Learning from Mixed Signals in Online Innovation Communities

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1219

References

  • Afuah A, Tucci CL (2012) Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):355–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Al-Abood SA, Davids K, Bennett SJ (2001) Specificity of task constraints and effects of visual demonstrations and verbal instructions in directing learners’ search during skill acquisition. J. Motor Behav. 33(3):295–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almirall E, Lee M, Majchrzak A (2014) Open innovation requires integrated competition-community ecosystems: Lessons learned from civic open innovation. Bus. Horizons 57(3):391–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andrieux M, Proteau L (2016) Observational learning: Tell beginners what they are about to watch and they will learn better. Frontiers Psych. 7:51.Google Scholar
  • Argote L (2012) Organizational Learning—Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
  • Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–924.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4):571–582.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow KJ (1962) The economic learning implications of by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):155–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Badets A, Blandin Y (2004) The role of knowledge of results frequency in learning through observation. J. Motor Behav. 36(1):62–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (1971) Social Learning Theory (General Learning Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bandura A (1977) Social Learning Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Bandura A, Jeffrey RW (1973) Role of symbolic coding and rehearsal processes in observational learning. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 26(1):122–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski W (2016) Creating value in online communities: The sociomaterial configuring of strategy, platform, and stakeholder engagement. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):704–723.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker BM, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using {lme4}. Accessed June 15, 2017, http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823.Google Scholar
  • Bauer J, Franke N, Tuertscher P (2016) Intellectual property norms in online communities: How user-organized intellectual property regulation supports innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):724–750.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100(5):992–1026.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1998) Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econom. Perspect. 12(3):151–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blandin Y, Proteau L (2000) On the cognitive basis of observational learning: Development of mechanisms for the detection and correction of errors. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. Sect. A 53(3):846–867.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blandin Y, Lhuisset L, Proteau L (1999) Cognitive processes underlying observational learning of motor skills. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. Sect. A 52(4):957–979.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blohm I, Riedl C, Fuller J, Leimeister JM (2016) Rate or trade? Identifying winning ideas in open ideas sourcing. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):27–48.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR (2015) “Open” disclosure of innovations, incentives and follow-on reuse: Theory on processes of cumulative innovation and a field experiment in computational biology. Res. Policy 44(1):4–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR, Menietti M (2016) Performance responses to competition across skill levels in rank‐order tournaments: Field evidence and implications for tournament design. RAND J. Econom. 47(1):140–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P (1990) The Logic of Practice (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bower GH, Hilgard ER (1981) Theories of Learning (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Brabham DC (2010) Moving the crowd at Threadless. Inform. Comm. Soc. 13(8):1122–1145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40–57.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Buchanan JJ, Dean NJ (2010) Specificity in practice benefits learning in novice models and variability in demonstration benefits observational practice. Psych. Res. 74(3):313–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer CF (2011) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll WR, Bandura A (1990) Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: A causal analysis. J. Motor Behav. 22(1):85–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Catalini C, Hui X (2017) Can capital defy the law of gravity? Investor networks and startup investment. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Dahl DW, Fuchs C, Schreier M (2014) Why and when consumers prefer products of user-driven firms: A social identification account. Management Sci. 61(8):1978–1988.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dahlander L, Magnusson MG (2005) Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Res. Policy. 34(4):481–493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahlander L, Piezunka H (2014) Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention. Res. Policy. 43(5):812–827.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Einhorn HJ, Hogarth RM (1981) Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Rev. Psych. 32(1):53–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epple D, Argote L, Murphy K (1996) An empirical investigation of the microstructure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing. Oper. Res. 44(1):77–86.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Firestein S (2015) Failure: Why Science Is So Successful (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Fitzgerald J, Gottschalk P, Moffitt R (1998) An analysis of sample attrition in panel data: The Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics. J. Human Resources. 33(2):251–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foster AD, Rosenzweig MR (1995) Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture. J. Political Econom. 103(6):1176–1209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Füller J, Hutter K, Hautz J, Matzler K (2014) User roles and contributions in innovation-contest communities. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(1):273–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelman A, Hill J (2006) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia DA, Manz CC (1985) Linking cognition and behavior: A script processing interpretation of vicarious learning. Acad. Management Rev. 10(3):527–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser, R (1989) Expertise and learning: How do we think about instructional processes now that we have discovered knowledge structures. Klahr D, Kotovsky K, eds. Complex Information Processing: The Impact of Herbert A. Simon (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 269–282.Google Scholar
  • Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Hanna R, Mullainathan S, Schwartzstein J (2014) Learning through noticing: Theory and evidence from a field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1311–1353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harlow HF (1949) The formation of learning sets. Psych. Rev. 56(1):51–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild PR, Sullivan BN (2002) Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):609–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heyes C, Foster C (2002) Motor learning by observation: Evidence from a serial reaction time task. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. Section A 55(2):593–607.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hildebrand C, Häubl G, Herrmann A, Landwehr JR (2013) When social media can be bad for you: Community feedback stifles consumer creativity and reduces satisfaction with self-designed products. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):14–29.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howell ST (2017) Learning from feedback: Evidence from new ventures. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 23874, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
