A Self-Fulfilling Cycle of Coercive Surveillance: Workers’ Invisibility Practices and Managerial Justification

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1175

References

  • Allen MW, Coopman SJ, Hart JL, Walker KL (2007) Workplace surveillance and managing privacy boundaries. Management Comm. Quart. 21(2):172–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvesson M, Willmott H (1992) On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Acad. Management Rev. 17(3):432–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariel B, Farrar WA, Sutherland A (2015) The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomized controlled trial. J. Quant. Criminology 31(3):509–535.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariel B, Sutherland A, Henstock D, Young J, Drover P, Sykes J, Megicks S, Henderson R (2016) Report: Increases in police use of force in the presence of body-worn cameras are driven by officer discretion: A protocol-based subgroup analysis of ten randomized experiments. J. Experiment. Criminology 12(3):453–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Attewell P (1987) Big brother and the sweatshop: Computer surveillance in the automated office. Sociol. Theory 5(1):87–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ball K (2010) Workplace surveillance: An overview. Labor History 51(1):87–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ball KD, Haggerty KD, Lyon D, eds. (2012) Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies (Routledge, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batt R, Holman D, Holtgrewe U (2009) The globalization of service work: Comparative institutional perspectives on call centers. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 62(4):453–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belgrave LL, Charmaz K (2007) Self. Ritzer G, ed. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA),4165–4168.Google Scholar
  • Bernstein ES (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):181–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein ES (2017) Making transparency transparent: The evolution of observation in management theory. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):217–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bierle PS (2013) Improving TSA’s public image: Customer-focused initiatives to encourage public trust and confidence. Report, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.Google Scholar
  • Braverman H (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century (Monthly Review Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brighenti A (2007) Visibility a category for the social sciences. Current Sociol. 55(3):323–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown K, Korczynski M (2010) When caring and surveillance technology meet: Organizational commitment and discretionary effort in home care work. Work Occupations 37(3):404–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown TM (2011) Raising Brooklyn: Nannies, Childcare, and Caribbeans Creating Community (New York University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Burawoy M (1979) Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Chan CK, Anteby M (2016) Task segregation as a mechanism for within-job inequality: Women and men of the transportation security administration. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(2):184–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charmaz K (1983) The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation contemporary field research. Emerson RM, ed. Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings (Little, Brown, Boston), 109–126.Google Scholar
  • Cooley CH (1902) Human Nature and the Social Order (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Courpasson D, Dany F, Clegg S (2012) Resisters at work: Generating productive resistance in the workplace. Organ. Sci. 23(3):801–819.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ditton J (1979) Baking time. Sociol. Rev. 27(1):157–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards RC (1979) Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Enzle ME, Sharon SC, Anderson C (1993) Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(2):257–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming P, Spicer A (2003) Working at a cynical distance: Implications for power, subjectivity and resistance. Organization 10(1):157–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming P, Sturdy A (2009) “Just be yourself!” Towards neo-normative control in organisations? Employee Relations 31(6):569–583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fosher KB (2009) Under Construction: Making Homeland Security at the Local Level (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Foucault M (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Vintage Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Frederickson HG, LaPorte TR (2002) Airport security, high reliability, and the problem of rationality. Public Admin. Rev. 62(September):33–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Funk M (2016) Should we see everything a cop sees? New York Times Magazine (October 23), 31–35, 48–49, 51.Google Scholar
  • Garland D (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gecas V (1982) The self-concept. Annual Rev. Sociol. 8:1–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilliom J, Monahan T (2012) SuperVision: An Introduction to the Surveillance Society (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser B, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Aldine, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
  • Goffman E (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Goffman A (2009) On the run: Wanted men in a Philadelphia ghetto. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(3):339–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman A (2015) On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City (Picador, New York).Google Scholar
  • Grant R, Higgins C (1989) Monitoring service workers via computer: The effect on employees, productivity, and service. National Productivity Rev. 8(2):101–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haggerty KD, Ericson RV, eds. (2006) The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).Google Scholar
  • Harris DA (2010) Picture this: Body worn video devices (“head cams”) as tools for ensuring fourth amendment compliance by police. Texas Tech Law Rev. 43:357–371.Google Scholar
  • Hatch J (2004) Employment in the public sector: Two recessions’ impact on jobs. Monthly Labor Rev. 127(October):38–47.Google Scholar
  • Hodson R (1995) Worker resistance: An underdeveloped concept in the sociology of work. Econom. Indust. Democracy 16(1):79–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hodson R (2001) Dignity at Work (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jermier JM, Knights DE, Nord WR (1994) Resistance and Power in Organizations (Taylor & Francis/Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  • Korczynski M (2014) Songs of the Factory: Pop Music, Culture, and Resistance (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  • Kosatka A (2011) Recommended security guidelines for airport planning, design and construction. J. Airport Management 6(1):32–39.Google Scholar
  • Krier D, Staples WG (1993) Seen but unseen: Part-time faculty and institutional surveillance and control. Amer. Sociologist 24(3/4):119–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kroener I, Neyland D (2012) New technologies, security and surveillance. Ball K, Haggerty KD, Lyon D, eds. Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies (Routledge, New York), 141–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kupchik A (2010) Homeroom Security: School Discipline in an Age of Fear (New York University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LaNuez D, Jermier JM (1994) Sabotage by managers and technocrats: Neglected patterns of resistance at work. Jermier JM, Knights D, Nord WR, eds. Resistance and Power in Organizations (Taylor & Francis/Routledge, London), 219–251.Google Scholar
  • Lepper MR, Greene D, Carskaddon G, Gronner P (1975) Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children’s intrinsic motivation. Personality Soc. Psych. 31(3):479–486.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy KEC (2015) The contexts of control: Information, power, and truck driving work. Inform. Soc. 31(2):160–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke K (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  • Lofland J, Snow A, Anderson L, Lofland LH (2006) Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observations and Analysis (Thompson/Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  • Loftus B, Goold B (2012) Covert surveillance and the invisibilities of policing. Criminology Criminal Justice 12(3):275–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyon D (1994) The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance in Modern Society (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
  • Lyon D (2001) Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life (Open University Press, Buckingham, UK).Google Scholar
  • Lyon D (2007) Surveillance Studies: An Overview (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Mars G (1982) Cheats at Work: An Anthropology of Workplace Crime (Allen & Unwin, London).Google Scholar
  • Marteache Solans N (2013) Employee theft from passengers at U.S. airports: An environmental criminology perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University Graduate School, Newark, NJ.Google Scholar
  • Marx GT (1988) Undercover: Police Surveillance in America (University of California Press, Berkley).Google Scholar
  • Marx GT (1999) Measuring everything that moves: The new surveillance at work. Res. Sociol. Work 8:165–189.Google Scholar
  • Marx GT (2016) Windows into the Soul: Surveillance and Society in an Age of High Technology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mead GH (1934) Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Menzies IEP (1960) A case-study in the functioning of social systems as a defense against anxiety: A report on the study of a nursing service of a general hospital. Human Relations 13(2):95–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Meyerson DE, Scully MA (1995) Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organ. Sci. 6(5):585–600.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Molotoch H, McClain N (2003) Dealing with urban terror: Heritages of control, varieties of intervention, strategies of research. Internat. J. Urban Regional Res. 27(3):679–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monahan T, Torre RD, eds. (2010) Schools Under Surveillance: Cultures of Control in Public Education (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Morrill C, Zald M, Rao H (2003) Covert political conflict in organizations: The view from below. Annual Rev. Sociol. 29:391–415.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagle R (2013) Picking Up: On the Streets and Behind the Trucks with the Sanitation Workers of New York City (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Oeur F (2016) Recognizing dignity: Young black men growing up in an era of surveillance. Socius: Sociol. Res. Dynamic World 2:1–15.Google Scholar
  • Patel R (2010) Working the Night Shift: Women in India’s Call Center Industry (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Paules GF (1991) Dishing It Out: Power and Resistance Among Waitresses in a New Jersey Restaurant (Temple University Press,Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Perrow C (1986) Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pierce L, Snow DC, McAfee A (2015) Cleaning house: The impact of information technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Sci. 61(10):2299–2319.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pinnock S (2007) Campaign to organize federal transportation security officers: A model of open source unionism. J. Labor Soc. 10(3):301–310.Google Scholar
  • Prasad P, Prasad A (2000) Stretching the iron cage: The constitution and implications of routine workplace resistance. Organ. Sci. 11(4):387–403.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pütz O (2012) From non-places to non-events: The airport security checkpoint. J. Contemporary Ethnography 41(2):154–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts KH (1990) Characteristics of one type of high reliability organization. Organ. Sci. 1(2):160–176.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roscigno VJ, Hodson R (2004a) The organizational and social foundations of worker resistance. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(1):14–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roscigno VJ, Hodson R (2004b) Workplace Ethnography Project. Accessed January 30, 2018, https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/3979.Google Scholar
  • Roy D (1959) “Banana time”: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organ. 18(4):158–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russell B (2009) Smiling Down the Line: Info-service Work in the Global Economy (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sallaz J (2009) The Labor of Luck: Casino Capitalism in the United States and South Africa (University of California Press, Berkeley).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott JC (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Sewell G (1998) The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):397–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sewell G, Barker JR (2006) Coercion versus care: Using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):934–961.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sewell G, Barker JR, Nyberg D (2012) Working under intensive surveillance: When does “measuring everything that moves” become intolerable? Human Relations 65(2):189–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder BH (2016) The Disrupted Workplace: Time and the Moral Order of Flexible Capitalism (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stanko TL, Beckman CM (2015) Watching you watching me: Boundary control and capturing attention in the context of ubiquitous technology use. Acad. Management J. 58(3):712–738.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stanton JM (2000) Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review, and research directions. Human Performance 13(1):85–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staples WG (1997) The Culture of Surveillance: Discipline and Social Control in the United States (St. Martin’s Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Staples WG (2000) Everyday Surveillance: Vigilance and Visibility in Postmodern Life (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
  • Taylor F (1911) The Principles of Scientific Management (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
  • Transportation Security Administration (2006) Recommended security guidelines for airport planning, design and construction. Report, Transportation Security Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Transportation Security Administration (2011) Recommended security guidelines for airport planning, design and construction. Report, Transportation Security Administration, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2010) Fiscal year 2011 congressional budget justification. Report, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2011) Fiscal year 2012 budget-in-brief. Report, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2013) Fiscal year 2014 budget-in-brief. Report, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Government Accountability Office (2012) Air passenger screening: Transportation Security Administration could improve complaint processes. Report GAO-13-43, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Government Accountability Office (2013) Transportation Security Administration could strengthen monitoring of allegations of employee misconduct. Report GAO-13-624, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Vallas SP (2003) The adventures of managerial hegemony: Teamwork, ideology, and worker resistance. Soc. Problems 50(2):204–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J (1990) The smile factory: Work at Disneyland. Frost P, Moore L, Louis MR, Lundberg CC, Martin J, eds. Reframing Organizational Culture (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 58–76.Google Scholar
  • Wallace RJ, Loffi JM (2014) The unmitigated insider threat to aviation (part 2): An analysis of countermeasures. J. Transportation Security 7(4):307–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiss RS (1994) Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.