Short on Time: Intertemporal Tensions in Business Sustainability

References

• Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. 20(4):696–717.Link, Google Scholar
• Bansal P (2005) Evolving sustainability: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management J. 26(3): 197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Acad. Management J. 43(4):717–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbier E (1987) The concept of sustainable economic development. Environment. Conservation 14(2):101–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu K, Palazzo G (2008) Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman M (1994) Judgement in Managerial Decision Making, 3rd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Blount S, Waller MJ, Leroy S (2005) Coping with temporal uncertainty: When rigid, ambitious deadlines don’t make sense. Starbuck WH, Marjoun M, eds. Organization at the Limit: Lessons from the Columbia Disaster (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 122–139.Google Scholar
• Bluedorn AC (2002) The Human Organization of Time (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Bluedorn AC, Denhardt RB (1988) Time and organizations. J. Management 14(2):299–320.Google Scholar
• Christmann P, Taylor G (2012) International business and the natural environment. Bansal P, Hoffman AJ, eds. Business and the Natural Environment (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 50–69.Google Scholar
• Clarke L (2008) Possibilistic thinking: A new conceptual tool for thinking about extreme events. Soc. Res. 75(3):669–690.Google Scholar
• Daly H (2005) Economics in a full world. Scientific American 293(3):100–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das TK (1987) Strategic planning and individual temporal orientation. Strategic Management J. 8(2):203–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Department of Natural Resources Canada (2012) Oil sands: A strategic resource for Canada, North America and the global market. Brochure, Government of Canada, Ottawa, ON. http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/energy/pdf/eneene/pubpub/pdf/OS-brochure-eng.pdf.Google Scholar
• Economist (2009) Is it worth it? (December 5) 6–8.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (New Society, Stony Creek, CT).Google Scholar
• Environment Canada (2011) Canada’s emission trends. Report En84-83/2011E, Government of Canada, Ottawa, ON. http://www.ec.gc.ca/Publications/E197D5E7-1AE3-4A06-B4FC-CB74EAAAA60F%5CCanadasEmissionsTrends.pdf.Google Scholar
• Espeland WN, Stevens ML (1998) Commensuration as a social process. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24:313–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espeland WN, Stevens ML (2008) A sociology of quantification. Eur. J. Sociol. 49(3):401–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferraro F, Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2005) Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):8–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George JM, Jones GR (2000) The role of time in theory and theory building. J. Management Stud. 26(4):657–684.Google Scholar
• Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. 47(2):200–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gladwin TN, Kennelly JJ, Krause T-S (1995) Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Acad. Management Rev. 20(4):874–907.Google Scholar
• Graves SB, Waddock SA (1994) Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Acad. Management J. 37(4):1034–1046.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graves SB, Waddock SA (2000) Beyond built to last … Stakeholder relations in “built to-last” companies. Bus. Soc. Rev. 105(4):393–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin JJ, Mahon JF (1997) The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty five years of incomparable research. Bus. Soc. 36(1):5–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn T, Pinkse J, Preuss L, Figge F (2014) Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. J. Bus. Ethics, ePub ahead of print January 9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5.Google Scholar
• Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart SL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Management Rev. 20(4):986–1014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart SL, Milstein MB (2003) Creating sustainable value. Acad. Management Executive 17(2):56–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes RH, Abernathy WJ (1980) Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Bus. Rev. 58(4):67–77.Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management J. 22(2):125–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman A, Bazerman M (2007) Changing practice on sustainability: Understanding and overcoming the organizational and psychological barriers. Sharma S, Starik M, Husted B, eds. Organizations and the Sustainability Mosaic: Crafting Long-Term Ecological and Societal Solutions (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 84–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homer-Dixon T, Garrison N (2009) Conclusion. Homer-Dixon T, Garrison N, eds. Carbon Shift: How the Twin Crises of Oil Depletion and Climate Change Will Define the Future (Random House Canada, Toronto), 202–214.Google Scholar
• Howard A (2010) Paradexity: The convergence of paradox and complexity. J. Management Development 29(3):210–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007. Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1991) The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(1): 193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keith D (2009) Dangerous abundance. Homer-Dixon T, Garrison N, eds. Carbon Shift: How the Twin Crises of Oil Depletion and Climate Change Will Define the Future (Random House Canada, Toronto), 27–57.Google Scholar
• Klassen RD, McLaughlin CP (1996) The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Sci. 42(8): 1199–1214.Link, Google Scholar
• Laverty KJ (1996) Economic “short-termism”: The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Acad. Management Rev. 21(3):825–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis MW (2000) Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):760–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Thaler RH (1989) Anomalies: Intertemporal choice. J. Econom. Perspect. 3(4):181–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lüscher LS, Lewis MW (2008) Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Acad. Management J. 51(2):221–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (1999) Research on organizations: Hopes for the past and lessons from the future. Nordiske Organisasjonsstudier 1:69–83.Google Scholar
• March JG (2008) Understanding organizational adaptation. March JG, ed. Explorations in Organizations (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 106–115.Google Scholar
• Marcus A (2009) Strategic Foresight: A New Look at Scenarios (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Marginson D, McAulay L (2008) Exploring the debate on short-termism: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Strategic Management J. 29(3):273–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):268–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J (1992) Beyond the Limits: Confronting Global Collapse-Envisioning a Sustainable Future (Chelsea Green, Post Mills, VT).Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman MA (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Mirvis PH (2000) Transformation at Shell: Commerce and citizenship. Bus. Soc. Rev. 105(1):63–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan G (1980) Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organizational theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(4):605–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA III, Tushman ML (2008) Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Brief AP, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 28 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 185–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organ. Stud. 24(3):403–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perlow LA, Okhuysen GA, Repenning NP (2002) The speed trap: Exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. Acad. Management J. 45(5):931–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinkse J, Kolk A (2009) International Business and Global Climate Change (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Kramer MR (2011) Creating shared value. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(1–2):62–77.Google Scholar
• Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. 20(4):685–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FSI, Lambin EF, Lenton TMet al. (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russo MV, Fouts PA (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Management J. 40(3):534–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Senge P, Smith B, Kruschwitz N, Laur J, Schley S (2008) The Necessary Revolution: How Individuals and Organizations Are Working Together to Create a Sustainable World (Doubleday, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrivastava P, Kennelly JJ (2013) Sustainability and place-based enterprise. Organ. Environment 26(1):83–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slawinski N, Bansal P (2012) A matter of time: The temporal perspectives of organizational responses to climate change. Organ. Stud. 33(11):1537–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):381–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16(5):522–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Benartzi S (2004) Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Political Econom. 112(1):S164–S187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA III (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif. Management Rev. 38(4):8–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whiteman G, Cooper WG (2000) Ecological embededness. Acad. Management J. 43(6):1265–1282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whiteman G, Walker B, Perego P (2013) Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. J. Management Stud. 50(2):307–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Yin RK (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zadek S (2004) The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(12):125–133.Google Scholar
• Zimbardo P, Boyd J (2008) The Time Paradox: The New Psychology of Time That Will Change Your Life (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar