Uncovering the Mitigating Psychological Response to Monitoring Technologies: Police Body Cameras Not Only Constrain but Also Depolarize

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1452

References

  • Aiello JR, Kolb KJ (1995) Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. J. Appl. Psych. 80(3):339–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aiello JR, Shao Y (1993) Electronic performance monitoring and stress: The role of feedback and goal setting. Smith MJ, Salvendy G, eds. Human-Computer Interaction: Applications and Case Studies (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1011–1016.Google Scholar
  • Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Alder GS (1998) Ethical issues in electronic performance monitoring: A consideration of deontological and teleological perspectives. J. Bus. Ethics 17(7):729–743.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alder GS, Ambrose ML (2005) Toward understanding fairness judgments associated with computer performance monitoring: An integration of the feedback, justice, and monitoring research. Human Resource Management Rev. 15(1):43–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alge BJ (2001) Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. J. Appl. Psych. 86(4):797–804.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alge BJ, Hansen SD (2014) Workplace monitoring and surveillance research since “1984”: A review and agenda. Coovert MD, Thompson LF, eds. The Psychology of Workplace Technology (Routledge, New York), 209–237.Google Scholar
  • Anteby M, Chan CK (2018) The self-fulfilling cycle of coercive surveillance. Organ. Sci. 29(2):247–263.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baguley T (2012) Serious stats: A guide to advanced statistics for the behavioral sciences (Palgrave Macmillan, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
  • Baruch Y, Holtom BC (2008) Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations 61(8):1139–1160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bates RA, Holton EF (1996) Computerized performance monitoring: A review of human resource issues. Human Resource Management Rev. 5(4):267–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batt R (2002) Managing customer services: Human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth. Acad. Management J. 45(3):587–597.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batt R, Colvin AJS (2011) An employment systems approach to turnover: Human resources practices, quits, dismissals, and performance. Acad. Management J. 54(4):695–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bauman Z, Lyon D (2013) Liquid Surveillance: A Conversation (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Bell NE, Staw BM (1989) People as sculptors vs. sculptures: The roles of personality and personal control in organizations. Arthur MB, Hall DT, eds. Handbook of Career Theory (Cambridge University Press, New York), 232–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein ES (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):181–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein ES (2017) Making transparency transparent: The evolution of observation in management theory. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):217–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bigley GA, Roberts KH (2001) The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1281–1299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blader SL, Gartenberg C, Prat A (2016). The contingent effect of management practices. Preprint, submitted January 27, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2723318.Google Scholar
  • Brehm JW (1972) Responses to the Loss of Freedom: A Theory of Psychological Reactance (General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Briscoe F, Chin MK, Hambrick DC (2014) CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1786–1809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown TC, Latham GP (2018) Maintaining relevance and rigor: How we bridge the practitioner—scholar divide within human resource development. Human Resource Development Quart. 29(2):99–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell DT, Stanley JL (1966) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (Rand McNally, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Carayon P (1993) Effect of electronic performance monitoring on job design and worker stress: Review of the literature and conceptual model. Human Factors 35(3):385–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cardinal LB, Kreutzer M, Miller CC (2017) An aspirational view of organizational control research: Re-invigorating empirical work to better meet the challenges of 21st century organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):559–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlsmith KM, Darley JM, Robinson PH (2002) Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(2):284–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll JS, Perkowitz WT, Lurigio AJ, Weaver FM (1987) Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology, and personality. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(1):107–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chalykoff J, Kochan TA (1989) Computer‐aided monitoring: Its influence on employee job satisfaction and turnover. Personnel Psych. 42(4):807–834.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chambers J, Schlenker B, Collisson J (2013) Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psych. Sci. 24(2):140–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chua RYJ (2013) The costs of ambient cultural disharmony: Indirect intercultural conflicts in social environment undermine creativity. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1545–1577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coates T (2015) The myth of police reform. The Atlantic (April 15), https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/04/the-myth-of-police-reform/390057.Google Scholar
  • D.K. (2015) Policing in America: What the cops say. The Economist (April 27), https://www.economist.com/democracy-in-america/2015/04/27/what-the-cops-say.Google Scholar
  • Dai H, Milkman KL, Hofmann DA, Staats BR (2015) The impact of time at work and time off from work on rule compliance: The case of hand hygiene in healthcare. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):846–862.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darley JM (2002) Just punishments: Research on retributional justice. Ross M, Miller DT, eds. The Justice Motive in Everyday Life (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 314–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Croon EM, Sluiter JK, Blonk RWB, Broersen JPJ, Frings-Dresen MHW (2004) Stressful work, psychological job strain, and turnover: A 2-year prospective cohort study of truck drivers. J. Appl. Psych. 89(3):442–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deci EL (1975) Intrinsic Motivation (Plenum, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dees T (2017) Body-worn cameras: Why everything you know is wrong. Police1.com (November 29), https://www.police1.com/police-products/body-cameras/articles/body-worn-cameras-why-everything-you-know-is-wrong-TFQzuEfbJMM5Whnh/.Google Scholar
  • Deutsch M (1971) Toward an understanding of conflict. Internat. J. Group Tensions 1(1):42–54.Google Scholar
  • Deuze M (2012) Media Life (Polity, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Dineen BR, Lewicki RJ, Tomlinson EC (2006) Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee citizenship and deviant behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 91(3):622–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doolin B (2004) Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system. Inform. Systems J. 14(4):343–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duckitt J, Wagner C, Du Plessis I, Birum I (2002) The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(1):75–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Esteban J, Ray D (1994) On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62(4):819–851.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Esteban J, Schneider G (2008) Polarization and conflict: Theoretical and empirical issues. J. Peace Res. 45(2):131–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feather NT (1999) Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 3(2):86–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flyverbom M (2019) The Digital Prism: Transparency and Managed Visibilities in a Datafied World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flyverbom M, Leonardi PM, Stohl C, Stohl M (2016) The management of visibilities in the digital age. Internat. J. Comm. 10:98–109.Google Scholar
  • Foucault M (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Allen and Lane, London).Google Scholar
  • George JM, Zhou J (2001) When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. J. Appl. Psych. 86(3):513–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilliom J, Monahan T (2012) Supervision (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM (2007) Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):393–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM (2008) The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):108–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R, Higgins C (1989) Monitoring service workers via computer: The effect on employees, productivity, and service. National Productivity Rev. 8(2):101–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM, Wall TD (2009) The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers. Organ. Res. Methods. 12(4):653–686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffith TL (1993) Teaching big brother to be a team player: Computer monitoring and quality. Acad. Management Perspect. 7(1):73–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1980) Work Redesign (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Hardy S, Bennett L, Rosen P, Carroll SM, White P, Palmer-Hill S (2017) The feasibility of using body worn cameras in an inpatient mental health setting. Mental Health Family Medicine 13:393–400.Google Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2018) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed. (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Homan AC, Van Knippenberg D, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW (2007) Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. J. Appl. Psych. 92(5):1189–1199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jamieson J (2004) Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with difference scores. Internat. J. Psychophysiol. 52(3):277–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jost JT, Federico CM, Napier JL (2009) Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Rev. Psych. 60:307–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judd CM, Kenny DA, McClelland GH (2001) Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psych. Methods 6(2):115–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judge TA, Bono JE (2001) Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):80–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judge TA, Thoresen CJ, Bono JE, Patton GK (2001) The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psych. Bull. 127(3):376–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jurgenson N (2013) Liquid surveillance and social media: Three provocations. Cyborgology (February 25), https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2013/02/25/liquid-surveillance-social-media-three-provocations/.Google Scholar
  • Knight K (2006) Transformations of the concept of ideology in the twentieth century. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 100(4):619–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolb KJ, Aiello JR (1996) The effects of electronic performance monitoring on stress: Locus of control as a moderator variable. Comput. Human Behav. 12(3):407–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda Z (1990) The Case for Motivated Reasoning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lahey T (2014) A watchful eye in hospitals. New York Times (February 16), https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/17/opinion/a-watchful-eye-in-hospitals.html.Google Scholar
  • Layperson GC, Carsey TM, Horowitz JM (2006) Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 9:83–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leana C, Appelbaum E, Shevchuk I (2009) Work process and quality of care in early childhood education: The role of job crafting. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1169–1192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LeBreton JM, Senter JL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ. Res. Methods 11(4):815–852.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee F, Edmondson AC, Thomke S, Worline M (2004) The mixed effects of inconsistency on experimentation in organizations. Organ. Sci. 15(3):310–326.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levy KC (2015) The contexts of control: Information, power, and truck-driving work. Inform. Soc. 31(2):160–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J, Hambrick DC (2005) Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Acad. Management J. 48(5):794–813.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke K (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  • Long CP, Sitkin SB (2018) Control–trust dynamics in organizations: Identifying shared perspectives and charting conceptual fault lines. Acad. Management Ann. 12(2):725–751.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacIntosh R, Beech N, Bartunek JM, Mason K, Cooke B, Denyer D (2017) Impact and management research: Exploring relationships between temporality, dialogue, reflexivity and praxis. British J. Management 28(1):3–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manger JT, Stephens D, Youngblood D, Ferrence M (2015) Major Cities Chiefs and Major County Sheriffs: Technology Needs—Body Worn Cameras (Lafayette Group, Vienna, VA).Google Scholar
  • Manning PK (1977) Police Work: The Social Organization of Policing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Mason D, Button G, Lankshear G, Coates S, Sharrock W (2002) On the poverty of apriorism: Technology, surveillance in the workplace and employee responses. Inform. Comm. Soc. 5(4):555–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCluskey JD, Uchida CD, Solomon SE, Wooditch A, Connor C, Revier L (2019) Assessing the effects of body‐worn cameras on procedural justice in the Los Angeles police department. Criminology 57(2):208–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McNall LA, Roch SG (2009) A social exchange model of employee reactions to electronic performance monitoring. Human Performance 22(3):204–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Millard WB (2015) Body cameras in the emergency department. Ann. Emergency Medicine 66(4):17–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):853–886.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morin R, Parker K, Stepler R, Mercer A (2017) Behind the Badge (Pew Research Center, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. General Psych. 2(2):175–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niehoff BP, Moorman RH (1993) Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Acad. Management J. 36(3):527–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Leary-Kelly AM, Griffin RW, Glew DJ (1996) Organization-motivated aggression: A research framework. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):225–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ostroff C, Kinicki AJ, Clark MA (2002) Substantive and operational issues of response bias across levels of analysis: An example of climate-satisfaction relationships. J. Appl. Psych. 87(2):355–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pang MS, Pavlou PA (2016). Armed with technology: The effects on fatal shootings of civilians by the police. Research Paper 16-020, Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Parker SK, Collins CG (2010) Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. J. Management 36(3):633–662.Google Scholar
  • Parker SK, Johnson A, Collins C, Nguyen H (2013) Making the most of structural support: Moderating influence of employees’ clarity and negative affect. Acad. Management J. 56(3):867–892.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patil SV (2018) “The public doesn’t understand”: The self-reinforcing interplay of image discrepancies and political ideologies in law enforcement. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(3):737–769.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peck D (2003) They’re watching you at work. Atlantic 312(5):72–84.Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J (1992) Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Pierce L, Snow DC, McAfee A (2015) Cleaning house: The impact of information technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Sci. 61(10):2299–2319.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Polzer JT, Crisp CB, Jarvenpaa SL, Kim JW (2006) Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Acad. Management J. 49(4):679–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt MG, Rockmann KW, Kaufmann JB (2006) Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Acad. Management J. 49(2):235–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratto F, Sidanius J, Stallworth LM, Malle BF (1994) Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(4):741–763.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ, Curran PJ, Bauer DJ (2006) Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. J. Ed. Behavioral Statist. 31(4):437–448.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pyrooz DC, Decker SH, Wolfe SE, Shjarback JA (2016) Was there a Ferguson effect on crime rates in large us cities? J. Criminal Justice 46:1–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson CD, Tomek S, Schumacker RE (2013) Tests of moderation effects: Difference in simple slopes versus the interaction term. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints 39(1):16–24.Google Scholar
  • Ranganathan A, Benson A (2020) A numbers game: Quantification of work, auto-gamification and worker productivity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 85(4):573–609.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raven BH (1965) Social influence and power. Steiner ID, Fishbein M, eds. Current Studies in Social Psychology (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York).Google Scholar
  • Raven BH (2008) The bases of power and the power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Anal. Soc. Issues Public Policy 8(1):1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raven BH, Kruglanski AW (1970) Conflict and power. Swingle P, ed. The Structure of Conflict (Academic Press, New York), 69–109.Google Scholar
  • Raven BH, Schwarzwald J, Koslowsky M (1998) Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 28(4):307–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogelberg SG, Stanton JM (2007) Introduction: Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organ. Res. Methods 10(2):195–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sewell G, Barker JR (2006) Coercion vs. care: Using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):934–961.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw JD, Delery JE, Jenkins GD, Gupta N (1998) An organization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Acad. Management J. 41(5):511–525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw JD, Dineen BR, Fang R, Vellella RF (2009) Employee-organization exchange relationships, HRM practices, and quit rates of good and poor performers. Acad. Management J. 52(5):1016–1033.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw JD, Zhu J, Duffy MK, Scott KL, Shih H, Susanto E (2011) A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. 96(2):391–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silverman BD (2012) Physician behavior and bedside manners: The influence of William Osler and the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Baylor Univ. Medical Center Proc. 25(1):58–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon B (2005) The return of panopticism: Supervision, subjection, and the new surveillance. Surveillance Soc. 3(1):1–20.Google Scholar
  • Skitka LJ, Tetlock PE (1993) Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(6):1205–1223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith MJ, Carayon P, Sanders KJ, Lim S, LeGrande D (1992) Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring. Appl. Ergonomics 23(1):17–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spreitzer GM (1995) Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 38(5):1442–1465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staats BR, Dai H, Hofmann DA, Milkman KL (2016) Motivating process compliance through individual electronic monitoring: An empirical examination of hand hygiene in healthcare. Management Sci. 63(5):1563–1585.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stanton JM (2000) Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review, and research directions. Human Performance 13(1):85–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stanton JM, Barnes-Farrell JL (1996) Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance. J. Appl. Psych. 81(6):738–745.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Surra CA, Longstreth M (1990) Similarity of outcomes, interdependence, and conflict in dating relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(3):501–516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor FW (1911) Principles of Scientific Management (Harper, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tetlock PE, Vieider F, Patil SV, Grant AM (2013) Accountability and ideology: When left looks right and right looks left. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 122(1):22–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tett RP, Meyer JP (1993) Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel Psych. 46(2):259–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyler TR, Blader SL (2005) Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1143–1158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Breukelen GJP (2006) Ancova versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 59(9):920–925.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J (1973) Observations on the making of policemen. Human Organ. 32(4):407–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker T (2015) Cameras in the classroom: Is big brother evaluating you? neaToday (January 23), https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/new-from-nea/cameras-classroom-big-brother-evaluating-you.Google Scholar
  • Wallace D, White MD, Gaub JE, Todak N (2018) Body-worn cameras as a potential source of depolicing: Testing for camera-induced passivity. Criminology 56(3):481–509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walton RE, Dutton JM (1969) The management of interdepartmental conflict: A model and review. Admin. Sci. Quart. 14(1):73–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weale S (2017) Use of body cameras in schools ‘risks turning students into suspects’. Guardian (February 8), https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/feb/08/body-cameras-schools-students-suspects-teachers.Google Scholar
  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (1999) Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Staw B, Sutton R, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol.21. (JAI, Greenwich, CT), 81–123.Google Scholar
  • Werhane PH (1985) Persons, Rights, and Corporations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Wilson JQ (1978) Varieties of Police Behavior (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Wilson N, Peel MJ (1991) The impact on absenteeism and quits of profit-sharing and other forms of employee participation. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 44(3):454–468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson MS, Sibley CG (2013) Social dominance orientation and right‐wing authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects on political conservatism. Political Psych. 34(2):277–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Withey MJ, Cooper WH (1989) Predicting exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(4):521–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolfe SE, Nix J (2016) The alleged “Ferguson effect” and police willingness to engage in community partnership. Law Human Behav. 40(1):1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yohe R (2017) Portsmouth police release body cam video in police officer-EMT altercation. WOWK News (February 2), https://www.wowktv.com/archives/portsmouth-police-release-body-cam-video-in-police-officer-emt-altercation/839064740/.Google Scholar
  • Yokum D, Ravishankar A, Coppock A (2017) Evaluating the effects of police body-worn cameras. Working paper, The Lab @ DC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Zajonc RB (1965) Social facilitation. Science 149(3681):269–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou J (2003) When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. J. Appl. Psych. 88(3):413–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.