- Cited by
- 19 May 2026 | ILR Review, Vol. 19
- 14 November 2025 | Human Resource Management, Vol. 76
- 12 August 2025 | Foundations and Trends® in Technology, Information and Operations Management, Vol. 19, No. 4
- Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 19, No. 2
- 13 March 2024 | Operations Research, Vol. 73, No. 3
- 21 January 2025 | African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, Vol. 64
- 29 May 2025 | Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento, Vol. 13, No. 27
- 27 August 2022 | BRQ Business Research Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 1
- 17 August 2023 | Chinese Management Studies, Vol. 18, No. 5
- 15 December 2020 | Organization Science, Vol. 34, No. 6
- 22 August 2023 | Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, Vol. 36, No. 3
- 23 April 2023 | Personnel Psychology, Vol. 76, No. 2
- 4 July 2022 | Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 30, No. 1
- 4 December 2022 | System Dynamics Review, Vol. 39, No. 1
- 10 October 2022 | Systems, Vol. 10, No. 5
- 18 November 2020 | Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 42, No. 5
- Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 269

Volume 31, Issue 5
Article Information
Supplemental Material
Metrics
Information
- Received:September 19, 2018
- Accepted:October 29, 2019
- Published Online:February 13, 2020
Copyright © 2020, INFORMS
Cite as
Keywords
The authors thank several organizations and their employees for allowing us access and sharing their data and insights with us. They also thank Matt Amengual, Emilio Castilla, Greg Distelhorst, Michael Jacobides, Sarah Kalloch, David Keith, Erin Kelly, Tom Kochan, Rogelio Oliva, Paul Osterman, John Sterman, and Ezra Zuckerman for their valuable suggestions. They are grateful for the comments of seminar participants at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford, and London Business School, and reviewers and conference attendees at Academy of Management, Carnegie School of Organizational Learning, INFORMS, International System Dynamics Society, Strategic Management Society, Strategy Science, and Theoretical Organizational Models. Felipe Csaszar and three anonymous reviewers provided excellent feedback in the review process that helped improve the manuscript. The authors are solely responsible for any errors.
