Demand Heterogeneity in Platform Markets: Implications for Complementors

References

• Adner R (2004) A demand-based perspective on technology life cycles. McGahan A, Baum JAC, eds. Business Strategy over the Industry Life Cycle (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK),25–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management J. 31(3):306–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2016) Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves. Strategic Management J. 37(4):625–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Levinthal D (2001) Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Sci. 47(5):611–628.Link, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Levinthal D (2004) What is not a real option: Considering boundaries for the application of real options to business strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 29(1):74–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Snow D (2010) Old technology responses to new technology threats: Demand heterogeneity and technology retreats. Indust. Corporate Change 19(5):1655–1675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Afuah A (2013) Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct. Strategic Management J. 34(3):257–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison G, Lau M, Rutstrom E (2008) Lost in state space: Are preferences stable? Internat. Econom. Rev. 49(3):1091–1112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus BL (1987) Forecasting sales of new contingent products: An application to the compact disc market. J. Product Innovation Management 4(4):243–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus BL, Putsis WP Jr (1999) Product proliferation: An empirical analysis of product line determinants and market outcomes. Marketing Sci. 18(2):137–153.Link, Google Scholar
• Binken JL, Stremersch S (2009) The effect of superstar software on hardware sales in system markets. J. Marketing 73(2):88–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boatwright P, Kalra A, Zhang W (2008) Should consumers use the halo to form product evaluations? Management Sci. 54(1):217–223.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A (2009) Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Chap. 7 (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Jeppesen LB (2015) Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management J. 36(12):1761–1777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ (1997) Co-Opetition (Currency Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Kemerer CF (1996) Network externalities in microcomputer software: An econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market. Management Sci. 42(12):1627–1647.Link, Google Scholar
• Budner S (1962) Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. J. Personality 30(1):29–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral LM (1990) On the adoption of innovations with “network” externalities. Math. Soc. Sci. 19(3):299–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Santalo J (2013) Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1331–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chau PYK, Hui KL (1998) Identifying early adopters of new IT products: A case of Windows 95. Inform. Management 33(5):225–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clements MT, Ohashi H (2005) Indirect network effects and the product cycle: Video games in the US, 1994–2002. J. Indust. Econom. 53(4):515–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corts KS, Lederman M (2009) Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the U.S. home video game market. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(2):121–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckhardt JT (2016) Welcome contributor or no price competitor? The competitive interaction of free and priced technologies. Strategic Management J. 37(4):742–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Grajek M, Kretschmer T (2016) Experience, consumers, and fit: Performance implications of pre-entry technological and market experience in mobile telephony. Working paper, European School of Management and Technology, Berlin.Google Scholar
• Elberse A, Oberholzer-Gee F (2007) Superstars and underdogs: An examination of the long tail phenomenon in video sales. MSI Reports: Working Paper Ser. 4:49–72.Google Scholar
• Electronic Arts (2010) Electronic Arts Inc. fiscal year 2010 proxy statement and annual report. Report, Electronic Arts, Redwood City, CA. http://investor.ea.com/ar2010/PDF/electronic_arts-2010_0087.pdf.Google Scholar
• Entertainment Software Association (2013) The 2013 essential facts about the computer and video game industry. Report, Entertainment Software Association, Washington, DC. https://www.isfe.eu/sites/isfe.eu/files/attachments/esa_ef_2013.pdf.Google Scholar
• Gandal N (1994) Hedonic price indexes for spreadsheets and an empirical test for network externalities. RAND J. Econom. 25(1):160–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartner (2013) Gartner says worldwide video game market to total $93 billion in 2013. Press release (October 29), Gartner, Stamford, CT. https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2614915.Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2014) Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. J. Product Innovation Management 31(3):417–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geroski PA (2000) Models of technology diffusion. Res. Policy 29(4):603–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golder PN, Tellis GJ (2004) Growing, growing, gone: Cascades, diffusion, and turning points in the product life cycle. Marketing Sci. 23(2):207–218.Link, Google Scholar
• Gretz RT, Basuroy S (2013) Why quality may not always win: The impact of product generation life cycles on quality and network effects in high-tech markets. J. Retailing 89(3):281–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Jain DC, Sawhney MS (1999) Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: An application to digital television. Marketing Sci. 18(3):396–416.Link, Google Scholar
• Harrison G, Johnson E, McInnes M, Rutstrom E (2005) Temporal stability of estimates of risk aversion. Appl. Financial Econom. Lett. 1(1):31–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschman EC (1980) Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. J. Consumer Res. 7(3):283–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huh YE, Kim SH (2008) Do early adopters upgrade early? Role of post-adoption behavior in the purchase of next-generation products. J. Bus. Res. 61(1):40–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• International Development Group (2011) IDG global forecast update. (August). Report, International Development Group, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
