Affective Primacy in Intraorganizational Task Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0939

References

  • Abelson R (1985) A variance explanation paradox: When a little explains a lot. Psych. Bull. 97:129–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abelson RP, Aronson E, McGuire WJ, Newcomb TM, Rosenberg MJ, Tannenbaum PH (1968) Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook (Rand McNally, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Ambady N, Bernieri FJ, Richeson JA (2000) Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. Advances Experiment. Soc. Psych. 32:201–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asch SE (1946) Forming impressions of personality. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 42:258–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barbalet JM (1998) Emotion, Social Theory, and Social Structure (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (1990) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:61–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnard CI (1938) The Functions of the Executive (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Blanchette I, Richards A (2004) Reasoning about emotional and neutral materials: Is logic affected by emotion? Psych. Sci. 15:745–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti SP, Cross R (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49:432–445.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti SP, Foster PC (2003) The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management 29:991–1013.Google Scholar
  • Brass DJ (1984) Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29:518–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass DJ, Glaskiewicz J, Greve HR, Tsai WP (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. 47:795–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buck R (1988) Human Motivation and Emotion, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Burkhardt ME, Brass DJ (1990) Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:104–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campos JJ, Stenberg C (1981) Perception, appraisal, and emotion: The onset of social referencing. Lamb ME, Sherrod LR, eds. Infant Social Cognition: Empirical and Theoretical Considerations (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 273–314.Google Scholar
  • Carver CS (2003) Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition Emotion 17:241–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casciaro T, Lobo MS (2008) When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53: 655–684.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chua RYJ, Morris MW, Ingram P (2009) Guanxi vs networking: Distinctive configurations of affect- and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs American managers. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 40: 490–508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark MS, Brissette I (2000) Relationship beliefs and emotion: Reciprocal effects. Frijda NH, Manstead ASR, Bem S, eds. Emotions and Belief: How Feelings Influence Thoughts (Cambridge University Press, New York), 212–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins R (1993) Emotional energy as the common denominator of rational action. Rationality Soc. 5:203–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins R (2004) Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dalton M (1959) Men Who Manage (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Diener E, Emmons RA (1984) The independence of positive and negative affect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 47:1105–1117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dion K, Walster E, Berscheid E (1972) What is beautiful is good. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 24:285–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Durkheim E (1933) The Division of Labor in Society (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1998) Attitude structure and function. Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1 (McGraw-Hill, New York), 269–322.Google Scholar
  • Eisenkraft N, Elfenbein HA (2010) The way you make me feel: Evidence for individual differences in affective presence. Psych. Sci. 21:60–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fichman M (1999) Variance explained: Why size does not (always) matter. Res. Organ. Behav. 21:295–331.Google Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P (2006) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends Cognitive Sci. 11:77–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foo MD, Uy MA, Baron RA (2009) How do feelings influence effort? An empirical study of entrepreneurs’ affect and venture effort. J. Appl. Psych. 94:1086–1094.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fredrickson BL (2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology—The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Amer. Psych. 56:218–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gaertner SL, Mann J, Murrell A, Dovidio JF (1989) Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57: 239–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (1995) Bayesian Data Analysis (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hammarling SJ (1982) Numerical solution of the stable, non-negative definite Lyapunov equation. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 2:303–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds PJ, Carley KM, Krackhardt D, Wholey D (2000) Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 81:226–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoff P (2005) Bilinear mixed-effects models for dyadic data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100:286–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg MA, Terry DJ (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. 25: 121–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homans GC (1950) The Human Group (Harcourt, Brace and World, New York).Google Scholar
  • Izard CE (1991) The Psychology of Emotions (Plenum Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kane AA (2010) Unlocking knowledge transfer potential: Knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity. Organ. Sci. 21: 643–660.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kenny DA (1994) Interpersonal Perception: A Social Relations Analysis (Guilford Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D (1999) The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 16:183–210.Google Scholar
