Getting to Know You: Motivating Cross-Understanding for Improved Team and Individual Performance

References

• Antonakis J (2017) On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications. Leadership Quart. 28(1):5–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bantel KA, Jackson SE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. 10(S1):107–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauer DJ, Preacher KJ, Gil KM (2006) Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 11(2):142–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayer M, Lewis K (2013) Cross-understanding, coordination, and performance. The role of cross-understanding in teamwork: New empirical evidence. Symposium, Academy of Management Annual Meeting, August 9–13, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell BS, Kozlowski SW (2002) A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group Organ. Management 27(1):14–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonner BLS, Romney AT, Alexander C (2016) In the same group but moving in different directions: Coordination effects in tasks with simultaneous intellective and judgmental performance criteria. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 22(4):471–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brett JF, VandeWalle D (1999) Goal orientation and goal content as predictors of performance in a training program. J. Appl. Psych. 84(6):863–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brodbeck FC, Kerschreiter R, Mojzisch A, Schulz-Hardt S (2007) Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):459–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):557–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM (2003) Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. J. Appl. Psych. 88(3):552–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Button SB, Mathieu JE, Zajac DM (1996) Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(1):26–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse S (1993) Shared mental models in expert team decision making. Castellan NJ, ed. Individual and Group Decision Making (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 221–246.Google Scholar
• Chadwick IC, Raver JL (2015) Motivating organizations to learn goal orientation and its influence on organizational learning. J. Management 41(3):957–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen G, Kanfer R (2006) Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Res. Organ. Behav. 27:223–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi NW, Huang JC (2014) Mechanisms linking transformational leadership and team performance: The mediating roles of team goal orientation and group affective tone. Group Organ. Management 39(3):300–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curseu PL, Meslec N, Pluut H, Lucas G (2015) Cognitive synergy in groups and group-to-individual transfer of decision-making competencies. Frontiers Psych. 6(1375):1–9.Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK (2008) The virtue and vice of workplace conflict: Food for (pessimistic) thought. J. Organ. Behav. 29(1):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dierdorff EC, Ellington JK (2012) Members matter in team training: Multilevel and longitudinal relationships between goal orientation, self‐regulation, and team outcomes. Personnel Psych. 65(3):661–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietz B, van Knippenberg D, Hirst G, Restubog SLD (2015) Outperforming whom? A multilevel study of performance-prove goal orientation, performance, and the moderating role of shared team identification. J. Appl. Psych. 100(6):1811–1824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dragoni L, Kuenzi M (2012) Better understanding work unit goal orientation: Its emergence and impact under different types of work unit structure. J. Appl. Psych. 97(5):1032–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dweck CS (1986) Motivational processes affecting learning. Amer. Psych. 41:1040–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dweck CS, Leggett EL (1988) A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psych. Rev. 95:256–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psych. Methods 12(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):84–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ, Church MA (1997) A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(1):218–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ, Harackiewicz JM (1996) Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(3):461–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engel D, Woolley AW, Jing LX, Chabris CF, Malone TW (2014) Reading the mind in the eyes or reading between the lines? Theory of mind predicts collective intelligence equally well online and face-to-face. PLoS One 9(12):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferraro F, Beunza D (2018) Creating common ground: A communicative action model of dialogue in shareholder engagement. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1187–1207.Link, Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Kim TY, Lee DR, Zhu J (2013) A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Acad. Management J. 56(3):827–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gully SM, Phillips JM (2005) A multilevel application of learning and performance orientations to individual, group, and organizational outcomes. Martocchio J, ed. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 24 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 1–51.Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Comm. Monographs 76(4):408–420.Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2015) An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behav. Res. 50(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2017) An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hirst G, Van Knippenberg D, Zhou J (2009) A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Acad. Management J. 52(2):280–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB (1998a) Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 34(5):423–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB (1998b) Group and individual training: The impact of practice on performance. Small Group Res. 29(2):254–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB (2001) Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(6):1080–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber GP, Lewis K (2010) Cross-understanding: Implications for group cognition and performance. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):6–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutzschenreuter T, Horstkotte J (2013) Performance effects of top management team demographic faultlines in the process of product diversification. Strategic Management J. 34(6):704–726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental Models: Toward a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kane AA, Rink F (2016) When and how groups utilize dissenting newcomer knowledge: Newcomers’ future prospects condition the effect of language-based identity strategies. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 19(5):591–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SW, Chao GT, Grand JA, Braun MT, Kuljanin G (2013) Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organ. Res. Methods 16(4):581–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krull JL, MacKinnon DP (1999) Multilevel mediation modeling in group-based intervention studies. Evaluation Rev. 23(4):418–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krull JL, MacKinnon DP (2001) Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behav. Res. 36(2):249–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee F (1997) When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help seeking and power motivation in organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 72(3):336–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Bachrach DG, Lewis K (2014) Social network ties, transactive memory, and performance in groups. Organ. Sci. 25(3):951–967.Link, Google Scholar
