Iterative Coordination and Innovation: Prioritizing Value over Novelty

References

• Aggarwal VA, Hsu DH, Wu A (2020) Organizing knowledge production teams within firms for innovation. Strategy Sci. 5(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Morris Lampert C (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander L, Van Knippenberg D (2014) Teams in pursuit of radical innovation: A goal orientation perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 39(4):423–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(2):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Pratt MG (2016) The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Res. Organ. Behav. 36:157–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ante SE (2011) Skype to acquire start-up GroupMe. Wall Street Journal (August 22), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424053111903327904576522964260277734.Google Scholar
• Arrington M (2010) GroupMe, born at TechCrunch Disrupt, secures funding and launches. TechCrunch (August 25), https://techcrunch.com/2010/08/25/groupme-born-at-techcrunch-disrupt-secures-funding-and-launches/.Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Mael F (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):20–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baudet GM (1978) On the branching factor of the alpha-beta pruning algorithm. Artificial Intelligence 10(2):173–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck K, Beedle M, Van Bennekum A, Cockburn A, Cunningham W, Fowler M, Grenning J, et al. (2001) Manifesto for Agile software development. Accessed July 2021, https://agilemanifesto.org/.Google Scholar
• Berg JM (2014) The primal mark: How the beginning shapes the end in the development of creative ideas. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 125(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein E, Shore J, Lazer D (2019) Improving the rhythm of your collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 61(1):29–36.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J (2018) What to expect from Agile. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 59(2):39–42.Google Scholar
• Broussard M (2015) The secret lives of hackathon junkies. Atlantic (July 8), https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/07/the-secret-lives-of-hackathon-junkies/397895/.Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Håkonsson DD, Nickerson J, Puranam P, Workiewicz M, Zenger T (2017) GitHub: Exploring the space between boss-less and hierarchical forms of organizing. J. Organ. Design 6(1):10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byron K, Khazanchi S (2012) Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psych. Bull. 138(4):809–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao L, Ramesh B (2007) Agile software development: Ad hoc practices or sound principles? IT Professional 9(2):41–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carson PP, Carson K (1993) Managing creativity enhancement through goal-setting and feedback. J. Creative Behav. 27(1):36–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Delecourt S, Hasan S, Koning R (2019) When does advice impact startup performance? Strategic Management J. 40(3):331–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Findley M, Jensen NM, Meier S, Nielson D (2016) Field experiments in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(1):116–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cromwell JR, Amabile TM, Harvey JF (2018) An integrated model of dynamic problem solving within organizational constraints. Reiter-Palmon R, Kennel VL, Kaufman JC, eds. Individual Creativity in the Workplace, Explorations in Creativity Research, vol. 7 (Academic Press, London), 53–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M (1996) Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Saez E (2003) The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):815–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1155–1179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal DA (2004) Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):404–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ. Sci. 20(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39(2):175–191.Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Furr N, O’Keeffe K, Dyer JH (2016) Managing multiparty innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 94(11):76–83.Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Greve HR (2019) Safe or profitable? The pursuit of conflicting goals. Organ. Sci. 30(4):647–667.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessments and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C (1988) Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Acad. Management J. 31(1):9–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C (1989) Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Acad. Management J. 32(2):274–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghosh S (2020) Think before you act: The unintended consequences of inexpensive business experimentation. Harvard Business School Working Paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Thomke SH, Pourkhalkhali H (2020) The effects of hierarchy on learning and performance in business experimentation. Harvard Business School Working Paper 20-081, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR, Gaba V (2020) Performance feedback in organizations and groups: Common themes. Argote L, Levine JM, eds. The Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Hoppmann J, Naegele F, Girod B (2019) Boards as a source of inertia: Examining the internal challenges and dynamics of boards of directors in times of environmental discontinuities. Acad. Management J. 62(2):437–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu S, Bettis RA (2018) Multiple organization goals with feedback from shared technological task environments. Organ. Sci. 29(5):873–889.Link, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A, Marx M (2016) Revisiting the small-firm effect on entrepreneurship: Evidence from firm dissolutions. Organ. Sci. 27(4):893–910.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Vakili K (2015) The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management J. 1457(36):1435–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keum DD, See E (2017) The influence of hierarchy on idea generation and selection in the innovation process. Organ. Sci. 28(4):653–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Srikanth K (2014) Coordinated exploration: Organizing joint search by multiple specialists to overcome mutual confusion and joint myopia. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):409–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knuth DE, Moore RW (1975) An analysis of alpha-beta pruning. Artificial Intelligence 6(4):293–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 1(12):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leckart S (2012) The hackathon is on: Pitching and programming the next killer app. Wired (February 17), https://www.wired.com/2012/02/ff-hackathons/.Google Scholar
• Leckart S (2015) The hackathon fast track, from campus to Silicon Valley. New York Times (April 6), https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/12/education/edlife/the-hackathon-fast-track-from-campus-to-silicon-valley.html.Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Prietula MJ (2014) Open collaboration for innovation: Principles and performance. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1414–1433.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Rerup C (2021) The plural of goal: Learning in a world of ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 32(3):527–908.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Workiewicz M (2018) When two bosses are better than one: Nearly decomposable systems and organizational adaptation. Organ. Sci. 29(2):207–224.Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List JA (2011) Was there really a Hawthorne effect at the Hawthorne plant? An analysis of the original illumination experiments. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 3(1):224–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lifshitz-Assaf H, Lebovitz S, Zalmanson L (2020) Minimal and adaptive coordination: How hackathons’ projects accelerate innovation without killing it. Acad. Management J. 64(3):684–715.Google Scholar
• Lincoln JR, Miller J (1979) Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relation networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(2):181–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu S, Bartol KM, Venkataramani V, Zheng X, Liu X (2019) Pitching novel ideas to the boss: The interactive effects of employees’ idea enactment and influence tactics on creativity assessment and implementation. Acad. Management J. 62(2):579–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Masicampo EJ, Baumeister RF (2011) Consider it done! Plan making can eliminate the cognitive effects of unfulfilled goals. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 101(4):667–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer MW, Zucker LG (1989) Permanently Failing Organizations (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Muja M, Lowe DG (2009) Fast approximate nearest neighbors with automatic algorithm configuration. VISAPP 2009 Proc. 4th Internat. Conf. Comput. Vision Theory Appl., vol. 2, 331–340.Google Scholar
• Nolte A, Pe-Than EPP, Filippova A, Bird C, Scallen S, Herbsleb JD (2018) You hacked and now what?: Exploring outcomes of a corporate hackathon. Proc. ACM Human-Comput. Interaction 2(CSCW):129.Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Sengul M (2020) What do multiple objectives really mean for performance? Empirical evidence from the French manufacturing sector. Strategic Management J. 41(13):2518–2547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen G, Bechky BA (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen G, Eisenhardt KM (2002) Integrating in groups: How formal knowledge interventions enable flexibility. Organ. Sci. 13(4):370–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Cummings A (1996) Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Acad. Management J. 39(3):607–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ordóñez LD, Schweitzer ME, Galinsky AD, Bazerman MH (2009) Goals gone wild: The systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting. Acad. Management Perspect. 23(1):6–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ott TE, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2017) Strategy formation in entrepreneurial settings: Past insights and future directions. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 11(3):306–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan Fang T, Wu A, Clough DR (2021) Platform diffusion at temporary gatherings: Social coordination and ecosystem emergence. Strategic Management J. 42(2):233–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pe-Than EPP, Nolte A, Filippova A, Bird C, Scallen S, Herbsleb JD (2019) Designing corporate hackathons with a purpose: The future of software development. IEEE Software 36(1):15–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner FD (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search—A review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):208–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):162–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reitzig M, Maciejovsky B (2015) Corporate hierarchy and vertical information flow inside the firm—A behavioral view. Strategic Management J. 36(13):1979–1999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Relihan T (2018) Agile at scale, explained. MIT Sloan Ideas Made to Matter (July 6), https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/agile-scale-explained.Google Scholar
• Reypens C, Levine SS (2018) Behavior in behavioral strategy: Capturing, measuring, analyzing. Augier M, Fang C, Rindova VP, eds. Behavioral Strategy in Perspective, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 39 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 221–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Rigby DK, Sutherland J, Noble A (2018) Agile at scale. Harvard Bus. Rev. 96(3):88–96.Google Scholar
• Rigby DK, Sutherland J, Takeuchi H (2016a) Embracing Agile. Harvard Bus. Rev. 94(5):40–50.Google Scholar
• Rigby DK, Sutherland J, Takeuchi H (2016b) The secret history of Agile innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (April 20), https://hbr.org/2016/04/the-secret-history-of-agile-innovation.Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilke O, Hu S, Helfat CE (2018) Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):390–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwaber K, Sutherland J (2013) The scrum guide. Accessed July 2021, https://scrumguides.org/.Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Perry-Smith JE (2001) Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 84(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1964) On the concept of organizational goal. Admin. Sci. Quart. 9(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Spender J, Grant R (1996) Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):5–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoop J, Noussair CN, Van Soest D (2012) From the laboratory to the field: Cooperation among fishermen. J. Polit. Econom. 120(6):1027–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strode DE, Huff SL, Hope B, Link S (2012) Coordination in co-located agile software development projects. J. Systems Software 85:1222–1238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutherland J, Sutherland J (2014) Scrum: The Art of Doing Twice the Work in Half the Time (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Taylor A, Greve HR (2006) Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. 49(4):723–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Unsworth K, Yeo G, Beck J (2014) Multiple goals: A review and derivation of general principles. J. Organ. Behav. 35(8):1064–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL, Koenig R (1976) Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 41(2):322–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• VersionOne (2020) 14th annual state of Agile report. Accessed July 2021, https://stateofagile.com/#ufh-i-615706098-14th-annual-state-of-agile-report/7027494.Google Scholar
• Vesey JT (1991) The new competitors: They think in terms of ‘speed-to-market’. Acad. Management Perspect. 5(2):23–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waller MJ, Zellmer-Bruhn ME, Giambatista RC (2002) Watching the clock: Group pacing behavior under dynamic deadlines. Acad. Management J. 45(5):1046–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wen W, Zhu F (2019) Threat of platform-owner entry and complementor responses: Evidence from the mobile app market. Strategic Management J. 40(9):1336–1367.Crossref, Google Scholar