Attention to Exploration: The Effect of Academic Entrepreneurship on the Production of Scientific Knowledge

References

• Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, Ferretti M, Parmentola A (2012) An individual‐level assessment of the relationship between spin‐off activities and research performance in universities. R & D Management 42(3):225–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A (2006) Engaging the inventor: Exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management J. 27(1):63–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Henderson RM (2002) Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Sci. 48(1):44–60.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Shah SK (2014) Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators. Res. Policy 43(7):1109–1133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmadpoor M, Jones BF (2017) The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance. Sci. 357(6351):583–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personality Soc. Pysch. 45(2):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 10:123–167.Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Goncalo JA (2007) Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Sci. 53(1):1–15.Link, Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB, Stephan PE (1999) Knowledge spillovers in biotechnology: Sources and incentives. J. Evolutionary Econom. 9(1):97–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2009) The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality, and direction of (public) research output. J. Indust. Econom. 57(4):637–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Manso G (2011) Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND J. Econom. 42(3):527–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y (2014) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Li D, Sampat BN (2019) Public R&D investments and private-sector patenting: Evidence from NIH funding rules. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(1):117–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldi S (1998) Normative vs. social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(6):829–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banal-Estanol A, Jofre-Bonet M, Lawson C (2015) The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK. Res. Policy 44(6):1160–1175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Pysch. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J, Feldman M (2008) Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organ. Sci. 19(1):69–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard M (2018) Made in academia: The effect of institutional origin on inventors’ attention to science. Organ. Sci. 29(5):818–836.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard M, Marx M (2020) Bridging academia and industry: How geographic hubs connect university science and corporate technology. Management Sci. 66(8):3425–3443.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard M, Vakili K, Teodoridis F (2019) When collaboration bridges institutions: The impact of university–industry collaboration on academic productivity. Organ. Sci. 30(2):426–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Blattberg RC, Kim B-D, Neslin SA (2008) Why database marketing? Blattberg RC, Kim B-D, Neslin SA, eds. Database Marketing (Springer, New York), 13–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bornmann L, Daniel HD (2008) What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. J. Documentation 64(1):45–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen HP (2010) Total, structural and secondary moderating effects in the Tobit model and their computation using Stata. Discussion paper, McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte, Charlotte, NC.Google Scholar
• Bowen HP (2012) Testing moderating hypotheses in limited dependent variable and other nonlinear models: Secondary vs. total interactions. J. Management 38(3):860–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breschi S, Lissoni F, Montobbio F (2007) The scientific productivity of academic inventors: New evidence from Italian data. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 16(2):101–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buenstorf G (2009) Is academic entrepreneurship good or bad for science? Individual-level evidence from the Max Planck Society. Res. Policy 38(2):281–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chai S (2017) Near misses in the breakthrough discovery process. Organ. Sci. 28(3):411–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Cirillo B, Brusoni S, Valentini G (2014) The rejuvenation of inventors through corporate spinouts. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1764–1784.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2002) Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. 48(1):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Colombo MG, Giannangeli S, Grilli L (2013) Public subsidies and the employment growth of high-tech start-ups: Assessing the impact of selective and automatic support schemes. Indust. Corporate Change 22(5):1273–1314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti R, Gambardella A, Mariani M (2013) Learning to be Edison: Inventors, organizations, and breakthrough inventions. Organ. Sci. 25(3):833–849.Link, Google Scholar
• Creswell JW (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Dahl M, Reichstein T (2007) Are you experienced? Prior experience and the survival of new organizations. Indust. Innovation 14(5):497–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, O’Mahony S, Gann DM (2016) One foot in, one foot out: How does individuals’ external search breadth affect innovation outcomes? Strategic Management J. 37(2):280–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P, David PA (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy 23(5):487–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Este P, Perkmann M (2011) Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. J. Tech. Transfer 36(3):316–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans JA (2010) Industry induces academic science to know less about more. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(2):389–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fewell Z, Hernán MA, Wolfe F, Tilling K, Choi H, Sterne JA (2004) Controlling for time-dependent confounding using marginal structural models. Stata J. 4(4):402–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fini R, Grimaldi R, Sobrero M (2009) Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: An assessment of Italian founders’ incentives. J. Tech. Transfer 34(4):380–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fini R, Jourdan J, Perkmann M (2018) Social valuation across multiple audiences: The interplay between ability and identity judgements. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2230–2264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fini R, Lacetera N, Shane S (2010) Inside or outside the IP system? Business creation in academia. Res. Policy 39(8):1060–1069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Folta TB, Delmar F, Wennberg K (2010) Hybrid entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 56(2):253–269.Link, Google Scholar
