The Creative and Cross-Functional Benefits of Wearing Hearts on Sleeves: Authentic Affect Climate, Information Elaboration, and Team Creativity

References

• Aggarwal I, Woolley AW (2019) Team creativity, cognition, and cognitive style diversity. Management Sci. 65(4):1586–1599.Link, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Pratt MG (2016) The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Res. Organ. Behav. 36:157–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Barsade SG, Mueller JS, Staw BM (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):367–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Humphrey RH (1995) Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations 48(2):97–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer M, Leenders R, Oldham G, Vadera A (2010) Win or lose the battle for creativity: The power and perils of intergroup competition. Acad. Management J. 53(4):827–845.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett LF, Russell JA (1998) Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(4):967–984.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade SG (2002) The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):644–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade SG, Gibson DE (2007) Why does affect matter in organizations? Acad. Management Perspect. 21(1):36–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade SG, Knight AP (2015) Group affect. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 2:21–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel CA, Saavedra R (2000) The collective construction of work group moods. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(2):197–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Biscaro C, Comacchio A (2018) Knowledge creation across worldviews: How metaphors impact and orient group creativity. Organ. Sci. 29(1):58–79.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowen DE, Ostroff C (2004) Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Acad. Management Rev. 29(2):203–221.Google Scholar
• Brislin RW (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. Triandis HC, Berry JW, eds. Handbook Cross-Cultural Psychology (Allyn & Bacon, Boston), 398–444.Google Scholar
• Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM (2002) Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Acad. Management J. 45(5):875–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bylund CL, Makoul G (2005) Examining empathy in medical encounters: An observational study using the empathic communication coding system. Health Comm. 18(2):123–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlson KD, Wu J (2012) The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organ. Res. Methods 15(3):413–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua R, Jin M (2020) Across the great divides: Gender dynamics influence how intercultural conflict helps or hurts creative collaboration. Acad. Management J. 63(3):903–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark MA, Robertson MM, Young S (2019) “I feel your pain”: A critical review of organizational research on empathy. J. Organ. Behav. 40(2):166–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Edmondson AC (2011) Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Acad. Management J. 54(3):461–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diefendorff JM, Erickson RJ, Grandey AA, Dahling JJ (2011) Emotional display rules as work unit norms: A multilevel analysis of emotional labor among nurses. J. Occupational Health Psych. 16(2):170–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44:350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Lei Z (2014) Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1(1):23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psych. Methods 12(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein HA (2007) Emotion in organizations: A review and theoretical integration. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):315–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emich KJ, Vincent LC (2020) Shifting focus: The influence of affective diversity on team creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 156:24–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forgas JP (1995) Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psych. Bull. 117(1):39–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frazier ML, Fainshmidt S, Klinger RL, Pezeshkan A, Vracheva V (2017) Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personal Psych. 70(1):113–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner WL, Cogliser CC, Davis KM, Dickens MP (2011) Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. Leadership Quart. 22(6):1120–1145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goncalo JA, Staw BM (2006) Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 100(1):96–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grandey AA, Foo SC, Groth M, Goodwin RE (2012) Free to be you and me: A climate of authenticity alleviates burnout from emotional labor. J. Occupational Health Psych. 17(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grodal S, Nelson AJ, Siino RM (2015) Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Continual engagement in innovative work. Acad. Management J. 58(1):136–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison SH, Dossinger K (2017) Pliable guidance: A multilevel model of curiosity, feedback seeking, and feedback giving in creative work. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2051–2072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison SH, Rouse ED (2014) Let’s dance! Elastic coordination in creative group work: A qualitative study of modern dancers. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1256–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison SH, Rouse ED (2015) An inductive study of feedback interactions over the course of creative projects. Acad. Management J. 58(2):375–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2013) A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(5):822–832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2014) Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):324–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey S, Kou CY (2013) Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):346–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoever IJ, Zhou J, van Knippenberg D (2018) Different strokes for different teams: The contingent effects of positive and negative feedback on the creativity of informationally homogeneous and diverse teams. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2159–2181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoever IJ, van Knippenberg D, van Ginkel WP, Barkema HG (2012) Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. J. Appl. Psych. 97(5):982–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homan AC, van Knippenberg D, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW (2007) Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. J. Appl. Psych. 92(5):1189–1199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homan AC, Hollenbeck JR, Humphrey SE, van Knippenberg D, Ilgen DR, Van Kleef GA (2008) Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intragroup differences, and performance of diverse work groups. Acad. Management. J. 51(6):1204–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu J, Erdogan B, Jiang K, Bauer TN, Liu S (2018) Leader humility and team creativity: The role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance. J. Appl. Psych. 103(3):313–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphrey RH (2008) The right way to lead with emotional labor. Humphrey RH, ed. Affect and Emotion: New Directions in Management Theory and Research (Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC), 1–17.Google Scholar
• Jackson MH, Poole MS (2003) Idea-generation in naturally occurring contexts: Complex appropriation of a simple group procedure. Human Comm. Res. 29(4):560–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jang S (2017) Cultural brokerage and creative performance in multicultural teams. Organ. Sci. 28(6):993–1009.Link, Google Scholar
• Kearney E, Gebert D, Voelpel SC (2009) When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Acad. Management J. 52(3):581–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kegan R, Lahey L, Fleming A, Miller M (2014) Making business personal. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(4):44–52.Google Scholar
• Keltner D, Haidt J (1999) Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition Emotion 13(5):505–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight AP (2015) Mood at the midpoint: Affect and change in exploratory search over time in teams that face a deadline. Organ. Sci. 26(1):99–118.Link, Google Scholar
• LeBreton JM, Senter JL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ. Res. Methods 11(4):815–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee HW, Choi JN, Kim S (2018) Does gender diversity help teams constructively manage status conflict? An evolutionary perspective of status conflict, team psychological safety, and team creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 144:187–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organ. Sci. 22(2):347–369.Link, Google Scholar
• Lingo EL, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):47–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litchfield RC (2008) Brainstorming reconsidered: A goal-based view. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):649–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little TD, Cunningham WA, Shahar G, Widaman KF (2002) To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Model. 9(2):151–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little TD, Rhemtulla M, Gibson K, Schoemann AM (2013) Why the items vs. parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psych. Methods 18(3):285–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, More PHB, Faraj S (2012) Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organ. Sci. 23(4):951–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Mannucci PV (2017) Drawing Snow White and animating Buzz Lightyear: Technological toolkits characteristics and creativity in cross disciplinary teams. Organ. Sci. 28(4):711–728.Link, Google Scholar
• Meyerson DE (1994) Interpretations of stress in institutions: The cultural production of ambiguity and burnout. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(4):628–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Erez M, Naveh E (2011) The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Acad. Management J. 54(4):740–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris JA, Feldman DC (1996) The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Acad. Management Rev. 21(4):986–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller JS, Melwani S, Goncalo JA (2012) The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psych. Sci. 23(1):13–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mumby DK, Putnam LL (1992) The politics of emotion: A feminist reading of bounded rationality. Acad. Management Rev. 17(3):465–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman A, Donohue R, Eva N (2017) Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Rev. 27(3):521–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborn AF (1957) Applied Imagination (Scribner, New York).Google Scholar
• Parke MR, Seo M (2017) The role of affect climate in organizational effectiveness. Acad. Management Rev. 42(2):334–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parke MR, Mannucci PV, Amkraut M (2019) Fostering creativity in organisations. Accessed August 28, 2020, https://www.london.edu/think/fostering-creativity-in-organisations.Google Scholar
• Parke MR, Seo M, Sherf EN (2015) Regulating and facilitating: The role of emotional intelligence in maintaining and using positive affect for creativity. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):917–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearsall MJ, Ellis APJ, Evans JM (2008) Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: Is activation the key? J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):225–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Mannucci PV (2017) From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):53–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Shalley CE (2014) A social composition view of team creativity: The role of member nationality-heterogeneous ties outside of the team. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1434–1452.Link, Google Scholar
• Pillay N, Park G, Kim YK, Lee S (2020) Thanks for your ideas: Gratitude and team creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 156:69–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resick CJ, Murase T, Randall KR, DeChurch LA (2014) Information elaboration and team performance: Examining the psychological origins and environmental contingencies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 124(2):165–176.Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Petkova AP (2007) When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organ. Sci. 18(2):217–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP, Wilk SL (2011) Waking up on the right or wrong side of the bed: Start-of-workday mood, work events, employee affect, and performance. Acad. Management J. 54(5):959–980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rouse ED (2020) Where you end and I begin: Understanding intimate co-creation. Acad. Management Rev. 45(1):181–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider B, Ehrhart M, Mayer DM, Saltz JL, Niles-Jolly K (2005) Understanding organization-customer links in service settings. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1017–1032.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N, Clore GL (2003) Mood as information: 20 years later. Psych. Inq. 14(3–4):296–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seehausen M, Kazzer P, Bajbouj M, Heekeren HR, Jacobs AM, Klann-Delius G, Menninghaus W, Prehn K (2016) Effects of empathic social responses on the emotions of the recipient. Brain Cogn. 103:50–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seo M, Barrett LF (2007) Being emotional during decision making, good or bad? An empirical investigation. Acad. Management J. 50(4):923–940.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Hitt MA, Zhou J (2015) Introduction: Integrating creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship to enhance the organization’s capability to navigate in the new competitive landscape. The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (Oxford University Press, New York), 1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin SJ, Zhou J (2007) When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1709–1721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton RI, Hargadon AB (1996) Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):685–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tangirala S, Alge BJ (2006) Reactions to unfair events in computer-mediated groups: A test of uncertainty management theory. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 100(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toegel G, Kilduff M, Anand N (2013) Emotion helping by managers: An emergent understanding of discrepant role expectations and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 56(2):334–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Ginkel WP, van Knippenberg D (2008) Group information elaboration and group decision making: The role of shared task representations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 105(1):82–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D (2017) Team innovation. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 4(1):211–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CKW, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1008–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vuori TO, Huy QN (2016) Distributed attention and shared emotions in the innovation process: How Nokia lost the smartphone battle. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(1):9–51.Google Scholar
• Zohar D, Luria G (2005) A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. J. Appl. Psych. 90(4):616–628.Crossref, Google Scholar