If Higher Pay Is Profitable, Why Is It So Rare? Modeling Competing Strategies in Mass Market Services

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1347

References

  • Adner R, Csaszar FA, Zemsky PB (2014) Positioning on a multiattribute landscape. Management Sci. 60(11):2794–2815.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ager DL, Roberto MA (2013) Trader Joe’s (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Appelbaum E, Schmitt J (2009) Review article: Low-wage work in high-income countries: Labor-market institutions and business strategy in the US and Europe. Human Relations 62(12):1907–1934.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arthur JB (1992) The link between business strategy and industrial-relations systems in American steel minimills. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 45(3):488–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bamber GJ, Gittell JH, Kochan TA, von Nordenflycht A (2009) Contrasting management and employment-relations strategies in European airlines. J. Indust. Relations 51(5):635–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batt R (1999) Work organization, technology, and performance in customer service and sales. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 52(4):539–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumann O, Schmidt J, Stieglitz N (2019) Effective search in rugged performance landscapes: A review and outlook. J. Management 45(1):285–318.Google Scholar
  • Bhamu J, Sangwan KS (2014) Lean manufacturing: Literature review and research issues. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 34(7):876–940.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Brynjolfsson E, Foster L, Jarmin R, Patnaik M, Saporta-Eksten I, Van Reenen J (2019) What drives differences in management practices? Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(5):1648–1683.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brusoni S, Prencipe A (2006) Making design rules: A multidomain perspective. Organ. Sci. 17(2):179–189.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017a) Industry Output and Employment Projections (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017b) National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Busemeyer JR, Swenson KN, Lazarte A (1986) An adaptive approach to resource-allocation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 38(3):318–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cable DM, Turban DB (2003) The value of organizational reputation in the recruitment context: A brand-equity perspective. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 33(11):2244–2266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carre F, Tilly C, Van Klaveren M, Voss-Dahm D (2010) Retail jobs in comparative perspective. Gautié J, Schmitt J, eds. Low-Wage Work in the Wealthy World (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 211–268.Google Scholar
  • Chen CX, Sandino T (2012) Can wages buy honesty? The relationship between relative wages and employee theft. J. Accounting Res. 50(4):967–1000.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chuang HHC, Oliva R (2015) Inventory record inaccuracy: Causes and labor effects. J. Oper. Management 39-40(1):63–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA, Siggelkow N (2010) How much to copy? Determinants of effective imitation breadth. Organ. Sci. 21(3):661–676.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dess GG, Shaw JD (2001) Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Acad. Management Rev. 26(3):446–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dosi G, Marengo L (1999) The co-evolution of technological knowledge and corporate organizations. Gambardella A, Malerba F, eds. The Organization of Economic Innovation in Europe (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 15–23.Google Scholar
  • Ennen E, Richter A (2010) The whole is more than the sum of its parts-or is it? A review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organizations. J. Management 36(1):207–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang C, Levinthal D (2009) Near-term liability of exploitation: Exploration and exploitation in multistage problems. Organ. Sci. 20(3):538–551.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Forrester JW, Senge P (1980) Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. Legasto A, Forrester JW, Lyneis JM, eds. System Dynamics, TIMES Studies in the Management Sciences, vol. 14 (North-Holland, New York), 209–228.Google Scholar
  • Gibbons R, Henderson R (2012) Relational contracts and organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1350–1364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1975) Development of the job diagnostic survey. J. Appl. Psych. 60(2):159–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hatch NW, Mowery DC (1998) Process innovation and learning by doing in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. 44(11):1461–1477.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Henly JR, Lambert SJ (2014) Unpredictable work timing in retail jobs: Implications for employee work-life conflict. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 67(3):986–1016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homer J (2019) Best practices in system dynamics modeling, revisited: A practitioner’s view. System Dynamics Rev. 35(2):177–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Humphreys KA, Gary MS, Trotman KT (2016) Dynamic decision making using the balanced scorecard framework. Accounting Rev. 91(5):1441–1465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ichniowski C, Shaw K, Prennushi G (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3):291–313.Google Scholar
  • Jiang KF, Lepak DP, Han KJ, Hong Y, Kim A, Winkler AL (2012) Clarifying the construct of human resource systems: Relating human resource management to employee performance. Human Resource Management Rev. 22(2):73–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • John R, Saloner G (2013) Strategy and organization. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 799–849.Google Scholar
