A Matter of Transition: Authenticity Judgments and Attracting Employees to Hybridized Organizations

References

• Aaker J, Vohs K, Mogilner C (2010) Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. J. Consumer Res. 37(2):224–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal P (2004) The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. J. Consumer Res. 31(1):87–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Reingen PH (2014) Functions of dysfunction: Managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):474–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin J, Stevenson H, Wei-Skillern J (2006) Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different or both? Entrepreneurship. Theory Practice 30(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barlow MA, Verhaal JC, Hoskins JD (2018) Guilty by association: Product-level category stigma and audience expectations in the U.S. craft beer industry. J. Management 44(7):2934–2960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1419–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Lee M (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):397–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besharov M (2014) The relational ecology of identification: How organizational identification emerges when individuals hold divergent values. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1485–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besharov M, Smith W (2014) Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):364–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee A, Dana J, Baron J (2017) Anti-profit beliefs: How people neglect the societal benefits of profit. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 113(5):671–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bicchieri C (2016) Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Bitektine A, Lucas J, Schilke O (2018) Institutions under a microscope: Experimental methods in institutional theory. Bryman A, Buchanan DA, eds. Unconventional Methodology in Organization and Management Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 147–167.Google Scholar
• Carroll G, Wheaton D (2009) The organizational construction of authenticity: An examination of contemporary food and dining in the US. Res. Organ. Behav. 29:255–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chahine S, Tannir L (2010) On the social and financial effects of the transformation of microfinance NGOs. Voluntas 21(3):440–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang LJ, Sanfey AG (2009) Unforgettable ultimatums? Expectation violations promote enhanced social memory following economic bargaining. Frontiers Behav. Neurosci. 3:36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chliova M, Mair J, Vernis A (2020) Persistent category ambiguity: The case of social entrepreneurship. Organ. Stud. 41(7):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cording M, Harrison JS, Hoskisson RE, Jonsen K (2014) Walking the talk: A multistakeholder exploration of organizational authenticity, employee productivity, and post-merger performance. Acad. Management Perspect. 28(1):38–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Critcher CR, Dunning D (2011) No good deed goes unquestioned: Cynical reconstruals maintain belief in the power of self-interest. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 47(6):1207–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dart R (2004) The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management Leadership 14(4):411–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dey P, Teasdale S (2016) The tactical mimicry of social enterprise strategies: Acting ‘as if’ in the everyday life of third sector organizations. Organization 23(4):485–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Paolella L (2013) Category stretching: Reorienting research on categories in strategy, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1100–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Granqvist N, Tyllström A (2017) From categories to categorization: A social perspective on market categorization. Durand R, Granqvist N, Tyllström A, eds. From Categories to Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 51 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), pp. 3–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebrahim A, Battilana J, Mair J (2014) The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 34:81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Dunning D (2000) Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self-or social prediction? J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 79(6), 861–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fein S (1996) Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(6):1164–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske A (1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psych. Rev. 99(4):689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frake J (2017) Selling out: The inauthenticity discount in the craft beer industry. Management Sci. 63(11):3930–3943.Link, Google Scholar
• Gehman J, Grimes M (2017) Hidden badge of honor: How contextual distinctiveness affects category promotion among certified B corporations. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2294–2320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Navis C (2013) Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1124–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta ER, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):317–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimes M, Williams TA, Zhao EY (2019) Anchors aweigh: The sources, variety, and challenges of mission drift. Acad. Management Rev. 44(4):819–845.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo B (2006) Charity for profit? Exploring factors associated with the commercialization of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 35(1):123–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O (2016) Turning back the clock in baseball: The increased prominence of extrinsic rewards and demand for authenticity. Organ. Sci. 27(4):929–953.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Ha J (2019) Committed diversification: Why authenticity insulates against penalties for diversification. Organ. Sci. 31(1):1–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Hayes A (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobson RP, Mortensen CR, Cialdini RB (2011) Bodies obliged and unbound: Differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 100(3):433–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad. Management J. 56(1):137–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B (2019) Authenticity is in the eye of the beholder: The exploration of audiences’ Lay Associations to authenticity across five domains. Rev. General Psych. 23(1):32–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Carroll G, Lehman D (2013) Authenticity and consumer value ratings: Empirical tests from the restaurant domain. Organ. Sci. 25(2):458–478.Link, Google Scholar