  • Lawler EJ (2001) An affect theory of social exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. 107:321–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler EJ, Yoon J (1996) Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61:89–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazega E, Lemercier C, Mounier L (2006) A spinning top model of formal organization and informal behavior: Dynamics of advice networks among judges in a commercial court. Eur. Management Rev. 3:113–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leary MR (2000) Affect, cognition, and the social emotions. Forgas JP, ed. Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 331–256.Google Scholar
  • Lincoln JR (1982) Intra- (and inter-) organizational networks. Bacharach SB, ed. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 1 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 1–38.Google Scholar
  • Lindenberg S (1997) Grounding groups in theory: Functional, cognitive, and structural interdependencies. Advances Group Processes 14: 281–331.Google Scholar
  • Lott AJ, Lott BE (1964) Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psych. Bull. 64:259–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mackie DM, Devos T, Smith ER (2000) Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79:602–616.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayo E (1945) The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization (Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK (1957) The role-set: Problems in sociological theory. British J. Sociol. 8:106–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller N, Brewer MB (1984) Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Mishra H, Mishra A, Nayakankuppam D (2007) Seeing through the heart’s eye: The interference of System 1 in System 2. Management Sci. 26: 666–678.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy ST, Zajonc RB (1993) Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64:723–739.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nebus J (2006) Building collegial information networks: A theory of advice network generation. Acad. Management Rev. 31:615–637.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newcomb TM (1961) The Acquaintance Process (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osgood CE (1962) Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. Amer. Psych. 17:10–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parkinson B (1996) Emotions are social. British J. Psych. 87:663–683.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phelps EA (2004) The human amygdala and awareness: Interactions between emotion and cognition. Gazzaniga MS, ed. The Cognitive Neuroscience (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 1005–1016.Google Scholar
  • Rich BL, Lepine JA, Crawford ER (2010) Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Acad. Management J. 53:617–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson WJ (1939) Management and the Worker (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Russell JA (1980) A circumplex model of affect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39:1161–1178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segal MW (1974) Alphabet and attraction: An unobtrusive measure of the effect of propinquity in a field setting. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 30:654–657.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherif M (1966) In Common Predicament: Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Sherif M, Harvey OJ, White J, Hood W, Sherif C (1961) The Robbers Cave Experiment: Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation (Institute of Intergroup Relations, University of Oklahoma, Norman).Google Scholar
  • Shrader CB, Lincoln JR, Hoffman AN (1989) The networks structures of organizations—Effects of task contingencies and distributional form. Human Relations 42:43–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simmons JP, Nelson LD (2006) Intuitive confidence: Choosing between intuitive and nonintuitive alternatives. J. Experiment. Psych. 135: 409–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slater PE (1955) Role differentiation in small groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 20:300–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sloman SA (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psych. Bull. 119:3–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snijders T, Bosker R (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  • Söderström T (2002) Discrete-Time Stochastic Systems, 2nd ed. (Springer, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strack F, Deutsch R (2004) Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 8:220–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang G (1988) Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 3rd ed. (Thomson Learning, New York).Google Scholar
  • Thagard P (2006) Hot Thought: Mechanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Thibaut JW, Kelley HH (1959) The Social Psychology of Groups (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tichy N, Fombrun C (1979) Network analysis in organizational settings. Human Relations 32:923–965.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vytal K, Hamann S (2010) Neuroimaging support for discrete neural correlates of basic emotions: A voxel-based meta-analysis. J. Cognitive Neurosci. 22:2864–2885.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Warr P, Inceoglu I (2012) Job engagement, job satisfaction, and contrasting associations with person-job fit. J. Occupational Health Psych. 17:129–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson D, Tellegen A (1985) Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psych. Bull. 98:219–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wojciszke B (2005) Affective concomitants of information on morality and competence. Eur. Psych. 10:60–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zajonc RB (1980) Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. Amer. Psych. 35:151–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.