Structural Recombination and Innovation: Unlocking Intraorganizational Knowledge Synergy Through Structural Change

References

• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Conti R (1999) Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Acad. Management J. 42(6):630–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS (1995) Technology strategy, governance structure and interdivisional coordination. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 28(3):337–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS (1996) Capabilities, technological diversification and divisionalization. Strategic Management J. 17(5):395–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belsley DA (1991) Conditioning Diagnostics, Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Veloso FM (2008) ISO 9000 practices and financial performance: A technology coherence perspective. J. Oper. Management 26(5):611–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Waldfogel J (2008) Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity. Res. Policy 37(9):1556–1567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry H (2014) Global integration and innovation: Multi-country knowledge generation within MNCs. Strategic Management J. 35(6):869–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J, Lingblad M (2005) Intrafirm competition and charter evolution in the multibusiness firm. Organ. Sci. 16(6):674–686.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowman EH, Singh H, Useem M, Bhadury R (1999) When does restructuring improve economic performance? Calif. Management Rev. 41(2):33–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breschi S, Lissoni F, Malerba F (2003) Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Res. Policy 32(1):69–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Trajtenberg M (1995) General purpose technologies: “Engines of growth”? J. Econometrics 65(1):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organization learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. 12(2):198–213.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Obel B (1998) Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: Developing Theory for Application (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Dussauge P, Mitchell W (1998) Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988–1992. Strategic Management J. 19(7):631–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Mitchell W (1998) Bilateral resource redeployment and capabilities improvement following horizontal acquisitions. Indust. Corporate Change 7(3):453–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB, Hatfield DE (2000) Internal knowledge generation: The research laboratory and innovative productivity in the pharmaceutical industry. J. Engrg. Tech. Management 17(3–4):247–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB, Opler TC (1995) Corporate diversification and innovative efficiency: An empirical study. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2–3):365–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB, Sitkin SB, Long CP (2004) Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organ. Sci. 15(4):411–431.Link, Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB, Turner SF, Fern MJ, Burton RM (2011) Organizing for product development across technological environments: Performance trade-offs and priorities. Organ. Sci. 22(4):1000–1025.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR, Rebentisch ES (2003) Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. 49(9):1180–1195.Link, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Colombo MG, Garrone P, Veugelers R (2005) The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological-and market-relatedness. Res. Policy 34(2):195–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Child J (1972) Organization structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 6(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Danneels E (2007) The process of technological competence leveraging. Strategic Management J. 28(2):511–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Dess GG, Shaw JD (2001) Voluntary turnover, social capital and organizational performance. Acad. Management Rev. 26(3):446–456.Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D, Bowman EH (1995) The effects of organizational downsizing on product innovation. Calif. Management Rev. 37(4):28–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drukker DM (2003) Testing for serial-correlation in linear panel-data models. Stata J. 3(2):168–177.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Brown SL (1999) Patching: Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77(3):71–82.Google Scholar
• Fiegenbaum A, Thomas H (1988) Attitudes toward risk and the risk-return paradox: Prospect theory explanations. Acad. Management J. 31(1):85–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiol CM (1994) Consensus, diversity and learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. 5(3):403–420.Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher SR, White MA (2000) Downsizing in a learning organization: Are there hidden costs? Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):244–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Eisenhardt KM (1996) The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations. Organ. Sci. 7(3):255–282.Link, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Eisenhardt KM (2001) Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1229–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. 19(12):1193–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Nayyar PR (1994) Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer. Strategic Management J. 15(5):365–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Rappa MA (1996) A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organ. Sci. 5(3):344–362.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Lant TK, Milliken FJ (1994) Mapping learning processes in organizations. Stubbart C, Meindl JP, Porac JF, eds. Advances in Managerial Cognition and Organizational Information Processing, Vol. 5 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 43–83.Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996a) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. 7(4):375–387.Link, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996b) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. 46(6):685–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature 28(4):1661–1707.Google Scholar
• Guthrie JP, Datta DK (2008) Dumb and dumber: The impact of downsizing on firm performance as moderated by industry conditions. Organ. Sci. 19(1):108–123.Link, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational sub-units. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (2002) Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multinational companies. Organ. Sci. 13(3):232–248.Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT, Lovas B (2004) How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):801–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE (1994) Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Sci. 40(12):1720–1747.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoopes DG, Postrel S (1999) Shared knowledge, “glitches,” and product development performance. Strategic Management J. 20(9):837–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M (1995) Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment. Res. Policy 24(4):521–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent data. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen JJP, Van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2005) Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Acad. Management J. 48(6):999–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RA, Hoskisson RE, Margulies N (1990) Corporate restructuring: Implications for organization change and development. Woodman RW, Pasmore WA, eds. Research in Organizational Change and Development, Vol. 4 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 141–165.Google Scholar
