Pay Harmony? Social Comparison and Performance Compensation in Multibusiness Firms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1109

References

  • Adams JS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 2(January):267–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G, Lampert CM, Tandon V (2013) Paradigm-changing vs. paradigm-deepening innovation: How firm scope influences firm technological response to shocks. Organ. Sci. 25(3):653–669.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argo JJ, White K, Dahl DW (2006) Social comparison theory and deception in the interpersonal exchange of consumption information. J. Consumer Res. 33(1):99–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N, Zenger T (2012) Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1643–1657.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N, Felin T, Foss N, Zenger Z (2012) Organizational economics of capability and heterogeneity. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1213–1226.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong JS, Collopy F (1996) Competitor orientation: Effects of objectives and information on managerial decisions and profitability. J. Marketing Res. 33(2):188–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron JN, Kreps DM (1999) Strategic Human Resources: Frameworks for General Managers (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bewley TF (1999) Why Wages Don’t Fall During a Recession (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bidwell M (2010) Problems deciding: How the structure of make-or-buy decisions leads to transaction misalignment. Organ. Sci. 21(2):362–379.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bidwell M (2012) Politics and firm boundaries: How organizational structure, group interests, and resources affect outsourcing. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1622–1642.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom M, Michel JG (2002) The relationships among organizational context, pay dispersion, and among managerial turnover. Acad. Management J. 45(1):33–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bower JL, Gilbert CG (2007) How managers’ everyday decisions create—or destroy—your company’s strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 85(2):72–79.Google Scholar
  • Buunk AP, Gibbons FX (2007) Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(1):3–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Card D, Mas A, Moretti E, Saez E (2012) Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2981–3003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter MA, Sanders WM (2002) Top management team compensation: The missing link between CEO pay and firm performance? Strategic Management J. 23(4):367–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen CX, Sandino T (2012) Can wages buy honesty? The relationship between relative wages and employee theft. J. Accounting Res. 50(4):967–1000.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohn A, Fehr E, Herrmann B, Schneider F (2014) Social comparison and effort provision: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(4):877–898.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins RL (1996) For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psych. Bull. 119(1):51–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cowherd DM, Levine DI (1992) Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(2):302–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crosby F (1976) A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psych. Rev. 83(2):85–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cruces G, Perez-Truglia R, Tetaz M (2013) Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. J. Public Econom. 98(February):100–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cuñat V, Guadalupe M (2009) Globalization and the provision of incentives inside the firm: The effect of foreign competition. J. Labor Econom. 27(2):179–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis GF, Cobb JA (2010) Corporations and economic inequality around the world: The paradox of hierarchy. Res. Organ. Behav. 30(May):35–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman B, Larkin I (2014) Social comparisons and deception across workplace hierarchies: Field and experimental evidence. Organ. Sci. 26(1):78–98.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman NS, Ruble DN (1981) Social comparison strategies dimensions offered and options taken. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 7(1):11–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frydman C, Jenter D (2010) CEO compensation. Ann. Rev. Financial Econom. 2(December):75–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gächter S, Thöni C (2010) Social comparison and performance: Experimental evidence on the fair wage-effort hypothesis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 76(3):531–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garcia SM, Tor A, Gonzalez R (2006) Ranks and rivals: A theory of competition. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(7):970–982.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gartenberg C (2014) Do parents matter? Effects of lender affiliation through the mortgage boom and bust. Management Sci. 60(11):2776–2793.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gartenberg C, Pierce L (2017) Subprime governance: Agency costs in vertically integrated banks and the 2008 mortgage crisis. Strategic Management J. 38(2):300–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giang V (2012) This CEO took action when employees started comparing salaries. Business Insider (November 5), http://www.businessinsider.com/what-to-do-when-employees-start-comparing-salaries-2012-11.Google Scholar
  • Gino F, Pierce L (2009) The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 109(2):142–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Pierce L (2010) Lying to level the playing field: Why people may dishonestly help or hurt others to create equity. J. Bus. Ethics 95(1):89–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman PS (1977) Social comparison processes in organizations. Staw BM, Salancik GR, eds. New Directions in Organizational Behavior (St. Clair, Chicago), 97–129.Google Scholar
  • Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111(3):465–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C, Campo-Rembado MA (2015) Integrative capabilities, vertical integration, and innovation over successive technology lifecycles. Working paper, Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
  • Hinds PJ, Bailey DE (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. 14(6):615–632.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hong H, Kubik JD, Stein J (2005) Thy neighbor’s portfolio: Word-of-mouth effects in the holdings and trades of money managers. J. Finance 60(6):2801–2824.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hyman HH (1942) The psychology of status. Arch. Psych. (Columbia University) 269:94.Google Scholar
