Theorizing Actor Interactions Shaping Innovation in Digital Infrastructures: The Case of Residential Internet Development in Belarus

References

• Aanestad M, Jensen TB (2011) Building nation-wide information infrastructures in healthcare through modular implementation strategies. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 20(2):161–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbate J (2000) Inventing the internet (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Afuah A, Tucci CL (2012) Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):355–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari S, Garud R (2009) Inter-generational transitions in socio-technical systems: The case of mobile communications. Res. Policy 38(2):382–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Heracleous L, Walsham G (2013) A rhetorical approach to IT diffusion: Reconceptualizing the ideology-framing relationship in computerization movements. Management Inform Systems Quart. 37(1):201–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Yoo Y (2012) Institutional contradictions and loose coupling: Postimplementation of NASA’s Enterprise Information System. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):376–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Biernacki P, Waldorf D (1981) Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol. Methods Res. 10(2):141–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Callon M (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fisherman of St Brieuc bay. Law J, ed. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge (Routledge, London), 196–232.Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Constantinides P, Barrett M (2014) Information infrastructure development and governance as collective action. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):40–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D, Dunne DD (2011) Organizing ecologies of complex innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1214–1223.Link, Google Scholar
• Dunn MB, Jones C (2010) Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):114–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunne DD, Dougherty D (2016) Abductive reasoning: How innovators navigate in the labyrinth of complex product innovation. Organ. Stud. 37(2):131–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards PN, Bowker GC, Jackson SJ, Williams R (2009) Introduction: An agenda for infrastructure studies. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(5):6.Google Scholar
• Eisenmann TR (2008) Managing proprietary and shared platforms. California Management Rev. 50(4):31–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, von Krogh G, Monteiro E, Lakhani KR (2016) Special section introduction—Online community as space for knowledge flows. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):668–684.Link, Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford R (1991) Bringing society back in symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. Powell W, DiMaggio P, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–266.Google Scholar
• Garud R, Jain S, Kumaraswamy A (2002) Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Acad. Management J. 45(1):196–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Jain S, Tuertscher P (2008) Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness. Organ. Stud. 29(3):351–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Tuertscher P, Van de Ven AH (2013) Perspectives on innovation processes. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):775–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Phillips N (2013) Institutional work as logics shift: The case of Intel’s transformation to platform leader. Organ. Stud. 34(8):1035–1071.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girasa R (2018) States’ regulation of virtual currencies. Regulation of Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technologies, Palgrave Studies in Financial Services Technology (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden BR (1992) The past is the past—or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad. Management J. 35(4):848–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden BR (1997) Further remarks on retrospective accounts on organizational and strategic management research. Acad. Management J. 40(5):1243–1252.Google Scholar
• Goodman LA (2011) Comment: on respondent‐driven sampling and snowball sampling in hard‐to‐reach populations and snowball sampling not in hard‐to‐reach populations. Sociol. Methodology 41(1):347–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2010) Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. J. Inform. Tech. 28:1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Monteiro E (1997) Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Accounting Management Inform. Tech. 7(4):183–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haraway DJ (2003) The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness (Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Heckathorn DD (2011) Comment: Snowball vs. respondent‐driven sampling. Sociol. Methodol. 41(1):355–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Bygstad B (2013) The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(3):907–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Yoo Y (2014) The liminality of trajectory shifts in institutional entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 25(3):932–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Hepsø V, Monteiro E, Rolland KH (2009) Ecologies of e-Infrastructures. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(5):2.Google Scholar
• Huang J, Henfridsson O, Liu MJ, Newell S (2017) Growing on steroids: Rapidly scaling the user base of digital ventures through digital innovation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):301–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber GP, Power DJ (1985) Retrospective reports of strategic‐level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management J. 6(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hultin L, Mähring M (2014) Visualizing institutional logics in sociomaterial practices. Inform. Organ. 24(3):129–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• ITU (2014) Measuring the Information Society Report (International Telecommunications Union, Geneva).Google Scholar
• ITU (2016) ICT Development Index 2016 (Belarus)(International Telecommunications Union, Geneva).Google Scholar
• Jack W, Suri T (2011) Mobile Money: The Economics of M-PESA (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelle U (1995) Theories as Heuristic Tools in Qualitative Research. Openness in Research: The Tension Between Self and Other (Van Gorcum, Assen, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• King JL, Lyytinen K (2005) Automotive informatics: Information technology and enterprise transformation in the automobile industry. Dutton WH, Kahin B, O‘Callaghan R, Wyckoff AW, eds. Transforming Enterprise: The Economic and Social Implications of Information Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 283–333.Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Panetta JA (2007) The principles of distributed innovation. Innovation 2(3):97–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50(2):289–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, Boland R Jr (2016) Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Inform. Systems J. 26(1):47–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margulis L, Sagan D (2007) Dazzle Gradually: Reflections on the Nature of Nature (Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction, VT).Google Scholar
• Minevich M, Richter F‐J (2005) Global Outsourcing Report 2005. Report, Going Global Ventures and HORASIS, New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
• Monteiro E (1998) Living with technology. Scandinavian J. Inform. Systems 10:249–254.Google Scholar
• Monteiro E, Pollock N, Williams R (2014) Innovation in information infrastructures: Introduction to the special issue. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(4):4.Google Scholar
• Morawczynski O, Pickens M (2009) Poor people using mobile financial services: Observations on customer usage and impact from M-PESA. CGAP Brief, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Accessed May 8, 2020, https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):223–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oborn E, Barrett M, Orlikowski W, Kim A (2019) Trajectory dynamics in innovation: developing and transforming a mobile money service across time and place. Organ. Sci. 30(5):1097–1123.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Bechky BA (2008) Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):422–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Lakhani KR (2011) Organizations in the Shadow of Communities. Communities and Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 3–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Gash DC (1994) Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 12(2):174–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(1):129–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raymond E (1999) The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge Tech. Policy 12(3):23–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richardson R, Kramer EH (2006) Abduction as the type of inference that characterizes the development of a grounded theory. Quality Res. 6(4):497–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodon J, Silva L (2015) Exploring the formation of a healthcare information infrastructure: hierarchy or meshwork? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16(5):394–417.Google Scholar
• Rybik K (2012) Online country. Business 10:14–16.Google Scholar
• Sahay S, Monteiro E, Aanestad M (2009) Configurable politics and asymmetric integration: Health e-infrastructures in India. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(5):4.Google Scholar
• Sanner TA, Manda TD, Nielsen P (2014) Grafting: balancing control and cultivation in information infrastructure innovation. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(4):220.Google Scholar
• Schetko N, Shkilionok M (2010) People slow down in creating HomeNets with all means, Tut.by (March 2), https://news.tut.by/it/162645.html.Google Scholar
• Schultze U, Bhappu AD (2017) Organization-sponsored sharing platforms: Managing the dialectics of conflicting institutional logics. Accessed October 6, 2020, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2017/Peer-to-Peer/Presentations/9.Google Scholar
• Seklickiy OF (2000) Development of internet for diverse customer segments in Belarus. Comm. Networks 2(3):78–80.Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thietart RA (2016) Strategy dynamics: Agency, path dependency, and self‐organized emergence. Strategic Management J. 37(4):774–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. 105:801–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W (2008) Institutional logics. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Sahlin‐Andersson K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 99–129.Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Tuertscher P, Garud R, Kumaraswamy A (2014) Justification and interlaced knowledge at ATLAS, CERN. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1579–1608.Link, Google Scholar
• Tuomi I (2002) Networks of Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Van Oost E, Verhaegh S, Oudshoorn N (2009) From innovation community to community innovation: User-initiated innovation in wireless Leiden. Sci. Tech. Human Values 34(2):182–205.Google Scholar
• West J, O’Mahony S (2008) The role of participation architecture in growing sponsored open source communities. Industry Innovation 15(2):145–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y (2013) The tables have turned: How can the information systems field contribute to technology and innovation management research? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14(5):227.Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Zorina A (2016) From a competing to a collaborative crowd: Tactics for co-creation with innovative bottom-up communities. Organ. Dynam. 45(2):80–93.Google Scholar
• Zabrodskaya KA (2013) Information services: Specificities and typology. Comm. Networks 5:121.Google Scholar
• Zittrain J (2008) The Future of the Internet—And How to Stop It (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar