Practice Implementation Within a Multidivisional Firm: The Role of Institutional Pressures and Value Consistency

References

• Ambos TC, Andersson U, Birkinshaw J (2010) What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(7):1099–1118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari SM, Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2010) Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):67–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J (2007) Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):836–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P (2003) From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organ. Sci. 14(5):510–527.Link, Google Scholar
• Bansal P (2005) Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management J. 26(3):197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Acad. Management J. 43(4):717–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett C, Ghoshal S (1986) Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard Bus. Rev. 64(6):87–94.Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J, Hood N, Jonsson S (1998) Building firm‐specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management J. 19(3):221–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitektine A, Haack P (2015) The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Acad. Management Rev. 40(1):49–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Björkman I, Fey CF, Park HJ (2007) Institutional theory and MNC subsidiary HRM practices: Evidence from a three-country study. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 38(3):430–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Björkman I, Ehrnrooth M, Smale A, John S (2011) The determinants of line management internalisation of HRM practices in MNC subsidiaries. Internat. J. Human Resources Management 22(8):1654–1671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouquet C, Birkinshaw J (2008) Weight vs. voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Acad. Management J. 51(3):577–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourne H, Jenkins M (2013) Organizational values: A dynamic perspective. Organ. Studies 34(4):495–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brenner B, Ambos A (2013) A question of legitimacy? A dynamic perspective on multinational firm control. Organ. Sci. 24(3):773–795.Link, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (1991) Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. 2(3):239–262.Link, Google Scholar
• Burns LR, Wholey DR (1993) Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. Acad. Management J. 36(1):106–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Canato A, Ravasi D, Phillips N (2013) Coerced practice implementation in cases of low cultural fit: Cultural change and practice adaptation during the implementation of Six Sigma at 3M. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1724–1753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler D (2014) Organizational susceptibility to institutional complexity: Critical events driving the adoption and implementation of the ethics and compliance officer position. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1722–1743.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Durand R, Levine D, Touboul S (2015) Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1597–1614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng B, Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2014) Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management J. 35(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JN, Price RH (2005) The effects of person-innovation fit on individual responses to innovation. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 78(1):83–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi SJ, Jia N, Lu J (2015) The structure of political institutions and effectiveness of corporate political lobbying. Organ. Sci. 26(1):158–179.Link, Google Scholar
• Christmann P (2004) Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy. Acad. Management J. 47(5):747–760.Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Zollo M, Hansen MT (2012) Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1429–1448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Schroeder RG, Mauriel JJ (2000) A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):850–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Powell W (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Jacqueminet A (2015) Peer conformity, attention, and heterogeneous implementation of practices in MNEs. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(8):917–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Kennedy MT, Davis GF (2012) How golden parachutes unfolded: Diffusion and variation of a controversial practice. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1077–1099.Link, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Eisenhardt KM (2001) Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1229–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao J, Bansal P (2013) Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. J. Bus. Ethics 112(2):241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia‐Pont C, Canales JI, Noboa F (2009) Subsidiary strategy: The embeddedness component. J. Management Stud. 46(2):182–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardberg NA, Fombrun CJ (2006) Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):329–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Bartlett CA (1990) The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Acad. Management Rev. 15(4):603–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Bartlett CA (1994) Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management J. 15(S2):91–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Nohria N (1993) Horses for courses: Organizational forms for multinational corporations. Sloan Management Rev. 34(2):23–35.Google Scholar
• Goodrick E, Salancik GR (1996) Organizational discretion in responding to institutional practices: Hospitals and cesarean births. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):1–28.Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelott ER, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):317–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2008) A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals. Acad. Management J. 51(3):476–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoenen AK, Kostova T (2014) Utilizing the broader agency perspective for studying headquarters-subsidiary relations in multinational companies. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(1):104–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonsson S (2009) Refraining from imitation: Professional resistance and limited diffusion in a financial market. Organ. Sci. 20(1):172–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT, Fiss PC (2009) Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among U.S. hospitals. Acad. Management J. 52(5):897–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim WC, Mauborgne RA (1993) Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals’ corporate strategic decisions. Acad. Management J. 36(3):502–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkman BL, Shapiro DL (2001) The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Acad. Management J. 44(3):557–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Sorra JS (1996) The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad. Management Rev. 21(4):1055–1080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T, Roth K (2002) Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Acad. Management J. 45(1):215–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T, Zaheer S (1999) Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):64–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T, Roth K, Dacin MT (2008) Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Acad. Management Rev. 33(4):994–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Asaba S (2006) Why do firms imitate each other? Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):366–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50(2):289–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Love EG, Cebon P (2008) Meanings on multiple levels: The influence of field‐level and organizational‐level meaning systems on diffusion. J. Management Stud. 45(2):239–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacLean TL, Behnam M (2010) The dangers of decoupling: The relationship between compliance programs, legitimacy perceptions, and institutionalized misconduct. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1499–1520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margolis J, Walsh J (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):268–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maritan CA, Brush TH (2003) Heterogeneity and transferring practices: Implementing flow manufacturing in multiple plants. Strategic Management J. 24(10):945–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Qian C (2014) Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organ. Sci. 25(1):127–148.Link, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Tilcsik A (2016) Institutional equivalence: How industry and community peers influence corporate philanthropy. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1325–1341.Link, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Toffel MW, Zhou Y (2016) Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organ. Sci. 27(2):483–504.Link, Google Scholar
• Matten D, Moon J (2008) “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):404–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 26(1):117–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer J, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ, Dutton JE, Beyer JM (1992) Understanding organizational adaptation to change: The case of work-family issues. Schweiger DM, Papenfuß K, eds. Human Resource Planning (Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany), 279–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowday RT, Steers RM, Porter LW (1979) The measurement of organizational commitment. J. Vocational Behav. 14(2):224–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nohria N, Ghoshal S (1994) Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters‐subsidiary relations. Strategic Management J. 15(6):491–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhmatovskiy I, David RJ (2012) Setting your own standards: Internal corporate governance codes as a response to institutional pressure. Organ. Sci. 23(1):155–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Pant PN, Lachman R (1998) Value incongruity and strategic choice. J. Management Stud. 35(2):195–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2011) Professions, organizations, and institutions: Tenure systems in colleges and universities. Work Occupations 38(3):340–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez-Aleman P (2011) Collective learning in global diffusion: Spreading quality standards in a developing country cluster. Organ. Sci. 22(1):173–189.Link, Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Spicer A (2014) How emerging organizations take form: The role of imprinting and values in organizational bricolage. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1785–1806.Link, Google Scholar
• Philippe D, Durand R (2011) The impact of norm‐conforming behaviors on firm reputation. Strategic Management J. 32(9):969–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Greve HR, Davis GF (2001) Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):502–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rathert N (2016) Strategies of legitimation: MNEs and the adoption of CSR in response to host-country institutions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 47(7):858–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rokeach M (1979) From individual to institutional values: With special reference to the values of science. Rokeach M, ed. Understanding Human Values: Individual and Societal (Free Press, New York), 47–70.Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1996) Institutionalism “old” and “new.” Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):270–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Souitaris V, Zerbinati S, Liu G (2012) Which iron cage? Endo- and exoisomorphism in corporate venture capital programs. Acad. Management J. 55(2):477–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D, Soule SA (1998) Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24:265–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Studenmund AH (2001) Using Econometrics: A Practical Guide (Addison Wesley, Boston).Google Scholar
• Suddaby R, Bitektine A, Haack P (2017) Legitimacy. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):451–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilcsik A (2010) From ritual to reality: Demography, ideology, and decoupling in a post-communist government agency. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1474–1498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tost LP (2011) An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Acad. Management Rev. 36(4):686–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Voss GB, Cable DM, Voss ZG (2000) Linking organizational values to relationships with external constituents: A study of nonprofit professional theatres. Organ. Sci. 11(3):330–347.Link, Google Scholar
• Wiersema MF, Bowen HP (2009) The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: Issues and methods. Strategic Management J. 30(6):679–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuan F, Woodman RW (2010) Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Acad. Management J. 53(2):323–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2015) Supervising across borders: The case of multinational hierarchies. Organ. Sci. 26(1):277–292.Link, Google Scholar