• Kramer RM (1994) The sinister attribution error: Paranoid cognition and collective distrust in organizations. Motivation Emotion 18(2):199–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laasch O (2018) Beyond the purely commercial business model: Organizational value logics and the heterogeneity of sustainability business models. Long Range Planning 51(1):158–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Bolton L, Winterich K (2017) To profit or not to profit? The role of greed perceptions in consumer support for social ventures. J. Consumer Res. 44(4):853–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehman DW, O’Connor K, Kovács B, Newman GE (2019) Authenticity. Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litrico J-B, Besharov ML (2019) Unpacking variation in hybrid organizational forms: Changing models of social enterprise among nonprofits, 2000–2013. J. Bus. Ethics 159(2):343–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markides CC, Williamson PJ (1994) Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strategic Management J. 15(S2):149–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathias BD, Huyghe A, Williams DW (2020) Selling your soul to the devil? The importance of independent ownership to identity distinctiveness for oppositional categories. Strategic Management J. 41(13):2548–2584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McShane L, Cunningham P (2012) To thine own self be true? Employees’ judgments of the authenticity of their organization’s corporate social responsibility program. J. Bus. Ethics 108(1):81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D (1999) The norm of self-interest. Amer. Psych. 54:1053–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Leung MD (2013) “Actual” and perceptual effects of category spanning. Organ. Sci. 24(3):684–696.Link, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Hannan MT, Rao H (2011) Category reinterpretation and defection: Modernism and tradition in Italian winemaking. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1449–1463.Link, Google Scholar
• Norton TA, Parker SL, Zacher H, Ashkanasy NM (2015) Employee green behavior: A theoretical framework, multilevel review, and future research agenda. Organ. Environ. 28(1):103–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pache A, Santos F (2013) Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 56(4):972–1001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolella L, Durand R (2016) Category spanning, evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market. Acad. Management J. 59(1):330–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW (2013) Betrayal as market barrier: Identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):1023–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes E (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radoynovska N, King BG (2019) To whom are you true? Audience perceptions of authenticity in nascent crowdfunding ventures. Organ. Sci. 30(4):878–802.Link, Google Scholar
• Ramus T, Vaccaro A, Berrone P (2020) Time matters! How hybrid organizations use time to respond to divergent stakeholder demands. Organ. Stud., ePub ahead of print March 7, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619900341.Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Patterson K (2009) Credit and classification: The impact of industry boundaries in nineteenth-century America. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):486–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruttan R, Nordgren L (2021) Instrumental use erodes sacred values. J. Personality Soc. Psych., ePub ahead of print January 22, https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvador CE, Mu Y, Gelfand MJ, Kitayama S (2020) When norm violations are spontaneously detected: An electrocortical investigation. Soc. Cognitive Affective Neurosci. 15(3):319–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Gonin M, Besharov ML (2013) Managing social-business tensions. Bus. Ethics Quart. 23(3):407–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiller SA, Fitzsimons GJ, Lynch JG Jr, McClelland GH (2013) Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. J. Marketing Res. 50(2):277–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne J-P (2012) Stigmatized categories and public disapproval of organizations: A mixed-methods study of the global arms industry, 1996–2007. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1027–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne J, Wry T (2014) Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. J. Management Stud. 51(1):56–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villalonga B (2004) Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business information tracking series. J. Finance 59(2):479–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiner B (1985) An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psych. Rev. 92(4):548–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Zhao E (2018) Taking trade-offs seriously: Examining the contextually contingent relationship between social outreach intensity and financial sustainability in global microfinance. Organ. Sci. 29(3):507–528.Link, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Jennings P (2014) Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1309–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar