Growing Apart: The Changing Firm-Size Wage Premium and Its Inequality Consequences

References

• Abowd JM, Kramarz F (1999) The analysis of labor markets using matched employer-employee data. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 2629–2710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armour P, Burkhauser RV, Larrimore J (2016) Using the pareto distribution to improve estimates of topcoded earnings. Econom. Inquiry 54(2):1263–1273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH, Manning A, Smith CL (2016) The contribution of the minimum wage to US wage inequality over three decades: A reassessment. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 8(1):58–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avent-Holt D, Tomaskovic-Devey D (2014) A relational theory of earnings inequality. Amer. Behavioral Scientist 58(3):379–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2007) Incentives for managers and inequality among workers: Evidence from a firm-level experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 122(2):729–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (2010) Building an institutional field to corral a government: A case to set an agenda for organization studies. Organ. Stud. 31(6):777–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN (1984) Organizational Perspectives on Stratification. Annual Rev. Sociol. 10(1):37–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Bielby WT (1980) Bringing the firms back in: Stratification, segmentation, and the organization of work. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 45(5):737–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Bielby WT (1984) The organization of work in a segmented economy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(4):454–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batt R, Colvin AJS, Keefe J (2002) Employee voice, human resource practices, and quit rates: Evidence from the telecommunications industry. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 55(4):573–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1964) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York).Google Scholar
• Bidwell MJ (2011) Paying more to get less: The effects of external hiring versus internal mobility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(3):369–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell MJ (2013) What happened to long-term employment? The role of worker power and environmental turbulence in explaining declines in worker tenure. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1061–1082.Link, Google Scholar
• Blau PM, Schoenherr RA (1971) The Structure of Organizations (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Brown C, Medoff J (1989) The employer size wage effect. J. Political Econom. 97(5):1027–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown C, Hamilton J, Medoff J (1990) Employers Large and Small (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Budig MJ, Hodges MJ (2010) Differences in disadvantage: Variation in the motherhood penalty across white women’s earnings distribution. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(5):705–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budig MJ, Hodges MJ (2014) Statistical models and empirical evidence for differences in the motherhood penalty across the earnings distribution. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):358–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli PH (1999) The New Deal at Work: Managing the Market-Driven Workforce (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Cappelli PH (2001) Assessing the decline of internal labor markets. Berg I, Kalleberg AL, eds. Sourcebook of Labor Markets: Evolving Structures and Processes (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York), 207–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli PH, Chauvin KW (1991) An interplant test of the efficiency wage hypothesis. Quart. J. Econom. 106(3):769–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli PH, Keller JR (2013) A study of the extent and potential causes of alternative employment arrangements. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 66(4):874–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cobb JA (2015) Risky business: Firms’ shifting of retirement risk and the decline of defined benefit pension plans. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1332–1350.Link, Google Scholar
• Cobb JA (2016) How firms shape income inequality: Stakeholder power, executive decision-making, and the structuring of employment relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 41(2):324–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cobb JA, Stevens FG (2017) These unequal states: Corporate organization and income inequality in the United States. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(2):304–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis-Blake A, Broschak JP (2009) Outsourcing and the changing nature of work. Annual Rev. Sociol. 35(August):321–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF (2009) Managed by the Markets: How Finance Re-Shaped America (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Davis GF (2016) The Vanishing American Corporation: Navigating the Hazards of a New Economy (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
• Davis GF, Cobb JA (2010) Corporations and economic inequality around the world: The paradox of hierarchy. Res. Organ. Behav. 30(December):35–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dencker JC, Fang C (2016) Rent seeking and the transformation of employment relationships: The effect of corporate restructuring on wage patterns, determinants, and inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(3):467–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiPrete TA, Goux D, Maurin E (2002) Internal labor markets and earnings trajectories in the post-Fordist economy: An analysis of recent trends. Soc. Sci. Res. 31(2):175–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin FR, Sutton JR, Meyer JW, Scott WR (1993) Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(2):396–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doeringer P, Piore MJ (1971) Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis (D.C. Heath and Company, Lexington, MA).Google Scholar
• Dube A (2017) Minimum wages and the distribution of family incomes. IZA Discussion Paper No. 10572, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Dube A, Kaplan E (2010) Does outsourcing reduce wages in the low-wage service occupations? Evidence from janitors and guards. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 63(2):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dulebohn JH, Werling SE (2007) Compensation research past, present, and future. Human Resource Management Rev. 17(2):191–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Even WE, Macpherson DA (2012) Is bigger still better? The decline of the wage premium at large firms. Southern Econom. J. 78(4):1181–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Firpo S, Fortin NM, Lemieux T (2009) Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica 77(3):953–973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fortin NM, Lemieux T, Firpo S (2011) Decomposition methods in economics. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4 (Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam), 1–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garen JE (1985) Worker heterogeneity, job screening, and firm size. J. Political Econom. 93(4):715–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Wulf J (2017) Pay harmony? Social comparison and performance compensation in multibusiness firms. Organ. Sci. 28(1):39–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1981) Toward a sociological theory of income differences. Berg I, ed. Sociological Perspectives on Labor Markets (Academic Press, New York), 11–47.Google Scholar
• Hao L, Naiman DQ (2007) Quantile Regression (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heneman RL, Werner JM (2005) Merit Pay: Linking Pay to Performance in a Changing World, 2nd ed. (Information Age Publishing Inc., Greenwich, CT).Google Scholar
