The Fickle Crowd: Reinforcement and Contradiction of Quality Evaluations in Cultural Markets

References

• Amabile TM (1983) Brilliant but cruel: Perceptions of negative evaluators. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 19(2):146–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asch SE (1951) Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. Guetzkow H, ed. Groups, Leadership and Men (Carnegie Press, Pittsburgh, PA), 177–190.Google Scholar
• Askin N, Mauskapf M (2017) What makes popular culture popular? Product features and optimal differentiation in music. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(5):910–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y (2013) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Barlow MA, Verhaal JC, Hoskins JD (2018) Guilty by association: Product-level category stigma and audience expectations in the U.S. craft beer industry. J. Management 44(7):2934–2960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Leca B, Boxenbaum E (2009) How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):65–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1991) A note on restaurant pricing and other examples of social influences on price. J. Political Econom. 99(5):1109–1116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin BA, Podolny JM (1999) Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):563–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Heath C (2007) Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. J. Consumer Res. 34(2):121–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Heath C (2008) Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(3):593–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumer H (1986) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method (University of California Press).Google Scholar
• Botelho T (2017) Audience to Evaluator: The Effect of Social Influence in Evaluation Processes (Academy of Management Proceedings, Briarcliff Manor, NY), 1:11342.Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1993) The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bowers A (2019) Balanced but not fair: Strategic balancing, rating allocations, and third-party intermediaries. Strategic Organ. February:1476127019828359.Google Scholar
• Bowers AH, Greve HR, Mitsuhashi H (2017) Look at me: Overt status-seeking behavior and competitive emergence among securities analysts. Emergence, Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Publishing Limited), 351–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(5):475–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Busenbark JR, Kalm M, LePine JA (2020) Divided we fall: How ratios undermine research in strategic management. Organ. Res. Methods 23(2):211–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan C, Berger J, Van Boven L (2012) Identifiable but not identical: Combining social identity and uniqueness motives in choice. J. Consumer Res. 39:561–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TW, Goldthorpe JH (2007a) Social status and newspaper readership. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(4):1095–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TW, Goldthorpe JH (2007b) Class and status: The conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(4):512–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chwe MS-Y (2001) Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Ridgeway CL, Zuckerman EW, Jank S, Jordan-Bloch S, Nakagawa S (2017) It’s the conventional thought that counts: How third-order inference produces status advantage. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(2):297–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C, West R, Jurafsky D, Leskovec J, Potts C (2013) No country for old members: User lifecycle and linguistic change in online communities. Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. on World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 307–318.Google Scholar
• de Langhe B, Fernbach PM, Lichtenstein DR (2016) Navigating by the stars: Investigating the actual and perceived validity of online user ratings. J. Consumer Res. 42(6):817–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Le Mens G (2016) Information sampling, belief synchronization, and collective illusions. Management Sci. 63(2):528–547.Link, Google Scholar
• Diekmann A, Ben Jann WP, Wehrli S (2014) Reputation formation and the evolution of cooperation in anonymous online markets. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):65–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles RG, White HC (1988) Price and authority in inter-profit center transactions. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:S17–S51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emons W (1997) Credence goods and fraudulent experts. RAND J. Econom. 28(1):107–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fine GA (2003) Crafting authenticity: The validation of identity in self-taught art. Theory Soc. 32(2):153–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fine GA (2004) Everyday Genius: Self-Taught Art and the Culture of Authenticity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fradkin A, Grewal E, Holtz D, Pearson M (2015) Bias and reciprocity in online reviews: Evidence from field experiments on Airbnb. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. on Econom. and Comput. (ACM, New York), 641–641.Google Scholar
• Frake J (2016) Selling out: The inauthenticity discount in the craft beer industry. Management Sci. 63(11):3930–3943.Link, Google Scholar
• Freeman J, Carroll GR, Hannan MT (1983) The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 692–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman E, Resnick P (2001) The social cost of cheap pseudonyms. J. Econom. Management Strategy 10:173–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans H (1999) Popular Culture and High Culture: An Analysis and Evaluation of Taste, 2nd ed. (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Silva JC (2011) Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Sci. 31(3):448–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Anchor, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Srivastava SB, Manian VG, Monroe W, Potts C (2016) Fitting in or standing out? The tradeoffs of structural and cultural embeddedness. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1190–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould RV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(5):1143–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M, Soong R (1986) Threshold models of interpersonal effects in consumer demand. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 7:83–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grazian D (2005) Blue Chicago: The Search for Authenticity in Urban Blues Clubs (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Guárdia-Sebaoun E, Guigue V, Gallinari P (2015) Latent trajectory modeling: A light and efficient way to introduce time in recommender systems. Proc. 9th ACM Conf. on Recommender Systems, 281–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Zuckerman EW, Kim M (2017) Why elites love authentic lowbrow culture: Overcoming high-status denigration with outsider art. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(4):828–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He SX, Bond SD (2015) Why is the crowd divided? Attribution for dispersion in online word of mouth. J. Consumer Res. 41(6):1509–1527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobsen GD (2015) Consumers, experts, and online product evaluations: Evidence from the brewing industry. J. Public Econom. 126(June):114–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2006) Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety, and client defections. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(1):97–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnston J, Baumann S (2007) Democracy versus distinction: A study of omnivorousness in gourmet food writing. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):165–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JW, King BG (2014) Seeing stars: Matthew effects and status bias in major league baseball umpiring. Management Sci. 60(11):2619–2644.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim M, Zuckerman Sivan EW (2017) Faking it is hard to do: Entrepreneurial norm enforcement and suspicions of deviance. Sociol. Sci. 4:580–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Pearce NA (2010) The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:249–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Carroll GR, Lehman DW (2013) Authenticity and consumer value ratings: Empirical tests from the restaurant domain. Organ. Sci. 25(2):458–478.Link, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Sharkey AJ (2014) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuwabara K (2015) Do reputation systems undermine trust? Divergent effects of enforcement type on generalized trust and trustworthiness. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(5):1390–1428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Tucker C, Wiertz C (2018) Advertising to early trend propagators: Evidence from Twitter. Marketing Sci. 37(2):177–199.Link, Google Scholar
• Lamont M, Molnár V (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28(1):167–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leibenstein H (1950) Bandwagon, snob, and veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand. Quart. J. Econom. 64(2):183–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardelli GJ, Pickett CL, Brewer MB (2010) Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations. Zanna MP, Olsen JM, eds. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 63–113.Google Scholar
• Leung MD (2014) Dilettante or renaissance person? How the order of job experiences affects hiring in an external labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):136–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine L (1988) Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America, 1st ed. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Li X, Hitt LM (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Lieberson S (2000) A Matter of Taste: How Names, Fashions, and Culture Change (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Lieberson S, Lynn FB (2003) Popularity as taste. Onoma 38(0):235–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luca M (2016) Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.Com. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper No. 12-016.Google Scholar
• Luca M, Reshef O (2021) The effect of price on firm reputation. Management Sci. 67(7):4408–4419.Link, Google Scholar
• Lynn F, Simpson B, Walker MH, Peterson C (2016) Why is the pack persuasive? The effect of choice status on perceptions of quality. Sociol. Sci. 3:239–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight B, Zietsma C (2018) Finding the threshold: A configurational approach to optimal distinctiveness. J. Bus. Venturing 33(4):493–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science the reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolella L, Durand R (2016) Category spanning, evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market. Acad. Management J. 59(1):330–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parigi P, Santana JJ, Cook KS (2017) Online field experiments: Studying social interactions in context. Soc. Psych. Quart. 80(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Passy C (2015) Opinion: How did Pabst Blue Ribbon become a hipster favorite? MarketWatch, accessed November 1, 2017, https://www.marketwatch.com/story/whatll-you-have-not-a-pabst-blue-ribbon-2015-07-16.Google Scholar
• Payne JW (1976) Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Performance 16:166–187.Google Scholar
• Peysakhovich A, Rand DG (2015) Habits of virtue: Creating norms of cooperation and defection in the laboratory. Management Sci. 62(3):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ (2013) Shaping Jazz: Cities, Labels, and the Global Emergence of an Art Form, 1st ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle‐status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2005) Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Prentice DA, Miller DT (1993) Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(2):243–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Watts DJ (2008) Leading the herd astray: An experimental study of self-fulfilling prophecies in an artificial cultural market. Soc. Soc. Psych. Quart. 71(4):338–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schelling TC (1960) The Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press Cambridge).Google Scholar
• Schelling TC (1981) The Strategy of Conflict, Reprint ed. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Simcoe TS, Waguespack DM (2010) Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57(2):274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Simmel G (1957) Fashion. Amer. J. Sociol. 62(6):541–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharkey AJ, Kovács B (2018) The many gifts of status: How attending to audience reactions drives the use of status. Management Sci. 64(11):5422–5443.Link, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe A (1965) Social structure and organizations. March JG, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Rand McNally, Chicago), 44(2):142–193.Google Scholar
• Strang D, David RJ, Akhlaghpour S (2014) Coevolution in management fashion: An agent-based model of consultant-driven innovation. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(1):226–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D, Macy MW (2001) In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):147–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swidler A (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(2):273–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taeuscher K, Rothe H (2021) Optimal distinctiveness in platform markets: Leveraging complementors as legitimacy buffers. Strategic Management J. 42(2):435–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW (2014) So you think you can dance? Lessons from the U.S. private equity bubble. Sociol. Sci. 1(March):81–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW (2017) Verstehen for sociology: Comment on Watts. Amer. J. Sociol. 122(4):1272–1291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban GL, Weinberg BD, Hauser JR (1993) Premarket forecasting of really new products. J. Marketing 60:47–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342(6157):468–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van de Rijt A (2019) Self-correcting dynamics in social influence processes. Amer. J. Sociol. 124(5):1468–1495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van de Rijt A, Kang SM, Restivo M, Patil A (2014) Field experiments of success-breeds-success dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(19):6934–6939.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veblen T (1899) Conspicuous Consumption (Penguin).Google Scholar
• Waguespack DM, Salomon R (2015) Quality, subjectivity, and sustained superior performance at the Olympic Games. Management Sci. 62(1):286–300.Link, Google Scholar
• Warren C, Campbell MC (2014) What makes things cool? How autonomy influences perceived coolness. J. Consumer Res. 41(2):543–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, vol. 1 (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Willer R, Kuwabara K, Macy MW (2009) The false enforcement of unpopular norms. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(2):451–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wojnicki AC, Godes D (2008) Word-of-mouth as self-enhancement. Preprint, submitted XX, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.908999.Google Scholar
• Yazdani E, Gopinath S, Carson S (2018) Preaching to the choir: The chasm between top-ranked reviewers, mainstream customers, and product sales. Marketing Sci. 37(5):838–851.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2009) The sound of silence: Observational learning in the U.S. kidney market. Marketing Sci. 29(2):315–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Glynn MA (2021) Optimal distinctiveness: On being the same and different. Working Paper.Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2000) Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):591–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2012) Construction, concentration, and (dis)continuities in social valuations. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38(1):223–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2015) Optimal distinctiveness revisited: An integrative framework for understanding the balance between differentiation and conformity in individual and organizational identities. Pratt M, Schultz M, Ashforth B, Ravasi D, eds. Handbook of Organizational Identity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 183–199.Google Scholar