Let Us Not Speak of Them, But Look and Pass? Organizational Responses to Online Reviews

References

• Amabile TM (1982) Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 43(5):997–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ananthakrishnan U, Proserpio D, Sharma S (2023) I hear you: Does quality improve with customer voice? Marketing Sci. 42(6):1143–1161.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson M, Magruder J (2012) Learning from the crowd: Regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database. Econom. J. 122(563):957–989.Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Gibbs BW (1990) The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organ. Sci. 1(2):177–194.Link, Google Scholar
• Augustine G (2021) We’re not like those crazy hippies: The dynamics of jurisdictional drift in externally mandated occupational groups. Organ. Sci. 32(4):1056–1078.Link, Google Scholar
• Basuroy S, Chatterjee S, Ravid SA (2003) How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets. J. Marketing 67(4):103–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botelho TL (2024) From audience to evaluator: When visibility into prior evaluations leads to convergence or divergence in subsequent evaluations among professionals. Organ. Sci. 35(5):1682–1703.Link, Google Scholar
• Bouleau C (2014) Chaque jour, Paris perd deux restaurants. Challenges (July 8), https://www.challenges.fr/entreprise/pourquoi-chaque-jour-deux-restaurants-disparaissent-a-paris_30573. [In French].Google Scholar
• BrightLocal (2024) What matters in online reviews? Retrieved December 30, 2024, https://www.brightlocal.com/learn/review-management/generating-reviews/what-matters-in-online-reviews/.Google Scholar
• Bromley P, Powell WW (2012) From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):483–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bundy J, Shropshire C, Buchholtz AK (2013) Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3):352–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2011) Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(2):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capoccia C (2018) Online reviews are the best thing that ever happened to small businesses. Forbes (April 11), https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/04/11/online-reviews-are-the-best-thing-that-ever-happened-to-small-businesses/.Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Busenbark JR, Woo H, Semadeni M (2016) Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2639–2657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (SAGE Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Chatikavanij N (2019) Michelin Guide’s top picks for Bangkok’s best street food stalls. Michelin Guide (April 11), https://guide.michelin.com/en/article/dining-out/michelin-guide-s-top-picks-for-bangkok-s-best-street-food-stalls.Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Flynn FJ (2005) Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organ. Sci. 16(4):434–447.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Toffel MW (2010) How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management J. 31(9):917–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Dover Y, Mayzlin D (2018) Channels of impact: User reviews when quality is dynamic and managers respond. Marketing Sci. 37(5):688–709.Link, Google Scholar
• Choudhury P, Wang D, Carlson NA, Khanna T (2019) Machine learning approaches to facial and text analysis: Discovering CEO oral communication styles. Strategic Management J. 40(11):1705–1732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu J (2021) Cameras of merit or engines of inequality? College ranking systems and the enrollment of disadvantaged students. Amer. J Sociol. 126(6):1307–1346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB (1980) Full-cycle social psychology. Bickman L, ed. Applied Social Psychology Annual (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 21–47.Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Zollo M, Hansen MT (2012) Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Acad. Management J. 55:1429–1448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowston K, Allen EE, Heckman R (2012) Using natural language processing technology for qualitative data analysis. Internat. J. Soc. Res. Methodology 15(6):523–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlin KB, Chuang YT, Roulet TJ (2018) Opportunity, motivation, and ability to learn from failures and errors: Review, synthesis, and ways to move forward. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):252–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daneshkhu S (2018) Glassdoor comments on job satisfaction cannot be ignored. Financial Times (July 12), https://www.ft.com/content/a24eb1ba-7f75-11e8-bc55-50daf11b720d.Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. 49(10):1407–1424.Link, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Narayan R (2006) A statistical measure of a population’s propensity to engage in post-purchase online word-of-mouth. Statist. Sci. 21(2):277–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, Gutierrez C (2019) Under a magnifying glass: On the use of experiments in strategy research. Strategic Organ. 17(4):497–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, Micheli MR (2023) To stem the tide: Organizational climate and the locus of knowledge transfer. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2436–2463.Link, Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G, King AA, Verona G (2015) Sanctioning in the wild: Rational calculus and retributive instincts in gourmet cuisine. Acad. Management J. 58(3):906–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Hawn O, Ioannou I (2019) Willing and able: A general model of organizational responses to normative pressures. Acad. Management Rev. 44(2):299–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman LB (1992) Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. Amer. J Sociol. 97(6):1531–1576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD (2003) Organizational perception management. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:297–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Sutton RI (1992) Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Acad. Management J. 35(4):699–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J Sociol. 113(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etter M, Ravasi D, Colleoni E (2019) Social media and the formation of organizational reputation. Acad. Management Rev. 44(1):28–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fauchart E, von Hippel E (2008) Norms-based intellectual property systems: The case of French chefs. Organ. Sci. 19(2):187–201.Link, Google Scholar
• Favaron SD, Di Stefano G, Durand R (2022) Michelin is coming to town: Organizational responses to status shocks. Management Sci. 68(9):6925–6949.Google Scholar
• Fine GA, Elsbach KD (2000) Ethnography and experiment in social psychological theory building: Tactics for integrating qualitative field data with quantitative laboratory data. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 36(1):51–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2006) The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Acad. Management J. 49(6):1173–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fourcade M, Healy K (2017) Seeing like a market. Socio-Econom. Rev. 15(1):9–29.Google Scholar
• Fradkin A, Grewal E, Holtz D, Pearson M (2015) Bias and reciprocity in online reviews: Evidence from field experiments on Airbnb. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 641.Google Scholar
• Gao GG, Greenwood BN, Agarwal R, McCullough J (2015) Vocal minority and silent majority: How do online ratings reflect population perceptions of quality? MIS Quart. 39(3):565–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A (1999) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, 1st ed. (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Anchor Books, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Sands DB, Cattani G, Porac J (2024) Rating systems and increased heterogeneity in firm performance: Evidence from the New York City restaurant industry, 1994–2013. Strategic Management J. 45(1):36–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6):1251–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawass H (2010) Exploring the determinants of the reconfiguration capability: A dynamic capability perspective. Eur. J. Innovation Management 13(4):409–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Ann. Econom. Soc. Measurement 5(4):475–492.Google Scholar
• Hoffower H (2019) The CEO of an international luxury restaurant group says there’s a new type of restaurant getting Michelin stars, and it’s part of fine dining’s evolution. Bus. Insider (July 13), https://www.businessinsider.com/how-are-michelin-starred-restaurants-changing-more-casual-informal-2019-7.Google Scholar
• Huising R (2015) To hive or to hold? Producing professional authority through scut work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):263–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Leslie P (2003) The effect of information on product quality: Evidence from restaurant hygiene grade cards. Quart. J. Econom. 118(2):409–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karunakaran A, Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2022) Crowd-based accountability: Examining how social media commentary reconfigures organizational accountability. Organ. Sci. 33(1):170–193.Link, Google Scholar
• King AA, Goldfarb B, Simcoe T (2021) Learning from testimony on quantitative research in management. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):465–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Hitt LM (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 9(4):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Liebman E, Saar-Tsechansky M, Stone P (2019) The right music at the right time: Adaptive personalized playlists based on sequence modeling. MIS Quart. 43(3):765–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Lerner JS (2003) The role of affect in decision making. Davidson RJ, Scherer KR, Goldsmith HH, eds. Handbook of Affective Science (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 619–642.Google Scholar
• Luca M (2016) Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com. Working paper No. 12-016, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Luca M, Zervas G (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Sci. 62(12):3412–3427.Link, Google Scholar
• Martins LL (2005) A model of the effects of reputational rankings on organizational change. Organ. Sci. 16(6):701–720.Link, Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Schweidel DA (2012) Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Sci. 31(3):372–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Ody-Brasier A, Sharkey A (2019) Under pressure: Reputation, ratings, and inaccurate self-reporting in the nursing home industry. Strategic Management J. 40(10):1517–1544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):145–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson D, Waguespack D (2020) Strategic behavior by market intermediaries. Strategic Management J. 41(13):2474–2492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ. Sci. 25(3):868–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Pattison K (2009) Managing an online reputation. New York Times (July 29), https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/30/business/smallbusiness/30reputation.html.Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2015) Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Acad. Management J. 58(3):856–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Proserpio D, Zervas G (2017) Online reputation management: Estimating the impact of management responses on consumer reviews. Marketing Sci. 36(5):645–665.Link, Google Scholar
• Rahman HA (2021) The invisible cage: Workers’ reactivity to opaque algorithmic evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):945–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranganathan A (2018) The artisan and his audience: Identification with work and price setting in a handicraft cluster in southern India. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(3):637–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2003) Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(4):795–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rozin P, Royzman EB (2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5(4):296–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen S, Lerman D (2007) Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. J. Interactive Marketing 21(4):76–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharkey A, Kovács B, Hsu G (2023) Expert critics, rankings, and review aggregators: The changing nature of intermediation and the rise of markets with multiple intermediaries. Acad. Management Ann. 17(1):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shirani-Mehr H (2014) Applications of deep learning to sentiment analysis of movie reviews. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Simonson I, Rosen E (2014) Absolute Value: What Really Influences Customers in the Age of (Nearly) Perfect Information (Harper Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Waguespack DM, Sorenson O (2011) The ratings game: Asymmetry in classification. Organ. Sci. 22(3):541–553.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chaudhry A (2018) When and how managers’ responses to online reviews affect subsequent reviews. J. Marketing Res. 55(2):163–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Li B, Singh PV (2018) Copycats vs. original mobile apps: A machine learning copycat-detection method and empirical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):273–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang X, Reger RK, Pfarrer MD (2021) Faster, hotter, and more linked in: Managing social disapproval in the social media era. Acad. Management Rev. 46(2):275–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang T, Wezel FC, Forgues B (2016) Protecting market identity: When and how do organizations respond to consumers’ devaluations? Acad. Management J. 59(1):135–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1994) Substance and symbolism in CEOs’ long-term incentive plans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):367–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (2001) Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):202–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Widdicombe L (2018) Improving workplace culture, one review at a time. New Yorker (January 15), https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/01/22/improving-workplace-culture-one-review-at-a-time.Google Scholar
• Wilden R, Gudergan SP, Nielsen BB, Lings I (2013) Dynamic capabilities and performance: Strategy, structure and environment. Long Range Planning 46(1–2):72–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson EO (1998) Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge (Alfred A. Knopf, New York).Google Scholar
• Wolff-Mann E (2016) Here’s what’s wrong with online reviews—And how to fix them. Money (July 16), https://money.com/page/online-reviews-trust-fix/.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2019) Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels. J. Econometrics 211(1):137–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zavyalova A, Pfarrer M, Reger RK, Shapiro D (2012) Managing the message: The effects of firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1079–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar