Robust Systems of Cooperation in the Presence of Rankings: How Displaying Prosocial Contributions Can Offset the Disruptive Effects of Performance Rankings

References

• Adler PS, Kwon SW (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1):17–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander RD (1987) The Biology of Moral Systems (Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
• Amabile T, Fisher CM, Pillemer J (2014) IDEO’s culture of helping. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(1–2):54–61.Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Brown CE (2010) The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:55–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Harbaugh W, Vesterlund L (2003) The carrot or the stick: Rewards, punishments, and cooperation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):893–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, Collopy F (1996) Competitor orientation: Effects of objectives and information on managerial decisions and profitability. J. Marketing Res. 33(2):188–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asch SE (1959) A perspective on social psychology. Koch S, ed. Formulations of the Person and the Social Context, Psychology: A Study of a Science, vol. 3 (McGraw-Hill, New York), 363–383.Google Scholar
• Axelrod RM (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Axelrod RM (1997) The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Axelrod R, Keohane RO (1985) Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. World Politics 38(1):226–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Axelrod R, Hammond RA, Grafen A, Day T (2004) Altruism via kin-selection strategies that rely on arbitrary tags with which they coevolve. Evolution 58(8):1833–1838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker WE, Bulkley N (2014) Paying it forward vs. rewarding reputation: Mechanisms of generalized reciprocity. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1493–1510.Link, Google Scholar
• Baker WE, Dutton J (2007) Enabling positive social capital in organizations. Ragins BR, Dutton J, eds. Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 325–346.Google Scholar
• Barnard CI (1938) The Functions of the Executive (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Barrett S (2016) Coordination vs. voluntarism and enforcement in sustaining international environmental cooperation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 113(51):14515–14522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett MY, DeSteno D (2006) Gratitude and prosocial behavior: Helping when it costs you. Psych. Sci. 17(4):319–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belmi P, Pfeffer J (2015) How “organization” can weaken the norm of reciprocity: The effects of attributions for favors and a calculative mindset. Acad. Management Discoveries 1(1):36–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES, Li S (2017) Seeing where you stand: From performance feedback to performance transparency. Acad. Management Proc. 2017(1):14752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1968) The hierarchy of authority in organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 73(4):453–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolino MC (1999) Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):82–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolino MC, Grant AM (2016) The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):599–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borman W, Motowidlo S (1993) Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Schmitt N, Borman WC, eds. Personnel Selection in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 71–98.Google Scholar
• Boyd R, Gintis H, Bowles S (2010) Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science 328(5978):617–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryan JH, London P (1970) Altruistic behavior by children. Psych. Bull. 73(3):200–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli P (2009) What’s old is new again: Managerial “talent” in an historical context. Martocchio JJ, Liao H, eds. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 28 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 179–218.Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Tavis A (2016) The future of performance reviews. Harvard Bus. Rev. Accessed August 25, 2017, https://hbr.org/2016/10/the-performance-management-revolutionGoogle Scholar
• Cook KS, Rice E (2003) Social exchange theory. Owens TJ, DeLamater J, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology (Kluwer Academic Publishers/Plenum Publishers, New York), 53–76.Google Scholar
• Cross RL, Parker A (2004) The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• DeSteno D, Bartlett MY, Baumann J, Williams LA, Dickens L (2010) Gratitude as moral sentiment: Emotion-guided cooperation in economic exchange. Emotion 10(2):289–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes CT, Fowler JH, Johnson T, McElreath R, Smirnov O (2007) Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature 446(7137):794–796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M (1949) An experimental study of the effects of co-operation and competition upon group process. Human Relations 2(3):199–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dooren WV, Bouckaert G, Halligan J (2015) Performance Management in the Public Sector (Routledge, Abingdon, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M, Gneezy U, Güth W, Van Damme E (2001) Direct vs. indirect reciprocity: An experiment. Homo Oeconomicus 18(1/2):19–30.Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (1998) Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. Econom. J. 108(448):726–735.Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2008) Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Plott CR, Smith VL, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1061–1073.Google Scholar
• Egas M, Riedl A (2008) The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperation. Proc. Royal Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 275(1637):871–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ekeh PP (1974) Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Engelmann D, Fischbacher U (2009) Indirect reciprocity and strategic reputation building in an experimental helping game. Games Econom. Behav. 67(2):399–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emmons RA, McCullough ME (2003) Counting blessings vs. burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 84(2):377–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erez A, Schilpzand P, Leavitt K, Woolum AH, Judge TA (2015) Inherently relational: Interactions between peers’ and individuals’ personalities impact reward giving and appraisal of individual performance. Acad. Management J. 58(6):1761–1784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Fischbacher U (2006) A theory of reciprocity. Games Econom. Behav. 54(2):293–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Gächter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415(6868):137–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Gintis H (2007) Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33(1):43–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ (2003) What have you done for me lately? Temporal adjustments to favor evaluations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 91(1):38–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ (2005) Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):737–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(4):25–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia SM, Tor A, Gonzalez R (2006) Ranks and rivals: A theory of competition. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 32(7):970–982.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glass GV, Willson VL, Gottman JM (2008) Design and Analysis of Time-Series Experiments (Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC).Google Scholar
• Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(2):161–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (1987) A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Acad. Management Rev. 12(1):9–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B, Vittoria Levati M (2005) Indirect reciprocity in cyclical networks. J. Econom. Psych. 26(5):711–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman RL, Sabala M, Gu Y, Anand A, Handley M, Sulo R, Wilkinson L (2008) Discovering emergent behavior from network packet data: Lessons from the Angle Project. Kargupta H, Han J, Yu PS, Motwani R, Kumar V, eds. Next Generation of Data Mining (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), 243–260.Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Wohlgezogen F, Zhelyazkov P (2012) The two facets of collaboration: Cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):531–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardin R (1982) Collective Action, Resources for the Future (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
• Hargadon A (2003) How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth About How Companies Innovate (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heisig JP, Schaeffer M, Giesecke J (2017) The costs of simplicity: Why multilevel models may benefit from accounting for cross-cluster differences in the effects of controls. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(4):796–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jan Piskorski M, Gorbatâi A (2017) Testing Coleman's social-norm enforcement mechanism: Evidence from Wikipedia. Amer. J. Sociol. 122(4):1183–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jen E (2003) Stable or robust? What’s the difference? Complexity 8(3):12–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jen E (2005) Robust Design: A Repertoire of Biological, Ecological, and Engineering Case Studies (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Jones GR, George JM (1998) The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):531–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kollock P (1993) “An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind”: Cooperation and accounting systems. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 58(6):768–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kollock P (1998) Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24(1):183–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ledyard J (1995) Public goods: A survey of experimental research. Kagel J, Roth A, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss C (1969) The Elementary Structures of Kinship (Beacon Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Lindahl WE, Winship C (1994) A logit model with interactions for predicting major gift donors. Res. Higher Ed. 35(6):729–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linden A (2015) Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single-and multiple-group comparisons. Stata J. 15(2):480–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linden A, Adams JL (2011) Applying a propensity score-based weighting model to interrupted time series data: Improving causal inference in programme evaluation. J. Evaluation Clinical Practice 17(6):1231–1238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma A (2018) China ranks citizens with a social credit system—here's what you can do wrong and how you can be punished. Business Insider (April 10), https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/china-social-credit-system-punishments-rewards-explained-a8297486.html.Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Galinsky AD (2008) Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):351–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Major B (1994) From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 26 (Academic Press, New York), 293–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marwell G, Ames RE (1979) Experiments on the provision of public goods. I. Resources, interest, group size, and the free-rider problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 84(6):1335–1360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marwell G, Ames RE (1980) Experiments on the provision of public goods. II. Provision points, stakes, experience, and the free-rider problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 85(4):926–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin J (1981) Relative deprivation: A theory of distributive injustice for an era of shrinking resources. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 53–107.Google Scholar
• McCullough ME, Kimeldorf MB, Cohen AD (2008) An adaptation for altruism: The social causes, social effects, and social evolution of gratitude. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 17(4):281–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milinski M, Semmann D, Krambeck HJ (2002) Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons.’ Nature 415(6870):424–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollick E, Rothbard N (2014) Mandatory Fun: Consent, Gamification and the Impact of Games at Work (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY).Google Scholar
• Molm LD (1997) Coercive Power in Social Exchange (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molm LD, Collett JL, Schaefer DR (2006) Conflict and fairness in social exchange. Soc. Forces 84(4):2331–2352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molm LD, Collett JL, Schaefer DR (2007) Building solidarity through generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):205–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moon SH, Scullen SE, Latham GP (2016) Precarious curve ahead: The effects of forced distribution rating systems on job performance. Human Resources Management Rev. 26(2):166–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mulligan JR, Bull Schaefer RA (2011) A new hope for rank and yank. J. Leadership Organ. Stud. 18(3):385–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murnighan JK, Saxon MS (1998) Ultimatum bargaining by children and adults. J. Econom. Psych. 19(4):415–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak MA (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science. 314(5805):1560–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak MA, Roch S (2007) Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proc. Royal Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 274(1610):605–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998a) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393(6685):573–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998b) The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. J. Theoret. Biol. 194(4):561–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak MA, Sigmund K (2005) Evolution of indirect reciprocity. IIASA Interim Report IR-05-079. Report, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria. Accessed August 28, 2017, http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/7763/.Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (2010) Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environ. Change. 20(4):550–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E, Burger J, Field CB, Norgaard RB, Policansky D (1999) Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science 284(5412):278–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penner LA, Dovidio JF, Piliavin JA, Schroeder DA (2005) Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Rev. Psych. 56(1):365–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettit NC, Doyle SP, Lount RB, To C (2016) Cheating to get ahead or to avoid falling behind? The effect of potential negative vs. positive status change on unethical behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes. 137:172–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer T, Rutte C, Killingback T, Taborsky M, Bonhoeffer S (2005) Evolution of cooperation by generalized reciprocity. Proc. Royal Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 272(1568):1115–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poortvliet PM (2013) Harming others’ task-related efforts. Soc. Psych. 44(6):373–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Crothers L, Lockhart C, eds. Culture and Politics (Palgrave Macmillan, New York), 223–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Queller DC (1985) Kinship, reciprocity and synergism in the evolution of social behaviour. Nature 318(6044):366–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A (2008) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, 2nd ed. (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Rabin M (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(5):1281–1302.Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Nowak MA, Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2014) Static network structure can stabilize human cooperation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111(48):17093–17098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rankin DJ, Taborsky M (2009) Assortment and the evolution of generalized reciprocity. Evolution 63(7):1913–1922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ring PS, van de Ven AH (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 19(1):90–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rock D, Jones B (2015) Why more and more companies are ditching performance ratings. Harvard Business Review. Accessed August 25, 2017, https://hbr.org/2015/09/why-more-and-more-companies-are-ditching-performance-ratings.Google Scholar
• Salvato C, Reuer J, Battigalli P (2017) Cooperation across disciplines: A multilevel perspective on cooperative behavior in governing interfirm relations. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):960–1004.Google Scholar
• Santos FC, Pacheco JM, Lenaerts T (2006) Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103(9):3490–3494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seinen I, Schram A (2006) Social status and group norms: Indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment. Eur. Econom. Rev. 50(3):581–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Sherif M (1958) Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. Amer. J. Sociol. 63(4):349–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherif M, Harvey OJ, White BJ, Hood WR, Sherif CW (1961) Intergroup Cooperation and Conflict: The Robbers Cave Experiment (University of Oklahoma Book Exchange, Norman, OK).Google Scholar
• Sigmund K, Hauert C, Nowak MA (2001) Reward and punishment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98(19):10757–10762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson B, Harrell A, Melamed D, Heiserman N, Negraia DV (2018) The roots of reciprocity: Gratitude and reputation in generalized exchange systems. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(1):88–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith KG, Carroll SJ, Ashford SJ (1995) Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Acad. Management J. 38(1):7–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart AJ, Plotkin JB (2014) Collapse of cooperation in evolving games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111(49):17558–17563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sudhir K, Roy S, Cherian M (2016) Do sympathy biases induce charitable giving? The effects of advertising content. Marketing Sci. 35(6):849–869.Link, Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum AS (1962) Control in organizations: Individual adjustment and organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 7(2):236–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tennie C, Frith U, Frith CD (2010) Reputation management in the age of the world-wide web. Trends Cognitive Sci. 14(11):482–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tesser A, Smith J (1980) Some effects of task relevance and friendship on helping: You don’t always help the one you like. J. Emperiment. Soc. Psych. 16(6):582–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thibault JW, Kelley HH (1959) The Social Psychology of Groups (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Tjosvold D (1984) Cooperation theory and organizations. Human Relations. 37(9):743–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tjosvold D, Wong ASH, Chen NYF (2014) Constructively managing conflicts in organizations. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1(1):545–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Totterdell P, Wall T, Holman D, Diamond H, Epitropaki O (2004) Affect networks: A structural analysis of the relationship between work ties and job-related affect. J. Appl. Psychol. 89(5):854–867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4):1039–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vohs KD, Nelson N, Rawn C (2009) Why do choices tax self-regulatory resources? Three tests of candidates to explain decision fatigue. McGill AL, Shavitt S, eds. NA–Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 36 (Association for Consumer Research, Duluth, MN), 172–176.Google Scholar
• Vriend T, Jordan J, Janssen O (2016) Reaching the top and avoiding the bottom: How ranking motivates unethical intentions and behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 137:142–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walster E, Walster GW, Berscheid E (1978) Equity: Theory and Research (Allyn & Bacon, Boston).Google Scholar
• Webster J, Wing-Fai L (2017) Introduction: Creativity, knowledge and innovation in virtual work. New Tech. Work Employment 32(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wedekind C, Milinski M (2000) Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science 288(5467):850–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinzweig A (2010) A Lapsed Anarchist’s Approach to Building a Great Business: Zingerman’s Guide to Good Leading, Part 1 (Zingerman’s Press, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
• West SA, Griffin AS, Gardner A (2007a) Social semantics: Altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. J. Evolutionary Biol. 20(2):415–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West SA, Griffin AS, Gardner A (2007b) Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Current Biol. 17(16):R661–R672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wijen F, Ansari S (2007) Overcoming inaction through collective institutional entrepreneurship: Insights from regime theory. Organ. Stud. 28(7):1079–1100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willer R (2009) Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zoltners AA, Sinha P, Lorimer SE (2008) Sales force effectiveness: A framework for researchers and practitioners. J. Personal Selling Sales Management. 28(2):115–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zoltners AA, Sinha PK, Lorimer SE (2011) How to manage forced sales rankings. Harvard Business Review Blog (July 27), https://hbr.org/2011/07/forced-rankings-salespeople.Google Scholar