  • Jacquemin AP, Berry CH (1979) Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. J. Indust. Econom. 27(4):359–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • John LK, Loewenstein G, Rick SI (2014) Cheating more for less: Upward social comparisons motivate the poorly compensated to cheat. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 123(2):101–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson C (2012) Behavioral responses to threatening social comparisons: From dastardly deeds to rising above. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 6(7):515–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kacperczyk A, Balachandran C (2017) Vertical and horizontal comparisons and mobility outcomes: Evidence from the Swedish microdata. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Karadja M, Mollerstrom J, Seim D (2016) Richer (and holier) than thou? The effect of relative income improvements on demand for redistribution. Rev. Econom. Statist., ePub ahead of print June 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00623.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraut RE, Fussell SR, Brennan SE, Siegel J (2002) Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. Hinds P, Keisler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA),137–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kulik CT, Ambrose ML (1992) Personal and situational determinants of referent choice. Acad. Management Rev. 17(4):212–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuziemko I, Norton MI, Saez E, Stantcheva S (2015) How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(4):1478–1508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lamertz K (2002) The social construction of fairness: Social influence and sense making in organizations. J. Organ. Behav. 23(1):19–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larkin I, Pierce L, Gino F (2012) The psychological costs of pay-for-performance: Implications for the strategic compensation of employees. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1194–1214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler EE (1965) Managers’ perceptions of their subordinates’ pay and of their superiors’ pay. Personnel Psych. 18(4):413–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence BS (2006) Organizational reference groups: A missing perspective on social context. Organ. Sci. 17(1):80–100.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lemieux T, MacLeod WB, Parent D (2009) Performance pay and wage inequality. Quart. J. Econom. 124(1):1–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Major B, Forcey B (1985) Social comparisons and pay evaluations: Preferences for same-sex and same-job wage comparisons. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 21(4):393–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manski C (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas A (2017) Does transparency lead to pay compression? J. Political Econom. Forthcoming.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monge PR, Contractor NS (2003) Theories of Communication Networks (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moran S, Schweitzer ME (2008) When better is worse: Envy and the use of deception. Negotiation Conflict Management Res. 1(1):3–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy KJ (1999) Executive compensation. Ashenfelter O, Layard PRG, Card DE, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics (North Holland, Amsterdam), 2485–2563.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy KJ (2012) The politics of pay: A legislative history of executive compensation. Hill J, Thomas R, eds. Research Handbook on Executive Pay (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 11–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2008) Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 29(13):1429–1449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obloj T, Zenger T (2017) Organization design, proximity, and productivity responses to upward social comparison. Organ. Sci. 28(1):1–18 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O’Reilly CA III, Main BG, Crystal GS (1988) CEO compensation as tournament and social comparison: A tale of two theories. Admin. Sci. Quart. 33(2):257–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palepu K (1985) Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management J. 6(3):239–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce L (2012) Organizational structure and the limits of knowledge sharing: Incentive conflict and agency in car leasing. Management Sci. 58(6):1106–1121.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Langton N (1993) The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):382–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poortvliet PM (2013) Harming others’ task-related efforts: The distinct competitive effects of ranking information on performance and mastery goal individuals. Soc. Psych. 44(6):373–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poppo L, Zenger T (1998) Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. 19(9):853–877.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rawley E (2010) Diversification, coordination costs, and organizational rigidity: Evidence from microdata. Strategic Management J. 31(8):873–891.Google Scholar
  • Rawley E, Simcoe TS (2010) Diversification, diseconomies of scope, and vertical contracting: Evidence from the taxicab industry. Management Sci. 56(9):1534–1550.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rebitzer JB, Taylor LJ (2011) Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motives: Standard and behavioral approaches to agency and labor markets. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 701–772.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seru A (2014) Firm boundaries matter: Evidence from conglomerates and R&D activity. J. Financial Econom. 111(2):381–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherif M (1936) The Psychology of Social Norms (Harper, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Shue K (2013) Executive networks and firm policies: Evidence from the random assignment of MBA peers. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(6):1401–1442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siegel PA, Hambrick DC (2005) Pay disparities within top management groups: Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms. Organ. Sci. 16(3):259–274.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Suls JM, Miller RL (1977) Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives (Hemisphere, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Suls J, Martin R, Wheeler L (2002) Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions Psych. Sci. 11(5):159–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor SE, Lobel M (1989) Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psych. Rev. 96(4):569–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thibaut JW, Walker L (1975) Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Timm J (2014) When the boss says, “don’t tell your coworkers how much you get paid.” Atlantic Monthly (July 15), http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/07/when-the-boss-says-dont-tell-your-coworkers-how-much-you-get-paid/374467/.Google Scholar
  • Tzabbar D, Vestal A (2015) Bridging the social chasm in geographically distributed R&D teams: The moderating effects of relational strength and status asymmetry on the novelty of team innovation. Organ. Sci. 26(3):811–829 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wade JB III, O’Reilly CA, Pollock TG (2006) Overpaid CEOs and underpaid managers: Fairness and executive compensation. Organ. Sci. 17(5):527–544.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wheeler L (1966) Motivation as a determinant of upward comparison. J. Experimental Soc. Psych. 1(September):27–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood JV (1996) What is social comparison and how should we study it? Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 22(5):520–537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zenger TR (1992) Why do employers only reward extreme performance? Examining the relationships among performance, pay, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(2):198–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou YM (2011) Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices. Strategic Management J. 32(6):624–639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.