  • Hsiang SM (2013) Visually-weighted regression. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  • Huang Y, Singh PV, Srinivasan K (2014) Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning. Management Sci. 60(9):2138–2159.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hutter K, Hautz J, Füller J, Mueller J, Matzler K (2011) Communitition: The tension between competition and collaboration in community-based design contests. Creativity Innovation Management 20(1):3–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2013) An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeppesen LB, Frederiksen L (2006) Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ. Sci. 17(1):45–63.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones DG, Endsley MR (2000) Overcoming representational errors in complex environments. Human Factors 42(3):367–378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • KC D, Staats BR, Gino F (2013) Learning from my success and from others’ failure: Evidence from minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 59(11):2435–2449.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. Amer. J. Political Sci. 44(2):347–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kornish LJ, Ulrich KT (2011) Opportunity spaces in innovation: Empirical analysis of large samples of ideas. Management Sci. 57(1):107–128.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krogh Gv, Hippel Ev (2006) The promise of research on open source software. Management Sci. 52(7):975–983.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani KR, Wolf RG (2005) Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam S, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levina N, Arriaga M (2014) Distinction and status production on user-generated content platforms: Using Bourdieu’s theory of cultural production to understand social dynamics in online fields. Inform. Systems Res. 25(3):468–488.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lorenz J, Rauhut H, Schweitzer F, Helbing D (2011) How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(22):9020–9025.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A, Malhotra A (2016) Effect of knowledge-sharing trajectories on innovative outcomes in temporary online crowds. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):685–703.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moffitt R, Fitzgerald J, Gottschalk P (1999) Sample attrition in panel data: The role of selection on observables. Ann. Econom. Statist. (55-56):129–152.Google Scholar
  • Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor SJ (2013) Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science 341(6146):647–651.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nadler J, Thompson L, van Boven L (2003) Learning negotiation skills: Four models of knowledge creation and transfer. Management Sci. 49(4):529–540.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR (1961) Uncertainty, learning, and the economics of parallel research and development efforts. Rev. Econom. Statist. 43(4):351–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newell A, Rosenbloom PS (1981) Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. Anderson JR, ed. Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 1–55.Google Scholar
  • Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human Problem Solving (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O'Mahony S, Lakhani K (2011) Organizations in the shadow of communities. Marquis C, Lounsbury M, Greenwood R, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Communities and Organizations, vol. 33 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 3–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (1994) Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(4):541–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2015) Linear and non-linear mixed effects models. Accessed June 1, 2017, http://cran.r-project.org/package=nlme.Google Scholar
  • Preece J, Shneiderman B (2009) The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Trans. Human-Comput. Interaction 1(1):13–32.Google Scholar
  • R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Accessed May 3, 2017, http://www.r-project.org.Google Scholar
  • Riedl C, Woolley A (2017) Teams vs. crowds: A field test of the relative contribution of incentives, member ability, and collaboration to crowd-based problem solving performance. Acad. Management Discov. 3(4):382–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riedl C, Zanibbi R, Hearst MA, Zhu S, Menietti M, Crusan J, Metelsky I, Lakhani KR (2016) Detecting figures and part labels in patents: competition-based development of graphics recognition algorithms. Internat. J. Document Anal. Recognition 19(2):155–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts JA, Hann I-H, Slaughter SA (2006) Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the apache projects. Management Sci. 52(7):984–999.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robins JM, Rotnitzky A, Zhao LP (1995) Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90(429):106–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers EM (2003) The Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rosen S (1972) Learning by experience as joint production. Quart. J. Econom. 86(3):366–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seidel VP, Langner B (2015) Using an online community for vehicle design: Project variety and motivations to participate. Indust. Corporate Change 24(3):635–653.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh PV, Tan Y, Youn N (2011) A hidden Markov model of developer learning dynamics in open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):790–807.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stanko MA (2016) Toward a theory of remixing in online innovation communities. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):773–791.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Sci. 12(2):257–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thomke SH (1998) Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Sci. 44(6):743–762.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thorndike EL (1898) Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychol. Rev. Monograph Supplements 2(4):i–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thornton RA, Thompson P (2001) Learning from experience and learning from others: An exploration of learning and spillovers in wartime shipbuilding. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(5):1350–1368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Knippenberg D, Dahlander L, Haas MR, George G (2015) Information, attention, and decision making. Acad. Management J. 58(3):649–657.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verbeek M, Nijman T (1992) Testing for selectivity bias in panel data models. Internat. Econom. Rev. 33:681–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G, Spaeth S, Lakhani KR (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy 32(7):1217–1241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G, Haefliger S, Spaeth S, Wallin MW (2012) Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quart. 36(2):649–676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiersma E (2007) Conditions that shape the learning curve: Factors that increase the ability and opportunity to learn. Management Sci. 53(12):1903–1915.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Inverse probability weighted M-estimators for sample selection, attrition, and stratification. Portuguese Econom. J. 1(2):117–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yates J, Orlikowski WJ, Woerner SL (2003) Virtual organizing: Using threads to coordinate distributed work. Sprague RH Jr, ed. Proc. 36th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA), 1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu L, Nickerson JV (2011) Cooks or cobblers? Crowd creativity through combination. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems. (ACM, New York), 1393–1402.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.