Using Verbal Irony to Move on with Controversial Issues

References

• Abdallah C, Langley A (2014) The double edge of ambiguity in strategic planning. J. Management Stud. 51(2):235–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackroyd S, Thompson P (1999) Organisational Misbehaviour (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Kärreman D (2007) Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1265–1281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attardo S (2002) Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. Anolli L, Ciceri R, Riva G, eds. Say Not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication, Emerging Communication: Studies in New Technologies and Practices in Communication, vol. 3 (IOS Press, Amsterdam), 159–180.Google Scholar
• Attardo S (2010) Linguistic Theories of Humor (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Berger AA (1976) Anatomy of a joke. J. Comm. 26(1):113–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergson H (1914) Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Bourgeois LJI, Eisenhardt KM (1988) Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Sci. 34(7):816–835.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown P, Levinson SC (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charman S (2013) Sharing a laugh: The role of humour in relationships between police officers and ambulance staff. Internat. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy. 33(3/4):152–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarke I, Kwon W, Wodak R (2012) A context-sensitive approach to analysing talk in strategy meetings. British J. Management 23(4):455–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper C (2008) Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: A relational process model. Human Relations 61(8):1087–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooren F (2010) Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism (John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooren F (2012) Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. J. Comm. 62(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooren F, Kuhn T, Cornelissen J, Clark T (2011) Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organ. Stud. 32(9):1149–1170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooren F, Matte F, Benoit-Barné C, Brummans BH (2013) Communication as ventriloquism: A grounded-in-action approach to the study of organizational tensions. Comm. Monographs 80(3):255–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JP, Durand R (2014) Moving forward: Developing theoretical contributions in management studies. J. Management Stud. 51(6):995–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culpeper J (2011) Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culpeper J (2016) Impoliteness strategies. Capone A, Mey JL, eds. Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology, vol. 4 (Springer, Berlin), 421–445.Google Scholar
• Cunliffe A, Coupland C (2012) From hero to villain to hero: Making experience sensible through embodied narrative sensemaking. Human Relations 65(1):63–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Descartes R (1728) Les Passions de l'Âme (Charles Le Clerc, Paris).Google Scholar
• Duncan JW (1982) Humor in management: Prospects for administrative practice and research. Acad. Management Rev. 7(1):136–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan JW (1984) Perceived humor and social network patterns in a sample of task oriented groups: A re-examination of prior research. Human Relations 37(11):895–907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan JW, Smeltzer LR, Leap TL (1990) Humor and work: Application of joking behavior to management. J. Management 16(2):255–278.Google Scholar
• Eisenberg EM (1984) Strategic Ambiguities: Essays on Communication, Organization, and Identity (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Fairclough N (2003) Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford JD, Ford LW (1995) The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):541–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freud S (1950) Humour. Strachey J, ed. Collected Papers: Miscellaneous Papers, 1888–1938 (Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, London).Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour (Penguin, Harmondsworth, UK).Google Scholar
• Gylfe P, Franck H, Vaara E (2019) Living with paradox through irony. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 155:68–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hatch MJ (1997) Irony and the social construction of contradiction in the humour of a management team. Organ. Sci. 8(3):275–288.Link, Google Scholar
• Hatch MJ, Ehrlich SB (1993) Spontaneous humour as an indicator of paradox and ambiquity in organizations. Organ. Stud. 14(4):505–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoad TF, ed. (1993) The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Holmes J (2000) Politeness, power and provocation: how humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Stud. 2(2):159–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoyle E, Wallace M (2008) Two faces of organizational irony: Endemic and pragmatic. Organ. Stud. 29(11):1427–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Lê J (2017) We have to do this and that? You must be joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organ. Stud. 28(3–4):433–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kant I (1987) Critique of Judgment, trans. Pluhar WS (Hackett, Indianapolis).Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Kierkegaard S (1965) The Concept of Irony, trans. Lee M. Capel (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN).Google Scholar
• King KN (1988) The use of humor in dispute resolution. Negotiation J. 4(2):119–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotthoff H (2003) Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. J. Pragmatics 35:1387–1411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotthoff H (2006) Gender and humor: The state of the art. J. Pragmatics 38(1):4–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreuz RJ, Roberts RM (1995) Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor Symbolic Activity 10(1):21–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krzyzànowski M (2011) Ethnography and critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Stud. 8(4):231–238.Google Scholar
• Kwon W, Clarke I, Wodak R (2009) Organizational decision-making, discourse, and power: Integrating across contexts and scales. Discourse Comm. 3(3):273–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon W, Clarke I, Wodak R (2014) Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings. J. Management Stud. 51(2):265–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaFave L, Haddad J, Maeson WA (1976) Superiority, enhanced self-esteem and perceived incongruity humor theory. Chapman AJ, Foot HC, eds. Humor and Laughter: Theory, Research and Applications (Wiley, New York), 63–91.Google Scholar
• Lampert MD, Ervin-Tripp SM (2006) Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends. J. Pragmatics 38(1):51–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee TW (1999) Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Locke K, Golden-Biddle K, Feldman MS (2008) Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organ. Sci. 19(6):907–918.Link, Google Scholar
