Stock Market Responses to Unethical Behavior in Organizations: An Organizational Context Model

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1244

References

  • Alicke M, Buckingham J, Zell E, Davis T (2008) Culpable control and counterfactual reasoning in the psychology of blame. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(10):1371–1381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alter A, Kernochan J, Darley J (2007) Transgression wrongfulness outweighs its harmfulness as a determinant of sentence severity. Law Human Behav. 31(4):319–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baucus M, Near J (1991) Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Acad. Management J. 34(1):9–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bennett V, Pierce L, Snyder J, Toffel M (2013) Customer-driven misconduct: How competition corrupts business practices. Management Sci. 59(8):1725–1742.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brady F (1985) A Janus-headed model of ethical theory: Looking two ways at business/society issues. Acad. Management Rev. 10(3):568–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling S (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darley J (2009) Morality in the law: The psychological foundations of citizens’ desires to punish transgressions. Ann. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 5:1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davidson W, Worrell D, Garrison S (1988) Effect of strike activity on firm value. Acad. Management J. 31(2):387–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derfler-Rozin R, Baker B, Gino F (2018) Compromised ethics in hiring processes? How referrers’ power affects employees’ reactions to referral practices. Acad. Management J. 61(2):615–636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management J. 14(1):57–74.Google Scholar
  • Fama E, French K (1992) The cross‐section of expected stock returns. J. Finance 47(2):427–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Fairness and retaliation. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(3):159–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flammer C (2013) Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Acad. Management J. 56(3):758–781.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flammer C (2015) Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Sci. 61(11):2549–2568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fritzsche D, Becker H (1984) Linking management behavior to ethical philosophy: An empirical investigation. Acad. Management J. 27(1):166–175.Google Scholar
  • Frooman J (1997) Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth. Bus. Soc. 36(3):221–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gailey J, Lee M (2005) An integrated model of attribution of responsibility for wrongdoing in organizations. Soc. Psych. Quart. 68(4):338–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Bazerman M (2009) When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(4):708–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Pierce L (2009) Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psych. Sci. 20(9):1153–1160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godfrey P, Merrill C, Hansen J (2009) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value. Strategic Management. J. 30(4):425–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H, Palmer D, Pozner J (2010) Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):53–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin J, Mahon J (1997) The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Bus. Soc. 36(1):5–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gunthorpe D (1997) Business ethics: A quantitative analysis of the impact of unethical behavior by publicly traded corporations. J. Bus. Ethics 16(5):537–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haidt J, Kesebir S (2010) Morality. Fiske D, Gilbert J, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 797–832.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton V (1986) Chains of command: Responsibility attribution in hierarchies. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 16(2):118–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton V, Sanders J (1995) Crimes of obedience and conformity in the workplace: Surveys of Americans, Russians, and Japanese. J. Soc. Issues 51(3):67–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser M (2006) Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong (Ecco, New York).Google Scholar
  • Henrich J, McElreath R, Barr A, Ensminger J, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A, Cardenas JC, et al.. (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312(5781):1767–1770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins R, Reimers M (1995) Analysis for Financial Management (Irwin, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Hirshleifer D, Teoh S (2003) Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. 36(1):337–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones T (1991) Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Acad. Management Rev. 16(2):366–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jonsson S, Greve H, Fujiwara-Greve T (2009) The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2):195–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karpoff J, Lee D, Vendrzyk V (1999) Defense procurement fraud, penalties, and contractor influence. J. Political Econom. 107(4):809–842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King B, Soule S (2007) Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):413–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kline R (2011) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed. (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
  • Leach C, Ellemers N, Barreto M (2007) Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(2):234–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J, Goldberg J, Tetlock P (1998) Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 24(6):563–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindenmeier J, Schleer C, Pricl D (2012) Consumer outrage: Emotional reactions to unethical corporate behavior. J. Bus. Res. 65(9):1364–1373.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Hirsch P (2010) Markets on Trial: The Economic Sociology of the U.S. Financial Crisis (Emerald, Bingley, UK).Google Scholar
  • MacKinlay C (1997) Event studies in economics and finance. J. Econom. Literature 35(1):13–39.Google Scholar
  • Margolis J, Walsh J (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):268–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McMahon J, Harvey R (2006) An analysis of the factor structure of Jones’ moral intensity construct. J. Bus. Ethics. 64(4):381–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McWilliams A, Siegel D (1997) Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Acad. Management J. 40(3):626–657.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mill JS (1897) Utilitarianism (Longmans, Green and Co., London).Google Scholar
  • Miller K, Sturdivant F (1977) Consumer responses to socially questionable corporate behavior: An empirical test. J. Consumer Res. 4(1):1–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmrose Z, Richardson V, Scholz S (2004) Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements. J. Accounting Econom. 37(1):59–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paruchuri S, Misangyi V (2015) Investor perceptions of financial misconduct: The heterogeneous contamination of bystander firms. Acad. Management J. 58(1):169–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peloza J (2006) Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. Calif. Management Rev. 48(2):52–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfarrer M, Decelles K, Smith K, Taylor M (2008) After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):730–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinto J, Leana C, Pil F (2008) Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):685–709.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao S, Hamilton J (1996) The effect of published reports of unethical conduct on stock prices. J. Bus. Ethics 15(12):1321–1330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rest J (1986) Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger, New York).Google Scholar
  • Simpson S (2002) Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder J (2010) Gaming the liver transplant market. J. Law Econom. Organ. 26(3):546–568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strachan J, Smith D, Beedles W (1983) The price reaction to (alleged) corporate crime. Financial Rev. 18(2):121–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thau S, Derfler-Rozin R, Pitesa M, Mitchell M, Pillutla M (2015) Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 100(1):98–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Umphress E, Bingham J (2011) When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organ. Sci. 22(3):621–640.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Umphress E, Bingham J, Mitchell M (2010) Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 95(4):769–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiltermuth S (2011) Cheating more when the spoils are split. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(2):157−168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiltermuth S, Bennett V, Pierce L (2013) Doing as they would do: How the perceived ethical preferences of third-party beneficiaries impact ethical decision-making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 122(2):280−290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge J (2003) Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(2):133–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young L, Saxe R (2009) Innocent intentions: A correlation between forgiveness for accidental harm and neural activity. Neuropsychologia 47(10):2065–2072.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Y, Wiersema M (2009) Stock market reaction to CEO certification: The signaling role of CEO background. Strategic Management J. 30(7):693–710.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zitzewitz E (2012) Forensic economics. J. Econom. Literature 50(3):731–769.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.