The Differential Impact of Intrafirm Collaboration and Technological Network Centrality on Employees’ Likelihood of Leaving the Firm

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1535

References

  • Agarwal R, Campbell BA, Franco AM, Ganco M (2016) What do I take with me? The mediating effect of spin-out team size and tenure on the founder–firm performance relationship. Acad. Management J. 59(3):1060–1087.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Echambadi R, Franco AM, Sarkar MB (2004) Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and survival. Acad. Management J. 47(4):501–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G, Lampert CM, Novelli E (2013) The second face of appropriability: Generative appropriability and its determinants. Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):248–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Al-Laham A, Tzabbar D, Amburgey TL (2011) The dynamics of knowledge stocks and knowledge flows: Innovation consequences of recruitment and collaboration in biotech. Indust. Corporate Change 20(2):555–583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alnuaimi T, George G (2016) Appropriability and the retrieval of knowledge after spillovers. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1263–1279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ballinger GA, Schoorman FD (2007) Individual reactions to leadership succession in workgroups. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):118–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ballinger GA, Cross R, Holtom BC (2016) The right friends in the right places: Understanding network structure as a predictor of voluntary turnover. J. Appl. Psych. 101(4):535–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron RA, Markman GD (2000) Beyond social capital: How social skills can enhance entrepreneurs’ success. Acad. Management Perspect. 14(1):106–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti SP (2005) Centrality and network flow. Social Networks 27(1):55–71.Google Scholar
  • Brass D (1984) Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4):518–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brennecke J, Rank ON (2017) The firm’s knowledge network and the transfer of advice among corporate inventors—A multilevel network study. Res. Policy 46(4):768–783.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burkhardt ME, Brass DJ (1990) Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):104–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2007) Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Acad. Management J. 50(1):119–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell BA, Kryscynski D, Olson DM (2017) Bridging strategic human capital and employee entrepreneurship research: A labor market frictions approach. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 11(3):344–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell BA, Ganco M, Franco AM, Agarwal R (2012) Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(1):65–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carnabuci G, Bruggeman J (2009) Knowledge specialization, knowledge brokerage and the uneven growth of technology domains. Soc. Forces 88(2):607–641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carnabuci G, Operti E (2013) Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1591–1613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casciaro T (1998) Seeing things clearly: Social structure, personality, and accuracy in social network perception. Soc. Networks 20(4):331–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casciaro T, Piskorski MJ (2005) Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):167–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cassiman B, Ueda M (2006) Optimal project rejection and new firm start-ups. Management Sci. 52(2):262–275.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cattani G, Ferriani S (2008) A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organ. Sci. 19(6):824–844.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen G (2005) Newcomer adaptation in teams: Multilevel antecedents and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 48(1):101–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cirillo B (2019) External learning strategies and technological search output: Spinout strategy and corporate invention quality. Organ. Sci. 30(2):361–382.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cirillo B, Breschi S, Prencipe A (2018) Divide to connect: Reorganization through R&D unit spinout as linking context of intra-corporate networks. Res. Policy 47(9):1585–1600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cirillo B, Brusoni S, Valentini G (2014) The rejuvenation of inventors through corporate spinouts. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1764–1784.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coff RW (1999) When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organ. Sci. 10(2):119–133.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coff RW, Raffiee J (2015) Toward a theory of perceived firm-specific human capital. Acad. Management Perspect. 29(3):326–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen BD, Dean TJ (2005) Information asymmetry and investor valuation of IPOs: Top management team legitimacy as a capital market signal. Strategic Management J. 26(7):683–690.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cross R, Cummings JN (2004) Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Acad. Management J. 47(6):928–937.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Easley D, Kleinberg J (2010) Networks, Crowds, and Markets, vol. 8 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Everett MG, Valente TW (2015) Bridging, brokerage and betweenness. Social Networks 44(January):202–208.Google Scholar
  • Fang R, Landis B, Zhang Z, Anderson MH, Shaw JD, Kilduff M (2015) Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1243–1260.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feeley TH, Hwang J, Barnett GA (2008) Predicting employee turnover from friendship networks. J. Appl. Comm. Res. 36(1):56–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferris GR, Judge TA (1991) Personnel/human resources management: A political influence perspective. J. Management 17(2):447–488.Google Scholar
  • Ferris GR, Treadway DC, Brouer RL, Munyon TP (2012) Political skill in the organizational sciences. Ferris GR, Treadway DC, eds. Politics in Organizations: Theory and Research Implications (Routledge/Taylor and Francis, New York), 487–528.Google Scholar
  • Ferris GR, Treadway DC, Kolodinsky RW, Hochwarter WA, Kacmar CJ, Douglas C, Frink DD (2005) Development and validation of the political skill inventory. J. Management 31(1):126–152.Google Scholar
  • Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Google Scholar
  • Freeman LC (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1):35–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gambardella A, Ganco M, Honoré F (2014) Using what you know: Patented knowledge in incumbent firms and employee entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 26(2):456–474.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gargiulo M, Benassi M (2000) Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. 11(2):183–196.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ge C, Huang KW, Png IP (2016) Engineer/scientist careers: Patents, online profiles, and misclassification bias. Strategic Management J. 37(1):232–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godart FC, Shipilov AV, Claes K (2014) Making the most of the revolving door: The impact of outward personnel mobility networks on organizational creativity. Organ. Sci. 25(2):377–400.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guan J, Liu N (2016) Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy. Res. Policy 45(1):97–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hagedoorn J (2003) Sharing intellectual property rights—An exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies. Indust. Corporate Change 12(5):1035–1050.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R, Cockburn I (1994) Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):63–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoegl M, Weinkauf K, Gemuenden HG (2004) Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organ. Sci. 15(1):38–55.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoisl K (2007) Tracing mobile inventors—The causality between inventor mobility and inventor productivity. Res. Policy 36(5):619–636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins SP (1995) Easy estimation methods for discrete‐time duration models. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 57(1):129–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins SP (2004) Survival analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Social and Economic Research, Essex, UK.Google Scholar
  • Jovanovic B (1979) Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econom. 87(5):972–990.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kacperczyk AJ (2012) Opportunity structures in established firms: Entrepreneurship vs. intrapreneurship in mutual funds. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):484–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Murray F (2010) Entrepreneurship and the construction of value in biotechnology. Phillips N, Sewell G, Griffiths D, eds. Technology and Organization: Essays in Honour of Joan Woodward. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 29 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, England), 107–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King A (2007) Cooperation between corporations and environmental groups: A transaction cost perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):889–900.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinbaum AM (2012) Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):407–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinbaum AM, Tushman ML (2007) Building bridges: The social structure of interdependent innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(1–2):103–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (2009) Firm-specific human capital: A skill-weights approach. J. Political Econom. 117(5):914–940.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP, Oyer P (2004) The structure of wages and internal mobility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):212–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP, Oyer P (2013) Personnel economics. Gibbons R, Roberts JD, eds. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 479–519.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marx M, Timmermans B (2017) Hiring molecules, not atoms: Comobility and wages. Organ. Sci. 28(6):1115–1133.Google Scholar
  • Mawdsley JK, Somaya D (2016) Employee mobility and organizational outcomes: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. J. Management 42(1):85–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice be. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
  • McFadden DL (1984) Econometric analysis of qualitative response models. Griliches Z, Intriligator MD, eds. Handbook of Econometrics (Elsevier), 1395–1457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ (2001) The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):121–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morris SS, Alvarez SA, Barney JB, Molloy JC (2017) Firm-specific human capital investments as a signal of general value: Revisiting assumptions about human capital and how it is managed. Strategic Management J. 38(4):912–919.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nanda R, Sørensen JB (2010) Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 56(7):1116–1126.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Narendranathan W, Stewart MB (1993) Modelling the probability of leaving unemployment: Competing risks models with flexible base-line hazards. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. C. Appl. Statist. 42(1):63–83.Google Scholar
  • Nerkar A, Paruchuri S (2005) Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Sci. 51(5):771–785.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nikolowa R (2014) Developing new ideas: Spin-outs, spinoffs, or internal divisions. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 98:70–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park HD, Tzabbar D (2016) Venture capital, CEOs’ sources of power, and innovation novelty at different life stages of a new venture. Organ. Sci. 27(2):336–353.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Paruchuri S (2010) Intraorganizational networks, interorganizational networks, and the impact of central inventors: A longitudinal study of pharmaceutical firms. Organ. Sci. 21(1):63–80.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Paruchuri S, Awate S (2017) Organizational knowledge networks and local search: The role of intra‐organizational inventor networks. Strategic Management J. 38(3):657–675.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Prentice RL, Gloeckler LA (1978) Regression analysis of grouped survival data with application to breast cancer data. Biometrics 34(1):57–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raffiee J, Feng J (2014) Should I quit my day job? A hybrid path to entrepreneurship. Acad. Management J. 57(4):936–963.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rider CI (2012) How employees’ prior affiliations constrain organizational network change: A study of US venture capital and private equity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):453–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2007) Patterned interactions in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Sci. 53(7):1068–1085.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rocha V, Carneiro A, Varum C (2018) Leaving employment to entrepreneurship: The value of co‐worker mobility in pushed and pulled‐driven start‐ups. J. Management Stud. 55(1):60–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers EM, Kincaid DL (1981) Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Salomon R, Martin X (2008) Learning, knowledge transfer, and technology implementation performance: A study of time-to-build in the global semiconductor industry. Management Sci. 54(7):1266–1280.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Liden RC (2001) A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Management J. 44(2):219–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. 51(5):756–770.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Soda GB, Tortoriello M, Iorio A (2017) Harvesting value from brokerage: Individual strategic orientation, structural holes, and performance. Acad. Management J. 61(3):896–918.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen JB, Sharkey AJ (2014) Entrepreneurship as a mobility process. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):328–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O, Rivkin JW, Fleming L (2006) Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Res. Policy 35(7):994–1017.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tan D, Rider CI (2017) Let them go? How losing employees to competitors can enhance firm status. Strategic Management J. 38(9):1848–1874.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tocher N, Oswald SL, Shook CL, Adams G (2012) Entrepreneur political skill and new venture performance: Extending the social competence perspective. Entrepreneurship Regional Development 24(5–6):283–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman ML (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(4):587–605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman ML, Nadler DA (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):613–624.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tzabbar D (2009) When does scientist recruitment affect technological repositioning? Acad. Management J. 52(5):873–896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tzabbar D, Kehoe R (2014) Can opportunity emerge from disarray? An examination of exploration and exploitation following star scientist turnover. J. Management 40(2):449–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tzabbar D, Vestal A (2015) Bridging the social chasm in geographically distributed R&D teams: The moderating effects of relational strength and status asymmetry on the novelty of team innovation. Organ. Sci. 26(3):811–829.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tzabbar D, Silverman B, Aharonson BS (2015) Learning by hiring or hiring to avoid learning? J. Management Psych. 30(5):550–564.Google Scholar
  • Wang C, Rodan S, Fruin M, Xu X (2014) Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation. Acad. Management J. 57(2):484–514.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wanous JP (1980) The Entry of Newcomers into Organizations (Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Psychology, East Lansing, MI).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman N (2003) Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organ. Sci. 14(2):149–172.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wezel FC, Cattani G, Pennings JM (2006) Competitive implications of interfirm mobility. Organ. Sci. 17(6):691–709.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao Z, Tsui AS (2007) When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yayavaram S, Ahuja G (2008) Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability. Admin. Sci. Quart.. 53(2):333–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao ZJ, Anand J (2013) Beyond boundary spanners: The “collective bridge” as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1513–1530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zou X, Ingram P (2013) Bonds and boundaries: Network structure, organizational boundaries, and job performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 120(1):98–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.