onsite mix with offshore suppliers. (March 17) http://www.informationweek.com/smartadvice-getting-the-right-onsite-mix-with-offshore-supplies/d/d-id/1023890.Google Scholar
• Janicki R, Parnas DL, Zucker J (1977) Tabular representations in relational documents. Brink C, Schmidt G, eds. Relational Methods in Computer Science (Springer-Verlag, Düsseldorf, Germany), 184–196.Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski PA, Lê JK, Feldman MS (2011) Toward a theory of coordinating: Creating coordinating mechanisms in practice. Organ. Sci. 23(4):907–927.Link, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in post-bureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):22–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Klein B, Crawford RG, Alchian A (1978) Vertical integration, appropriable rents and the competitive contracting process. J. Law Econom. 21(2):297–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 24(4):625–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.Link, Google Scholar
• Kotha S, Srikanth K (2013) Managing a global partnership model: Lessons from the Boeing 787 “Dreamliner” program. Global Strategy J. 3(1):41–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut R, Fussell S, Brennan S, Siegel J (2002) Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. Hinds PJ, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 137–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut RE, Streeter L (1995) Coordination in large scale software development. Comm. ACM 38(3):69–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut RE, Galegher J, Egido C (1988) Relationships and tasks in scientific research collaborations. Human-Comput. Interaction 3(1):31–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kretschmer T, Puranam P (2008) Integration through incentives in differentiated organizations. Organ. Sci. 19(6):860–875.Link, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organizations and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ, Argyres NS (2004) Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organ. Sci. 15(4):394–410.Link, Google Scholar
• McGuire TW, Kiesler S, Siegel J (1987) Group and computer mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(5):917–930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Monteverde K (1995) Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry. Management Sci. 41(10):1624–1638.Link, Google Scholar
• Mullick N, Bass M, Houda Z, Sangwan R, Paulish D, Cataldo M, Herbsleb JD, Bass L (2006) Siemens Global Studio Project: Experiences adopting an integrated GSD infrastructure. Internat. Conf. Global Software Engrg. (ICGSE’06) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 203–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Nishiguchi T (1994) Strategic Industrial Sourcing: The Japanese Advantage (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Nohria N, Ghoshal S (1997) The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multi-National Corporations for Value Creation (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• O’Connail B, Whittaker S, Wilbur S (1993) Conversations over videoconferences: An evaluation of the spoken aspects of video mediated interaction. Human-Comput. Interaction 8(4):389–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen G, Bechky B (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson GM, Olson JS (2000) Distance matters. Human-Comput. Interaction 15(2):139–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson JS, Teasley S, Covi L, Olson G (2002) The (currently) unique advantages of co-located work. Hinds PJ, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 113–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orton JD, Weick KE (1990) Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. 15(2):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Reuter HH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R, Mahoney J (1996) Modularity, flexibility and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. 17(Special issue):63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schelling TC (1960) The Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2003) Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1991) Organizations and markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(2):25–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sosa M, Gargiulo M, Rowles C (2012) Inter-team communication in complex new product development. Working Paper 2012/65/TOM/OB, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Puranam P (2011) Integrating distributed work: Comparing task design, communication and tacit coordination mechanisms. Strategic Management J. 32(8):849–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1985) Contracts as hierarchical documents. Stinchcombe AL, Heimer CA, eds. Organization Theory and Project Management (Norwegian University Press, Bergen, Norway), 121–171.Google Scholar
• Takeishi A (2002) Knowledge partitioning in the inter-firm division of labor: The case of automotive product development. Organ. Sci. 13(3):321–338.Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Nadler D (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organization design. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):613–624.Google Scholar
• Ulrich K, Eppinger S (1999) Product Design and Development (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh G, Krishna S (2005) Economics of offshoring software projects: The influence of multistaging on onsite-offshore mix. Proc. Pacific Asia Conf. Inform. Systems, Bangkok, 1554–1560.Google Scholar
• Weber M (1921/1978) Economy and Society (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1979) Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. J. Law Econom. 22(2):233–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin R (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.Link, Google Scholar