Minding the Gap: How Perspective-Taking and Status Reflexivity Help Black Women Executives to Relate Across Difference at Work

References

• Arnett RD (2023) Uniting through difference: Rich cultural-identity expression as a conduit to inclusion. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1887–1913.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Sluss DM (2006) Relational identities in organizations: Healthy versus unhealthy. Kyriakidou O, Özbilgin MF, eds. Relational Perspectives in Organization Studies: A Research Companion (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 8–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atewologun D, Mahalingam R (2018) Intersectionality as a methodological tool in qualitative equality, diversity and inclusion research. Booysen LAE, Bendl R, Pringle JK, eds. Handbook of Research Methods in Diversity Management, Equality and Inclusion at Work (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 149–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atewologun D, Singh V (2010) Challenging ethnic and gender identities. Equality Diversity Inclusion 29(4):332–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrita AM, Wong-Padoongpatt G (2023) Ethnic identity and resilience: A moderated mediation analysis of protective factors for self-blame and racial microaggressions. Frontiers Psych. 14:1198375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baxter LA, Montgomery BM (1996) Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Beale F (1979) Double jeopardy: To be Black and female. Cade T, ed. The Black Woman: An Anthology (New American Library, New York), 90–100.Google Scholar
• Bell EL, Nkomo SM (1998) Armoring: Learning to withstand racial oppression. J. Comparative Family Stud. 29(2):285–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell EL, Nkomo SM (1999) Postcards from the borderlands: Building a career from the outside/within. J. Career Development 26(1):69–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brescoll VL, Dawson E, Uhlmann EL (2010) Hard won and easily lost: The fragile status of leaders in gender-stereotype-incongruent occupations. Psych. Sci. 21(11):1640–1642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(5):475–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruneau EG, Saxe R (2012) The power of being heard: The benefits of ‘perspective-giving’ in the context of intergroup conflict. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(4):855–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023) 5 Facts about black women in the labor force. U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Casciaro T (2014) Affect in organizational networks. Brass DJ, Labianca G, Mehra A, Halgin DS, Borgatti SP, eds. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 40 (Emerald Group, Bingley, UK), 219–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Lobo MS (2008) When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):655–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cha SE, Roberts LM (2019) Leveraging minority identities at work: An individual-level framework of the identity mobilization process. Organ. Sci. 30(4):735–760.Link, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2014) Constructing Grounded Theory (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay P (2003) Can dissimilarity lead to positive outcomes? The influence of open versus closed minds. J. Organ. Behav. 24(3):295–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay P, Tluchowska M, George E (2004) Identifying the ingroup: A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Acad. Management Rev. 29(2):180–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiaburu DS, Harrison DA (2008) Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 93(5):1082–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins PH (1986) Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Soc. Problems 33(6):14–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins PH (1990) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Collins PH (1999) Moving beyond gender: Intersectionality and scientific knowledge. Ferree MF, ed. Revisioning Gender (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 261–284.Google Scholar
• Crenshaw K (1991) Mapping the margins: Identity politics, intersectionality, and violence against women. Stanford Law Rev. 43(6):1241–1299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS (2005) Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. J. Management 31(6):874–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dumas TL, Phillips KW, Rothbard NP (2013) Getting closer at the company party: Integration experiences, racial dissimilarity, and workplace relationships. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1377–1401.Link, Google Scholar
• Dunbar NE, Burgoon JK (2005) Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 22(2):207–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Heaphy ED (2003) The power of high-quality connections. Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship (Berret-Koehler, San Francisco), 263–278.Google Scholar
• Eby LT, Allen TD (2012) Personal Relationships: The Effect on Employee Attitudes, Behavior, and Wellbeing (Taylor & Francis, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein C (1973) Positive effects of the multiple negative: Explaining the success of black professional women. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(4):912–935.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferdman BM, Roberts LM (2013) Creating inclusion for oneself: Knowing, accepting, and expressing one’s whole self at work. Ferdman BM, Deane BR, eds. Diversity at Work: The Practice of Inclusion (Jossey-Bass/Wiley, San Francisco), 93–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Field E, Krivkovich A, Kügele S, Robinson N, Yee L (2023) Women in the workplace. McKinsey & Company (October 5), https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace.Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Ku G (2004) The effects of perspective-taking on prejudice: The moderating role of self-evaluation. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 30(5):594–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Moskowitz GB (2000) Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78(4):708–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Magee JC, Inesi ME, Gruenfeld DH (2006) Power and perspectives not taken. Psych. Sci. 17(12):1068–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall EV, Hall AV, Galinsky AD, Phillips KW (2019) MOSAIC: A model of stereotyping through associated and intersectional categories. Acad. Management Rev. 44(3):643–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hess JA (2002) Distance regulation in personal relationships: The development of a conceptual model and a test of representational validity. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 19(5):663–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewlin PF, Karelaia N, Kouchaki M, Sedikides C (2020) Authenticity at work: Its shapes, triggers, and consequences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 158:80–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hooks B (1984) Black women: Shaping feminist theory. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center (South End Press, Boston), 1–15.Google Scholar
• Ibarra H (1993) Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Acad. Management Rev. 18(1):56–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson SE, May KE, Whitney K (1995) Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision making teams. Guzzo RA, Salas E, eds. Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 204–261.Google Scholar
• Jones EB, Bartunek JM (2021) Too close or optimally positioned? The value of personally relevant research. Acad. Management Perspect. 35(3):335–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• King DD, Fattoracci ES, Hollingsworth DW, Stahr E, Nelson M (2023) When thriving requires effortful surviving: Delineating manifestations and resource expenditure outcomes of microaggressions for Black employees. J. Appl. Psych. 108(2):183–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ku G, Wang CS, Galinsky A (2015) The promise and perversity of perspective-taking in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 35:79–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Labianca G, Brass DJ (2006) Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):596–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leigh A, Desai SD (2023) What’s race got to do with it? The interactive effect of race and gender on negotiation offers and outcomes. Organ. Sci. 34(2):935–958.Link, Google Scholar
• Lindsey A, King E, Hebl M, Levine N (2015) The impact of method, motivation, and empathy on diversity training effectiveness. J. Bus. Psych. 30(3):605–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Livingston RW, Rosette AS, Washington EF (2012) Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psych. Sci. 23(4):354–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyons BJ, Pek S, Wessel JL (2017) Toward a “sunlit path”: Stigma identity management as a source of localized social change through interaction. Acad. Management Rev. 42(4):618–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCluney CL, Rabelo VC (2019) Conditions of visibility: An intersectional examination of Black women’s belongingness and distinctiveness at work. J. Vocational Behav. 113:103–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCluney CL, Durkee MI, Smith RE II, Robotham KJ, Lee SSL (2021) To be, or not to be… Black: The effects of racial codeswitching on perceived professionalism in the workplace. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 97:104199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melwani S, Rothman NB (2022) The push-and-pull of frenemies: When and why ambivalent relationships lead to helping and harming. J. Appl. Psych. 107(5):707–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Methot JR, Melwani S, Rothman NB (2017) The space between us: A social-functional emotions view of ambivalent and indifferent workplace relationships. J. Management 43(6):1789–1819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Methot JR, LePine JA, Podsakoff NP, Christian JS (2016) Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? Exploring tradeoffs of multiplex relationships and their associations with job performance. Personnel Psych. 69(2):311–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mikulincer M, Birnbaum G, Woddis D, Nachmias O (2000) Stress and accessibility of proximity-related thoughts: Exploring the normative and intraindividual components of attachment theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78(3):509–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, Bar-On N, Ein-Dor T (2010) The pushes and pulls of close relationships: Attachment insecurities and relational ambivalence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(3):450–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller JB, Stiver IP (1997) The Healing Connection (Beacon Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Parker SK, Axtell CM (2001) Seeing another viewpoint: Antecedents and outcomes of employee perspective taking. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1085–1100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parks MR (1981) Ideology in interpersonal communication: Off the couch and into the world. Ann. Internat. Comm. Assoc. 5(1):79–107.Google Scholar
• Petsko CD, Rosette AS, Bodenhausen GV (2022) Through the looking glass: A lens-based account of intersectional stereotyping. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 123(4):763–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR (2008) How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic tests of three mediators. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 38(6):922–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Rothbard NP, Dumas TL (2009) To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):710–732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purdie-Vaughns V, Eibach R (2008) Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles 59:377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabelo VC, Robotham KJ, McCluney CL (2021) “Against a sharp white background”: How Black women experience the white gaze at work. Gender Work Organ. 28(5):1840–1858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins BR, Ehrhardt K (2021) Gaining perspective: The impact of close cross-race friendships on diversity training and education. J. Appl. Psych. 106(6):856–881.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reid PT, Comas-Diaz L (1990) Gender and ethnicity: Perspectives on dual status. Sex Roles 22(7–8):397–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rice DB, Boyd TL, Franklin DA (2023) Black and abused: Understanding who Black employees hold accountable for their mistreatment. Internat. J. Human Resource Management, ePub ahead of print September 24, https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2023.2261847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts LM, Creary SJ (2013) Navigating the self in diverse work contexts. Roberson QM, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Diversity and Work (Oxford University Press, New York), 73–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts LM, Cha SE, Kim SS (2014) Strategies for managing impressions of racial identity in the workplace. Cultural Diversity Ethnic Minority Psych. 20(4):529–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Livingston RW (2012) Failure is not an option for Black women: Effects of organizational performance on leaders with single versus dual-subordinate identities. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(5):1162–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, de Leon RP, Koval CZ, Harrison DA (2018) Intersectionality: Connecting experiences of gender with race at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 38:1–22.Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Koval CZ, Ma A, Livingston RW (2016) Race matters for women leaders: Intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties. Leadership Quart. 27(3):429–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothman NB, Melwani S (2017) Feeling mixed, ambivalent, and in flux: The social functions of emotional complexity for leaders. Acad. Management Rev. 42(2):259–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruiz Castro M, Holvino E (2016) Applying intersectionality in organizations: Inequality markers, cultural scripts and advancement practices in a professional service firm. Gender Work Organ. 23(3):328–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sackett PR, DuBois CL, Noe AW (1991) Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and White-Black differences in performance ratings. J. Appl. Psych. 76(2):263–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Settles IH (2006) Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles 54(9–10):589–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Settles IH, Buchanan NT, Dotson K (2019) Scrutinized but not recognized: (In)visibility and hypervisibility experiences of faculty of color. J. Vocational Behav. 113:62–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherf EN, Venkataramani V (2015) Friend or foe? The impact of relational ties with comparison others on outcome fairness and satisfaction judgments. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 128:1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shih M, Wang E, Trahan Bucher A, Stotzer R (2009) Perspective taking: Reducing prejudice towards general outgroups and specific individuals. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 12(5):565–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sidanius J, Cotterill S, Sheehy-Skeffington J, Kteily N, Carvacho H (2017) Social dominance theory: Explorations in the psychology of oppression. Sibley CG, Barlow FK, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 149–187.Google Scholar
• Smith AN, Watkins MB, Ladge JJ, Carlton P (2019) Making the invisible visible: Paradoxical effects of intersectional invisibility on the career experiences of executive Black women. Acad. Management J. 62(6):1705–1734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Todd AR, Bodenhausen GV, Richeson JA, Galinsky AD (2011) Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 100(6):1027–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trzebiatowski T, McCluney C, Hernandez M (2023) Managing the double bind: Women directors’ participation tactics in the gendered boardroom. Organ. Sci. 34(2):801–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Velez BL, Cox R Jr, Polihronakis CJ, Moradi B (2018) Discrimination, work outcomes, and mental health among women of color: The protective role of womanist attitudes. J. Counseling Psych. 65(2):178–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkataramani V, Labianca GJ, Grosser T (2013) Positive and negative workplace relationships, social satisfaction, and organizational attachment. J. Appl. Psych. 98(6):1028–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang CS, Kenneth T, Ku G, Galinsky AD (2014) Perspective-taking increases willingness to engage in intergroup contact. PLoS One 9(1):e85681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang C, Ku G, Smith AN, Edwards B, Scott E, Galinsky AD (2024) Increasing Black employees’ social identity affirmation and organizational involvement: Reducing social uncertainty through organizational and individual strategies. Organ. Sci., Articles in Advance October 30, https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2020.14659.Google Scholar
• Warren MT, Warren MA (2019) Measuring high-quality work relationships: A test of model and gender invariance. Personnel Psych. 18(1):46–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watkins MB, Simmons A, Umphress E (2019) It’s not black and white: Toward a contingency perspective on the consequences of being a token. Acad. Management Perspect. 33(3):334–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis N (2015) Situated intersectionality and social inequality. Raisons Politiques 58(2):91–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zembylas M (2022) The affective dimension of epistemic injustice. Ed. Theory 72(6):703–725.Crossref, Google Scholar