Working with the “Enemy”: Supervised Space, Free Space, and Cross-Border Collaboration amid Geopolitical Rivalry

References

• Alvarez S, Rangan S (2019) Editors’ comments: The rise of nationalism (redux)—An opportunity for reflection and research. Acad. Management Rev. 44(4):719–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anievas A (2014) Capital, the State, and War: Class Conflict and Geopolitics in the Thirty Years’ Crisis, 1914–1945 (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Arikan I, Shenkar O (2013) National animosity and cross-border alliances. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1516–1544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth B, Barker Caza B, Meister A (2024) My place: How workers become identified with their workplaces and why it matters. Acad. Management Rev. 49(2):366–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldry C (1999) Space—The final frontier. Sociology 33(3):535–553.Google Scholar
• Baldry C, Barnes A (2012) The open-plan academy: Space, control and the undermining of professional identity. Work Employment Soc. 26(2):228–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bar-Tal D (2000) Shared Beliefs in a Society: Social Psychological Analysis (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baracuhy B (2022) Corporate geopolitics: How boards navigate a complex and volatile world. World Econom. Forum (October 14).Google Scholar
• Battaglia D (2012) Arresting hospitality: The case of the “handshake in space.” J. Roy. Anthropological Inst. 18:S76–S89.Google Scholar
• Berg BL, Lune H (2012) Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (Pearson, Boston).Google Scholar
• Bertello A, De Bernardi P, Santoro G, Quaglia R (2022) Unveiling the microfoundations of multiplex boundary work for collaborative innovation. J. Bus Res. 139:1424–1434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk S, Luo Y (2024) The politicized nature of international business. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 55:281–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyes T, Steyaert C (2012) Spacing organization: Non-representational theory and performing organizational space. Organization 19(1):45–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boon B (2007) Working within the front-of-house/back-of-house boundary: Room attendants in the hotel guest room space. J. Management Organ. 13(2):160–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boone C, Özcan S (2016) Ideological purity vs. hybridization trade-off: When do Islamic banks hire managers from conventional banking? Organ. Sci. 27(6):1380–1396.Link, Google Scholar
• Buchanan B (2020) The Hacker and the State: Cyber-Attacks and the New Normal of Geopolitics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bucher S, Langley A (2016) The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics. Organ. Sci. 27(3):594–613.Link, Google Scholar
• Bucher SV, Chreim S, Langley A, Reay T (2016) Contestation about collaboration: Discursive boundary work among professions. Organ. Stud. 37(4):497–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buckley PJ (2023) Corporate reactions to the fracturing of the global economy. Internat. Bus. Rev. 32(6):102014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgess C, ed. (2010) Footprints in the Dust: The Epic Voyages of Apollo, 1969–1975 (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE).Google Scholar
• Burgess C, Hall R (2009) The First Soviet Cosmonaut Team (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burrows WE (1998) This New Ocean: The Story of the First Space Age (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Burrows M, Muller-Kaler J (2021) Smart partnerships amid great power competition: AI, China, and the global quest for digital sovereignty. Atlantic Council, GeoTech Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Bushuyev K (1976) An atmosphere of harmony. Ostroumov G, ed. Handshake in Space: A Special Publication (Izvestiya Press, Moscow), 274–278.Google Scholar
• Canales R (2016) From ideals to institutions: Institutional entrepreneurship and the growth of Mexican small business finance. Organ. Sci. 27(6):1548–1573.Link, Google Scholar
• Cartel M, Boxenbaum E, Aggeri F (2019) Just for fun! How experimental spaces stimulate innovation in institutionalized fields. Organ. Stud. 40(1):65–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carton AM (2018) “I’m not mopping the floors, I’m putting a man on the moon”: How NASA leaders enhanced the meaningfulness of work by changing the meaning of work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(2):323–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassutt M (2018) The Astronaut Maker: How One Mysterious Engineer Ran Human Spaceflight for a Generation (Chicago Review Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2014) Constructing Grounded Theory (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Claggett JL, Karahanna E (2018) Unpacking the structure of coordination mechanisms and the role of relational coordination in an era of digitally mediated work processes. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):704–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Courpasson D, Dany F, Delbridge R (2017) Politics of place: The meaningfulness of resisting places. Human Relations 70(2):237–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui V, Vertinsky I, Wang Y, Zhou D (2023) Decoupling in international business: The “new” vulnerability of globalization and MNEs’ response strategies. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 54:1562–1576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunningham W (1977) The All-American Boys (Macmillan Publishing Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B, Joerges B (1996) Travels of ideas. Czarniawska B, Sevón G, eds. Translating Organizational Change (De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany), 13–47.Google Scholar
