The More You Know: The Impact of Personal Knowledge on Interpersonal Treatment at Work

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.15606

References

  • Abele S, Stasser G (2008) Coordination success and interpersonal perceptions: Matching vs. mismatching. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(3):576–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen TD (2003) Mentoring others: A dispositional and motivational approach. J. Vocational Behav. 62(1):134–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allport GW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Altman I, Taylor DA (1973) Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York).Google Scholar
  • Asch SE (1946) Forming impressions of personality. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 41(3):258–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bain PG, Vaes J, Leyens JP (2014) Humanness and Dehumanization (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering: An Experimental and Social Study (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Baym N, Larson J, Martin R (2021) What a year of WFH has done to our relationships at work. Harvard Business Review (March 22), https://hbr.org/2021/03/what-a-year-of-wfh-has-done-to-our-relationships-at-work.Google Scholar
  • Bohnert D, Ross WH (2010) The influence of social networking web sites on the evaluation of job candidates. Cyberpsych. Behav. Soc. Networking 13(3):341–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolino MC, Grant AM (2016) The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):599–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer MB (1988) A dual process model of impression formation. Srull TK, Wyer RS, eds. Advances in Social Cognition, vol. 1 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 1–36.Google Scholar
  • Bruner JS (1957) Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing (W. W. Norton & Company Inc., New York).Google Scholar
  • Buffer (2020) The 2020 state of remote work. Accessed January 14, 2022, https://lp.buffer.com/state-of-remote-work-2020.Google Scholar
  • Bulger CA, Matthews RA, Hoffman ME (2007) Work and personal life boundary management: Boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum. J. Occupational Health Psych. 12(4):365–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burley K (1989) Work-family conflict and marital adjustment in dual career couples: A comparison of three time models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, CA.Google Scholar
  • Byron K, Laurence G (2015) Diplomas, photos, and tchotchkes as symbolic self-representations: Understanding employees’ individual use of symbols. Acad. Management J. 58(1):298–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron CD, Harris LT, Payne BK (2016) The emotional cost of humanity: Anticipated exhaustion motivates dehumanization of stigmatized targets. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 7(2):105–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler J, Schwarz N (2010) Use does not wear ragged the fabric of friendship: Thinking of objects as alive makes people less willing to replace them. J. Consumer Psych. 20(2):138–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman JA, Flynn FJ (2005) Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organ. Sci. 16(4):434–447.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clark SC (2000) Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations 53(6):747–770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colbert A, Bono J, Purvanova R (2016) Flourishing via workplace relationships: Moving beyond instrumental support. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1199–1223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins NL, Miller LC (1994) Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Bull. 116(3):457–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt JA, LePine JA, Zapata CP, Wild RE (2011) Trust in typical and high-reliability contexts: Building and reacting to trust among firefighters. Acad. Management J. 54(5):999–1015.Google Scholar
  • Creary SJ, Caza BB, Roberts LM (2015) Out of the box? How managing a subordinate’s multiple identities affects the quality of a manager-subordinate relationship. Acad. Management Rev. 40(4):538–562.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai SD, Kouchaki M (2017) Moral symbols: A necklace of garlic against unethical requests. Acad. Management J. 60(1):7–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA (2006) Formative vs. reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British J. Management 17(4):263–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dieker J (2017) Less Human Than Other Nurses: An Examination of Attributions of Humanness Toward an Older Adult in Long-Term Care (University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO).Google Scholar
  • Duck S (1994) Meaningful Relationships: Talking, Sense, and Relating (Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Dumas TL, Sanchez-Burks J (2015) The professional, the personal and the ideal worker: Pressures and objectives shaping the boundary between life domains. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):803–843.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunbar RIM (2004) Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Rev. General Psych. 8(2):100–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Heaphy ED (2003) The power of high-quality connections. Cameron K, Dutton J, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Oakland, CA), 263–278.Google Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Ragins BR (2007) Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Workman KM, Hardin AE (2014) Compassion at work. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1(1):277–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach KD, Bechky BA (2018) How observers assess women who cry in professional work contexts. Acad. Management Discoveries 4(2):127–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epley N, Schroeder J, Waytz A (2013) Motivated mind perception: Treating pets as people and people as animals. Gervais SJ, ed. Objectification and (De)humanization (Springer, New York), 127–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferris DL, Lian H, Brown DJ, Morrison R (2015) Ostracism, self-esteem, and job performance: When do we self-verify and when do we self-enhance? Acad. Management J. 58(1):279–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Neuberg SL (1990) A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 23 (Academic Press, San Diego), 1–74.Google Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Pavelchak MA (1986) Category-based vs. piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. Sorrentino RM, Higgins ET, eds. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (Guilford Press, New York), 167–203.Google Scholar
  • Forbes Coaches Council (2022) 13 Effective ways to bring your ‘whole self’ to work. Forbes (August 10), https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2022/08/10/14-effective-ways-to-bring-your-whole-self-to-work/?sh=3cc35034261e.Google Scholar
  • Forest AL, Wood JV (2012) When social networking is not working individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psych. Sci. 23(3):295–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Marketing Res. 18(3):382–388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghumman S, Ryan AM (2013) Not welcome here: Discrimination toward women who wear the Muslim headscarf. Human Relations 66(5):671–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons DE (2004) Network structure and innovation ambiguity effects on diffusion in dynamic organizational fields. Acad. Management J. 47(6):938–951.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson KR (2018) Can I tell you something? How disruptive self-disclosure changes who “we” are. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):570–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gini A (1998) Work, identity and self: How we are formed by the work we do. J. Bus. Ethics 17(7):707–714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM, Mayer DM (2009) Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. J. Appl. Psych. 94(4):900–912.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM, Parker SK (2009) Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):317–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray HM, Gray K, Wegner DM (2007) Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315(5812):619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenhalgh EM, Watt SE (2015) Preference for consistency and value dissimilarities in dehumanization and prejudice toward asylum seekers in Australia. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 45(1):110–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grosser TJ, Lopez-Kidwell V, Labianca G (2010) A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group Organ. Management 35(2):177–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gutek BA, Searle S, Klepa L (1991) Rational vs. gender role explanations for work-family conflict. J. Appl. Psych. 76(4):560–568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton EA, Gordon JR, Whelan‐Berry KS (2006) Understanding the work‐life conflict of never‐married women without children. Women Management Rev. 21(5):393–415.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannah ST, Jennings PL, Bluhm D, Peng AC, Schaubroeck JM (2014) Duty orientation: Theoretical development and preliminary construct testing. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 123(2):220–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardin AE, Schinoff BS, Byron K, Balven RA (2022) A window into coworkers’ worlds: Examining the impact of incidental learning. Academy of Management Conference, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  • Haslam N (2006) Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 10(3):252–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hewlin PF, Dumas TL, Burnett MF (2017) To thine own self be true? Facades of conformity, values incongruence, and the moderating impact of leader integrity. Acad. Management J. 60(1):178–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hewstone M, Swart H (2011) Fifty‐odd years of inter‐group contact: From hypothesis to integrated theory. British J. Soc. Psych. 50(3):374–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinkin TR (1998) A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organ. Res. Methods 1(1):104–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hochschild A (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feelings (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Hoff TJ (1999) The social organization of physician-managers in a changing HMO. Work Occupations 26(3):324–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman BJ, Bynum BH, Piccolo RF, Sutton AW (2011) Person-organization value congruence: How transformational leaders influence work group effectiveness. Acad. Management J. 54(4):779–796.Google Scholar
  • Ingram P, Zou X (2008) Business friendships. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:167–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jourard SM (1959) Self-disclosure and other-cathexis. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 59(3):428–431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jourard SM, Lasakow P (1958) Some factors in self-disclosure. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 56(1):91–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelman HC (1973) Violence without moral restraint: Reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers. J. Soc. Issues 29(4):25–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelman HC (1976) Violence without restraint: Reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers. Krem GM, Rappoport LH, eds. Varieties of Psychohistory (Springer, New York), 282–314.Google Scholar
  • King LA, Burton CM, Hicks JA, Drigotas SM (2007) Ghosts, UFOs, and magic: Positive affect and the experiential system. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(5):905–919.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda Z, Spencer SJ (2003) When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psych. Bull. 129(4):522–544.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda Z, Thagard P (1996) Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psych. Rev. 103(2):284–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kurland NB, Pelled LH (2000) Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. Acad. Management Rev. 25(2):428–438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarsfeld PF, Merton RK (1954) Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Berger M, Abel T, Page CH, eds. Freedom and Control in Modern Society (Octagon Books, New York), 18–66.Google Scholar
  • Lemay EPJ, Clark MS, Feeney BC (2007) Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(5):834–853.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman MD (2013) Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired To Connect (Crown Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
  • Little LM, Major VS, Hinojosa AS, Nelson DL (2015) Professional image maintenance: How women navigate pregnancy in the workplace. Acad. Management J. 58(1):8–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loughnan S, Haslam N (2007) Animals and androids implicit associations between social categories and nonhumans. Psych. Sci. 18(2):116–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lykken DT (1968) Statistical significance in psychological research. Psych. Bull. 70(3):151–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mason MF, Macrae CN (2004) Categorizing and individuating others: The neural substrates of person perception. J. Cognitive Neuroscience 16(10):1785–1795.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGonagle AK, Hamblin LE (2014) Proactive responding to anticipated discrimination based on chronic illness: Double-edged sword? J. Bus. Psych. 29:427–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Methot JR, Lepine JA, Podsakoff NP, Christian JS (2016) Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? Exploring tradeoffs of multiplex relationships and their associations with job performance. Personality Psych. 69(2):311–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nisbett RE, Zukier H, Lemley RE (1981) The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information. Cognitive Psych. 13(2):248–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ollier-Malaterre A, Rothbard NP, Berg JM (2013) When worlds collide in cyberspace: How boundary work in online social networks impacts professional relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 38(4):645–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paluck EL, Green SA, Green DP (2019) The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behav. Public Policy 3(2):129–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paul P (2022) Do not bring your ‘whole self’ to work. New York Times (September 25), https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/25/opinion/business-economics/work-office-whole-self.html.Google Scholar
  • Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(5):751–783.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips KW, Rothbard NP, Dumas TL (2009) To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):710–732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pillemer J, Rothbard NP (2018) Friends without benefits: Understanding the dark sides of workplace friendship. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):635–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Paine JB, Bachrach DG (2000) Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. J. Management 26(3):513–563.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prati F, Crisp RJ, Meleady R, Rubini M (2016) Humanizing outgroups through multiple categorization: The roles of individuation and threat. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 42(4):526–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Putnam RD (1995) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. J. Democracy 6(1):65–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raghuram S, Hill NS, Gibbs JL, Maruping LM (2019) Virtual work: Bridging research clusters. Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):308–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragins BR (2008) Disclosure disconnects: Antecedents and consequences of disclosing invisible stigmas across life domains. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):194–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramarajan L (2014) Past, present and future research on multiple identities: Toward an intrapersonal network approach. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):589–659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • re:Work (2017) Tool: Use “one simple thing” for goal setting. Accessed April 12, 2017, https://rework.withgoogle.com/guides/managers-care-professionally-personally-for-team/steps/use-one-simple-thing-for-goal-setting/.Google Scholar
  • Reis HT (2007) Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships 14(1):1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reis HT, Clark MS (2013) Responsiveness. Simpson JA, Campbell L, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Close Relationships (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 400–423.Google Scholar
  • Reis HT, Clark MS, Holmes JG (2004) Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 201–225.Google Scholar
  • Rokeach M (1973) The Nature of Human Values (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rothbard NP, Ollier-Malaterre A (2016) Boundary management. Allen TD, Eby LT, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Work and Family (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 109–122.Google Scholar
  • Rothbard NP, Beetz AM, Harari D (2021) Balancing the scales: A configurational approach to work-life balance. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 8:73–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruttan RL, Lucas BJ (2018) Cogs in the machine: The prioritization of money and self-dehumanization. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 149:47–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schinoff BS, Ashforth BE, Corley KG (2020) Virtually (in) separable: The centrality of relational cadence in the formation of virtual multiplex relationships. Acad. Management J. 63(5):1395–1424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schroeder J, Kardas M, Epley N (2017) The humanizing voice: Speech reveals, and text conceals, a more thoughtful mind in the midst of disagreement. Psych. Sci. 28(12):1745–1762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz M (2001) The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Acad. Management J. 44(4):661–681.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz SH, Struch N (1989) Values, stereotypes, and intergroup antagonism. Stereotyping and Prejudice (Springer, New York), 151–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro C (2005) Corporate Confidential: 50 Secrets Your Company Doesn’t Want You To Know–And What To Do About Them (St. Martin’s Griffin, New York).Google Scholar
  • Swencionis JK, Fiske ST (2014) More human: Individuation in the 21st century. Bain PG, Vaes J, Leyens J-P, eds. Humanness and Dehumanization (Routledge, New York), 276–293.Google Scholar
  • Tost LP, Hardin AE, Roberson JW, Gino F (2022) Different roots, different fruits: Gender-based differences in cultural narratives about perceived discrimination produce divergent psychological consequences. Acad. Management J. 65(6):1804–1834.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trefalt Š (2013) Between you and me: Setting work-nonwork boundaries in the context of workplace relationships. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1802–1829.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trope Y, Liberman N (2003) Temporal construal. Psych. Rev. 110(3):403–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber M (1947) The Theory of Economic and Social Organization (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Weisz E, Zaki J (2018) Motivated empathy: A social neuroscience perspective. Curr. Opin. Psych. 24:67–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wells MM, Thelen L (2002) What does your workspace say about you? The influence of personality, status, and workspace on personalization. Environ. Behav. 34(3):300–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilkinson K, Tomlinson J, Gardiner J (2017) Exploring the work–life challenges and dilemmas faced by managers and professionals who live alone. Work Employment Soc. 31(4):640–656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winczewski LA, Bowen JD, Collins NL (2016) Is empathic accuracy enough to facilitate responsive behavior in dyadic interaction? Distinguishing ability from motivation. Psych. Sci. 27(3):394–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wyer RS, Carlston DE (1979) Social Cognition, Inference, and Attribution (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.