• Foster JG, Rzhetsky A, Evans JA (2015) Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(5):875–908.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freedman LP, Cockburn IM, Simcoe TS (2015) The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research. PLoS Biology 13(6):e1002165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Ganco M, Honoré F (2014) Using what you know: Patented knowledge in incumbent firms and employee entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 26(2):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Gittelman M, Kogut B (2003) Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Sci. 49(4):366–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Goel RK, Grimpe C (2012) Are all academic entrepreneurs created alike? Evidence from Germany. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 21(3):247–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb B (2008) The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? Res. Policy 37(1):41–58.Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee L-E (2009) Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organ. Sci. 20(4):740–758.Link, Google Scholar
• Gruber M, Harhoff D, Hoisl K (2013) Knowledge recombination across technological boundaries: Scientists vs. engineers. Management Sci. 59(4):837–851.Link, Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen M, Smeby JC (2005) Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Res. Policy 34(6):932–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton KS (2003) Subfield and level of classification of journals. CHI Research No. 2012-R, Haddon Heights, NJ.Google Scholar
• Hayter CS (2015) Public or private entrepreneurship? Revisiting motivations and definitions of success among academic entrepreneurs. J. Tech. Transfer 40(6):1003–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hicks R, Tingley D (2011) Causal mediation analysis. Stata J. 11(4):605–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hmieleski KM, Powell EE (2018) The psychological foundations of university science commercialization: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Acad. Management Perspect. 32(1):43–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang K, Murray F (2009) Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? Evidence from human genetics. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1193–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes SS (2001) Making dollars out of DNA: The first major patent in biotechnology and the commercialization of molecular biology, 1974–1980. Isis 92(3):541–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1989) Real effects of academic research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(5):957–970.Google Scholar
• Jain S, George G, Maltarich M (2009) Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Res. Policy 38(6):922–935.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk AJ (2012) Opportunity structures in established firms: Entrepreneurship vs. intrapreneurship in mutual funds. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):484–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk AJ (2013) Social influence and entrepreneurship: The effect of university peers on entrepreneurial entry. Organ. Sci. 24(3):664–683.Link, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein JT (1990) Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice (Wayne State University Press, Detroit, MI).Google Scholar
• Kneeland MK, Schilling MA, Aharonson BS (2020) Exploring uncharted territory: Knowledge search processes in the origination of outlier innovation. Organ. Sci. 31(3):535–557.Link, Google Scholar
• Koestler A (1964) The Act of Creation (Arkana, London).Google Scholar
• Kotha R, George G, Srikanth K (2013) Bridging the mutual knowledge gap: Coordination and the commercialization of university science. Acad. Management J. 56(2):498–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Lacetera N (2009) Academic entrepreneurship. Managerial Decision Econom. 30(7):443–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Drori I (2012) Collaborating for knowledge creation and application: The case of nanotechnology research programs. Organ. Sci. 23(3):704–724.Link, Google Scholar
• Leahey E, Beckman CM, Stanko TL (2017) Prominent but less productive: The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists’ research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(1):105–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Meyer-Doyle P (2017) How performance incentives shape individual exploration and exploitation: Evidence from microdata. Organ. Sci. 28(1):19–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 1987(3):783–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14:95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Q, Maggitti PG, Smith KG, Tesluk PE, Katila R (2013) Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Acad. Management J. 56(3):893–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lifshitz-Assaf H (2018) Dismantling knowledge boundaries at NASA: The critical role of professional identity in open innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):746–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louis KS, Jones LM, Anderson MS, Blumenthal D, Campbell EG (2001) Entrepreneurship, secrecy, and productivity: A comparison of clinical and non-clinical life sciences faculty. J. Tech. Transfer 26(3):233–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowe R, Gonzalez-Brambila C (2007) Faculty entrepreneurs and research productivity. J. Tech. Transfer 32(3):173–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maggitti PG, Smith KG, Katila R (2013) The complex search process of invention. Res. Policy 42(1):90–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maine E, Thomas V (2017) Raising financing through strategic timing. Nature Nanotech. 12(2):93–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1992) Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. 99(1):172–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Marx M, Fuegi A (2020) Reliance on science: Worldwide front‐page patent citations to scientific articles. Strategic Management J. 41(9):1572–1594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadyen MA, Cannella AA (2005) Knowledge creation and the location of university research scientists’ interpersonal exchange relations: Within and beyond the university. Strategic Organ. 3(2):131–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Meyer M (2003) Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms. R & D Management 33(2):107–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F (2002) Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Res. Policy 31(8, 9):1389–1403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F, Tripsas M (2004) The exploratory processes of entrepreneurial firms: The role of purposeful experimentation. Adv. Strat. Management 21:45–75.Google Scholar
• Nagle F, Teodoridis F (2020) Jack of all trades and master of knowledge: The role of diversification in new distant knowledge integration. Strategic Management J. 41(1):55–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (2004) The market economy, and the scientific commons. Res. Policy 33(3):455–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolaou N, Birley S (2003) Social networks in organizational emergence: The university spinout phenomenon. Management Sci. 49(12):1702–1725.Link, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Gorman C, Byrne O, Pandya D (2008) How scientists commercialise new knowledge via entrepreneurship. J. Tech. Transfer 33(1):23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J (2003) From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities. Res. Policy 32(6):1081–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1):5–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Walsh K (2009) The two faces of collaboration: Impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Indust. Corporate Change 18(6):1033–1065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, McKelvey M, Phillips N (2019) Protecting scientists from Gordon Gekko: How organizations use hybrid spaces to engage with multiple institutional logics. Organ. Sci. 30(2):298–318.Link, Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Salandra R, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Hughes A (2021) Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011–2019. Res. Policy 50(1):104114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Autio E, Broström A, D’Este P, Fini R, et al.. (2013) Academic engagement and commercialization: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Res. Policy 42(2):423–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Langton N (1993) The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):382–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (1996) Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology. Res. Policy 25(7):1097–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (2000) The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva 38:1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F (2013) The competitive implications of certifications: The effects of scientific and regulatory certifications on entries into new technical fields. Acad. Management J. 56(2):597–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F Jr, Theeke M (2012) Getting competition down to a science: The effects of technological competition on firms’ scientific publications. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1135–1153.Link, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Sandholtz KW (2012) Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of organizational forms. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(2):94–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods Instruments Comput. 36(4):717–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prokesch S (2017) The Edison of medicine. Harvard Bus. Rev. (March–April):134–143.Google Scholar
• Raffiee J, Feng J (2014) Should I quit my day job? A hybrid path to entrepreneurship. Acad. Management J. 57(4):936–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reschke BP, Azoulay P, Stuart TE (2018) Status spillovers: The effect of status-conferring prizes on the allocation of attention. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):819–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins JM, Finkelstein DM (2000) Correcting for noncompliance and dependent censoring in an AIDS clinical trial with inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) log‐rank tests. Biometrics 56(3):779–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1994) Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1998) Uncertainty and technological change. Neef D, Siesfeld GA, Cefola J, eds. The Economic Impact of Knowledge (Butterworth Heinemann, Boston), 17–34.Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL (2004) Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management J. 25(3):201–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Stephan P (2013) Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organ. Sci. 24(3):889–909.Link, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Green E (2011) Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences. Res. Policy 40(10):1321–1331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Shane S (2001) Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Sci. 47(2):205–220.Link, Google Scholar
• Shane SA (2004) Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shichijo N, Sedita SR, Baba Y (2015) How does the entrepreneurial orientation of scientists affect their scientific performance? Evidence from the quadrant model. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management 27(9):999–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe TS, Waguespack DM (2011) Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57(2):274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Slavova K, Fosfuri A, De Castro JO (2016) Learning by hiring: The effects of scientists’ inbound mobility on research performance in academia. Organ. Sci. 27(1):72–89.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Sohn E (2020) How local industry R&D shapes academic research: Evidence from the agricultural biotechnology revolution. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print December 7, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1407.Link, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB, Fassiotto MA (2011) Organizations as fonts of entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1322–1331.Link, Google Scholar
• Stephan PE, Gurmu S, Sumell AJ, Black G (2007) Who’s patenting in the university? Evidence from the survey of doctorate recipients. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 16(2):71–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. 50(6):835–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Ding WW (2006) When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(1):97–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thursby M, Thursby J, Gupta-Mukherjee S (2007) Are there real effects of licensing on academic research? A life cycle view. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(4):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toole AA, Czarnitzki D (2010) Commercializing science: Is there a university “brain drain” from academic entrepreneurship? Management Sci. 56(9):1599–1614.Link, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Sci. 342(6157):468–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen JE, Schein EH (1977) Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Staw BM, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 1 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 209–264.Google Scholar
• Vanaelst I, Clarysse B, Wright M, Lockett A, Moray N, S'Jegers R (2006) Entrepreneurial team development in academic spinouts: An examination of team heterogeneity. Entrepreneurial Theory Practice 30(2):249–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitley R (2000) The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Winter SG, Cattani G, Dorsch A (2007) The value of moderate obsession: Insights from a new model of organizational search. Organ. Sci. 18(3):403–419.Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR (1996) Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93(23):12709–12716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR (1997) Individual action and the demand for institutions: Star scientists and institutional transformation. Amer. Behav. Scientist 40(4):502–513.Crossref, Google Scholar