• Dale K (2005) Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization 12(5):649–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daskalaki M, Kokkinidis G (2017) Organizing solidarity initiatives: A socio-spatial conceptualization of resistance. Organ. Stud. 38(9):1303–1325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davies C (2007) Humour and protest: Jokes under communism. Internat. Rev. Soc. History 52(S15):291–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Vaujany FX, Vaast E (2014) If these walls could talk: The mutual construction of organizational space and legitimacy. Organ. Sci. 25(3):713–731.Link, Google Scholar
• Earle JS, Gehlbach S (2015) The productivity consequences of political turnover: Firm-level evidence from Ukraine’s orange revolution. Amer. J. Political Sci. 59(3):708–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellis T (2018) Reds in Space: American Perceptions of the Soviet Space Programme from Apollo to Mir 1967–1991 (University of Southampton).Google Scholar
• Ellis T (2019) “Howdy partner!” Space brotherhood, detente, and the symbolism of the 1975 Apollo-Soyuz Test Project. J. Amer. Stud. 53(3):744–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertug G, Cuypers IRP, Dow D, Edman J (2024) The effect of nationalism on governance choices in cross-border collaborations. J. Management 50(7):2597–2640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans S, Boyte H (1992) Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
• Ezell EC, Ezell LN (1978) The partnership: A history of the Apollo-Soyuz test project. Accessed July 20, 2021, NASA.gov.Google Scholar
• Faems D, Janssens M, Madhok A, Looy BV (2008) Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: Connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application. Acad. Management J. 51(6):1053–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan GH, Zietsma C (2017) Constructing a shared governance logic: The role of emotions in enabling dually embedded agency. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2321–2351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fayard AL, Weeks J (2007) Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organ. Stud. 28(5):605–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fewer TJ, Tarakci M (2024) CEO political partisanship and corporate misconduct. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print August 23, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2022.0909.Google Scholar
• Fjellström D, Bai W, Oliveira L, Fang T (2023) Springboard internationalisation in times of geopolitical tensions. Internat. Bus. Rev. 32(6):102144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2):219–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Froehlich W (1976) Apollo Soyuz (United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Furnari S (2014) Interstitial spaces: Microinteraction settings and the genesis of new practices between institutional fields. Acad. Management Rev. 39(4):439–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal U, Blegind Jensen T, Lyytinen K (2014) Identity orientation, social exchange, and information technology use in interorganizational collaborations. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1372–1390.Link, Google Scholar
• George G, Fewer TJ, Lazzarini S, McGahan AM, Puranam P (2024) Partnering for grand challenges: A review of organizational design considerations in public–private collaborations. J. Management 50(1):1557–1211.Google Scholar
• Gerovitch S (2014) Voices of the Soviet Space Program: Cosmonauts, Soldiers, and Engineers Who Took the USSR into Space (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gift K, Gift T (2015) Does politics influence hiring? Evidence from a randomized experiment. Political Behav. 37(3):653–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill MJ, Gill DJ, Roulet TJ (2018) Constructing trustworthy historical narratives: Criteria, principles and techniques. British J. Management 29(1):191–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine DeGruyter, New York).Google Scholar
• Gray LM (1975) Working paper on a case study on the transfer of space technology. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2009) Cultural biases in economic exchange? Quart. J. Econom. 124(3):1095–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A, George G, Fewer TJ (2024) Venture Meets Mission: Aligning People, Purpose, and Profit to Innovate and Transform Society (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halford S (2004) Towards a sociology of organizational space. Sociol. Res. Online 9(1):13–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall R, Shayler DJ, Vis B (2005) Russia’s Cosmonauts (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany).Google Scholar
• Hampel CE, Tracey P (2017) How organizations move from stigma to legitimacy: The case of cook’s travel agency in Victorian Britain. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2175–2207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy C, Phillips N, Lawrence TB (2003) Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. J. Management Stud. 40(2):321–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A (2015) From what happened to what happens: Using microhistorical case studies to build grounded theory in organization studies. Elsbach K, Kramer R, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research (Routledge, New York), 122–133.Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Wadhwani RD (2023) Theorizing with microhistory. Acad. Management Rev. 48(4):681–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey D (1990) Between space and time: Reflections on the geographical imagination. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geographers 80(3):418–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasija D, Liou R, Ellstrand A (2020) Navigating the new normal: Political affinity and multinationals’ post‐acquisition performance. J. Management Stud. 57(3):569–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hatch MJ (1987) Physical barriers, task characteristics, and interaction activity in research and development firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 32(3):387–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haynes K (2010) Other lives in accounting: Critical reflections on oral history methodology in action. Critical Perspect. Accounting 21(3):221–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heinze KL, Weber K (2016) Toward organizational pluralism: Institutional intrapreneurship in integrative medicine. Organ. Sci. 27(1):157–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds P, Liu L, Lyon J (2011) Putting the global in global work: An intercultural lens on the practice of cross-national collaboration. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):135–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirst A (2011) Settlers, vagrants and mutual indifference: Unintended consequences of hot‐desking. J. Organ. Change Management 24(6):767–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G, Mellewigt T (2009) Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: Matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1025–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Abrams D, Brewer MB (2017) Social identity: The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 20(5):570–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howell MC, Prevenier W (2001) From Reliable Sources: An Introduction to Historical Methods (Cornell University Press, Ithica, NY).Google Scholar
• Huddy L (2001) From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psych. 22(1):127–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huising R (2014) The erosion of expert control through censure episodes. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1633–1661.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyengar S, Lelkes Y, Levendusky MS, Malhotra N, Westwood SJ (2019) The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 22(1):129–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Burke G, Spee P (2015) Constructing spaces for strategic work: A multimodal perspective. Brit. J. Management 26(S1):S26–S47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenks A (2020) Securitization and secrecy in the late Cold War: The view from space. Kritika 21(3):659–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenks A (2021) U.S.-Soviet handshakes in space and the cold war imaginary. J. Cold War Stud. 23(2):100–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen NM, Malesky E, Weymouth S (2014) Unbundling the relationship between authoritarian legislatures and political risk. Brit. J. Political Sci. 44(3):655–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jost JT, Federico CM, Napier JL (2009) Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Rev. Psych. 60(1):307–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kieser A (1994) Why organization theory needs historical analyses—And how this should be performed. Organ. Sci. 5(4):608–620.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim CS, Inkpen AC (2005) Cross-border R&D alliances, absorptive capacity and technology learning. J. Internat. Management 11(3):313–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kipping M, Üsdiken B (2014) History in organization and management theory: More than meets the eye. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):535–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kipping M, Wadhwani RD, Bucheli M (2014) Analyzing and interpreting historical sources: A basic methodology. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Knight G (2015) Government intervention in international business. Stone J, Rutledge DT, Rizova P, Xiaoshuo H, Dennis R, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Oxford, UK), 1–2.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornberger M, Clegg SR (2004) Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building. Organ. Stud. 25(7):1095–1114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krasnyak O (2018) The Apollo–Soyuz Test Project: Construction of an ideal type of science diplomacy. Hague J. Diplomacy 13(4):410–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Lindberg K, Mørk BE, Nicolini D, Raviola E, Walter L (2019) Boundary work among groups, occupations, and organizations: From cartography to process. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):704–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee MY, Mazmanian M, Perlow L (2020) Fostering positive relational dynamics: The power of spaces and interaction scripts. Acad. Management J. 63(1):96–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard P (2013) Changing organizational space: Green? Or lean and mean? Sociology 47(2):333–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonov A, Lomov B, Lebedev V (1976) The problem of interpersonal communication in international space flights. Current Digest Soviet Press 26(16):1–11.Google Scholar
• Lethbridge C (2023) Apollo-Soyuz Test Project Fact Sheet ( Spaceline.org).Google Scholar
• Li J, Shapiro D, Peng MW, Ufimtseva A (2022a) Corporate diplomacy in the age of U.S.–China rivalry. Acad. Management Perspect. 36(4):1007–1032.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Van Assche A, Li L, Qian G (2022b) Foreign direct investment along the belt and road: A political economy perspective. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 53(5):902–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li C, Brodbeck FC, Shenkar O, Ponzi LJ, Fisch JH (2017) Embracing the foreign: Cultural attractiveness and international strategy. Strategic Management J. 38(4):950–971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lumineau F, Oliveira N (2018) A pluralistic perspective to overcome major blind spots in research on interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):440–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo Y (2022) Illusions of techno-nationalism. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 53(3):550–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maclean M, Harvey C, Clegg SR (2016) Conceptualizing historical organization studies. Acad. Management Rev. 41(4):609–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Jarvenpaa SL, Bagherzadeh M (2015) A review of interorganizational collaboration dynamics. J. Management 41(5):1338–1360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mäkelä K, Andersson U, Seppälä T (2012) Interpersonal similarity and knowledge sharing within multinational organizations. J. Internat. Bus. Rev. 21(3):439–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marchington M, Vincent S (2004) Analysing the influence of institutional, organizational and interpersonal forces in shaping inter-organizational relations. J. Management Stud. 41(6):1029–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massey D (2005) For Space (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1984) Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Ed. Res. 13(5):20–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris M, Podolny J, Sullivan B (2008) Culture and coworker relations: Interpersonal patterns in American, Chinese, German and Spanish divisions of a global retail bank. Organ Sci. 19(4):517–532.Link, Google Scholar
• Moss W (1988) Oral History—What is It and Where Did It Come From? The Past Meets the Present (Lanham, New York).Google Scholar
• National Archives (1972) Cooperation in space. Accessed July 20, 2021, https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/events/centennials/nixon/exhibit/nixon-online-exhibit-agreement.html#:~:text=On%20May%2024%2C%201972%2C%20President,with%20a%20Soyuz%20command%20module.Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Mattes J (2015) The spatiality of trust: Factors influencing the creation of trust and the role of face-to-face contacts. Eur. Management J. 33(4):230–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nygaard A, Dahlstrom R (2002) Role stress and effectiveness in horizontal alliances. J. Marketing 66(2):61–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Office of Technology Assessment (1985) U.S.-Soviet Cooperation in Space. A Technical Memorandum (Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Ostroumov G (1976a) Handshake in Space: A Special Publication (NASA, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Ostroumov G (1976b) Top of the pyramid. Notes of a journalist concerning the Soyuz-Apollo Project. Ostroumov G, ed. Handshake in Space: A Special Publication (Izvestiya Press, Moscow), 46–63.Google Scholar
• Pace S (2023) U.S. space policy and theories of international relations: The case for analytical eclecticism. Space Policy 65:101538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker JN, Hackett EJ (2012) Hot spots and hot moments in scientific collaborations and social movements. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 77(1):21–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry DR (2005) Multi-National Cooperation in Space Operations (Naval Postgraduate School).Google Scholar
• Peterson TD (2017) A Fire to be Lighted: The Training of American Astronauts from 1959 to the Present (Texas A&M University).Google Scholar
• Phan PH (2019a) Implications for management research in the new political economy. Acad. Management Perspect. 33(4):367–370.Google Scholar
• Phan PH (2019b) International politics and management research: A glaring white space calling out to be filled. Acad. Management Perspect. 33(1):1–2.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelan D (2010) The eagle and the bear. Burgess C, ed. Footprints in the Dust: The Epic Voyages of Apollo, 1969–1975 (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln), 43–77.Google Scholar
• Polletta F (1999) “Free spaces” in collective action. Theory Soc. 28(1):1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Dutta S (2012) Free spaces as organizational weapons of the weak: Religious festivals and regimental mutinies in the 1857 Bengal Native Army. Admin. Sci Quart. 57(4):625–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhodes A (1976) Propaganda: The Art of Persuasion: World War II (Chelsea House Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Ring PS, Van De Ven AH (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 19(1):90–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy R (2025) Governance of knowledge development in a public-private partnership: NASA’s efforts to design the Space Shuttle. Res. Policy 54(2):105151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruffini PB (2017) What is science diplomacy? Science and Diplomacy: A New Relationship of International Relations (Springer International Publishing, London), 11–26.Google Scholar
• Sagdeev R (2007) United States-Soviet space cooperation during the Cold War. NASA.gov. Accessed February 6, 2021, https://www.nasa.gov/50th/50th_magazine/coldWarCoOp.html.Google Scholar
• Salvato C, Reuer J, Battigalli P (2017) Cooperation across disciplines: A multilevel perspective on cooperative behavior in governing interfirm relations. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):960–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandle P (2022) UK satellite company OneWeb suspends Baikonur launches. Reuters (March 3), https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/uk-satellite-company-oneweb-suspends-baikonur-launches-2022-03-03/.Google Scholar
• Sassen S (2007) A Sociology of Globalization (Norton, New York).Google Scholar
• Schauer WH (1976) The Politics of Space: A Comparison of the Soviet and American Space Programs (Holmes & Meier Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Scott D, Leonov A (2004) Two Sides of the Moon: Our Story of the Cold War Space Race (Thomas Dunne Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Shi W, Hoskisson RE, Zhang YA (2016) A geopolitical perspective into the opposition to globalizing state-owned enterprises in target states. Global Strategy J. 6(1):13–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shortt H (2015) Liminality, space and the importance of “transitory dwelling places” at work. Human Relations 68(4):633–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siebert S, Wilson F, Hamilton JRA (2017) “Devils may sit here”: The role of enchantment in institutional maintenance. Acad. Management J. 60(4):1607–1632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith HE Jr (1972) Memo to Lunney: “Debriefing activities and future plans, status of Working Group No. 2.” July 27. The NASA History Series, Scientific and Technical Information Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Song M, Berends H, Van Der Bij H, Weggeman M (2007) The effect of IT and co‐location on knowledge dissemination. J. Product Innovation Management 24(1):52–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stafford T (2002) We Have Capture: Tom Stafford and the Space Race (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Stephenson KA, Kuismin A, Putnam LL, Sivunen A (2020) Process studies of organizational space. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):797–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (2005) The Logic of Social Research (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Suddaby R, Coraiola D, Harvey C, Foster W (2020) History and the micro‐foundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 41(3):530–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun P, Doh JP, Rajwani T, Siegel D (2021) Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 52(9):1818–1853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swigart K, Anantharaman A, Williamson J, Grandey A (2020) Working while liberal/conservative: A review of political ideology in organizations. J Management 46(6):1063–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor FW (1911) The Principles of Scientific Management (Harper & Brothers Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Spicer A (2007) Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces. Internat. J. Management Rev. 9(4):325–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenzer H, Pudelko M (2017) The influence of language differences on power dynamics in multinational teams. J. World Bus. 52(1):45–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thelen DF, Wood BM (2010) NASA astronauts on Soyuz: Experience and lessons for the future. NASA Center for AeroSpace Information, Hanover, MD.Google Scholar
• Thomas DC, Peterson MF (2018) Cross Cultural Management: Essential Concepts, 4th ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Tindale RS, Meisenhelder HM, Dykema‐Engblade AA, Hogg MA (2001) Shared cognition in small groups. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tjosvold D (1984) Cooperation theory and organizations. Human Relations 37(9):743–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner V (1974) Dramas, Fields and Metaphors (Cornell University Press, Ithica, NY).Google Scholar
• Ullman H (2022) America’s new era of dangerous coexistence. The Hill (August 1), https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/3581478-americas-new-era-of-dangerous-coexistence/.Google Scholar
• Uribe J, Sytch M, Kim YH (2020) When friends become foes: Collaboration as a catalyst for conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(3):751–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker M (1995) The Cold War: A History (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Wang D, Weiner RJ, Li Q, Jandhyala S (2021) Leviathan as foreign investor: Geopolitics and sovereign wealth funds. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 52(7):1238–1255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Waeger D (2017) Organizations as polities: An open systems perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):886–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welch C, Piekkari R, Plakoyiannaki E, Paavilainen-Mäntymäki E (2011) Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 42(5):740–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolfe AJ (2013) Competing with the Soviets: Science, Technology, and the State in Cold War America (JHU Press, Baltimore).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright AL, Irving G, Zafar A, Reay T (2023) The role of space and place in organizational and institutional change: A systematic review of the literature. J. Management Stud. 60(4):991–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yates J (2014) Understanding historical methods in organization studies. Bucheli MR, Wadhwani D, eds. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 265–283.Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2018) Case Study Research and Applications (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2015) Supervising across borders: The case of multinational hierarchies. Organ. Sci. 26(1):277–292.Link, Google Scholar
• Zietsma C, Lawrence TB (2010) Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(2):189–221.Crossref, Google Scholar