  • Kochan TA, Osterman P (1994) The Mutual Gains Enterprise: Forging a Winning Partnership Among Labor, Management, and Government (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Lambert SJ (2008) Passing the buck: Labor flexibility practices that transfer risk onto hourly workers. Human Relations 61(9):1203–1227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ling TK, Lee CK, Ho W (2009) The analysis and case studies of successful express logistics companies. Internat. J. Value Chain Management 3(1):20–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macduffie JP (1995) Human-resource bundles and manufacturing performance—organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 48(2):197–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Mayfield M (2010) The Business of Caring: Ararat Nursing Facility(Paraprofessional Healthcare Institute and Hitachi Foundation, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • McGregor D (1960) The Human Side of Enterprise (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Milkovich GT, Newman JM, Gerhart BA (2014) Compensation, 11th ed. (McGraw-Hill, Irwin, NY).Google Scholar
  • Minsky M (1961) Steps toward artificial intelligence. Proc. Institution Radio Engineers 49(1):8–30.Google Scholar
  • Osterman P (2000) Work reorganization in an era of restructuring: Trends in diffusion and effects on employee welfare. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 53(2):179–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pil FK, MacDuffie JP (1996) The adoption of high-involvement work practices. Indust. Relations 35(3):423–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ployhart RE, Moliterno TP (2011) Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):127–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M, Siggelkow N (2008) Contextuality within activity systems and sustainability of competitive advantage. Acad. Management Perspect. 22(2):34–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(6):61–87.Google Scholar
  • Prokesch S (2017) The right thing to do. Harvard Bus. Rev. (December 7), https://hbr.org/2017/12/the-right-thing-to-do.Google Scholar
  • Rahmandad H (2008) Effect of delays on complexity of organizational learning. Management Sci. 54(7):1297–1312.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rahmandad H (2019) Interdependence, complementarity, and ruggedness of performance landscapes. Strategy Sci. 4(3):175–249.Google Scholar
  • Rahmandad H, Sterman J (2012) Reporting guidelines for simulation-based research in social sciences. System Dynam. Rev. 28(4):396–411.Google Scholar
  • Rahmandad H, Henderson R, Repenning NP (2018) Making the numbers? “Short termism” and the puzzle of only occasional disaster. Management Sci. 64(3):1328–1347.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raman A, DeHoratius N, Ton Z (2001) Execution: The missing link in retail operations. Calif. Management Rev. 43(3):136–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Repenning NP (2002) A simulation-based approach to understanding the dynamics of innovation implementation. Organ. Sci. 13(2):109–127.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin JW (2001) Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organ. Sci. 12(3):274–293.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rubinstein SA, Kochan TA (2001) Learning from Saturn: Possibilities for Corporate Governance and Employee Relations (ILR Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  • Sadun R, Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2017) Why do we undervalue competent management? Great leadership and brilliant strategy won’t succeed without operational excellence. Harvard Bus. Rev. 95(5):120–127.Google Scholar
  • Sastry MA (1997) Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42 (2):237–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shah R, Ward PT (2003) Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles, and performance. J. Oper. Management 21(2):129–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2001) Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. 44(4):838–857.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2002a) Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):125–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2002b) Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: Organizational consequences. Management Sci. 48(7):900–916.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2011) Firms as systems of interdependent choices. J. Management Stud. 48(5):1126–1140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sinha KK, Van de Ven AH (2005) Designing work within and between organizations. Organ. Sci. 16(4):389–408.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman J (2000) Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, 1st ed. (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Ton Z (2014) The Good Jobs Strategy: How the Smartest Companies Invest in Employees to Lower Costs and Boost Profits (New Harvest Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ton Z (2017) How to build a business on good jobs. Harvard Bus. Rev. (December 1), https://hbr.org/2017/12/how-to-build-a-business-on-good-jobs.Google Scholar
  • Ton Z, Harrow S (2010) Mercadona (Harvard Business School, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Torres JP (2019) System dynamics review and publications 1985-2017: Analysis, synthesis and contributions. System Dynamics Rev. 35(2):160–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams JC, Lambert SJ, Kesavan S, Fugiel PJ, Ospina LA, Rapoport ED, Jarpe M, et al.. (2018) Stable scheduling increases productivity and sales: The stable scheduling study. Center for WorkLife Law. Accessed November 24, 2019, http://worklifelaw.org/publications/Stable-Scheduling-Study-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1991) The Machine That Changed the World: How Japan's Secret Weapon in the Global Auto Wars Will Revolutionize Western Industry, 1st ed. (HarperPerennial, New York).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.