Organizations Decentered: Data Objects, Technology and Knowledge

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1552

References

  • Aaltonen A, Alaimo C, Kallinikos J (2021) The making of data commodities. Data analytics as embedded process. J. Management Inform. Systems 38(2):401–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adner R (2017) Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. J. Management 43(1):39–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alaimo C (2021) From people to objects: The digital transformation of fields, Organ. Stud., ePub ahead of print June 28, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/01708406211030654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alaimo C, Kallinikos J (2017) Computing the everyday: Social media as data platforms. Inform. Soc. 33(4):175–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alaimo C, Kallinikos J (2019) Social media and the infrastructuring of sociality. Res. Sociol. Organ. 62:289–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alaimo C, Kallinikos J, Valderrama E (2020a) Platforms as service ecosystems: Lessons from social media. J. Inform. Tech. 35(1):25–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alaimo C, Kallinikos J (2021) Managing by data: Algorithmic categories and organizing. Organ. Stud. 42(9):1385–1407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alaimo C, Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A (2020b) Data and value. Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, eds. Handbook of Digital Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 162–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich HE, Pfeffer J (1976) Environments of organizations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 2(1):79–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Appadurai A, ed. (1988) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  • Arthur WB (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey D, Leonardi P, Chong J (2010) Minding the gaps: Understanding technological interdependence and coordination in knowledge work. Organ. Sci. 21(3):713–730.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1485–1504.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31:78–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley WC (2015) Anticipatory work: How the need to represent knowledge across boundaries shapes work practices within them. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1612–1628.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barley WC, Leonardi PM, Bailey DE (2012) Engineering objects for collaboration: Strategies of ambiguity and clarity at knowledge boundaries. Human Comm. Res. 38(3):280–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski WJ, Yates JA (2012) Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1448–1466.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003a) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(3):720–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003b) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechmann A, Bowker GC (2019) Unsupervised by any other name: Hidden layers of knowledge production in artificial intelligence on social media. Big Data Soc. 6(1):2053951718819569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beniger J (1986) The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Borgmann A (2010) Orientation in technological space. First Monday 15:6–7.Google Scholar
  • Bowker G, Star SL (1999) Sorting Things Out. Classification and Its Consequences (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Buckland MK (1991) Information as thing. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 42(5):351–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buckland M (2017) Information and Society (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ceruzzi PE (2012) Computing: A Concise History (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler AD (1977) The Visible Hand. The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Chandler AD, Cortada JW, eds. (2000) A Nation Transformed by Information: How Information Has Shaped the United States from Colonial Times to the Present (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Cline-Cohen P (1982) A Calculating People: The Spread of Numeracy in Early America (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Cortada JW (2019) IBM: The Rise and Fall and Reinvention of a Global Icon (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cortada JW (2011) Information and the Modern Corporation (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desrosières A (1998) The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Dourish P (2016) Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context. Big Data Soc. 3(2):205395171666512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dourish P (2017) The Stuff of Bits: An Essay on the Materialities of Information (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreyfus HL (2001) On the Internet (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  • Eco U (1976) A Theory of Semiotics (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards PN (2010) A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Ekbia HR (2009) Digital artifacts as quasi‐objects: Qualification, mediation, and materiality. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 60(12):2554–2566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espeland W, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):1–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espeland WN, Stevens ML (1998) Commensuration as a social process. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24(1):313–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espeland WN, Stevens ML (2008) A sociology of quantification. Eur. J. Sociol, Arch. Eur. Sociol. 49(3):401–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eubanks V (2018) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (St. Martin Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ewenstein B, Whyte J (2009) Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as ‘epistemic objects’. Organ. Stud. 30(1):7–30.Google Scholar
  • Faraj S, Pachidi S (2021) Beyond uberization: The co-constitution of technology and organizing. Organ. Theory 2(1):2631787721995205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Pachidi S, Sayegh K (2018) Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Inform. Organ. 28(1):62–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, von Krogh G, Monteiro E, Lakhani KR (2016) Online community as space for knowledge flows. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):668–684.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Faulkner P, Runde J (2013) Technological objects, social positions, and the transformational model of social activity. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(3):803–818.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faulkner P, Runde J (2019) Theorizing the digital object. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(4):1279–1302.Google Scholar
  • Gillespie T (2014) The relevance of algorithms. Gillespie T, Boczkowski PJ, Foot KA, eds. Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 167–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gitelman L (2014) Paper Knowledge: Toward a Media History of Documents (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).Google Scholar
  • Goodman N (1978) Ways of Worldmaking (Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, IN).Google Scholar
  • Goody J (1986) The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray G, Benning B (2019) Crowdsourcing criminology: Social media and citizen policing in missing person cases. SAGE Open. 9(4):2158244019893700.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hanseth O (2000) The economics of standards. Ciborra C, ed. From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 56–70.Google Scholar
  • Hanseth O, Ciborra C (2007) Risk, Complexity and ICT (Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
  • Hanseth O, Monteiro E, Hatling M (1996) Developing information infrastructure: The tension between standardization and flexibility. Sci. Tech. Human Values 21(4):407–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson K (1991) Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Sci. Tech. Human Values 16(4):448–473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopwood AG (1987) The archeology of accounting systems. Account. Organ. Soc. 12(3):207–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hui Y (2016) On the Existence of Digital Objects, vol. 48 (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iliadis A, Russo F (2016) Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data Soc. 3(2):205395171667423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones M (2019) What we talk about when we talk about (big) data. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 28(1):3–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kallinikos J (2005) The order of technology: complexity and control in a connected world. Inform. Organ. 15(3):185–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kallinikos J (2007) The Consequences of Information: Institutional Implications of Technological Change (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham).Google Scholar
  • Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A (2013a) The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):357–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kallinikos J, Hasselbladh H (2009) Work, control and computation: Rethinking the legacy of neo-institutionalism. Res. Sociol. Organ. 27:257–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kallinikos J, Hasselbladh H, Marton A (2013b) Governing social practice. Theory Soc. 42(4):395–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kallinikos J, Tempini N (2014) Patient data as medical facts: Social media practices as a foundation for medical knowledge creation. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):817–833.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S (2011) Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organ. Sci. 22(2):320–346.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75:35–48.Google Scholar
  • Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A (2020) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):366–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knorr-Cetina K (1999) Epistemic Cultures (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knorr-Cetina KK (2001) Objectual practice. Knorr-Cetina KK, Schatzki TR, Von Savigny E, eds. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (Routledge, London), 175–188.Google Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2012) Car Crashes Without Cars: Lessons About Simulation Technology and Organizational Change From Automotive Design (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2014) Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):796–816.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2021) COVID‐19 and the new technologies of organizing: Digital exhaust, digital footprints, and artificial intelligence in the wake of remote work. J. Management Stud. 58:1.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2010) What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):1–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Nardi BA, Kallinikos J, eds. (2012) Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Treem JW (2020) Behavioral visibility: A new paradigm for organization studies in the age of digitization, digitalization, and datafication. Organ. Stud. 41(12):1601–1625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Treem JW (2012) Knowledge management technology as a stage for strategic self-presentation: Implications for knowledge sharing in organizations. Inform. Organ. 22(1):37–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonelli S (2014) What difference does quantity make? On the epistemology of big data in biology. Big Data Soc. 10.1177/2053951714534395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonelli S (2019) Data Governance is Key to Interpretation: Reconceptualizing Data in Data Science. Harvard Data Science Review. 1(1). 10.1162/99608f92.17405bb6.Google Scholar
  • Levy K (2015) The contexts of control: Information, power, and truck-driving work. Inform. Soc. 31(2):160–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luhmann N (1990) Essays on Self-Reference (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Luhmann N (2002) Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1994) Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • March JG (2006) Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management J. 27(3):201–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McIntyre D, Srinivasan A, Afuah A, Gawer A, Kretschmer T (2020) Multi-sided platforms as new organizational forms. Acad. Management Perspect., ePub ahead of print May 7, https://journals.aom.org/doi/epdf/10.5465/amp.2018.0018.Google Scholar
  • Miettinen R, Virkkunen J (2005) Epistemic objects, artefacts and organizational change. Organization 12(3):437–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller P, O’Leary T (1987) Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Account. Organ. Soc. 12(3):235–265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H (1979) The Structuring of Organization: A Synthesis of the Research (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Monteiro E, Parmiggiani E (2019) Synthetic knowing: The politics of the Internet of things. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(1):167–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Möhlmann M, Zamalson L, Henfridsson O, Gregory RW (2021) Algorithmic management of work on online labor platforms: When matching meets control. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 45(4):1999–2022.Google Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Noble SU (2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism (NYU Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ong WJ (1982) Orality and Literacy (Routledge, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Neil C (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (Broadway Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ. Sci. 25(3):868–891.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Østerlie T, Monteiro E (2020) Digital sand: The becoming of digital representations. Inform. Organ. 30(1): 100275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pachidi S, Berends H, Faraj S, Huysman M (2021) Make way for the algorithms: Symbolic actions and change in a regime of knowing. Organ. Sci. 32(1):18–41.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parker G, Van Alstyne M, Choudary SP (2016a) Platform Revolution (Norton, New York).Google Scholar
  • Parker G, Van Alstyne MW, Jiang X (2016b) Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. Boston University Questrom School of Business Research Paper (2861574).Google Scholar
  • Passi S, Jackson SJ (2018) Trust in data science: Collaboration, translation, and accountability in corporate data science projects. Proc. ACM Human-Comput. Interaction, 2(CSCW), 136.Google Scholar
  • Poon M (2009) From new deal institutions to capital markets: Commercial consumer risk scores and the making of subprime mortgage finance. Account. Organ. Soc. 34(5):654–674.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poovey M (1998) A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter TM (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Power M (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  • Roos J, Von Krogh G (1995) Organizational Epistemology (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rosch E (1975) Cognitive reference points. Cognit. Psych. 7(4):532–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyes-Braem P(1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognit. Psych. 8(3):382–439.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenblat A (2018) Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2005) Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organ. Sci. 16(5):491–508.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sapsed J, Salter A (2004) Postcards from the Edge: Local communities, global programs and boundary objects. Organ. Stud. 25(9):1515–1534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Searle JR (1995) The Construction of Social Reality (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Sergeeva AV, Faraj S, Huysman M (2020) Losing touch: an embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1248–1271.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1944) The Mathematical Theory of Communication (The University of Illinois Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Shapiro CS, Varian HR (1998) Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Smith G (2020) Data mining fool’s gold. J. Inform. Tech. 35(3):182–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Star SL (2010) This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci. Tech. Human Values 35(5):601–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, translations, and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19(3):387–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swanson EB (2020) How information systems came to rule the world: Reflections on the information systems field. Inform. Soc. 36(2):109–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swanson EB (2021) When data becomes infrastructure and our lives depend on it. ECIS 2021 Research Papers, 10, https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2021_rp/10.Google Scholar
  • Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tuomi I (1999) Data are more than knowledge: Implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational memory. J. Management Inform. Systems 16(3):103–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Krogh G (2018) Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing. Acad. Management Discov. 4(4):404–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Krogh G, Roos J, Slocum K (1994) An essay on corporate epistemology. Strategic Management J. 15(2):53–71.Google Scholar
  • Waardenburg L, Sergeeva A, Huysman M (2018) Hotspots and blind spots: A case of predictive policing in practice. Schultze U, Aanestad M, Mähring M, et al., eds., Living with Monsters? Social Implications of Algorithmic Phenomena, Hybrid Agency, and the Performativity of Technology, vol. 543 (Springer, San Francisco, CA), 96–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing (Addison-Wesley, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Weinberger D (2007) Everything is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Winner L (1986) The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Winter SG, Szulanski G (2001) Replication as strategy. Organ. Sci. 12(6):730–743.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yates J (1989) Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management (JHU Press, Baltimore, MD).Google Scholar
  • Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research Commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S(2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zuboff S (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Zuboff S (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: the Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power (Profile Books, Ltd., London).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.