• LePine JA (2005) Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: Effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. J. Appl. Psych. 90(6):1153–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine JM, Thompson L (1996) Conflict in groups. Higgins ET, Kruglanski AW, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (Guilford, New York), 745–776.Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Herndon BD (2015) Cross-understanding and power: How being understood affects influence and performance. Individual perspectives and emergent team information processes. Symposium, Academy of Management Annual Meeting, August 7–11, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Belliveau M, Herndon BD, Keller J (2007) Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(2):159–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehta A, Field H, Armenakis A, Mehta N (2008) Team goal orientation and team performance: The mediating role of team planning. J. Management 35(4):1026–1046.Google Scholar
• Meslec N, Graff D (2015) Being open matters: The antecedents and consequences of cross-understanding in teams. Team Performance Management 21(1/2):6–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nederveen Pieterse A, Van Knippenberg D, van Ginkel WP (2011) Diversity in goal orientation, team reflexivity, and team performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 114(2):153–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Otoiu C, Andrei D, Baban A (2012) Cross-understanding and trust formation within medical emergency intervention teams. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 33:875–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poortvliet PM, Janssen O, Van Yperen NW, Van de Vliert E (2007) Achievement goals and interpersonal behavior: How mastery and performance goals shape information exchange. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 33(10):1435–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porath CL, Bateman TS (2006) Self-regulation: From goal orientation to job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 91(1):185–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter COLH (2005) Goal orientation: Effects of backing up behavior, performance, efficacy and commitment in teams. J. Appl. Psych. 90(4):811–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter COLH, Webb JW, Gogus CI (2010) When goal orientations collide: Effects of learning and performance orientation on team adaptability in response to workload imbalance. J. Appl. Psych. 95(5):935–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rariden S, Lewis K (2013) Cross-understanding in diverse groups. The role of cross-understanding in teamwork: New empirical evidence. Symposium, Academy of Management Annual Meeting, August 9–13, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Rosenthal TL, Zimmerman BJ (1978) Social Learning and Cognition (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rouse WB, Morris NM (1986) On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psych. Bull. 100(3):349–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schippers MC, Den Hartog DN, Koopman PL (2007) Reflexivity in teams: A measure and correlates. Appl. Psych. 56(2):189–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selig JP, Preacher KJ (2008) Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects. Computer software. Accessed March 24, 2015, http://quantpsy.org/.Google Scholar
• Spector PE (2006) Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organ. Res. Methods 9(2):221–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE (1981) Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(4):501–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan JD, Parente DH, Brown RC (2002) Seeing the forest and the trees: Balancing knowledge using large scale simulations in capstone business strategy classes. J. Management Ed. 26(2):164–193.Google Scholar
• Summers JK, Humphrey SE, Ferris GR (2012) Team member change, flux in coordination, and performance: Effects of strategic core roles, information transfer, and cognitive ability. Acad. Management J. 55(2):314–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Troth AC, Jordan PJ, Lawrence SA, Tse HH (2012) A multilevel model of emotional skills, communication performance, and task performance in teams. J. Organ. Behav. 33(5):700–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• VandeWalle D (1997) Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Ed. Psych. Measurement 57(6):995–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• VandeWalle D, Cummings LL (1997) A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. J. Appl. Psych. 82(3):390–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Mierlo H, Van Hooft EA (2015) A group-level conceptualization of the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework antecedents and motivational outcomes. Group Organ. Management 40(6):776–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1986) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior (Springer, New York), 185–208.Google Scholar
• West MA (1996) Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. West MA, ed. Handbook of Work Group Psychology (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 555–579.Google Scholar
• Wilkens R, London M (2006) Relationships between climate, process, and performance in continuous quality improvement groups. J. Vocational Behav. 69(3):510–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Aggarwal I, Malone TW (2015) Collective intelligence and group performance. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 24(6):420–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yanghua J (2008) Collective goal orientation and justice climate on team learning. Proc. 2008 Internat. Conf. Comput. Sci. Software Engrg. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 101–104.Google Scholar
• Yeo GB, Neal A (2004) A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: Effects of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. J. Appl. Psych. 89(2):231–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Zyphur MJ, Preacher KJ (2009) Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models. Organ. Res. Methods 12(4):695–719.Crossref, Google Scholar