• Karim S (2006) Modularity in organizational structure: The reconfiguration of internally developed and acquired business units. Strategic Management J. 27(9):799–823.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S (2009) Business unit reorganization and innovation in new product markets. Management Sci. 55(7):1237–1254.Link, Google Scholar
• Karim S (2012) Exploring structural embeddedness of product market activities and resources within business units. Strategic Organ. 10(4):333–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Mitchell W (2004) Innovating through acquisition and internal development. Long Range Planning 37(6):525–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaul A (2012) Technology and corporate scope: Firm and rival innovations as antecedents of corporate transactions. Strategic Management J. 33(4):347–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):22–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.Link, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2010) Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management J. 31(2):224–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(Special issue):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebeskind JP (1996) Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):93–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luscher LL, Lewis MW (2008) Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Acad. Management J. 51(2):221–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makri M, Hitt MA, Lane PJ (2010) Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 31(6):602–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. 33(11):1404–1418.Link, Google Scholar
• Markides CC, Williamson PJ (1994) Related diversification, core competencies and corporate performance. Strategic Management J. 15(S2):149–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKinley W, Scherer AG (2000) Some unanticipated consequences of organizational restructuring. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):735–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D (1982) Evolution and revolution: A quantum view of structural change in organizations. J. Management Stud. 19(2):31–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DJ, Fern MJ, Cardinal LB (2007) The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Acad. Management J. 50(2):308–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler D, Tushman ML (1997) Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1982) The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency. Quart. J. Econom. 97(3):453–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nerkar A (2003) Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Sci. 49(2):211–229.Link, Google Scholar
• Nerkar A, Paruchuri S (2005) Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Sci. 51(5):771–785.Link, Google Scholar
• Nesta L, Saviotti PP (2005) Coherence of the knowledge base and the firm’s innovative performance: Evidence from the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. J. Indust. Econom. 53(1):123–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nixon RD, Hitt MA, Lee H, Jeong E (2004) Market reactions to announcements of corporate downsizing actions and implementation strategies. Strategic Management J. 25(11):1121–1129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Orr J (1996) Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (IRL Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1987) From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 65(3):43–59.Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Srikanth K (2007) What they know vs. what they do: How acquirers leverage technology acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 28(8):805–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Singh H, Chaudhuri S (2009) Integrating acquired capabilities: When structural integration is (un)necessary. Organ. Sci. 20(2):313–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Singh H, Zollo M (2006) Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 49(2):263–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romanelli E, Tushman ML (1994) Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Acad. Management J. 37(5):1141–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith KG, Collins CJ, Clark KD (2005) Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Acad. Management J. 48(2):346–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song J, Almeida P, Wu G (2003) Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. 49(4):351–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Srivastava MK, Gnyawali DR (2011) When do relational resources matter? Leveraging portfolio technological resources for breakthrough innovation. Acad. Management J. 54(4):797–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Podolny JM (1996) Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sydow J, Schreyogg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):689–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Rumelt R, Dosi G, Winter SG (1994) Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 23(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organization in Action (McGraw-Hill, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Toh PK, Polidoro F (2013) A competition-based explanation of collaborative invention within the firm. Strategic Management J. 34(10):1186–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Reagans R, McEvily B (2011) Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1024–1039.Link, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of information. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):172–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W (2000) Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management J. 21(9):925–939.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. 44(5):996–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W (2002) Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organ. Sci. 13(2):179–190.Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML (1978) Technical communication in R&D laboratories: The impact of project work characteristics. Acad. Management J. 21(4):624–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Katz R (1980) External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Sci. 26(11):1071–1085.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW, de Boer M (1999) Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organ. Sci. 10(5):551–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL, Koenig R (1976) Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 41(2):322–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1994) “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. 40(4):429–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zander U, Kogut B (1995) Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. 6(1):76–92.Link, Google Scholar