Technology Ecosystem Governance

References

• Adler PS, Chen CX (2011) Combining creativity and control: Understanding individual motivation in large-scale collaborative creativity. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 36(2):63–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilar A (1998) Industrial platforms—A unique feature of the European Commission’s biotechnology R&D programme. Trends Biotech. 16(9):365–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avital M, Te’eni D (2009) From generative fit to generative capacity: Exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance. Inform. Systems J. 19(4):345–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY (2008) Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms. Indust. Corporate Change 17(1):155–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, Vol. 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Woodard CJ (2008) The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 19–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bator FM (1958) The anatomy of market failure. Quart. J. Econom. 72(3):351–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10):1849–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A (2009) Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 163–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busquets J, Rodon J, Wareham J (2009) Adaptability in smart business networks: An exploratory case in the insurance industry. Decision Support Systems 47(4):287–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caglio A, Ditillo A (2008) A review and discussion of management control in inter-firm relationships: Achievements and future directions. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 33(7–8):865–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron KS (1986) Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Sci. 32(5):539–553.Link, Google Scholar
• Castellucci F, Ertug G (2010) What’s in it for them? Advantages of higher-status partners in exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. 53(1):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Huang P, Wu DJ (2012) Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quart. 36(1):263–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Santalo J (2013) Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1331–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapin FS, Peterson G, Berkes Fet al. (2004) Resilience and vulnerability of northern regions to social and environmental change. AMBIO: J. Human Environment 33(6):344–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua CEH, Wareham J (2008) Parasitism and Internet auction fraud: An exploration. Inform. Organ. 18(4):303–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, March JG (1974) Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Collins H (1990) Ascription of legal responsibility to groups in complex patterns of economic integration. Modern Law Rev. 53(6):731–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H (1997) The Economics of the Business Firm: Seven Critical Commentaries (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2011) Platform envelopment. Strategic Management J. 32(12):1270–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.Link, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):202–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: J. Human Environment 31(5):437–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox PB, Wareham J (2010) Governance mechanisms in Internet-based affiliate marketing programs in Spain. Internat. J. E-Bus. Res. 6(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano M (2002) Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano M (2008) How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 49(2):28–35.Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Halaburda H (2010) Responding to the Wii? HBS Case 709-448, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Rev. Ecology Systematics 4:1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H, Kilduff M, Tsai W (2005) Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organ. Sci. 16(4):359–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Knudsen T, Augier M (2006) Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation, and the role of industry architectures. Res. Policy 35(8):1200–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspect. 8(2):93–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein R, Wareham J, Cousins K (2011) Electronic intermediary functional roles and profitability. Decision Sci. 42(2):309–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Messerschmitt D, Szyperski C (2003) Software Ecosystems: Understanding an Indispensable Technology and Industry (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Miller P, Kurunmäki L, O’Leary T (2008) Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 33(7–8):942–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1994) Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):458–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole MS, van de Ven AH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):562–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Sarker S, Sahaym A, Bjørn-Andersen N (2012) Exploring value cocreation in relationships between an ERP vendor and its partners: A revelatory case study. MIS Quart. 36(1):317–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons R (1995) Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Smith W, Lewis M (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):381–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan A, Venkatraman N (2010) Indirect network effects and platform dominance in the video game industry: A network perspective. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 57(4):661–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. March JG, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Rand-McNally, Chicago), 142–193.Google Scholar
• Thrane S (2007) The complexity of management accounting change: Bifurcation and oscillation in schizophrenic inter-organisational systems. Management Accounting Res. 18(2):248–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary-platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Weisenfeld U, Reeves JC, Hunck-Meiswinkel A (2001) Technology management and collaboration profile: Virtual companies and industrial platforms in the high-tech biotechnology industries. R&D Management 31(1):91–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolter C, Veloso FM (2008) The effects of innovation on vertical structure: Perspectives on transaction costs and capabilities. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):586–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodard CJ (2008) Architectural control points. Vaishnavi V, Baskerville R, eds. Proc. Third Internat. Conf. Design Sci. Res. Inform. Syst. Tech. (Georgia State University, Atlanta), 359–363.Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar