An Altercentric Perspective on the Origins of Brokerage in Social Networks: How Perceived Empathy Moderates the Self-Monitoring Effect

References

• Ahuja G, Soda G, Zaheer A (2012) The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organ. Sci. 23(2):434–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Austin EJ, Farrelly D, Black C, Moore H (2007) Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side? Personality Individual Differences 43(1):179–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker WE (2000) Achieving Success Through Social Capital: Tapping the Hidden Resources in Your Personal and Business Networks, 1st ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Baldwin TT, Bedell MD, Johnson JL (1997) The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Acad. Management J. 40(6):1369–1397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett MY, DeSteno D (2006) Gratitude and prosocial behavior: Helping when it costs you. Psych. Sci. 17(4):319–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Smart L, Boden JM (1996) Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psych. Rev. 103(1):5–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden N (2014) Networking becomes a dirty word: MBA students need to view their contacts as people rather than things. Financial Times (London) (February 2), http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/ac56ebf8-4c91-11e3-923d-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3NQDS6ZDJ.Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Shah NP (2013) The downfall of extraverts and rise of neurotics: The dynamic process of status allocation in task groups. Acad. Management J. 56(2):387–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyatzis RE (1982) The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Boyatzis RE (2009) Competencies as a behavioral approach to emotional intelligence. J. Management Development 28(9):749–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ (1984) Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4):518–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer DD (2000) Forgetting in the recall-based elicitation of personal and social networks. Soc. Networks 22(1):29–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briggs SR, Cheek JM (1988) On the nature of self-monitoring: Problems with assessment, problems with validity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(4):663–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burger MJ, Buskens V (2009) Social context and network formation: An experimental study. Soc. Networks 31(1):63–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1980) Models of network structure. Annual Rev. Sociol. 6:79–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1982) Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action (Academic Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1997) The contingent value of social capital. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(2):339–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2012) Network-related personality and the agency question: Multi-role evidence from a virtual world. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(3):543–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2014) Reinforced structural holes. Working paper, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Burt RS, Ronchi D (2007) Teaching executives to see social capital: Results from a field experiment. Soc. Sci. Res. 36(3):1156–1183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS, Kilduff M, Tasselli S (2013) Social network analysis: Foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annual Rev. Psych. 64:527–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buskens V, van de Rijt A (2008) Dynamics of networks if everyone strives for structural holes. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(2):371–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne DE (1971) The Attraction Paradigm (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Caldwell DF, O’Reilly CA (1982) Boundary spanning and individual performance: The impact of self-monitoring. J. Appl. Psych. 67(1):124–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2011) Robust inference with multi-way clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(2):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Lobo MS (2008) When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):655–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Gino F, Kouchaki M (2014) The contaminating effects of building instrumental ties: How networking can make us feel dirty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(4):705–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Supplement):S95–S120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly BS, Ones DS (2010) An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psych. Bull. 136(6):1092–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook KS, Rice E (2006) Social exchange theory. Delamater J, ed. Handbook of Social Psychology (Springer, New York), 53–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Côté S, DeCelles KA, McCarthy JM, Van Kleef GA, Hideg I (2011) The Jekyll and Hyde of emotional intelligence. Psych. Sci. 22(8):1073–1080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csárdi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Systems:Article 1695.Google Scholar
• D’Agostino RB, Belanger A, D’Agostino RB Jr (1990) A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. Amer. Statistician 44(4):316–321.Google Scholar
• Davis MH (1980) A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog Selected Documents Psych. 10(4):85.Google Scholar
• Davis MH (1994) Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Davis MH, Kraus LA (1997) Personality and empathic accuracy. Ickes BW, ed. Empathic Accuracy (Guilford Press, New York), 144–168.Google Scholar
• Day DV, Schleicher DJ (2006) Self-monitoring at work: A motive-based perspective. J. Personality 74(3):685–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekker DJ, Krackhardt D, Franses PH (2002) Dynamic effects of trust and cognitive social structures on information transfer relationships. ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-33-MKT, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Dion K, Berscheid D, Walster E (1972) What is beautiful is good. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 24(3):285–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feiler DC, Kleinbaum AM (2015) Popularity, similarity, and the network extraversion bias. Psych. Sci. 26(5):593–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L, Schachter S, Back K (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing (Harper & Brothers, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher D (1981) Communication in Organizations (West Publishing Co., St. Paul, MN).Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ (2003) How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad. Management J. 46(5):539–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Ames DR (2006) What’s good for the goose may not be as good for the gander: The benefits of self-monitoring for men and women in task groups and dyadic conflicts. J. Appl. Psych. 91(2):272–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Chatman JA, Spataro SE (2001) Getting to know you: The influence of personality on impressions and performance of demographically different people in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):414–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Reagans RE, Amanatullah ET, Ames DR (2006) Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(6):1123–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedkin NE (1990) A Guttman scale for the strength of an interpersonal tie. Soc. Networks 12(3):239–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman HS, Miller-Herringer T (1991) Nonverbal display of emotion in public and in private: Self-monitoring, personality, and expressive cues. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 61(5):766–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Funder DC, Kolar DC, Blackman MC (1995) Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(4):656–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gangestad SW, Snyder M (2000) Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psych. Bull. 126(4):530–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gargiulo M, Benassi M (2000) Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. 11(2):183–196.Link, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Gore JS, Cross SE, Morris ML (2006) Let’s be friends: Relational self-construal and the development of intimacy. Personal Relationships 13(1):83–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouriéroux C, Monfort A, Trognon A (1984) Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: Theory. Econometrica 52(3):681–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg LS, Watson JC, Elliot R, Bohart AC (2001) Empathy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Res., Practice, Training 38(4):380–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogan R (1969) Development of an empathy scale. J. Consulting Clinical Psych. 33(3):307–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Roberts PW (2000) Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(2):387–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Zou X (2008) Business friendships. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:167–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO (2006) The economics of social networks. Blundell R, Newey WK, Persson T, eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John OP, Robins RW (1993) Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. J. Personality 61(4):521–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John OP, Cheek JM, Klohnen EC (1996) On the nature of self-monitoring: Construct explication with Q-sort ratings. J. Personality Soc. Psych 71(4):763–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellett JB, Humphrey RH, Sleeth RG (2002) Empathy and complex task performance: Two routes to leadership. Leadership Quart. 13(5):523–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL (2006) Dyadic Data Analysis (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2010) Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):317–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Day DV (1994) Do chameleons get ahead? The effects of self-monitoring on managerial careers. Acad. Management J. 37(4):1047–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Krackhardt D (2008) Interpersonal Networks in Organizations: Cognition, Personality, Dynamics, and Culture (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Chiaburu DS, Menges JI (2010) Strategic use of emotional intelligence in organizational settings: Exploring the dark side. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:129–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM (2012) Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):407–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE (2014) Inside the black box of the corporate staff: Social networks and the implementation of corporate strategy. Strategic Management J. 35(1):24–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum AM, Stuart TE, Tushman ML (2013) Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1316–1336.Link, Google Scholar
• Koman ES, Wolff SB (2008) Emotional intelligence competencies in the team and team leader. J. Management Development 27(1):55–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1987) Cognitive social structures. Soc. Networks 9(2):109–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lennox RD, Wolfe RN (1984) Revision of the self-monitoring scale. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 46(6):1349–1364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lun J, Kesebir S, Oishi S (2008) On feeling understood and feeling well: The role of interdependence. J. Res. Personality 42(6):1623–1628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margaret MH, Diana B (2008) Social and emotional competencies predicting success for male and female executives. J. Management Development 27(1):13–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marmaros D, Sacerdote B (2006) How do friendships form? Quart. J. Econom. 121(1):79–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Weiss A (2009) Observer ratings of personality. Robins RW, Fraley RC, Krueger RF, eds. Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology (Guilford Press, New York), 259–272.Google Scholar
• McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2001) The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):121–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehrabian A, Epstein N (1972) A measure of emotional empathy. J. Personality 40(4):525–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreno JL (1937) Sociometry in relation to other social sciences. Sociometry 1(1/2):206–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D, Borgatti SP, Davis JP (2014) Brokerage as a process: Decoupling third party action from social network structure. Borgatti SP, Brass DJ, Halgin DS, Labianca G, Mehra A, eds. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 40 (Emerald Group Publishing, Cambridge, MA), 135–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Offermann LR, Bailey JR, Vasilopoulos NL, Seal C, Sass M (2004) The relative contribution of emotional competence and cognitive ability to individual and team performance. Human Performance 17(2):219–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh H, Kilduff M (2008) The ripple effect of personality on social structure: Self-monitoring origins of network brokerage. J. Appl. Psych. 95(5):1155–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh I-S, Wang G, Mount MK (2011) Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 96(4):762–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oishi S, Kesebir S (2012) Optimal social-networking strategy is a function of socioeconomic conditions. Psych. Sci. 23(12):1542–1548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oishi S, Koo M, Akimoto S (2008) Culture, interpersonal perceptions, and happiness in social interactions. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(3):307–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oishi S, Krochik M, Akimoto S (2010) Felt understanding as a bridge between close relationships and subjective well-being: Antecedents and consequences across individuals and cultures. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 4(6):403–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oishi S, Schiller J, Gross EB (2013) Felt understanding and misunderstanding affect the perception of pain, slant, and distance. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 4(3):259–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parks MR, Floyd K (1996) Meanings for closeness and intimacy in friendship. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 13(1):85–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, version 3.0.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna).Google Scholar
• Regan DT (1971) Effects of a favor and liking on compliance. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 7(6):627–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reis HT, Clark MS, Holmes JG (2004) Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. Mashek DJ, Aron AP, eds. Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 201–225.Google Scholar
• Riemann R, Angleitner A, Strelau J (1997) Genetic and environmental influences on personality: A study of twins reared together using the self- and peer report NEO-FFI scales. J. Personality 65(3):449–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers CR (1980) A Way of Being (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Rubineau B, Polman E (2012) Taken or granted? Social capital, narcissism, and agency. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Sasovova Z, Mehra A, Borgatti SP, Schippers MC (2010) Network churn: The effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(4):639–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott BA, Barnes CM, Wagner DT (2012) Chameleonic or consistent? A multilevel investigation of emotional labor variability and self-monitoring. Acad. Management J. 55(4):905–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silva JMCS, Tenreyro S (2006) The log of gravity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):641–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmel G (1902 [1950]) The Sociology of Georg Simmel, translated and edited by Wolff KH (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Snyder M (1974) Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 30(4):526–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder M, Gangestad S (1986) On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(1):125–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sprecher S, Treger S, Wondra JD, Hilaire N, Wallpe K (2013) Taking turns: Reciprocal self-disclosure promotes liking in initial interactions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(5):860–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swann WB, Rentfrow PJ, Guinn JS (2003) Self-verification: The search for coherence. Leary M, Tangney J, eds. Handbook of Self and Identity (Guilford Press, New York), 367–383.Google Scholar
• Swann WB, Stein-Seroussi A, Giesler RB (1992) Why people self-verify. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 62(3):392–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toegel G, Anand N, Kilduff M (2007) Emotion helpers: The role of high positive affectivity and high self-monitoring managers. Personnel Psych. 60(2):337–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W, Su K-H, Chen M-J (2011) Seeing through the eyes of a rival: Competitor acumen based on rival-centric perceptions. Acad. Management J. 54(4):761–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vissa B (2012) Agency in action: Entrepreneurs’ networking style and initiation of economic exchange. Organ. Sci. 23(2):492–510.Link, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ (1999) Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(2):493–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolff SB (2005) Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI): Technical manual. Report, Hay Group, Philadelphia. http://bit.ly/ECI_Tech_Man.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (1997) Quasi-likelihood methods for count data. Pesaran MH, Schmidt P, eds. Handbook of Applied Econometrics: Microeconomics, Vol. 2 (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 352–406.Google Scholar