Pragmatism, Practice, and the Boundaries of Organization

References

• Adler PS, Obstfeld D (2007) The role of affect in creative projects and exploratory search. Indust. Corporate Change 16(1):19–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmadjian CL, Lincoln JR (2001) Keiretsu, governance, and learning: Case studies in change from the Japanese automotive industry. Organ. Sci. 12(6):683–701.Link, Google Scholar
• Ansell C (2011) Pragmatist Governance: Re-Imagining Institutions and Democracy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Brusoni S (2005) The limits to specialization: Problem solving and coordination in modular networks. Organ. Stud. 26(12):1885–1907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabigiosu A, Zirpoli F, Camuffo A (2013) Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry. Res. Policy 42(3):662–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campagnolo D, Camuffo A (2010) The concept of modularity in management studies: A literature review. Internat. J. Management Rev. 12(3):259–283.Google Scholar
• Chan C-Y (2002) A treatise on crash sensing for automotive air bag systems. Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Trans. 7(2):220–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chia R, MacKay B (2007) Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice. Human Relations 60(1):217–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark K, Fujimoto T (1991) Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Cohen MD (2007) Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organ. Stud. 28(5):773–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmas M, Toffel M (2008) Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management J. 29(10):1027–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewey J (1922) Human Nature and Conduct (Modern Library, New York).Google Scholar
• Dewey J (1929) The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action (Minton, Balch & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Dewey J (1938) Logic: The Theory of Inquiry (Henry Holt and Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Dewey J (1939) Theory of Valuation (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Dewey J (1958 [1925]) Experience and Nature (Dover, Mineola, NY).Google Scholar
• Dewey J, Tufts JH (1936 [1932]) Ethics, revised ed. (Henry Holt and Company, New York). [Orig. pub. 1908.]Google Scholar
• Dyer JH (1996) How Chrysler created an American keiretsu. Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(4):42–56.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elkjaer B, Simpson B (2011) Pragmatism: A lived and living philosophy. What can it offer to contemporary organization theory? Tsoukas H, Chia R, eds. Philosophy and Organization Theory, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 32 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 55–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M (1997) Manifesto for a relational sociology. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(2):281–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1240–1253.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fine CH (1998) Clockspeed Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Fligstein N (1996) Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4):656–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fujimoto T (1999) Evolution of Manufacturing Systems at Toyota (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Fujimoto T (2001) The Japanese automobile parts supplier system: The triplet of effective inter-firm routines. Internat. J. Automotive Tech. Management 1(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia-Pont C, Nohria N (2002) Local versus global mimetism: The dynamics of alliance formation in the automobile industry. Strategic Management J. 23(4):307–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Kumaraswamy A, Langlois R, eds. (2003) Managing in the Modular Age (Blackwell, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1981) A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, Volume 1: Power, Property and the State (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Gilson R, Sabel C, Scott R (2009) Contracting for innovation: Vertical disintegration and interfirm collaboration. Columbia Law Rev. 109(3):431–502.Google Scholar
• Gross N (2009) A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(3):358–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helper S, Sako M (1995) Supplier relations in Japan and the United States: Are they converging? Sloan Management Rev. 36(3):77–84.Google Scholar
• Helper S, Sako M (1998) Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 34(3):387–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helper S, MacDuffie JP, Sabel C (2000) Pragmatic collaborations: Advancing knowledge while controlling opportunism. Indust. Corporate Change 9(3):443–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P (2005) Strategy as Practice: An Activity Based Approach (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P (2008) Shaping strategy as a structuration process. Acad. Management J. 51(4):621–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Kaplan S (2008) Using strategy tools in practice: An exploration of technologies of rationality in use. Acad. Management Proc. 2008(August):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Spee AP (2009) Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field. Internat. J. Management Rev. 11(1):69–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Wilson DC (2006) Actionable strategy knowledge: A Practice perspective. Eur. Management J. 24(5):348–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Balogun J, Seidl D (2007) Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations 60(1):5–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joas H (1987) Giddens’ theory of structuration: Introductory remarks on a sociological transformation of the philosophy of praxis. Internat. Sociol. 2(1):13–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joas H (1993) Pragmatism and Social Theory (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Joas H (1996) The Creativity of Action (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Jones MR, Karsten H (2008) Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quart. 32(1):127–157.Google Scholar
• Kilpinen E (2003) Clarence Ayres memorial lecture: Does pragmatism imply institutionalism? J. Econom. Issues 37(2):291–304.Google Scholar
• Langlois R (2002) Modularity in technology and organization. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 49(1):19–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman M, Asaba S (2006) Why do firms imitate each other? Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):366–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo J, Baldwin CY, Whitney DE, Magee CL (2012) The architecture of transaction networks: A comparative analysis of hierarchy in two sectors. Indust. Corporate Change 21(6):1307–1335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacDuffie JP (2013) Modularity-as-property, modulatization-as-process, and “modularity”-as-frame: Lessons from product architecture initiatives in the global automotive industry. Global Strategy J. 3(1):8–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacDuffie JP, Helper S (2006) Collaboration in supply chains: With and without trust. Heckscher C, Adler P, eds. Collaborative Community (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 417–466.Google Scholar
• Meyer KE, Mudambi R, Narula R (2011) Multinational enterprises and local contexts: The opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. J. Management Stud. 48(2):235–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mikkola J (2006) Capturing the degree of modularity embedded in product architectures. J. Product Innovation Management 23(2):128–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nishiguchi T (1994) Strategic Industrial Sourcing: The Japanese Advantage (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 3(3):398–427.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (1996) Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 7(1):63–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enabling a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Powell W (2001) The capitalist firm in the twenty-first century: Emerging patterns in Western enterprise. DiMaggio P, ed. The Twenty-First-Century Firm: Changing Economic Organization in International Perspective (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 3–30.Google Scholar
• Powell W, Packalen K, Whittington K (2012) Organizational and institutional genesis: The emergence of high-tech clusters in the life sciences. Padgett J, Powell W, eds. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 434–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ro Y, Liker J, Fixson S (2007) Modularity as a strategy for supply chain coordination: The case of U.S. auto. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 54(1):172–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabel C (1993) Studied trust: Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. Human Relations 46(9):1133–1170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabel C (1994) Learning by monitoring: The institutions of economic development. Smelser N, Swedberg R, eds. The Handbook of Economic Sociology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 137–165.Google Scholar
• Sabel C (2006) A real-time revolution in routines. Adler P, Heckscher C, eds. The Firm as a Collaborative Community: The Reconstruction of Trust in the Knowledge Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 106–151.Google Scholar
• Sanchez R, Mahoney J (1996) Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter special issue):63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott R (1981) Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1996) Institutionalism “old” and “new.” Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):270–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sewell WH (1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson B (2009) Pragmatism, mead and the practice turn. Organ. Stud. 30(12):1329–1347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spee AP, Jarzabkowski P (2009) Strategy tools as boundary objects. Strategic Organ. 7(2):223–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sturgeon T (2002) Modular production networks: A new American model of industrial organization. Indust. Corporate Change 11(3):451–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitford J (2002) Pragmatism and the untenable dualism of means and ends: Why rational choice theory does not deserve paradigmatic privilege. Theory Soc. 31(3):325–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whittington R (2010) Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, Vaaro E, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 109–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1998) The institutions of governance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(2):75–79.Google Scholar
• Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 24(10):991–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zirpoli F, Becker M (2011a) The limits of design and engineering outsourcing: Performance integration and the unfulfilled promises of modularity. R&D Management 41(1):22–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zirpoli F, Becker M (2011b) What happens when you outsource too much. Sloan Management Rev. 52(2):59–64.Google Scholar
• Zirpoli F, Camuffo A (2009) Product architecture, inter-firm vertical coordination and knowledge partitioning in the auto industry. Eur. Management Rev. 6(4):250–264.Crossref, Google Scholar