• Izushi H, Aoyama Y (2006) Industry evolution and cross-sectoral skill transfers: A comparative analysis of the video game industry in Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Environment Planning A 38(10):1843–1861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johns J (2006) Video games production networks: Value capture, power relations and embeddedness. J. Econom. Geography 6(2):151–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn BE (1995) Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services. J. Retailing Consumer Services 2(3):139–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Agarwal S (2017) Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: Evidence from application software developers in the iOS and Android smartphone ecosystems. Organ. Sci. 28(3):531–551.Google Scholar
• Karshenas M, Stoneman PL (1993) Rank, stock, order, and epidemic effects in the diffusion of new process technologies: An empirical model. RAND J. Econom. 24(4):503–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1986) Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J. Political Econom. 94(4):822–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspect. 8(2):93–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Srinivasan V (2009) A conjoint-hazard model of the timing of buyers’ upgrading to improved versions of high-technology products. J. Product Innovation Management 26(3):278–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinschmidt EJ, Cooper RG (1991) The impact of product innovativeness on performance. J. Product Innovation Management 8(4):240–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klingebiel R, Adner R (2015) Real options logic revisited: The performance effects of alternative resource allocation regimes. Acad. Management J. 58(1):221–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenker R, Bassett G Jr (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46(1):33–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kretschmer T, Grajek M (2009) Usage and diffusion of cellular telephony, 1998–2004. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(2):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landsman V, Stremersch S (2011) Multihoming in two-sided markets: An empirical inquiry in the video game console industry. J. Marketing 75(6):39–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee E, Lee J, Lee J (2006) Reconsideration of the winner-take-all hypothesis: Complex networks and local bias. Management Sci. 52(12):1838–1848.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1985) Experts as negative opinion leaders in the diffusion of a technological innovation. J. Consumer Res. 11(4):914–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• McAlister L (1982) A dynamic attribute satiation model of variety-seeking behavior. J. Consumer Res. 9(2):141–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath RG (1997) A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):974–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McIntyre DP, Srinivasan A (2017) Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management J. 38(1):141–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris C (2012) Ubisoft’s Guillemot: New consoles are overdue. Gamasutra (July 23), http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/174498/Ubisofts_Guillemot_New_consoles_are_overdue.php.Google Scholar
• Nair H (2007) Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(3):239–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H, Chintagunta P, Dubé J-P (2004) Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants. Quant. Marketing Econom. 2(1):23–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Priem RL (2007) A consumer perspective on value creation. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):219–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priem RL, Butler JE, Li S (2013) Toward reimagining strategy research: Retrospection and prospection on the 2011 AMR Decade Award article. Acad. Management Rev. 38(4):471–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ram S, Jung HS (1994) Innovativeness in product usage: A comparison of early adopters and early majority. Psych. Marketing 11(1):57–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (1998) Technological lockout: An integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):267–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2002) Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. Acad. Management J. 45(2):387–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R (1978) Entry deterrence in the ready-to-eat breakfast cereal industry. Bell J. Econom. 9(2):305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sevilla J, Redden JP (2014) Limited availability reduces the rate of satiation. J. Marketing Res. 51(2):205–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shih CF, Venkatesh A (2004) Beyond adoption: Development and application of a use-diffusion model. J. Marketing 68(1):59–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stremersch S, Tellis GJ, Franses PH, Binken JL (2007) Indirect network effects in new product growth. J. Marketing 71(3):52–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suarez FF (2004) Battles for technological dominance: An integrative framework. Res. Policy 33(2):271–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suarez FF (2005) Network effects revisited: The role of strong ties in technology selection. Acad. Management J. 48(4):710–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Todd PA (1995) Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. 6(2):144–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2015) Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):266–281.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Tschang FT (2007) Balancing the tensions between rationalization and creativity in the video games industry. Organ. Sci. 18(6):989–1005.Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh A, Vitalari NP (1986) Computing technology for the home: Product strategies for the next generation. J. Product Innovation Management 3(3):171–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vishwanath A (2005) Impact of personality on technology adoption: An empirical model. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 56(8):803–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wareham J, Fox PB, Giner Cano JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Wijnberg NM, Gemser G (2000) Adding value to innovation: Impressionism and the transformation of the selection system in visual arts. Organ. Sci. 11(3):323–329.Link, Google Scholar
• Ye G, Priem RL, Alshwer AA (2012) Achieving demand-side synergy from strategic diversification: How combining mundane assets can leverage consumer utilities. Organ. Sci. 23(1):207–224.Link, Google Scholar
• Yin PL, Davis JP, Muzyrya Y (2014) Entrepreneurial innovation: Killer apps in the iPhone ecosystem. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):255–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeithaml VA (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Marketing 52(3):2–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Iansiti M (2012) Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management J. 33(1):88–106.Crossref, Google Scholar