• Hertz R (2010) Economic crisis and new social realities: Bait and switch and the American dream—Presidential Address 2010. Sociol. Forum 25(4):643–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinings CR, Greenwood R (2002) Disconnects and consequences in organization theory? Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):411–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodson R, Kaufman RL (1982) Economic dualism: A critical review. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 47(6):727–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollister MN (2004) Does firm size matter anymore? The new economy and firm size wage effects. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(5):659–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Idson TL, Oi WY (1999) Workers are more productive in large firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(2):104–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs JA, Gerson K (2005) The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Jacoby SM (1985) Employing Bureaucracy: Managers, Unions, and the Transformation of Work in American Industry, 1900–1945 (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Jacoby SM (2005) The Embedded Corporation: Corporate Governance and Employment Relations in Japan and the United States (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kalleberg AL (2011) Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Kalleberg AL, Sørensen AB (1979) Sociology of labor-markets. Annual Rev. Sociol. 5(1):351–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalleberg AL, Van Buren ME (1996) Is bigger better? Explaining the relationship between organization size and job rewards. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(1):47–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim C, Tamborini CR (2014) Response error in earnings: An analysis of the survey of income and program participation matched with administrative data. Sociol. Methods Res. 43(1):39–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimberly JR (1976) Organizational size and structuralist perspective: review, critique and proposal. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(4):571–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knoke D, Kalleberg AL (1994) Job-training in U.S. organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 59(4):537–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kochan TA, Riordan CA (2016) Employment relations and growing income inequality: Causes and potential options for its reversal. J. Indust. Relations 58(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunda G, Barley SR, Evans J (2002) Why do contractors contract? The experience of highly skilled technical professionals in a contingent labor market. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 55(2):234–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemieux T (2008) The changing nature of wage inequality. J. Population Econom. 21(1):21–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemieux T, MacLeod WB, Parent D (2009) Performance pay and wage inequality. Quart. J. Econom. 124(1):1–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lepak DP, Snell SA (1999) The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Acad. Management J. 24(1):31–48.Google Scholar
• Levy F, Temin P (2011) Inequality and institutions in 20th century America. Rhode P, Rosenbloom J, Weiman D, eds. Economic Evolution and Revolution in Historical Times (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA), 357–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin K-H (2015) The financial premium in the US labor market: A distributional analysis. Soc. Forces 94(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin K-H (2016) The rise of finance and firm employment dynamics. Organ. Sci. 27(4):972–988.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin K-H, Tomaskovic-Devey D (2013) Financialization and US income inequality, 1970–2008. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(5):1284–1329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCain M (2009) Serving students: A survey of contracted food service work in New Jersey’s K-12 public schools. Technical report, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
• McCall L (2001) Sources of racial wage inequality in metropolitan labor markets: Racial, ethnic, and gender differences. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(4):520–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris M, Western B (1999) Inequality in earnings at the close of the twentieth century. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25(1):623–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mouw T, Kalleberg AL (2010) Occupations and the structure of wage inequality in the United States, 1980s to 2000s. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(3):402–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2008) Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 29(13):1429–1449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Zenger TR (2017) Organization design, proximity, and productivity responses to upward social comparison. Organ. Sci. 28(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Oi WY, Idson TL (1999) Firm size and wages. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3 (Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam), 2165–2214.Google Scholar
• Osterman PS (1996) Broken Ladders: Managerial Careers in the New Economy (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Osterman PS (1999) Securing Prosperity: The American Labor Market: How It Has Changed and What to Do About It (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Parsons T (1956) Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 1(1):63–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paternoster R, Brame R, Mazerolle P, Piquero A (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36(4):859–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (2010) Building sustainable organizations: The human factor. Acad. Management Perspect. 24(1):34–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Davis-Blake A (1992) Salary dispersion, location in the salary distribution, and turnover among college administrators. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 45(4):753–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piketty T (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piore MJ (2002) Thirty years later: Internal labor markets, flexibility and the new economy. J. Management Governance 6(4):271–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raff DMG, Summers LH (1987) Did Henry Ford pay efficiency wages? J. Labor Econom. 5(4):S57–S86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rawley E, Simcoe TS (2010) Diversification, diseconomies of scope, and vertical contracting: Evidence from the taxicab industry. Management Sci. 56(9):1534–1550.Link, Google Scholar
• Shin T (2009) Earnings inequality within organizations. Soc. Sci. Res. 38(1):225–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song J, Price DJ, Guvenen F, Bloom N (2015) Firming up inequality. Working Paper 21199, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB, Sorenson O (2007) Corporate demography and income inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(5):766–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stolzenberg RM (1978) Bringing boss back in: Employer size, employee schooling, and socioeconomic achievement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 43(6):813–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Troske KR (1999) Evidence on the employer size-wage premium from worker-establishment matched data. Rev. Econom. Statist. 81(1):15–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villemez WJ, Bridges WP (1988) When bigger is better: Differences in the individual-level effect of firm and establishment size. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 53(2):237–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JP, Weber K, Margolis JD (2003) Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. J. Management 29(6):859–881.Google Scholar
• Western B, Rosenfeld J (2011) Unions, norms, and the rise in U.S. wage inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(4):513–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yellen JL (1984) Efficiency wage models of unemployment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(2):200–205.Google Scholar
• Zenger TR (1994) Explaining organizational diseconomies of scale in R&D: Agency problems and the allocation of engineering talent, ideas, and effort by firm size. Management Sci. 40(6):708–729.Link, Google Scholar