• Lynch OH (2002) Humorous communication: Finding a place for humor in communication research. Comm. Theory 12(4):423–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynch OH (2009) Kitchen antics: The importance of humour and maintaining professionalism at work. J. Appl. Comm. Res. 37:444–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maitlis S, Christianson MK (2014) Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):57–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGhee PE, Pistolesi E (1979) Humor: Its Origin and Development (WH Freeman, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Menz F (1999) ‘Who am I gonna do this with?’: Self-organization, ambiguity and decision-making in a business enterprise. Discourse Soc. 10(1):101–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JC (2000) Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Comm. Theory 10(3):310–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyerson DE, Scully MA (1995) Crossroads tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organ. Sci. 6(5):585–600.Link, Google Scholar
• Morreall J (1983) Taking Laughter Seriously (SUNY Press, Albany, NY).Google Scholar
• Patriotta G, Spedale S (2009) Making sense through face: Identity and social interaction in a consultancy task force. Organ. Stud. 30(11):1227–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1998) Pragmatism as the logic of abduction. Project PE, ed. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 2 (1893–1913) (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN), 226–241.Google Scholar
• Pizzini F (1991) Communication hierarchies in humour: Gender differences in the obstetrical/gynaecological setting. Discourse Soc. 2(4):477–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plester B, Sayers J (2007) ‘Taking the piss’: Functions of banter in the IT industry. Humor 20:157–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putnam LL, Fairhurst GT, Banghart S (2016) Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):65–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quintilian (1920) The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian (Original work written 1st Century A.D.) (Heinemann, London).Google Scholar
• Reisigl M, Wodak R (2015) The discourse-historical approach (DHA). Wodak R, Meyer M, eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd ed. (Sage, London), 23–61.Google Scholar
• Riad S, Vaara E (2011) Varieties of national metonymy in media accounts of international mergers and acquisitions. J. Management Stud. 48(4):737–771.Google Scholar
• Richie C (2014) ‘Taking the piss’: Mockery as a form of communications. Comedy Stud. 5(1):33–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romero E, Pescosolido A (2008) Humor and group effectiveness. Human Relations 61(3):395–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romero EJ (2005) The effect of humour on mental state and work effort. Internat. J. Work Organ. Emotion 1(2):137–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schad J, Lewis MW, Raisch S, Smith WK (2016) Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):5–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott T (2007) Expression of humour by emergency personnel involved in sudden deathwork. Mortality 12(4):350–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seidl D, Guérard S (2015) Meetings and workshops as strategy practices. Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, Vaara E, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 564–581.Google Scholar
• Sillince JA, Barker JR (2012) A tropological theory of institutionalization. Organ. Stud. 33(1):7–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sillince JA, Golant BD (2017) The role of irony and metaphor in working through paradox during organizational change. Smith WK, Lewis MW, Jarzabkowski P, Langley A, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 260–276.Google Scholar
• Sillince J, Jarzabkowski P, Shaw D (2012) Shaping strategic action through the rhetorical construction and exploitation of ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 23(3):630–650.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith WJ, Vernard Harrington K, Neck CP (2000) Resolving conflict with humor in a diversity context. J. Management Psych. 15(6):606–625.Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Lewis MW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):381–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swabey MC (1962) Comic laughter: A philosophical essay. J. Philos. 59(14):376–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tangherlini TR (2000) Heroes and lies: Storytelling tactics among paramedics. Folklore 111(1):43–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teague F, Preminger A, Brogan T (1993) New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Tracy SJ, Myers KK, Scott CW (2006) Cracking jokes and crafting selves: Sensemaking and identity management among human service workers. Comm. Monographs 73(3):283–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsang EWK, Elsaesser F (2011) How contrastive explanation facilitates theory building. Acad. Management Rev. 36:401–419.Google Scholar
• Utsumi A (2000) Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. J. Pragmatics 32(12):1777–1806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dijk TA (2008) Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J, Sørensen JB, Mitchell TR (2007) The interplay between theory and method. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1145–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veale T, Feyaerts K, Brône G (2006) The Cognitive Mechanisms of Adversarial Humor (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (2007) The generative properties of richness. Acad. Management J. 50(1):14–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Browning LD (1986) Argument and narration in organizational communication. J. Management 12(2):243–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4):409–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Westwood RI, Johnston A (2013) Humor in organization: From function to resistance. Humor 26(2):219–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wodak R (1996) Disorders of Discourse (Longman, London).Google Scholar
• Wodak R (2011) The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual, 2nd ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK).Google Scholar
• Wodak R (2013) Analyzing meetings in political and business contexts. Different genres—similar strategies? Cap P, Okulska O, eds. Genres in Political Discourse (Benjamins, Amsterdam), 187–221.Google Scholar
• Wodak R (2014) Perspectives from critical discourse studies and the discourse-historical approach. Cooren F, Vaara E, Langley A, Tsoukas H, eds. Language and Communication at Work: Discourse, Narrativity, and Organizing (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 39–70.Google Scholar
• Wodak R, Krzyzànowski M, Forchtener B (2011) The interplay of language ideologies and contextual cues in multilingual interactions: Language choice and code-switching in European Union institutions. Language Soc. 41(2):157–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yakhlef A, Essén A (2013) Practice innovation as bodily skills: The example of elderly home care service delivery. Organization 20(6):881–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zietsma C, Toubiana M, Voronov M, Roberts A (2018) Emotions in Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar